FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 2 (PDF
version)
Stop subsidizing
union-busters
In 2003, we bought and swallowed a
Big Gulp. And now, working families are getting a little indigestion.
To ensure that our state was
chosen by Boeing for its 787 Dreamliner assembly work, then-Gov. Gary Locke
warned legislators he would propose tax incentives big enough to make them
"gulp." That he did, and the Legislature -- read: taxpayers --
swallowed all $3.2-billion-over-20-years of them.
It was an unprecedented public
subsidy, not just for Washington state, but for any state -- so big that it
became part of an international trade dispute with Airbus and a case study in
an Ernst & Young corporate-consulting presentation, "How to Turn Your
Government Relations Department from a Money Pit to a Cash Cow."
(We're not making that up.) That enormous package of tax breaks was
touted as an opportunity to create not just 800 to 1,200 jobs assembling the
787, but to attract and retain other family-wage aerospace jobs among Boeing
suppliers.
It's impossible to know just how
big a factor the Big Gulp played in the company's decision, but Washington won
the 787. Plus, Boeing has rebounded spectacularly from the industry's
post-9/11 slump and now has a record backlog of jet orders, not just for 787s,
but for its other commercial airplanes.
But now comes some
indigestion. The International Association of Machinists District 751,
which represents Boeing's hourly workers and was instrumental in supporting
the passage of the 787 incentives back in 2003, has watched as its members'
jobs have been outsourced to nonunion Boeing contractors, companies that
benefit from the Big Gulp aerospace tax breaks. This was not the
Legislature's intent, to subsidize Boeing suppliers that pay lower wages and
offer fewer benefits so that the company could replace its good family-wage
jobs.
Adding salt to that wound is the
fact that some of these companies have aggressively fought to stop their
employees from choosing for themselves whether they want to organize a
union. For example, metal distributor and cutter TMX Aerospace in Auburn
had 20 federal unfair labor practice charges brought against it for its
conduct in opposing its employees' campaign to join the Machinists union.
So this year, with strong support
from the Washington State Labor Council, the Machinists are supporting SB 5700
and HB 1828, the Aerospace Incentives Accountability bills. They would
require recipients of the aerospace tax breaks to remain neutral and allow
their employees to choose for themselves whether they want to organize a
union. Any company that actively discourages or encourages unionization
would be disqualified from receiving the state subsidy.
Ultimately, federal labor law
reform is necessary to restore the freedom to choose unionization; our state
is not allowed to pass better laws to protect union rights. But our
state can decide not to grant special subsidies to companies that choose to
interfere with worker rights. We can implement a policy that tells these
aerospace firms that when they choose not to be neutral, they are also
choosing to sacrifice the special incentives that taxpayers have bestowed on
them.
The WSLC applauds and thanks SB
5700 sponsor Sen. Margarita Prentice and co-sponsoring Sens. Kohl-Welles,
Franklin, Keiser, Murray, Hatfield, Weinstein, Rasmussen, Hargrove, Tom and
Kline; plus HB 1828 sponsor Rep. Mike Sells and co-sponsoring Reps. Campbell,
Conway, Cody, Green, Seaquist, McCoy, Chase, Dunshee, Wood, Moeller, Kenney,
P. Sullivan, B. Sullivan, Kirby, Roberts, Appleton, Blake, Hasegawa, Hunt,
Miloscia, Lovick, Morrell, Williams, Rolfes, Hurst, Simpson and Ormsby.
A hearing on HB 1828 is
scheduled for Tuesday, Feb. 20 at 1:30 p.m. in House Commerce and Labor and
that same day at a time TBA in Senate Labor and Commerce.
The unprecedented aerospace tax
incentives the Legislature approved in 2003 are a good investment only if they
produce family-wage jobs where workers' rights are respected. If this
investment is succeeding in producing the good jobs as intended, then
employers -- with their happy workers -- have nothing to fear from union
neutrality.
Action, not
rhetoric needed on payday loans
Webster's defines
"usury" as the act of lending money at an exorbitant rate of
interest. It has been condemned by some of history's most important teachers
of morality and ethics: Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, Aristotle... Oprah. In
the Divine Comedy, Dante even places usurers in the seventh circle of
hell.
Well, Dante wasn't a
legislator. That kind of rhetoric may sell literary masterpieces, but it
doesn't solve problems. And here at WSLC Legislative Update,
we're all about solving problems.
One of the biggest problems
Washington state legislators are finding with proposals to rein in the payday
loan industry is that "exorbitant" interest is in the eye of the
beholder. Is 391% an exorbitant annual interest rate for a short-term
payday loan? Should our state, as one Seattle Times business columnist
recently put it, "treat adults as adults" and let people make their
own decisions about how much they'll pay for quick cash? Or should we
protect desperate mostly low-income consumers from what many consider to be
"predatory" lending?
Passions run high on both sides of
the issue, not just in Olympia but across the nation as the industry has grown
at an accelerated pace in the past decade. Industry lobbyists point out
that they are filling a need for emergency/short-term borrowing, evidenced by
more than 3.5 million payday loans taken out in Washington state last
year. But advocates for poor and middle-income workers point to examples
of people falling into a cycle of debt from which it can take years to
extricate themselves.
The Washington State Labor Council
is part of a coalition seeking to regulate practices in the industry that will
enable borrowers to convert emergency debt into what it really is for many
borrowers, short- to medium-term debt. Being able to consolidate all
payday debt and to restructure it over a period of several months will help
most borrowers from falling into a cycle of two-week borrowing from multiple
shops, which traps them into an extended period of medium- to long-term debt
at exorbitant interest rates. Loan consolidation and restructuring up
front will significantly reduce annualized interest rates. Even this
will not be enough for some borrowers so long as "ability to repay"
loans are not factored into the borrowing equation.
Answers have been found
elsewhere. Since 2001, the North Carolina State Employees Credit Union
has been offering an alternate product by having borrowers open a checking
account and linking it to line of credit at a 12% APR. It would be worth
having them come out to our state and describe how this works.
Unfortunately, frustration levels
have risen so high in our state that productive discussion seems to have shut
down. Everyone needs to take a deep breath, step back for a second and
scale down their rhetoric, particularly rhetoric that hits at a personal
level. It is OK for us to disagree on the issues -- even at times to
vehemently disagree -- but it is not OK to cast aspersions upon the character
and intentions of legislators on either side of the issue or upon the
coalition trying to be heard. We're pretty sure that Oprah & Co.
would agree with that, too.
The WSLC has some disagreement
with Rep. Steve Kirby (D-Tacoma), who leads the House Insurance, Financial
Services and Consumer Protection Committee, in both the substance and the
timing of changes he is proposing to address the problem. We think more
should be done, and more should be done now. However, we have always
found him to be an honorable man and one who cares about working people and
working families. We hope to continue working with him on this issue and
others.
What we would like to see happen
is a meeting between Rep. Kirby, coalition members and Rep. Sherry Appleton
(D-Poulsbo) to begin a substantive discussion on the issue and to see what
other ideas we can come up with to protect consumers.
WSLC-supported
bills target socialized U.I. costs
SB 5373 and HB 1406, sponsored by
Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles and Rep. Steve Conway, resolve some unfinished
business from the 2003 changes to the Unemployment Insurance system.
Quite a bit of unnecessary socialized cost gets created in the system due to
corporate behavior and the fact that the Employment Security Department (ESD)
does not have the necessary tools to deal with the problems.
These bills correct the problems
of corporate officers drawing benefits while the business is still operating
and they are still working, and of corporate officers opting for coverage just
before the business goes down and collecting far more benefits than taxes
paid. The bills also give ESD the ability to go after corporate officers for
back taxes when there is a willful evasion of taxes -- both the Labor &
Industries and the Revenue departments have this ability.
Another critical part of the bills
is treating businesses that enter into relationships with Professional
Employee Organizations the same way as all other employers. The bill
requires businesses to keep their own individual experience ratings just like
they do at L&I. Doing anything else creates socialized costs in the
system that other employers must bear. The whole purpose of experience
rating is to create incentives for businesses to control their employment
practices and for those who lay more people off to bear a larger portion of
the system's costs.
The bill as a whole significantly
reduces socialized costs, creates uniformity of treatment across employers,
gives ESD the tools necessary to deal with employer fraud, and creates
consistency among agencies. That's why the Washington State Labor
Council strongly supports it.
Some hearings
next week
MONDAY, Feb. 5 @ 10 a.m.: Senate
Labor and Commerce will hear two Unemployment Insurance bills, SB 5534 and SB
5702.
TUESDAY, Feb. 6 @ 10 a.m.: House
State Government hears several significant election bills. TUESDAY @ 1:30
p.m.: House Commerce and Labor hears HB 1658 on Family Leave Insurance, HB
1118 providing living wages on public contracts, and HB 1399 an important
collective bargaining bill for certain higher education employees who don't
now have the right to collective bargaining. TUESDAY @ 1:30 p.m. in Senate
Labor and Commerce hears SB 5622 its version of the higher ed colle ctive
bargaining bill and SB 5678 a bad workers' compensation pension study bill,
plus other workers' comp bills.
WEDNESDAY, Feb. 7 @ 8 a.m.: Joint
House and Senate Health Care hearing on HB 1825 and SB 5729, which provide
significant funding for our public health infrastructure.
THURSDAY, Feb. 8 @ 8 a.m.: House
Commerce and Labor hears some good workers' compensation bills and one bad
one.