MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12 (PDF
version)
Sure and certain relief
The workers' compensation system
is hard for many of us to understand. Let's face it, few people pay it
much attention because nobody expects to be injured at work. But when we do
get injured, we count on that safety net being there so we can continue to
provide for our families.
That's why Washington's working
families are so fortunate to have a Workers' Compensation Caucus of labor
experts and other advocates for injured workers who track every legislative
proposal in this area. The Caucus judges each bill by the standard set
forth in RCW 51.04.010: Does it promote "sure and certain relief for
workers, injured in their work, and their families and dependents?"
As always, this year there are
quite a few bills affecting the workers' compensation system, and one of the
most important involves vocational rehabilitation. For about 20 years
now, our state has been trying to fix our voc-rehab system, which everyone
agrees isn't effectively achieving its goal of returning injured workers to
employability. This year, for the first time, business and labor have
reached agreement on what to do -- although it required both sides to take
huge issues off the table. HB 2073 authorizes a 5-year pilot program that will
give us far more information on what works and what doesn't.
While labor continues to have
serious issues involving the current "employability" standard --
which costs injured workers their benefits when they can do minimum-wage work,
and which is not addressed in the bill -- the Washington State Labor Council
supports HB 2073. Other bills that the Workers' Compensation Caucus supports
include:
-
HB 1244 and SB 5241,
making sure that employee contributions to their own hour banks do not end
up barring them from receiving the value of health care contributions
should the employer not make contributions after they are injured.
-
HB 1503 deals with
another long-term problem: employer use of Independent Medical Exams to
bypass the expertise of attending physicians or other qualified
physicians. The bill gives injured workers' physicians the opportunity to
refer their patients to other physicians before an IME, requires requests
to the attending physician to deal with the subject of an IME, and
addresses qualifications for who can perform IMEs.
One workers' compensation bill the
WSLC opposes is SB 5290, which passed from committee and is now in Senate
Rules. It would establish Medical and Chiropractic Advisory Committees to
advise the Department of Labor and Industries. The bill's two main problems:
1) It doesn't address problems that arose last time this was attempted, a
concern shared by the Washington State Medical Association. Nor would these
committees have business and labor representatives, who could help resolve
such problems as they arise. As WSMA stated, having business and labor
representatives could "keep the advisory committee and L&I focused on
the issues at hand." 2) The committees' members are not chosen the
same way the other L&I statutory advisory committees are chosen. Normally,
the stakeholder groups submit names and L&I must choose from that
list. But in
SB 5290, they merely take that list into consideration. WSLC opposition would
become support with amendments fixing these two problems.
Improve
initiative accountability, transparency
When our state's founders
established a public initiative process to give people the ability to petition
for state action, they couldn't have envisioned the initiative industry of
today. They certainly wouldn't have imagined hucksters in gorilla suits
hawking everything from painless tax cuts to restrictions on who can be
married.
Nothing sends today's initiative
profiteers into apoplectic fits quite like legislative attempts to regulate
"their" initiative process. These are people whose livelihoods
depend on their ability to inspire public outrage about... whatever... and to
foster cynical, paranoid distrust of government. So when "guv-mint"
butts into their business, you just have to expect a certain amount of spittle
on the hearing room microphones.
The WSLC has supported many
initiatives and coordinated signature gathering for a few, including our
state's groundbreaking minimum wage initiative in 1998. We have no interest in
making it harder to get legitimate ballot measures before voters or creating
needless hurdles to participate in that process. That said, the WSLC supports
some common-sense measures that will strengthen the initiative process by
improving transparency and accountability.
-
HB 2018 calls for the
licensing of paid signature gathering firms, plus permitting and training
of paid signature gatherers.
People in gorilla suits (and their sponsors) who oppose any regulation of
the initiative industry like to point out that there has never been a case
of petition fraud prosecuted in Washington state, as if that means there
is no fraud. The problem is that there is no way to track and prosecute
itinerant paid petitioners who sometimes travel from state to state
collecting signatures for a living. There are hundreds of petitions filed
every year that have duplicated names, invalid signatures or people who
don't exist. Are we to believe those are all "accidental" when
people are getting paid?
HB 2018, coupled with HB 2019, will establish some accountability for
petitions which have intentionally been falsified with fake signatures or
duplicated names. Legitimate, honest petitioners and signature-gathering
firms have nothing to fear from permitting and a little training.
-
HB 2019 clarifies a law
passed last year that requires signature gatherers, paid or not, to sign a
declaration on the back of the petition attesting that the signatures on
the petition are those of registered voters.
Last year's Initiative 917, Tim Eyman's latest $30 car tab measure, failed
to qualify for the ballot because of an extraordinary number of invalid
signatures. In addition, some, but not all of I-917 petitions lacked the
required declaration. Overall, I-917 had a "duplicate rate" of
4.0%, but the petitions with no signed declaration had a duplicate rate of
5.1%, and petitions with illegible declarations had a duplicate rate of
6.0%.
Having petitioners sign this declaration reminds them of their
responsibilities under the law and discourages fraud.
-
HB 2047 would change
the reporting schedule for initiative campaigns during the
signature-gathering phase providing more financial disclosure to voters.
Between January and July 2006, more than $3.1 million was raised by
initiative campaigns in Washington. But the $1.1 million raised in the
month of June alone was not reported until after the early-July signature
deadline, making it impossible to know where last-minute contributions to
pay for signatures were coming from.
Hearing set for
Taxpayer Healthcare Fairness Act
HB 2094, the Washington Taxpayer
Healthcare Fairness Act sponsored by Rep. Steve Conway (D-Tacoma), will be
heard Tuesday at 1:30 p.m. in the House Commerce and Labor Committee. SB 5977,
its companion bill sponsored by Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-Seattle), will be
heard the same day and time in Senate Labor and Commerce.
Like last year's Fair Share Health
Care bill, the intent of this new legislation is to discourage employer
"cost-shifting" onto taxpayers. But rather than create a threshold
percentage of payroll costs that must go toward providing health coverage, the
Taxpayer Healthcare Fairness Act would just require employers to reimburse the
state for the costs of their workers on tax-funded health plans. To protect
working people enrolled in the Medicaid or Basic Health programs, HB 2094
would also make it illegal for employers to discriminate against enrollees by,
for example, firing them to avoid reimbursing the state.
Let's close the
PEO loophole
Professional Employee
Organizations provide services normally associated with a company's human
resources department: payroll administration, medical benefits, retirement
plans, workers' compensation and unemployment insurance, and more. Mostly
small to mid-size businesses hire PEOs to essentially become
"co-employers" and lease employees from them.
The upside is that the arrangement
can save businesses money on administrative tasks and help them afford
employee benefits they couldn't otherwise offer. The potential downsides for
workers are many, not the least of which is that a PEO’s assumption of
employer responsibilities can jeopardize workers’ rights under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, Family and Medical Leave Act, and other important
statutes.
Another downside is that client
businesses have used PEOs to manipulate their experience ratings and avoid
paying the unemployment and workers' compensation taxes they should pay.
Employers with high rates of work injury or layoff can dodge paying their
taxes simply by hiring a PEO with a lower rating.
SB 5373 is designed to help cut
down on fraud and excess socialized costs. It would also close a PEO loophole
by requiring their clients to maintain their own experience ratings. The
Washington State Labor Council supports SB 5373 and urges its passage.
Some hearings
next week
TUESDAY, Feb. 13 @ 1:30 p.m.:
House Commerce and Labor hears the Washington Taxpayer Healthcare Fairness Act
(see above), HB 1693 modifying time periods for collective bargaining by state
ferry employees, HB 1913 certifying an employee organization for the purposes
of state collective bargaining, and HB 1916 applying interest arbitration to
certain care providers.
WEDNESDAY, Feb. 14 @ 8 a.m.: House
Higher Education hears several bills related to pay, benefits and full-time
opportunities for community and technical college faculty.
THURSDAY, Feb. 15 @ 8 a.m.: House
Commerce and Labor hears several workers' compensation bills (see above).
THURSDAY @ 1:30 p.m.: Senate Labor and Commerce hears several workers'
compensation bills (see above).
FRIDAY, Feb. 16 @ 1:30 p.m.: House
Commerce and Labor hears bills on apprenticeship utilization standards,
prevailing wage standards and mechanic certification.