FRIDAY, JANUARY 21
(PDF version)
Apprenticeship: It's a
win-win
Last year's debate about what, if
anything, government should do about the offshore outsourcing of Washington jobs
included a lot of rhetoric about improving job training for the jobs we still
have. But the legislature -- specifically the State Senate -- ignored a great opportunity to do just that.
|
Some
upcoming HEARINGS
|
|
TUESDAY, Jan. 25—At
1:30 p.m. in House Hearing Room A, the House Health Care Committee hears
a number of labor-supported bills on prescription drugs, including the
pool-purchasing bill HB 1219, and three reimportation bills 1168, 1194
and 1316.
WEDNESDAY—8
a.m. in Room C, House Commerce and Labor hears HB 1308 regarding
additional funding for prevailing wage programs; 8 a.m. in Senate
Hearing Room 1, Senate Education hears two bills allowing for simple
majorities to pass school levies and bonds.
THURSDAY—1
p.m. in Room 2, Senate Government Operation hears SB 5219 proposing to
change primary election dates; 1 p.m. in Room 4, Senate Labor and
Commerce hears SB 5090 privatizing the sale of liquor; 3:30 p.m. in Room
A, House Appropriations hears various bills related to state employee
pensions.
FRIDAY—8
a.m. House State Government hears an election overview in Room D. |
Apprenticeship is the ideal
solution. Unlike many training and retraining programs, apprenticeships are
financed by the existing workforce and the employers that benefit from them.
More than 10,000 apprentices are registered at our community and technical
colleges, and earn the highest wages of any job-training program. Although those
jobs may be economically cyclical, they cannot be outsourced offshore.
Thanks to an executive order by
Governor Gary Locke, Washington has promoted apprenticeship opportunities for
nearly five years via utilization requirements at major public works projects.
At least 15% of the total labor hours on these projects must be performed by
apprentices. When first enacted, construction industry lobbyists made dire
predictions of higher costs and excluded contractors, but none of that has
happened. (For one thing, the requirement is waived if not enough apprentices
are available or in other extraordinary circumstances.) By all accounts,
apprenticeship utilization requirements have been a tremendous success.
Now it's time to codify the
executive order and make the standard permanent, which is what HB 1028 and SB
5097 would do. Sponsored by Rep. Steve Conway (D-Tacoma) and Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles
(D-Seattle), both were heard in their respective labor committees this week.
Apprentices testified how these life-changing programs provided them family-wage
job opportunities they didn't previously have.
The Associated General Contractors,
the Associated Builders and Contractors, and the Construction Industry Training
Council -- all representing employers' interests -- testified against the bills.
They claimed the bills would interfere with collectively bargained contract
provisions, deter some contractors from bidding, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Randy Loomans, Education Director
for the Washington State Labor Council, pointed out that each of these three
organizations were signatory to apprenticeship utilization agreements with
Spokane School District. In other words, they sing a different tune when they
know their potential client is motivated to promote training and apprenticeship.
Responding to the argument that
there aren't enough apprentices available, Loomans pointed out that every single
project covered under the current executive order has exceeded the 15 percent
requirement. For example, 24.9 percent of the hours worked on the Legislative
Building repair and reconstruction project were performed by apprentices.
Last year, similar legislation
easily passed the House but was killed without a vote in the
Republican-controlled Senate by then-committee chair Sen. Jim Honeyford
(R-Sunnyside). This year, voters wisely handed control of that body back to the
Democrats. Look for both bills to be voted out of committee beginning next week.
The WSLC urges both the House and Senate to approve these win-win bills as
quickly as possible.
Gregoire gets
moving on health care
This week, Governor Christine
Gregoire hit the ground running by launching a package of executive-request
health care legislation. She also issued an Executive Order directing DSHS to
return to 12-month eligibility review cycles, a move that will keep more than
19,000 children from losing health care coverage. Her legislative proposals
include:
-
Allowing private employers to
purchase health insurance through state-administered programs;
-
Seeking a federal waiver to
authorize the state to license Canadian prescription drug wholesalers, which
would allow the reimportation of cheaper medicines;
-
Creating a prescription
drug-purchasing consortium that expands the existing evidence-based
prescription drug program and its preferred drug list; and
-
Creating a long-term care task
force to develop recommendations on public and private mechanisms for
financing long-term care, particularly in rural communities.
The Washington State Labor Council
supports these important measures and congratulates Gregoire on her immediate
leadership on this important issue.
Even more must be done. Large
employers should not be allowed to abandon their employees and pass on enormous
costs to taxpayers and the entire health care system. It's not fair that
businesses that do the right thing and provide affordable health benefits must
compete with such employers. Investing in employee health should be a
requirement for large businesses in Washington, whether that coverage is
provided through the employer or through a fee paid by the large employer to the
state.
That's why the WSLC joins business,
community and social service interests in a Fair Share Coalition that is
supporting legislation called the Health Care Responsibility Act. It would
require large employers who fail to provide affordable health care benefits to
pay a fee to the state to create slots in the Basic Health Plan for their
employees.
The WSLC also supports a Health Care
Disclosure Act. This legislation would allow taxpayers to determine which
employers are shifting the cost of employee health care coverage to the state.
It requires the state to collect and disclose the employers of applicants for
publicly funded health care programs like Medicaid and the BHP, as well as the
employers of any person receiving uncompensated care in a hospital.
Are you worth
more dead or alive to your boss?
"Dead Peasant Insurance"
is the unsavory industry slang for insurance policies taken out by corporations
on the lives of thousands of their rank-and-file employees, usually without
workers’ knowledge or consent. The practice allows corporations to earn
tax-free investment income and is actively marketed by insurance companies as an
"attractive, off-balance-sheet asset."
In one notorious example, Enron
bought life insurance on rank-and-file employees at its Portland General
subsidiary. The company was the beneficiary when an employee died and the
proceeds went into a special compensation and benefits fund for Enron's top
executives and directors.
Enron would have liked to take out
policies on its Texas employees, but unlike Oregon, Dead Peasant policies are
illegal in that progressive state. Of course that didn't stop one corporation
from defying Texas law when it took out "Dead Janitor" policies on
some 350,000 of its employees, including those in Texas. You guessed it:
Wal-Mart.
"The practice is as widespread
as it is little-known," wrote the Wall Street Journal. "Millions of
current and former workers at hundreds of large companies are thus worth a great
deal to their employers dead, as well as alive, yielding billions of dollars in
tax breaks over the years, as well as a steady stream of tax-free death
benefits."
This week, the Washington State
Labor Council testified in support of HB 1033, sponsored by Rep. Steve Kirby
(D-Tacoma), which would require notification and consent from the employee when
their employer buys life insurance coverage on them.
But even if HB 1003 passes,
important questions remain. While it makes sense that businesses would have an
insurable interest in key employees critical to their operation, it's hard to
imagine why a company should be allowed to profit from the deaths of
wage-earning workers like janitors. It's also hard to understand why an employer
can retain that insurable interest even after the worker leaves the company.
Urge support for
HB 1154, mental health parity
Washington is one of 17 states that
does not require health insurance plans to offer the same level of coverage for
mental health services as they do for medical services. HB 1154, sponsored Rep.
Shay Schual-Berke (D-Normandy Park), would create that "mental health
parity." A similar measure passed the House 64-33 last year, but was killed
in the Republican-controlled Senate.
HB 1154 was heard and passed by the
House Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee. Please call the
toll-free Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000 and leave a message urging
your state legislators to support this important measure..