FRIDAY, MARCH 14 (download
and print a PDF version of this newsletter)
Just when you thought the
"competitiveness" rhetoric that substitutes for honest debate in
Olympia couldn't get any more simplistic and vacuous, the right-wing extremists
who have seized control of this state's Republican Party lower the bar
again. Now the Mother of All Talking Points is "job-killer."
Minimum wage?
"Job-killer." Prescription drug bill? "Job-killer."
Ergonomic safety rule? "Job-killer." Injured worker benefits?
"Job-killer." Unemployment benefits for people whose jobs have been
killed? "Job-killer."
Business lobbyists got the
"job-killing" memo, too. In fact, they probably wrote it.
Building Industry Association of
Washington literature calls L&I's proposed workers' comp premium increases
"job-killers." The Association of Washington Business actually
has a website
that includes a list of "job-killer" bills—ranging from HB 1428
raising certification standards for electricians to HB 1830 requiring Wal-Mart
and other large companies with employees on the state's Basic Health Plan to
partially reimburse the state. (The site's JobMaker® bills include SB
5161 repealing the ergonomics rule. How many jobs do ya think will be created by
repealing a workplace safety rule that isn't even being enforced yet?)
HB 1869 is a common-sense bill sponsored
by Rep. Jim McIntire (D-Seattle) to require independent performance audits of
the more than 400 tax exemptions on the state's books. Deciding which tax breaks
work is an obvious response to public outcry for government efficiency and
accountability for how it spends our money. Under the bill, a citizens'
commission would analyze tax breaks at least once every 10 years to see if the
corporate lobbyists' job-creation and job-maintenance promises are kept. The
commission would recommend which tax breaks should stay and which are a waste of
taxpayer dollars. It would still be up to the legislature whether to repeal them
or not.
The bill passed the House Finance
Committee on a strict party-line vote Monday. Which means, it's likely to pass
the House along similar lines, and then never even get a hearing in the Senate,
where Republicans hold a 25-24 majority.
Why? It's a "job-killer."
"This bill would kill
jobs," says Rep. Jack Cairnes (R-Covington), the Finance Committee's
ranking minority member who retained his seat last fall by a full 90 votes. Then
he unleashes the final rhetorical nail in his argument, saying our state's
businesses shouldn't have their special tax breaks subjected to the whims of
"a huge liberal committee."
As a public service, let's give
Cairnes the benefit of the doubt and explain his argument in detail not always
available in media coverage (although that consideration deserves to be
forfeited for his lame invocation of the L-word). Some businesses decide where
they will move or whether they will stay based on what incentives they are
offered by competing state governments. In order to promote economic
development, Washington can't afford to have its hands tied by a citizens
commission when it offers tax breaks with no strings attached. Even though that
panel would not have the authority to revoke a tax break, the mere public
pressure their analyses might generate constitutes an unacceptable challenge of
state legislators' authority. It is, therefore, "a job-killer."
How's this for a sound bite?
"Bulls---."
The truth is, now that budget times
are tight and the public trough cannot be lapped at so easily, even business
lobbyists are conceding they should be accountable for their promises.
Last year on a 91-7 vote, the House passed a tax break aimed at saving Goodrich,
which at the time employed 2,000 workers in Washington, some $500,000
annually. What was unique—perhaps even unprecedented—about the bill is
that the company would have to report back to the legislature in three years
what they did with the money and justify the tax break's reauthorization.
Prominent business lobbyist Steve
Gano told the Everett Herald, "If we can’t convince the
Legislature that we did some good with that, then we don’t deserve it."
This year, semiconductor companies
in Clark County are pushing HB 1751, a tax break with accountability strings
attached. They include an annual report available to the public on wages
and benefits of the jobs created, and a sunset on the tax break when the
legislature's fiscal committees must report on its effectiveness.
The strings now willingly sought by
business interests are exactly what McIntire's HB 1869 seeks. To argue
against the bill is to say that every single one of the 400 tax breaks, including the infamous bull semen
(not censored!) exemption, is more important than the
Basic Health Plan, or services for the developmentally disabled, or nursing home
assistance or foster care funding, all of which are victimized in the governor's
extreme all-cuts budget proposal.
When somebody gets a tax break,
everybody else picks up the slack. That includes the businesses that
apparently don't merit special treatment, but more often than not, it means you
and me.
It's time for someone to stand up
and say, "If businesses don't want to be here unless we absolve them of
their responsibility to be good citizens and neighbors, which includes paying
their fair share of taxes, then good riddance."
Well, now someone has.
As for all this
"job-killer" nonsense, it's more than just an irritating way to
evade defending your position on important issues. It's a cynical
calculated attempt to play on the fears of all of us who have watched our job
security vanish in this Bush economy. The right-wing agenda to privatize
government services, deregulate business, shift the tax burden from businesses
to individuals and destroy unions hasn't changed for a century. But now
it's cloaked in language designed to instill fear in working people.
Anybody who reads the newspaper
knows what really killed the jobs in this state and nation: corporate greed and
corruption that has decimated the stock market, destroyed the retirement savings
for millions and extended a national recession. That and a minority
president so out-of-touch with the lives and struggles of everyday working (and
not-working) people that what passes for his economic policy is more massive tax
breaks for businesses and the wealthy.
Meanwhile, Bush's latest project,
"mini-lateral" preemptive war, is not only tearing this country and
the international community apart, it is preventing an economic recovery that
could put some of us back to work. The airline industry crippled by the
9-11 terrorist attacks says war may doom the industry. Now that's a job
killer, especially in Washington.
Here's a final sobering thought: By
the time you get our next Legislative Update that war is likely to have
begun.
What happened
this week
Now that we've gotten that off our
collective chest, little space remains for Legislative Updating. So here are
some quick bullets on this week's developments (get more detail on a daily basis
at www.wslc.org):
SB 5971, closing Fircrest School,
passed the Senate Friday afternoon on a 36-13 vote (roll call not available at
press time) after being unanimously approved Monday by the Senate Ways and Means
Committee. The WSLC joins the Washington Federation of State Employees in
opposing this closure that would unnecessarily disrupt the lives of
developmentally disabled citizens.
SB 5697, freezing the minimum
wage (and defying voters), passed 25-24 in the Senate on Wednesday. As
reported earlier this week, three Democrats—Sens. Marilyn Rasmussen, Jim
Hargrove and Tim "Call Me Maverick" Sheldon—sided with majority
Republicans in support, and three Republicans—Sens. Pam Roach, Shirley Winsley
and Luke Esser—broke with their caucus and voted no. The other two bills
attacking the minimum wage, SB 5768 (tip credit) and SB 5681 (freeze with a
teenage sub-minimum and living wage ordinance ban), could be voted upon at any
time.
SB 5378, slashing workers'
compensation benefits, also passed 25-24 Wednesday on a party-line vote,
except GOP Sen. Shirley Winsley voted no and Tim "Maverick Like James
Garner, Not Mel Gibson" Sheldon voted yes.
SB 5728, an omnibus tort
reform bill that includes the "worker blacklisting" language,
passed Friday by a 28-21 vote. This would grant legal immunity to employers who
show reckless disregard for the truth when providing negative references about
former employees.
HB 1777, implementing the Home
Care Worker Contract, passed from House Appropriations on a strong
bipartisan vote 19-6 on Wednesday and is ready for floor action.
HB 1065, the apprenticeship
utilization bill, has passed two committee votes and faced possible House
floor action today, but no word at press time.
SB 5904, the
pharmaceutical industry placebo bill, is also expected to come up for a
Senate vote at any time. This bill would do nothing to assist the people of this
state in dealing with the skyrocketing cost of prescription drugs.
The next cutoff
is Wednesday, March 19
The next cutoff is Wednesday, March
19. (Is there an echo in here?) Bills not related to the budget must have
passed the house of origin by 5 p.m. that day. It's a pretty safe bet that
a flurry of floor action will happen in the hours leading up to that cutoff, so
next week we should be able to offer a more comprehensive roundup of bill
status.
PREVIOUS EDITIONS of
the WSLC Legislative Update:
March
7 -- What a Difference a House Makes
Feb.
21 -- Workplace safety in jeopardy (re: BIAW ergo initiative, blocking WISHA
inspections)
Feb.
14 -- MORE business tax breaks?! (re: digging a deeper budget hole
with no accountability)
Feb. 7 -- Commerce and ANTI-Labor? (re: workers'
comp, minimum wage and transportation)
Feb. 3 -- Now is the time... to pay less? (re:
workers' comp and minimum wage)
Jan. 24 -- Drug bill off to a strong start;
competagogues go after ergonomics rule again
Jan. 17 -- It's the Economy, Stupid! (re:
"competagogues" and Washington's business environment)
Jan.
10 -- A Question of Priorities (re: explosion of corporate influence
on government)