|
Reports for Jan.
28-Feb. 1, 2002
News from previous weeks:
Jan. 22-25 -- Jan. 14-18 -- Jan.
7-11
FRIDAY,
February 1 -- Legislative
Update: NO "SAFE HARBOR" FOR ERGO
...plus -- Turnout too low to certify Delta-AFA election;
union says Delta broke law
...plus -- Women in
Trades Show is February 12 in Tacoma
— In today's Spokesman-Review
* -- Old
tax breaks never die -- Buying
bees? A gun safe? Human body parts? There's a sales tax break for each. Work
as a meatpacker? A pea processor? A boxing promoter? The state lawbooks
include business tax exemptions, some dating to the 1930s, for all those.
Since 1854, Washington territorial and state lawmakers have enshrined more
than 430 tax breaks in state law, covering everything from cargo ships to
consulates to bull semen.
— In today's Eastside Journal --
Bush
to cut Boeing retraining money
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Enact
prescription drug reform -- Op-ed by Reps. Cody and Sommers.
...plus -- Eyman
paid himself $165,000 -- He made more than any elected official in 2001,
including Governor Locke, for promoting initiatives that either fail
constitutional tests or are so poorly written they require more
(money-making) "Son of" initiatives to fix. And he says government
is inefficient. As columnist Joel Connelly explains today, Kingpin
Tim Eyman is accountable to no one.
— In today's Olympian --House
passes regional transportation financing bill
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Phillips
labor talks continue (with PACE)
...plus -- Public
worker bargaining is also a key issue in Olympia -- An anti-collective
bargaining op-ed demonizing unions by conservative think tanker.
— In yesterday's Oregonian -- Public
sympathy behind striking nurses, poll shows
— In today's L.A. Times -- Despite
recession, perks for top executives grow
— In today's N.Y. Times* -- Harvard
chief backs raises for low-wage staff (students forced issue)
...plus -- AFL-CIO
brings international witnesses to tell of harsher side of growth
...plus -- Bush
had no problem releasing Clinton documents, but keeps Enron info secret
— Today from MSNBC -- Enron's
Lay gave Bush names for regulatory panel, two were appointed
THURSDAY,
January 31
— In today's News-Tribune --
Voters
will back gas-tax hike, if... -- Business groups' poll says support is there,
but hinges on linking new taxes to specific transportation projects;
spending the taxes efficiently; and funding not just roads, but also
improved bus, rail and ferry services.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- House
Democrats accept that voters will decide on gas-tax boost
...plus -- Mulally's
"decisive" actions vital to Boeing commercial division --
Contract talks discussed.
— In today's Olympian -- Efficiencies
bill may cut rural road costs, signed by Locke
...plus -- Small-business
owners feel burdened by regulations (such as not-yet-implemented ergo)
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- House
panel OKs 50-percent rule for school levies
— In yesterday's (Centralia) Chronicle -- Apprenticeship
fair draws a crowd in Chehalis
— In today's Seattle Times -- Children
of farmworkers deserve a fair shot at college (Sanchez op-ed)
— In today's News-Tribune -- All
workers deserve access to portable pensions (Burbank column)
— In today's Roll Call -- Teamsters
woo top Republicans -- The burgeoning friendship is giving the labor
union some influential allies to assist it in attaining its No. 1 priority:
bringing an end to the federal supervision it has chafed under for the past
13 years.
— In today's N.Y. Times * -- Vote
at Delta a key test for unions -- Results expected tomorrow.
...plus -- Bush
budget to seek job-training cut -- This from the man who, two nights
ago, told the nation: "When America works, America prospers; so my
economic security plan can be summed up in one word: jobs. ... (and) Good
jobs begin with good schools."
— Today from MSNBC -- Enron
memo lobbied Cheney to oppose price caps -- VP and P comply.
— In today's Washington Post -- House
Republican predicts GOP gains in fall election
...plus -- Civil
servants listen for another Bush applause line -- AFGE blasts Bush on
privatization.
...plus -- Bush's
focus -- and the country's -- Broder column: "(Poll show) voters
rate the domestic economy their top worry over terrorism by a 2-to-1 margin.
And within the economy, they found, the biggest concern by far is the rising
cost of medical care. Bush made no explicit reference to that problem...
When the budget comes out next week, there will be hundreds of freezes or
cuts in programs important to domestic constituencies. When I asked Budget
Director Mitch Daniels how much political flak he expects, his answer was:
'It depends if we can sell guns vs. butter.' "
WEDNESDAY,
January 30 -- Prescription
drug bill attacked with full-page ad blitz
— In today's Seattle Times
-- Eyman
launches new initiative
...plus -- Japanese
firms sign on to Boeing Sonic Cruiser project
— In today's Eastside Journal -- Weyerhaeuser
CEO blasts Boeing over layoffs
— In today's Everett Herald -- SPEEA
spurns Boeing contract offer in Texas
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Governor
Locke, along Route 18, pushes gas tax
— In today's News-Tribune -- Bill
for 2nd Narrows bridge looks likely to clear House
— In yesterday's Olympian -- Nurses
seek right to refuse overtime
— In today's Oregonian -- Extra
strike pay to scab OHSU nurses illegal, board says
— In today's Washington Post -- Defense
balks at Bush's contracting out goals -- "Essential" services
should not be privatized, Pentagon memo says, citing national security
concerns.
TUESDAY,
January 29 -- State
employees' premiums rise 159% in governor's plan
At SPEEA.org -- Irving
SPEEA unanimously rejects Boeing contract offer
Just in from The Seattle Times -- Eyman
launches new "Son of I-747" initiative
— In today's Olympian -- Highway
"efficiencies" bill OK'd by House
— In today's SCJ -- Boeing
plays a part in area's traffic problem, solution
— In today's Bremerton Sun -- Local
lawmakers fight closure of Mission Creek Youth Camp -- Sen. Tim
"Look-Ma-I'm-a-Democrat" Sheldon argues against
privatization of fire suppression work.
— In today's UW Daily -- Administration
refuses to take position on I-200 exemption bill
— In the P.S. Business Journal -- A
Pacific Northwest spin-off for Amtrak?
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Privatizing
profits, socializing costs -- Must-read Sean Gonsalves column (link goes
to Cape Cod Times because the P-I's site doesn't post his Tuesday columns.)
...plus -- In
defense of Initiative 776 -- Must-read Tim Eyman op-ed, if you like
listening to a man nobody elected declare himself the voice of the taxpayers
of Washington.
— In today's Washington Post -- Ignorant
Lay: Ex-Enron CEO out of the loop, wife says (Also see yesterday's Reuters
story -- Good
Lay: Ex-Enron CEO is honest man, wife says and today's P-I story
-- Poor
Lay: Ex-Enron CEO is broke, wife says)
...plus -- Soft
money: Had enough? -- Dionne column: It shouldn't have taken Enron to
move campaign reform up the list of congressional priorities... But Enron
does create delicate problems for both political parties. If there was
ever a time to be on record against money politics, this is it.
— In today's N.Y. Times * -- The
Great Divide -- Krugman column: "I predict that in the years ahead
Enron, not Sept. 11, will come to be seen as the greater turning point in
U.S. society."
MONDAY,
January 28
At AFLCIO.org -- Unfinished
business, including worker relief, faces Congress as it returns
— In today's Seattle P-I -- After
layoffs, retraining critical for economic recovery -- See also, State's
retraining program rocked by recession (below).
— In today's News-Tribune -- Working
women still earning less than men
...and Sunday -- Chopp's
Narrows Bridge bill the only show in town (editorial)
— In Sunday's Columbian -- Locke
says he opposes repeal of manufacturing sales tax exemption
— In today's Yakima Herald -- Lawmakers,
governor shouldn't give in to Tim Eyman (editorial)
— In today's Roll Call -- Tax
debate roils Democrats -- GOP spin describing suspension of future tax
cuts as "tax increases" has Democrats worried about budget message
for election.
— In today's N.Y. Times * -- What's
a recovery without jobs? -- Herbert column: The politicians give lip
service to working Americans who have to struggle mightily to make ends
meet. But the crucially important issue of employment rarely gets the
kind of sustained attention it warrants.
...and Sunday -- Immigrant
laborers feel stranded on Pacific NW as day jobs dry up
— In today's L.A. Times -- SAG
election is drama straight out of Hollywood
— Today from Reuters -- Good
Lay: Ex-Enron CEO is honest man, wife says
News from previous weeks:
Jan. 22-25 -- Jan. 14-18 -- Jan.
7-11

FRIDAY,
FEBRUARY 1
Turnout too low to certify Delta-AFA
organizing vote
The
Association of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO, today released the following
statement regarding the long-awaited results of Delta Air Lines organizing
campaign:
WASHINGTON,
D.C. -- Delta Air Lines management’s exploitation of the 9-11 tragedy as
part of an illegal campaign to interfere with the flight attendants’
vote was decisive in discouraging enough flight attendants from voting in
the largest ever union election in the airline industry. With fewer
than 50 percent of the eligible flight attendants returning their ballots,
the National Mediation Board could not certify the Association of Flight
Attendants, AFL-CIO, as the flight attendants' representative after the
mail-in ballots were counted today.
Even
though AFA received 98 percent of the valid ballots cast, AFA will not be
certified as the bargaining representative for the Delta flight attendants
under NMB rules. Of the 19,033 eligible voters, a total of 5,609
ballots were returned. 5,520 votes were cast for AFA and 89 votes
were cast for “other.”
“In
America, democratic elections are supposed to express the voice of the
people,” said AFA International President Patricia Friend. “In
this election, the flight attendants’ voices were silenced by fear and
intimidation. Now the American government must act to punish Delta
for violating the rights of its workers and silencing their voices.”
According
to hundreds of flight attendant reports, Delta didn’t just discuss the
effects of 9-11 on the airline, management used 9-11 to make flight
attendants fear for their jobs if they voted for the union. It
is illegal to threaten workers with a loss of their job to intimidate them
into not supporting a campaign to join a union.
Delta
management engaged in various tactics to create an atmosphere of fear and
intimidation, going so far as to tell the over 3,000 laid off flight
attendants that they were not eligible to vote, to keep them from
returning their ballots. In fact, all laid off flight attendants
were eligible to vote.
“Videos
of our CEO played continuously in our crew rooms,” said Seattle-based
flight attendant Mike Trau. “He kept repeating the threats 9-11 have
placed on our airline and talking about our family atmosphere, then he’d
instruct us to rip up our ballots.” Not returning your ballot in
an NMB election is a “no” vote.
On
Sept. 12, Delta began conducting weekly conference calls that were
censored so that pro-union flight attendants were not permitted to ask
questions. Other departments at Delta do not have these conference
calls, only flight attendants.
Delta
communications with flight attendants during the election period
inextricably linked Delta’s survival to defeating the union effort.
These communications included:
--
Letters and videos from senior
management to the homes of flight attendants implicitly threatening
flight attendants with job loss if they unionized;
--
Supervisors illegally questioning AFA
supporters asking, “How can you support a union at a time like
this?”
--
Management constantly referring to
the job losses in the industry in the wake of 9-11 and falsely promoting
Delta’s lay-off plans as better than those at unionized carriers.
--
One-on-one meetings where supervisors
would take aside flight attendants they identified as AFA supporters and
grill them on their support for the union, in many cases saying that
support was anti-Delta.
“There
is a reason that interference with a worker’s right to freely choose to
join a union is illegal – it works,” said Friend. “Delta’s entire
campaign focused on creating fear and uncertainty in flight attendants’
minds.”
“While
we were grieving for the loss of our co-workers on those planes on 9-11,
Delta management used our fears and anxiety against us,” said Los
Angeles-based flight attendant Lorraine York. “Delta illegally
interfered with our rights as American workers before the terrorist
attacks. But that paled in comparison to management’s exploitation
of our national tragedy,” said Atlanta-based flight attendant John
Jablonski.
A
majority of Delta’s 19,000 flight attendants had signed representation
cards by August 2001, when AFA filed a petition for an election with the
NMB. On September 6, 2001, AFA also filed hundreds of flight
attendant affidavits with the NMB charging illegal interference –
including intimidation, threats and surveillance -- by Delta management.
In
October 2001, the NMB found that the flight attendant claims presented a prima
facie case of illegal conduct against Delta (to view the NMB’s
decision, visit www.afanet.org
). But rather than take action to charge Delta with illegal conduct
and provide the flight attendants with an atmosphere free from
intimidation when voting, the NMB held off further investigation and
hearings on the charges until after the election.
The
NMB set the flight attendant election ballots to be mailed to flight
attendants’ homes on Dec. 7, 2001. Ballots for elections conducted
under the auspices of the NMB are usually mailed from the NMB’s
headquarters in Washington, DC. But because of anthrax contamination
fears, the NMB altered its process and had all ballots mailed and returned
to Chicago, and extended the usual 30-day balloting process by 30
additional days. Ballots were shipped in bulk to the NMB’s
Washington, DC, office and counted today.
The
NMB will immediately begin a full-scale investigation into the charges of
illegal conduct by Delta management. If the NMB finds sufficient
evidence that illegal interference occurred, it can set a new election,
possibly changing the balloting procedures to make the balloting process
less likely to be influenced by Delta’s illegal conduct.
With
close to 20,000 flight attendants involved, the Delta vote was the largest
private-sector union election in more than 30 years. Delta is the only
major U.S. air carrier whose flight attendants do not have union
representation.
Almost
50,000 flight attendants at 26 carriers have joined together to form AFA,
the largest flight attendant union in the world. Visit us @ www.afanet.org.

FRIDAY,
FEBRUARY 1
Women in Trades Show is Feb. 12 in Tacoma
The Women in
Trades Show -- featuring hands-on demonstrations, women's construction wear
fashion show, special guest speakers, a crane simulator and information
about apprenticeship programs, among many other things -- comes to Pierce
County for the first time on Tuesday, Feb. 12 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at
Tacoma's King Oscar Convention Center.
DIRECTIONS -- From the north: Take I-5 South
to exit 129. Turn left onto Tacoma Mall Blvd. Turn left on 84th Street. Turn
right onto Hosmer. From the south: Take I-5 North to exit 128. Turn
right onto Hosmer.
For
more information, check out the
website of the show's sponsor, the High Wage Career Connection, a
division of the Pierce County Labor Council, AFL-CIO, or call 253-473-0284.

WEDNESDAY,
JANUARY 30
Apprenticeship fair draws a crowd in Chehalis
The
following story by (Centralia) Chronicle reporter Amy Emerson appeared in
Wednesday's edition and is posted here because the story will soon expire
and disappear from the newspaper's website.
Even
snow couldn't stop hundreds of job-seekers from traveling to Chehalis
Tuesday to attend the local area's second annual apprenticeship fair.
The event was sponsored by the Thurston-Lewis County Labor Council, Laborers
Local 252, Northwest Laborers-Employers Training Trust, Pacific Mountain
Workforce Development Council, WorkSource Lewis County and Centralia
College.
Trade representatives were on hand in Yard Birds Mall to answer questions
about the various trades, including operating engineers, cement masons,
electricians, cabinet makers, carpenters, boilermakers and millmen.
Apprenticeship programs typically involve four years of training, during
which the apprentice is paid hourly wages, and is provided benefits such as
health care and retirement.
Once training is complete and the apprentice is given journeyman status, the
person has skills recognized across the country, skills that can draw a wage
of $30 an hour or more.
"An apprenticeship is a fabulous program for anyone wanting to develop
their career, man or woman," said Tami St. Paul, representative of the
Western Washington Operating Engineers.
St. Paul added that her organization attends more than 50 trade shows a
year, and said the Chehalis fair has "really stuck out in my mind as
one of the best fairs in the state."
"We got some really great applicants at this fair last year, and I
believe we put a number of them to work," she said.
St. Paul said local attendees are "generally interested in
apprenticeship programs and ask thoughtful questions.
"One of the usual questions is 'How much does an apprenticeship cost?'
They are surprised to learn that instead of paying to learn, they get paid
to learn," said St. Paul.
St. Paul added that people seeking information about apprenticeships are
also surprised to learn that only 4 percent of college graduates make more
money than skilled tradespeople.
"I make $27.31 an hour, and I plan to retire when I'm 52. I don't know
of too many college grads who can say that," she said with a chuckle.
"I have been at fairs where the educators who bring their students to
learn about apprenticeships end up becoming interested in the programs
themselves," said St. Paul.
In addition to filling out applications and collecting informational packets
about the various trades, attendees were able to listen to presentations
about apprenticeship programs.
St. Paul and Tawny Sayers of Northwest Laborers led a presentation about
women and apprenticeship.
The two estimated that 60 to 80 people attended their presentation.
"I was impressed with the number of women who were here today, and
that's so great because the trades are a great way for women to take care of
their families,"said Sayers.
Sayers said that before entering an apprenticeship, she was a single mother
on public assistance.
"And now, I am self-sufficient with a career that I love," she
said.
Sayers and St. Paul said the trades have seen a surge of women in the past
10 years. They attribute that to men becoming more open to women in
traditionally male jobs.
"As more women get into the trades, prove that they can accomplish
physically demanding work, and earn respect from their male coworkers, the
door into those jobs becomes more and more open to more women," said
Sayers.
St. Paul noted that the trades are attractive to women for numerous reasons,
one being that women earn the same amount of money for the same work as men.
"Unfortunately, that isn't they way things work in many other
industries. Many times women make 70 cents for every dollar that men earn,
and for the same work," she said.
"But another reason women are getting into the trades is because it
gives them a chance to take better care of their families, and also, when
mom gets up and goes to work each morning, particularly to a job that is
usually held by men, that sends a great message to your kids that they can
do whatever they want to do if they work towards it," she added.
Sheryl Johnson, Shelton, came to the fair with her husband, Brad.
"We are in retail and feel pretty stuck in our jobs right now,"
she said. "We came to this fair to find options for him, but I'm
leaving with a whole new outlook on my own career. It's been pretty
inspiring."
---
Amy Emerson covers energy, business and economic issues for The Chronicle.
She may be reached by e-mail at aemerson@chronline.com,
or by telephoning 807-8231.

WEDNESDAY,
JANUARY 30
Prescription drug bill attacked with
full-page ad blitz
As the House Health Care Committee considers taking action
Thursday on HB 2431, a bill designed to reduce prescription drug costs, a
blitz of full-page newspaper advertisements appeared Wednesday that
encourage health care providers and consumers to call legislators and oppose
the bill.
Both Seattle daily newspapers -- and possibly others around
the state -- contain full-page advertisements by an organization called the
International Patient Advocacy Association soliciting calls to legislators
that claim "HB 2431 is bad medicine for the state." The cost
of running such a one-time ad in the Seattle papers is more than $18,000.
"That's big money to attack a bill at the committee
stage of the legislative process," said Robby Stern, a lobbyist for the
Washington State Labor Council. "Given the fact that the
deep-pocketed pharmaceutical drug industry stood alone in opposing HB 2431
at the hearings here, I'd be really surprised in they weren't paying for
this somehow."
The ads feature the headline: "A Notice to Health Care
Providers. URGENT! Your Action Is Required Today." They suggest
that HB 2431 will create a statewide drug formulary that will restrict
consumer access to certain drugs.
In fact, HB 2431 would do no such thing. It would
consolidate prescription drug purchasing for state health care programs by
having an expert panel of pharmacists and health care providers develop a
"preferred drug list" based on clinical data about the
effectiveness of similar drugs. The "preferred" drugs would not be
chosen merely because they are cheaper, they may even be more expensive than
other drugs in their category. The savings result when they are purchased
in bulk through negotiations with the drug companies.
But most importantly, doctors would not be forced
to prescribe the "preferred" drugs. They would merely have
to indicate a specific drug that isn't on the list with their
prescription. Only in cases where the doctor did not have a preference
between similar drugs would the "preferred" drug be chosen.
"This bill is about making the state a smart shopper
when it comes to prescription drugs," said Barbara Flye, Executive
Director of Washington Citizen Action, a consumer advocacy group that
supports HB 2431. "This bill isn't about limiting access to
needed medication, it is about simplifying the process for doctors to
prescribe needed medications to their patients. Otherwise, the
Washington Medical Association wouldn't be supporting it."
The International Patient Advocacy Association, which
sponsored Wednesday's advertisements, is a non-profit organization
"that provides education, legal resources and support to health care
consumers" (according to its website).
It appears to be a one-man organization. Founder and director, Lenny
Van Pelt, is an attorney with a chronic illness who conducts a private law
practice in Bellevue and has a history of opposing restrictive HMO
formularies that require consumers to switch to cheaper drugs. (He is
out of town and could not be reached Wednesday for comment.)
"The ads are very misleading and designed to incite,
not inform," Flye said. "It's not an accident that this ad
repeatedly uses the word 'formulary,' even though that word appears nowhere
in the bill. Some health care providers are frustrated with private
HMOs use of drug formularies that restrict their ability to prescribe
certain drugs, and they may be incited by the 'F' word to call their
legislators and complain.
"If those doctors take a close look at the bill, I
think they will strongly support HB 2431 as much as the rest of us do,"
Flye said.
In addition to the Washington Medical Association, groups
testifying in support of HB 2431 include the American Heart Association, the
American Lung Association, the AARP and the Washington State Pharmacists
Association.
CALL TO ACTION: Call the Legislative Hotline at
1-800-562-6000 and leave a message for your legislators that you SUPPORT HB
2431 to reduce prescription drug costs, and that they shouldn't be swayed by
drug industry attempts to torpedo the bill.

TUESDAY,
JANUARY 29
State employees' premiums rise 159% in
governor's plan
The following information is an excerpt from today's
Legislative Hotline at the website of the Washington Federation of State
Employees, AFSCME Council 28: (www.wfse.org:)
Yesterday we learned that the governor wants you to pay not
25 percent more for your health insurance premiums -- but actually an
astronomical 158.9 percent more for health insurance premiums starting next
year.
That's right -- nearly 159 percent more.
And the proposal to raise your premium share from 8 percent
to 10 percent of the total premium cost isn't quite right either. That's how
it was portrayed in the governor's budget documents released in December.
The Senate Ways and Means Committee analyzed the governor's
state employee health insurance proposal and concluded Gov. Locke actually
wants the average state employee to pay 22 percent of premium costs
(compared to the actual 9 percent now). We went back and looked at the fine
print in the governor's budget and the 10 percent figure he used wasn't an
average but the MINIMUM amount he wants state employees to pay.
So, an average 159 percent hike in premium payments, a
minimum of 10 percent of premium costs, an average of 22 percent of premium
costs -- plus a 100 percent increase in office visit co-pays and a still
undefined "cost-sharing" on prescription drugs to cut the state's
costs by 15 percent.
So, if you remember any numbers on the health insurance
issue, remember these two: A 159 percent increase in health insurance
premiums to make state employees pay 22 percent of total costs.
In dollar terms, here's what the governor is proposing.
Increasing premium share from the current average of $41 a
month to $106.17 a month in 2003. That average increase of $65.17 works out
to a 158.9 percent increase. And if you're in a high-cost plan, your
premiums could run to hundreds of dollars a month. By the way, that would
mean that your premium costs would have jumped 266 percent from 2001 to
2003.
These figures came out during the Senate Ways and Means
Committee's
hearing Tuesday on state employee health benefits.
Your Federation Executive Director Greg Devereux led the way
as employee groups blasted the governor's plan.
Devereux said this proposal amounts to unacceptable
cost-shifting to state employees. What's needed, he said, is a comprehensive
look at why all health costs are going up.
And raising the office co-pays 100 percent -- from $10 to
$20 -- would actually increase costs, he said. State employees and their
families would defer treatment until their conditions worsen and costs of
treatment would be higher.
What happens now?
The Legislature is scouring the governor's budget. They'll
then write their own. So this is the time to influence them to do the right
thing on pay and benefits.
So, call your senator and urge him or her to reject Gov.
Locke's proposed 159 percent increase in state employee health costs. It
doesn't make sense, especially if the governor wants to delay your 2002 pay
raise and pay you less than the cost-of-living index.
Call the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000.

MONDAY,
JANUARY 28
State's retraining program rocked by
recession
The following excerpt is from a recent WSLC
Legislative Update:
One of the priorities for District 751 of the
International Association of Machinists this legislative session is to
secure more funding for the dislocated worker retraining program, which is
financed not through the state’s revenue-desperate General Fund but
through the relatively healthy Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.
When the program was established in a compromise that
netted businesses hundreds of millions of dollars worth of UI tax breaks,
its costs were capped at $30 million through July 1, 2002.
As of this week, that money has officially run out,
largely because the recession and massive Boeing layoffs have created an
unanticipated demand for retraining. In the program’s next fiscal
year, which begins July 1, $20 million more will be made available but the
waiting list of laid-off Boeing workers who have already applied for the
program will absorb it all. So there’s nothing left for, say, the
75 people at the mill in Camas who just lost their jobs.
IAM 751 Political Director Linda Lanham and others
testified at the House Commerce and Labor Committee hearing recently about
the desperate need for more retraining money that would not only invest in
our workforce of the future, but also provide economic stimulus (as
unemployment benefits are designed to do) in the communities of our state
disproportionately affected by the layoffs and recession.
Then the business lobbyists did what they do. They
repeated the false accusation that our state has the highest cost UI
system in the state (it actually ranks 11th in the country for UI taxes as
a percentage of taxable wages), and they said the state is not competitive
and retraining doesn’t work and blah, blah, blah. We won’t bore or
insult you with more of their unbearably insensitive arguments other than
to say they constituted a slap in the face of the tens of thousands of
workers who’ve lost their jobs, not through any fault of their own, but
because of recession and the Sept. 11 tragedy.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues
in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail
to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.
Copyright © 2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|