FRIDAY, JANUARY 28
(PDF version)
Tax system
'unconscionable'
"The Washington state tax structure is enormously
regressive.
For anyone to argue that it makes sense for the poor to pay a higher proportion
of their income in taxes than the rich is utter nonsense."
|
2005
WSLC LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE
|
|
The Washington State Labor
Council’s 2005 Legislative Conference is Thursday, February 24 at
the Red Lion Olympia Hotel. All union members are invited to attend and
get updates on the status of legislation affecting working families.
Registration starts at 7:30 a.m. and the conference begins at 8:30 a.m.
Gov. Christine Gregoire is
scheduled to speak at 9 a.m., followed by a number of legislative
leaders. The conference concludes with lunch, at which time attendees
are urged to meet with their legislators to discuss the issues most
important to them.
As usual, from 6:30 to 8:30
p.m. Wednesday night before the conference, there will be a reception
offering an excellent opportunity for informal conversation with
legislators and other public officials. Avoid the reception lines by
visiting the early registration table in the lobby at 2 p.m.
The registration fee is $30
and includes materials, lunch Friday and admission to the reception
Thursday night. Download a
registration form or call (206) 281-8901 for more information. |
So said Bill Gates, Sr., before the
House Finance Committee this week. After summarizing the findings of the
Washington Tax Structure Committee he chaired, Gates added some personal
comments characterizing the state's tax system as "unconscionable." He
favors a personal and corporate income tax. Gates reminded state legislators
that companies like Amgen and Microsoft owe their good fortunes to significant
public tax dollar investment in education, roads, and research and development.
In contrast, lobbyists from the
business associations argued against such public investments. While rightly
pointing out the unfairness of the current B&O gross-receipts tax, these
lobbyists continued to whine and exaggerate about our state's "business
climate" in their testimony. They argue for a no-new-revenue budget, while
making erroneous statements about the cost of workers’ compensation and
unemployment insurance. And of course, never once did they mention how the state’s
structural budget gap could be narrowed by suspending some of their tax
preferences or agreeing to real disclosure and accountability measures.
WSLC President Rick Bender had a
different take.
"Washington now ranks 46th
nationally in K-12 spending, 48th in customized training dollars, we have over a
half million people who have no health insurance, and a transportation
infrastructure that is woefully under-funded," Bender testified.
"Washington state is facing a structural budget gap. We are simply not
generating enough revenue to fund our state’s growing human service needs, our
economic and physical infrastructure, or to adequately compensate our dedicated
and hardworking state employees."
Greg Devereux, Executive Director of
the Washington Federation of State Employees, posed the question: "Is it
better to give a business a targeted tax break or is it better spend an extra
$100 million on mental health, transportation, or job training?" He
suggested that the legislature currently has no way to evaluate this question;
no way to determine what gives the best rate of return to the state's taxpayers.
Kudos to Finance Committee Chair
Rep. Jim McIntire (D-Seattle), who called this first of four hearings designed
to build bipartisan support for changes to our broken tax system. The
committee's next hearing—on Tuesday, Feb. 1 at 10 a.m.—will look at the
issue of what are appropriate tax and spending limits.
Tax
accountability, disclosure bills heard
Previously, the House Finance
Committee heard three bills supported by the Washington State Labor Council:
HB 1069 would create a
citizens' commission to study, review and make critical recommendations on our
state’s 535 tax preferences—a number that has doubled over the past 20
years. It was approved Wednesday by the Finance Committee on a 5-3 party-line
vote.
"It could scare businesses
off," said Rep. Ed Orcutt (R-Kalama), who joined GOP colleagues Reps. John
Ahern (R-Spokane) and Dan Roach (R-Bonney Lake) on the committee in voting
"no." Even Rep. Orcutt's hometown newspaper, the uber-conservative
(Vancouver) Columbian, editorialized that the bill is "the right thing to
do" and called the objections of Republicans "thin." When Rep.
Orcutt isn't opposing scrutiny of tax breaks, he's proposing new ones. Amidst a
projected $1.8 billion shortfall, he has proposed a break for the construction
of tsunami-resistant structures.
HB 1069 suggests a 10-year review
cycle, which labor feels is too long a time period for such an important issue.
The WSLC urges a floor amendment to reduce the review time to four years.
Speaker Frank Chopp (D-Seattle) has put HB 1069 on his list of "fast
track" bills he hopes to advance to the Senate very quickly, perhaps as
soon as next week.
HB 1094, sponsored by Rep.
Sharon Tomiko Santos (D-Seattle), adopts best practices regarding public
disclosure and accountability for tax preferences. It would require businesses
that receive tax incentives to fill out a survey identifying themselves and
including information about their business activities, detailing employment,
wages and employer-provided health and retirement benefits. The surveys would
then be disclosed to the public upon request. HB 1094 has been heard by the
committee, but has yet to be voted upon.
HB 1096, also sponsored by
Rep. Santos, would require the governor to submit a tax expenditure/preference
report along with the governor’s biennial budget. The point is that tax
preferences are expenditures, too. When the state defers revenue from businesses
or individuals it is making a value judgment, and at the same time, creating a
cost because there is less revenue for education, health care, etc. HB 1094 has
been heard, but not yet voted upon.
Check out the WSLC's 2005
Position Papers
How often have we all heard
legislators, policymakers and pundits ask, "Yes, but where does organized
labor stand on this issue?" (Don't answer that.)
The 2005 Washington State Labor
Council Position Papers answer that question on many specific legislative
issues, offering background information, labor’s position and recent
legislative histories.
On issues ranging from the minimum
wage to workers’ compensation, from workplace safety to unemployment
insurance, the WSLC and other labor organizations are all too often the only voice
representing working people in Olympia. That is unfortunate, given the number of
high-paid corporate lobbyists roaming the halls who often fight to remove or
roll back workplace standards and rights. But it is a banner the WSLC and other
labor organizations carry with pride.
Find out where we stand and why by
downloading the WSLC 2005 Position Papers at www.wslc.org/legis
or by calling 206-281-8901 or 360-943-0608 to have them mailed to you.
Keep the calls
coming on apprenticeship
HB 1028 and SB 5097, the companion
bills to promote apprenticeship utilization in Washington state, are on the
move. HB 1028 advanced Monday from committee and could get a House floor vote
any time; and SB 5097 passed from its committee on Thursday. Please call the
toll-free Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000 and leave a message urging
your legislators to support these bills.
Some of next
week's hearings
MONDAY, Jan. 31
-- At 10 a.m., the Senate Labor and Commerce Committee hears SB 5069 creating a
family leave insurance program; at 1:30 p.m. House Labor and Commerce will hear
HB 1173, the companion bill on family leave, and HB 1439 requiring the hours of
work for individual homecare providers to be subject to collective bargaining.
TUESDAY, Feb. 1
-- At 10 a.m., House Finance will have a discussion of spending, tax limits and
tax reform.
THURSDAY,
Feb. 3 -- At 8 a.m., Senate Labor and Commerce hears SB 5240 giving the
Department of L&I the authority to levy administrative penalties for
wage-and-hour violations; and SB 5466, a Farm Bureau-supported change in the
definition of wages for purposes of workers' comp (which would lower time-loss
benefits for some injured workers). At 1:30 p.m., House Labor and Commerce hears
HB 1264 prohibiting non-competition agreements in the broadcasting industry.
FRIDAY,
Feb. 4 -- At 1:30 p.m., House Health Care hears a number of bills related to
improving patient and employee safety in the health care industry.