| This page was last updated on |
| 10.05.2007 |
|
(Some resolution numbers are skipped because those proposed resolutions were withdrawn, tabled or rejected by delegates, or combined with another similar submission.) Previous
years' resolutions: 2004 -- 2003 -- 2002 -- 2001 -- 2000
-- 1999
1. Regarding
the HACIENDA LUISITA
WORKERS MASSACRE in the Philippines REGARDING THE HACIENDA LUISITA
WORKERS WHEREAS, On November 16, 2004, in an assault on striking farm workers and sugarcane workers of the Cojuanco family-owned Hacienda Luisita, fourteen people were killed, more than one hundred unjustifiably arrested and more than 440 are still missing; and WHEREAS, since that massacre, at least 32 human rights activists have been either abducted or assassinated, including Father William Tadena, who was murdered because of his open support for the slain workers, and attorney Romeo Capulong survived an assassination attempt; and WHEREAS, these brutal attacks were committed by the Tarlac Philippine National Police and the 69th Infantry Battalion of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, under the direction of Department of Labor and Employment Secretary Patricia Santo Tomas, the large landowning Cojuanco family, and the administration of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo; and WHEREAS, despite these ongoing assaults, the workers are courageously continuing to strike for their demands; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, condemns the brutal actions by the Cojuanco family, DSLE Secretary Santo Tomas, the Philippine National Police, the Armed Forces of the Philippines, and the Macapagal Arroyo regime against the striking workers; and, be it further RESOLVED, that we extend our deepest sympathy and solidarity to the workers, their families and their unions; and, be it further RESOLVED,
that we call upon President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to resign immediately
for failing to publicly denounce these political killings, for cheating in
the last election as proven in her public admission when she testified to
the Commissioner on Elections regarding votes, for failing to uphold the
Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International
Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) and for failing to pursue peace talks with the
National Democratic Front of the Philippines; and, be it further RESOLVED, that we will advise all WSLC affiliates and the National AFL-CIO of these blatant human rights abuses and urge them to join us in taking action along the lines suggested in this resolution; and, be it finally RESOLVED, that
the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, send this resolution to the
Washington State Congressional Delegation, and to the National AFL-CIO,
and that we encourage the national AFL-CIO to forward this resolution to
the United Nations, the U.S.
Human Rights Commission, as well as to the President of the RESOLUTION TO FEND OFF A
“TAKINGS” INITIATIVE WHEREAS, a sweeping “takings” initiative (Measure 37) became law in Oregon in November 2004; and WHEREAS, special interests in Washington, like the BIAW, the Farm Bureau and Tim Eyman, are rumored to be running a similar initiative in Washington in 2006; and WHEREAS, such an initiative would create a process by which property owners can receive monetary compensation for any action government takes to prevent unlimited development or be exempted from current regulations; and WHEREAS, according to the Oregon Secretary of State, Measure 37 will cost Oregon $344 million a year in administrative costs alone -- before paying even one claim; and WHEREAS, such an initiative could bankrupt already struggling local governments across Washington state and burden taxpayers; and WHEREAS, further reduction of government budgets could lead to cuts in publicly funded jobs such as transit workers, teachers, police, EMTs and fire fighters, and librarians; and WHEREAS, such budget deficits could also decrease funding for public works projects such as road building and maintenance; and WHEREAS, developers and businesses such as Wal-Mart stand to benefit from exemptions from land use regulations, allowing development to occur that would displace local businesses and undermine good paying union jobs; and WHEREAS, we find that just compensation for landowners is already required by the U.S. Constitution, and this initiative goes way beyond such compensation; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED,
that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, oppose a sweeping
takings initiative from being run in REGARDING PRIVATIZATION OF
FEDERAL JOBS WHEREAS, one of the very first acts of the Bush Administration, upon claiming
office in January 2000, was to announce a President’s Management Agenda
that included orders to federal agencies to privatize or outsource at
least 425,000 federal jobs within four years; and WHEREAS, in May 2003, the Bush Administration rewrote the rules and procedures
that are used to review federal jobs for privatization and outsourcing,
contained in the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-76, in
ways that dramatically increased the bias of the process in favor of
private contractors taking over federal jobs, even if they cost the
government more than continued in-house performance; and WHEREAS, the May 2003 A-76 rewrite also doubled the number of federal jobs the
Bush Administration wanted subjected to privatization review to 850,000.
In addition, in defiance of legislation passed by the Congress later that
year that forbade the use of privatization quotas, the Bush Administration
has continued to require federal agencies to subject arbitrary numbers of
federal jobs to privatization review, including those that are
“inherently governmental” the result of which will be to endanger the
public interest and increase costs to taxpayers. In addition, despite the
fact that the new A-76 outlawed direct conversions of federal jobs without
benefit of a cost comparison (competition) between in-house teams and the
privatized alternative, federal agencies including the Department of
Veterans Affairs, the Bureau of Prisons, and the EEOC continued to
privatize without competitions; and WHEREAS, in 2001, in response to the tragic events of September 11, Congress
voted to federalize airport security screening but the Bush Administration
insisted that the price of its support of the legislation would be that
these new federal employees would have virtually none of the civil service
rights or protections afforded to other federal employees. Obliging the
demands of President Bush, the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) would
not recognize a union and would not authorize its management to engage in
collective bargaining. AFGE has organized TSA workers in spite of this ban
on union activity, but the Bush Administration continues to refuse to
recognize the union and acts in a harsh, arbitrary, and discriminatory way
toward this segment of the federal workforce; and WHEREAS, in 2002 Congress
established the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which would become
the third largest federal agency and would be comprised of 22 formerly
separate agencies including the INS, the Coast Guard, the Border Patrol,
FEMA, Customs, and TSA among other agencies. Again, the Bush
Administration insisted on, and won, legal authority to eliminate most
forms of collective bargaining and other union representational activity,
as well as the establishment of new “pay for performance,”
classification, adverse actions, and appeals’ systems to be formulated
solely at the discretion of management and political appointees. The Bush
Administration’s rationale for taking union rights away from federal
employees in DHS was its contention that collective bargaining was
“inconsistent with national security” and that no truly patriotic or
loyal American would object to the elimination of collective bargaining
rights; and WHEREAS, AFGE has a pending lawsuit challenging the DHS systems that were to be
implemented in Summer 2005, and as a result, the agency’s initial
implementation has been delayed until September, 2005 pending the outcome
of AFGE’s suit that charges that DHS exceeded its legal authorities in
the design and planed roll-out of the new, anti-union, anti-worker “HRMax”;
and WHEREAS, upon declaring victory in Iraq in the spring of 2003, the Bush
Administration, through Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, demanded and
obtained even broader authorities to restrict union activity, collective
bargaining, worker rights, and eligibility for fair pay and fair treatment
than was granted to DHS management. Civilian employees in the Department
of Defense, under the Bush Administration’s so-called “National
Security Personnel System” will lose their annual pay adjustment, their
retention rights in a WHEREAS, the Bush
Administration has authored legislation that it intends to have introduced
by fall 2005 that would extend these restrictions on collective bargaining
and impose a highly subjective, politicized “pay for performance” to
the rest of government; and WHEREAS, the Bush
Administration has tried to force career employees at the Social Security
Administration to disseminate false information about the financial
solvency of the Social Security system when they interact with the public
in the course of their regular duties. This attempt to politicize the
agency in order to further the Administration’s effort to dismantle the
Social Security system through privatization was presented to employees as
a direct assignment; and WHEREAS, the Bush Administration has packed the Federal Services Impasse Panel
with harshly anti-union members who, when considering bargaining impasses
between federal unions and agency management, have found in favor of
management almost all of the time. For example, in 2004 AFGE and CMS (the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) reached bargaining impasse on
26 issues ranging from dues withholding to workplace health and safety.
The Bush FSIP implemented management’s last offer on 25 of 26 issues,
finding for the union only on the issue of parking. Exploiting the fact
that federal unions have essentially no recourse at FSIP when management
presents harsh, concessionary ultimatums in the context of collective
bargaining, the SSA has forced a new contract on AFGE that reflects almost
no compromise on the part of management; and WHEREAS, the Bush Administration used its notorious “strong-arm” techniques
to eliminate in Conference provisions of laws passed by both the House and
Senate that would have made the process for considering privatization of
federal jobs fairer to federal employees and more advantageous to
taxpayers. These provisions included the right of federal employees to
appeal contracting out decisions to GAO and the courts when they have
evidence of wrongdoing by agencies. Private companies eager to profit from
government work already have such rights, and despite bicameral and
bipartisan support for equal rights for affected federal employees, the
White House forced these provisions to be dropped from the final bill; and
WHEREAS, for more than 20 years the Department of Veterans Affairs has been
prohibited by law from using taxpayer dollars appropriated for the purpose
of providing patient care at Veterans’ Health Care facilities. Over the
objections of AFGE and numerous veterans’ service organizations, the
Congress is poised to end the prohibition so that the Bush privatization
agenda can divert precious patient care funds to contractors eager to make
a profit on veterans’ misfortune. Further, instead of addressing chronic
understaffing at VA health care facilities, the agency is replacing
dedicated and cost-effective federal employees with contractors, by
contracting out the VA Puget Sound Compensation and Pension Service, which
performs one thousand per month disability eligibility exams for veterans,
to the private corporation called QTC Management, Inc.; and WHEREAS, in spite of the fact that the federal prison inmate population has increased dramatically over the past decades as a result of mandatory sentencing laws (the inmate population has increased 6-fold in the past 25 years), the Bureau of Prisons has set staffing levels of just 89% (compared with 95% in the 1990’s) of adequacy. As a result, there has been a 34% increase in inmate assaults against corrections officers without a weapon, and a 64% increase in inmate assaults with a weapon against corrections officers in that time. With the BOP acknowledging that its prisons are 41% above rated capacity, the Bush Administration has refused to address these public safety and corrections officer safety issues; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, join with AFGE to fight these Bush Administration policies by supporting AFGE-sponsored legislative attempts to restrict and repeal the Administration’s privatization agenda and gain changes in the privatization review process that will make it more fair to employees and more advantageous to taxpayers; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, join with AFGE to oppose the extension of anti-union collective bargaining restrictions and subjective, politically inspired “pay for performance” systems government-wide, which the Bush Administration intends to press for starting in August 2005; and, be it further RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, join with AFGE to prevent the Bush Administration’s political appointees in the Social Security Administration from forcing career civil servants to spread disinformation regarding the financial health of Social Security as part of the Administration’s attempt to dismantle the program through privatization; and, be it finally RESOLVED,
that the Washington State Labor
Council, AFL-CIO, join with and support AFGE’s efforts to improve
staffing at federal prison facilities as a means of providing superior
protection both to local communities and corrections officers and their
families. CONCERNING FERRY WORKERS WHEREAS, the current law RCW 47.64.170 and 1983 c 15 s8; and RCW 47.64.210 and 1983 c 15 s 12 simply states that collective bargaining for Ferry Workers shall commence after the State budget has been adopted by the legislature and approved by the Governor; and WHEREAS, since the mid-1980s under this law all maritime and related unions under the Washington State Ferries System have not experienced successful collective bargaining compared to pre-existence of the above-noted laws; henceforth, Ferry Workers standard of living has been greatly eroded, and respective unions have been in perpetual negotiations that are costly in time and finances; and WHEREAS, the structure of starting and finishing collective bargaining before the legislature convenes to address the new economic package is practical in achieving improvements for all Ferry Workers; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council Convention of 2005 adopt this legislative resolution for law changes concerning Ferry Workers at the Washington State Ferries System.
REGARDING APPRENTICESHIP
PROGRAMS WHEREAS, apprenticeship programs – traditional throughout the wide variety of construction trades and more recently established within other careers, such as cosmetology and law enforcement – offer the unique opportunity to earn living wages and receive excellent benefits, all while acquiring valuable, marketable skills; and WHEREAS, apprenticeship programs have, over generations, proven their effectiveness; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Apprenticeship and Training Council structure assures quality training and guarantees an adequate supply of highly skilled, reliable workers; and WHEREAS, apprenticeship programs, funded by workers, union, and employers, demand virtually no taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, apprenticeship programs have for over two decades actively recruited women and minorities into the building and construction trades, encouraging these groups to pursue a career that rewards equal pay for equal work; and WHEREAS, journey level construction workers are currently retiring in numbers too great to be replaced by new applicants, widening a “skills gap” with the clear potential to cripple our industry in coming years; and WHEREAS, in 2000, Governor Gary Locke spearheaded Executive Order 00-01, mandating that certain percentages of all hours worked on public projects be performed by registered apprentices; and WHEREAS, Executive Order 00-01 has been extraordinarily successful in achieving the interrelated goals of opening career opportunities, broadening access to apprenticeship programs, and addressing the looming skills gap; and WHEREAS, the executive order in action has proven apprenticeship utilization critics wrong, as their dire predictions of increased costs, shrunken bidding pools, journeyman displacement, and struggles with compliance never materialized; and WHEREAS, the 2005 Legislature, through passing ESSB 5097, codified the order in a bipartisan show of support for apprenticeship utilization standards; and WHEREAS, ESSB 5097 was the very first bill signed by Governor Christine Gregoire, demonstrating both her commitment to educating Washington’s construction workforce and the urgency of the industry-wide problem; and WHEREAS, neither ESSB 5097 or Executive Order 00-01 apply to K-12 construction projects; and WHEREAS, such projects represent $819 million worth of construction work during the current biennium; and WHEREAS, a few, but far from all, school districts enforce apprenticeship utilization standards; and WHEREAS, voter-approved K-12 school bonds and capital levies also generate substantial construction work, often dramatically increasing funds available for building improvement, renovation, and replacement; and WHEREAS, expanding education and training opportunities on such projects would be a logical extension of and supplement to the overall goals of K-12 construction, employing and educating young people in a way that employs and educates even younger people; and WHEREAS, including apprenticeship utilization language within proposed school bonds would also enhance public familiarity with the concept of apprenticeship, an outcome that labor could only benefit from; and WHEREAS, supplementing a capital levy or construction bond proposal with such language would likely increase its chance of success at the ballot box; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that all Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, affiliates make every feasible effort to draft, propose or support only those school construction bonds or capital levies that incorporate apprenticeship utilization standards; and, be it further RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, encourage non-affiliated entities, such as school districts, to draft, propose or support only those capital levy and construction bond proposals that include apprenticeship utilization language; and, be it finally RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, transmit a copy of this resolution to all relevant sources in order to demonstrate its support of this matter. RESOLUTION ON FAMILY MEDICAL
LEAVE AND INSURANCE WHEREAS,
the Federal Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 has proved to be an
outstanding success in providing workers with unpaid leave and job
protections while allowing them to give necessary care to family members
with serious illnesses and/or injuries; and WHEREAS,
the Federal Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 has also provided working men
and women in this country with unpaid leave and job protection while they
struggle with their own serious illnesses and injuries; and WHEREAS,
without paid leave time many working men and women in Washington State
find themselves unable to use the federal and state family medical leaves
thereby forcing them to make difficult, and many times, devastating
choices regarding the care of their loved ones and their employment; and WHEREAS,
the need for Family Medical Leave Insurance has increased exponentially
with the decrease in health care insurance coverage, the increase of day
surgeries and out-patient care, demanding that working family members
provide round-the-clock care in their homes for their loved ones; and
WHEREAS,
the Federal Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 is now under attack by
President Bush, Labor Secretary Chao, many others in Congress, as well as
by many Washington State corporations and businesses, as part of a
concerted effort to reduce all labor standards, and the erosion of the
Federal Family Medical Leave Act would have an adverse effect on
Washington workers; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED
that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO and its affiliated
unions go on record in opposition to any actions taken by the President,
the U. S. Department of Labor and/or Congress that would weaken the
protections and coverage provided by the Federal Family Medical Leave Act
of 1993; and be it further RESOLVED
that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO and its affiliated unions
shall support efforts in the Washington State Legislature that would
reinstate a State Family Medical Leave Act that ensures working men and
women in REGARDING LABOR’S WHEREAS, the education and training of Washington’s Workforce is the cornerstone of our state’s economy; and WHEREAS,
labor’s participation in all
areas of training is vital to the success of WHEREAS, Employment Security, the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges and the Workforce Training Board, give millions of state and federal dollars out locally for workforce training through Request for Proposal (RFP); and WHEREAS, in the past it was a stated requirement by these state agencies that all Request for Proposals (RFP) have authentic labor participation and sign off; and WHEREAS, there is no longer a stated requirement of labor’s participation in these request for proposals; and WHEREAS, it is essential that labor be a part of any federal, state or local workforce training Request for Proposal; now, therefore, be it WHEREAS, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, and the Labor members on the Workforce Training Board, work with the Board, Employment Security and the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges to make it a requirement that labor participate and sign off on all future workforce training Request for Proposals; and be it finally RESOLVED, that no Request for Proposals originating from Employment Security, the State Board of Community and Technical Colleges and the Workforce Training Board pertaining to workforce training be funded unless there is labor participation or sign off on the proposal. OPPOSING CHANGES TO THE 2005
REVENUE PACKAGE WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Washington specifies that the use of motor vehicle fuel taxes be dedicated for the construction and maintenance of Washington State’s transportation infrastructures; and WHEREAS,
generations of WHEREAS, the complexities of Washington’s diverse, expansive and vulnerable geography require comprehensive stewardship that permits Washington to compete as a trade state in a global economy, simultaneously affording a quality of life for its people and wildlife; and WHEREAS, the nationwide demand for 185,000 construction apprentices each year for the next ten years mirrors an aging population of highly-skilled and experienced workers edging into retirement, and that transportation construction projects generate jobs, education and apprenticeship opportunities in an industry that requires extensive understanding of the complexities in heavy highway, underground, bridge and ferry construction; and WHEREAS, Washington’s Governor Gregoire, and the 2005 State Legislature guided the due process that developed a bipartisan transportation package that will protect public safety, will enhance the economy and foster a vibrant future for Washington State; and WHEREAS, opponents have filed Initiative 912 and Initiative 342, and may propose other initiatives which would repeal other portions of the 2005 new transportation funding law and stall any progress of moving Washington’s transportation infrastructure out of harm’s way and on to a safe and efficient future; and WHEREAS, passage of Initiative 912 and Initiative 342, and any similar initiative created to repeal new transportation funds, would be a severe detriment to Washington’s transportation needs, would result in an increased danger to the public, and would drastically paralyze economic growth for our state and nation; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that NO Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, affiliate will sign, support or otherwise render any assistance to further the claims and cause of Initiative 912 and Initiative 342, or any other proposed assault on the 2005 transportation revenue package; and be it finally RESOLVED,
that the President of the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO,
transmit a copy of this resolution to all relevant sources in order to
demonstrate its ardent opposition to Initiative 912 and Initiative
342 and any efforts opposing the 2005 Transportation Revenue Package. RESOLUTION ON TRUTH IN
CAMPAIGNS AND INITIATIVES WHEREAS, many political and initiative campaigns use misstatements and untruths to promote their goal of electoral victory; and WHEREAS, in many circumstances, these untruths have led to severe consequences for working people with the most notable recent example being the passage of an initiative that repealed Washington’s ergonomic rule; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Supreme Court in a 1999 opinion found that our statute on false political advertising related to ballot measures to be invalid under the free speech protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; and WHEREAS, all citizens and residents of Washington have an interest in demanding truthful debate in political campaigns; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council work in coalition with other like-minded organizations to establish a Truth in Campaigns pledge for candidates and ballot measure campaigns to voluntarily agree to adopt; and be it finally RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council work with legislators to explore legislation that allows publication in the state voters’ pamphlet of a “Truth in Campaigns pledge” seal for those campaigns who have agreed to abide by the terms of the pledge. RESOLUTION ON
WORKERS'
COMPENSATION I.M.E.S WHEREAS, it is a common practice by the state fund and self insured employers to order Independent Medical Exams (IMEs) for injured workers; and WHEREAS, the determination by these IMEs have a major impact on the lives of injured workers; and WHEREAS, many injured workers have expressed the belief that the IME doctor or panel were essentially company doctors with little compassion or sympathy for injured workers; and WHEREAS, it is essential that injured workers be treated fairly and also feel that they have been treated fairly; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that any provider selected to perform an IME must have an active practice seeing their own patients as the predominant source of income for their practice, and that the Department develop incentives to ensure high quality IMEs; and be it finally RESOLVED, that all IMEs, including IMEs ordered by self-insured employers, shall be scheduled by the Department off of a rotating list of providers who have an active practice, provided that there shall be a process for the injured worker or their representative and the claims manager to schedule agreed upon IMEs. REGARDING WISHA WARRANT
AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the authority of WISHA to obtain warrants to enter employer property, when employers refuse entry, has been challenged in a law suit by the Washington State Farm Bureau; and WHEREAS, WISHA having the authority to gain access to employer property is essential to the protection of health and safety of workers in Washington; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, in coordination with its affiliates, take all steps necessary, in the courts or legislatively, to insure that the authority of WISHA to obtain warrants is indisputable and beyond challenge and do everything possible to defeat the efforts of those who seek to undermine the health and safety protections of workers in Washington. USE OF GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE WHEREAS, musculoskeletal injuries continue to account for at least 50% of Workers Compensation claims and represent a huge toll in pain, suffering and lost work days for Washington workers; and WHEREAS, federal OSHA is using the powers granted to it under the OSHA general duties clause to require reasonable ergonomic standards in industries monitored by OSHA; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, go on record supporting the use by WISHA of their general duties clause to cite Washington employers for failure to create conditions that would assist in avoiding preventable musculoskeletal injuries; and be it finally RESOLVED, that the 2005 Washington State Labor Council Convention urge the labor members of the WISHA Advisory Committee to continue to advise and encourage WISHA to use all means available, including the general duties clause, to help prevent musculoskeletal injuries. RESOLUTION ON CENTERS FOR
OCCUPATIONAL WHEREAS,
the health and safety of WHEREAS, the first step in the prevention of workplace illnesses and injuries is the education of employers and employees alike; and WHEREAS, when workers are injured it is imperative that they receive treatment and care that is in accordance with the best practices available to make them whole and return them to work as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, the Department of Labor and Industries, along with the business and labor communities have piloted two Centers for Occupational Health and Education, one located in Renton at Valley Medical Center and one located in Spokane at St. Luke’s Hospital; and WHEREAS, these two centers have demonstrated that injured workers are receiving the treatment and care that have enabled them to return to work faster, with better long term results and with greater confidence in their care in comparison to those not treated in one of these centers; and WHEREAS, these two centers have provided educational opportunities for medical practitioners as well as business, labor and community groups in the prevention, care and treatment of workplace illnesses and injuries; and WHEREAS, the COHE’s have successfully demonstrated their ability to reduce the costs of medical treatment and time loss, as well as the pain and suffering of injured workers, thereby helping to maintain the competitive edge of doing business in Washington State; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the affiliates of the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, encourage their members to avail themselves of the educational opportunities, care and treatment that are offered by the Centers for Occupational Health and Education, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, and their affiliates support the efforts of the Centers for Occupational Health and Education with their continued participation on the business-labor advisory boards and continuing education presentations; and be it finally RESOLVED,
that the RESOLUTION ON HEALTH CARE
LEGISLATION WHEREAS, 45 million Americans are not covered by health insurance, of which, over 700,000 are Washingtonians, and 120 million Americans are underinsured for health care purposes; and WHEREAS, health care coverage costs continue to rise by double digits each year, caused in part by health care providers shifting the cost of the uninsured and underinsured to the insured, as reported by the Washington Hospital Association, a cost shift of approximately 20%; and WHEREAS, profitable companies and corporations continue to shift the costs of health care coverage for their employees to State Health Care plans and other taxpayer supported programs, despite their ability to pay for those benefits; and WHEREAS, the rising cost of health care benefits is the number one issue in virtually every union’s collective bargaining process, as employers seek to shift increased health care coverage costs to their employees, eroding wage increases and other benefits; and, WHEREAS, increased health care costs are the number one reason for the breakdown of bargaining and the cause of labor disputes; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the passage of health care legislation that addresses and seeks to resolve the above conditions, be pursued by the Washington State Labor Council and its affiliated unions as a priority during the 2006 Washington State legislative session. RESOLUTION OF RECOGNITION WHEREAS, the 2005 Washington State Labor Council convention took place during an unprecedented time in the history of the AFL-CIO; and WHEREAS, in the midst of great uncertainty and division, convention delegates, alternates, guests, officers and staff came together with renewed friendship and solidarity; and WHEREAS, despite the turmoil, confusion, and general mayhem that always accompanies this event, the 2005 convention was a complete success; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this body, with great appreciation and respect, recognizes and applauds this year’s convention host, the Spokane Regional Labor Council, for a job very well done! Copyright © 2005 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO |