WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column2000 Convention
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

UPDATED DAILY  M-F by 9 a.m. Pacific

Links to commercial press stories are functional at the date of posting. In some cases, links "expire" when the source would like to begin charging you for old news. WSLC Reports Today  links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative. The intention is to inform.  The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content.
 

Reports for March 3-7, 2003

Previous weeks' news: Feb. 24-28 -- Feb. 18-21 -- Feb. 10-14

FRIDAY, March 7 -- WSLC Legislative Update: What a Difference a House Makes
...plus at WFSE.org -- Ecology workers file for union election with WFSE
— In today's Olympian -- 1,200 Department of Ecology workers file for union
...plus -- Union members (IUOE) to vote on Miller severance deal; no recommendation from union
— In today's Spokesman-Review -- Idaho House passes anti-union "Paycheck Protection" bill
— In today's King County Journal -- Auburn outsourcing plan worries Boeing unions
— In today's News Tribune -- Boeing won't be as high-flying; New strategy for profit, not market share
— In today's Seattle Times -- Issaquah district, teachers try to rebuild after divisive strike
...plus -- Media mergers endanger democracy, diversity of news (Inslee op-ed) AFL-CIO agrees.
— In yesterday's Daily World -- Raymond Weyerhaeuser mill eyes $1 million upgrade
At AFLCIO.org -- President Sweeney applauds Senate opposition to Estrada nomination
...plus at SEIU.org -- Bush administration's smallpox compensation plan is a step forward
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Officials seek smallpox vaccine comp fund (you'd get $262 K if it kills you)
...plus -- Texas investor group woos unions with proposal to run United Airlines
— In today's Washington Post -- Pilot pensions off course as airline troubles endanger payments
— In today's S.F. Examiner -- California considers pension fund team to root out corporate evildoers
— New from Business Week -- Palace coup at the AFL-CIO -- In a sharp rebuke to Sweeney, a group of five union chiefs concerned that he hasn't made enough (organizing) progress have pulled off something of a palace coup. After most of the press had left labor's annual winter gathering in Florida, the group quietly pushed through the creation of a new governing body to run the federation.
— New from AP -- Broadway musicians' union declares strike

THURSDAY, March 6 -- More balanced approach to budget urged by new coalition
— In today's Seattle Times -- State's fiscal crisis shouldn't be dumped on the needy (op-ed)
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Company again threatens legislature it may leave without tax breaks
...plus --
Rally Saturday to protest proposed closure of Fircrest School
— Also in today's Seattle Times -- Boeing to outsource more work; Auburn unit targeted
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Boeing Auburn facility will be "reorganized" -- Says IAM's Kelliher: "Boeing is going down the same road that drove McDonnell Douglas out of the commercial airplane business: making less and less of each plane. It's a dangerous path for the future of Boeing and this region."
— In today's Oregonian -- Longview Aluminum assailed by Steelworkers after bankruptcy filing
— In today's Olympian -- Locke orders streamlining to make state more "business-friendly"
— In yesterday's Longview Daily News -- House prescription drug bill would save dollars (editorial)
— In today's News Tribune -- Prescription drug bill opposition is greed, not politics (AARP op-ed)
— In today's Bremerton Sun -- Foot ferry demise swamps meeting about impending fare increases
— In the P.S. Business Journal -- OSHA sends letters to high-injury employers (that'll teach 'em)
— In today's Salem S-J -- Oregon legislators eye tapping workers' comp fund to deal with budget
Today at AFLCIO.org -- Union movement says media monopolies threaten democracy
— In today's Seattle Times -- The FCC and the octopus --
The Federal Communications Commission is convening in Seattle tomorrow to hear testimony on whether to loosen or repeal its rules on media ownership. These rules should remain. (Learn more at seattle.indymedia.org.)
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Foundation's withdrawn aid offer leave Yakima's working poor bruised
...plus -- Businesses begin to consider costs of the uninsured -- Don't forget next week's events!
...plus -- Yale oxymoron: Labor relations -- "They're such an elitist institution. They just look down at the workers. They can't come to terms with looking at their unions as an equal."
— In today's Washington Post -- White House proposes smallpox compensation plan
— In the new Onion -- Bush offers taxpayers another $300 if we go to war

WEDNESDAY, March 5 -- 2003 Women in Trades Fair will be April 11 at Seattle Center
At WashTech.org -- State bill aims to give better warning of mass layoffs
(plus "Take Action")
— In today's Spokesman-Review -- Slain state worker called "early retiree;" bill would change policy
...plus -- Idaho Dems fail in attempt to change bill barring union political deductions
— In yesterday's Tri-City Herald -- State's last unionized WinCo holds UFCW decertification vote 
— In today's News Tribune -- Longview Aluminum files for bankruptcy
...plus -- Foot ferries in peril, may be victim of state budget deficit
— In today's Everett Herald -- Budget bleak if jail tax fails again; county offices brace for more cuts
...plus -- Lease terms still stalling Boeing tanker deal (Corliss column)
...plus -- Focused on the truth, filmmaker producing first-ever Everett Massacre documentary
— In today's Olympian -- Group, U.S. Senators seek federal funds to teach jobless new skills
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Rare shipment puts Bellingham terminal back in action
...plus -- Jail worker may lose job for sex she says was rape; Teamsters file grievance
At AFLCIO.org -- Bush Medicare plan breaks his promise of guaranteed drug benefit
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Study raises estimate of U.S. uninsured (see planned CTUW activities)
...plus -- Bush plan rewards switch to private insurers, punishes those who stay in Medicare
...plus -- A bad prescription -- Editorial: Bush's Medicare plan falls far short of an adequate insurance benefit. Its main purpose is still to drive the elderly out of traditional Medicare as part of a radical and untested restructuring of social welfare policy.
— In today's Washington Post -- Bush Medicare plan a boon to drug companies, HMO industry
...plus -- How Congress hands your tax money to private corporations -- Days before the House Ways and Means Committee took up an innocuous military bill last month, Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) made an offer to other Republican committee members at their weekly luncheon: prepare a wish list of tax breaks under $100 million each, and they could add them to the measure.

TUESDAY, March 4 -- Get involved in next week's "Cover the Uninsured" activities
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Affordable health insurance a must (Bender-Brunell op-ed)
...plus --
Trumka, Sweeney (not that one) argue about labor's Iraq position
— In today's Olympian -- Labor group (WSLC) throws weight behind gambling expansion
— In today's Seattle Times -- Eastside janitors seek better conditions, matching those in Seattle
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Business tax breaks demand scrutiny -- Editorial: In this year of performance-based outcomes, every expense has to justify itself.
...plus -- Longshoreman working again (photo of ILWU 7 workers unloading first cargo ship in 2 years)
— A special series in the Wichita Eagle -- Boeing's global push: World assembly required?
...plus -- Boeing's global push Part 2: Workers worlds apart
...plus -- How can Wichita compete? -- Familiar refrain from Boeing's Alan Mulally: "We want to (keep jobs) in Wichita -- as long as we can be competitive." Kansas is a so-called Right-to-Work state where employers on average pay about one-third what they pay here in UI premiums. Today's question: Is it possible in America to achieve Boeing's definition of "competitive?" Discuss.
— In today's News Tribune -- Fircrest School at center of tug of war
— In today's Oregonian -- State, public employee unions on collision course over wage freeze
...plus -- Portland teachers ratify contract requiring them to work 10 days for free
— In today's Spokesman-Review -- Anti-union Paycheck Protection advances to floor of Idaho House
— News from AP -- Airport security screeners seek bargaining rights despite Bush's ban on unions
...plus -- Musicians union sets Thursday strike deadline that could shut down Broadway
— In today's S.F. Francisco -- Ailing workers' comp fund means biggest insurer must raise rates
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Yale's labor troubles deepen as thousands go on strike

MONDAY, March 3 -- It easily passed last year, but now Senate GOP balking on drug bill
— In today's Seattle Times and several other AP newspapers -- Cures differ for state's big drug tab
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Home care: It takes love AND money
— In today's Olympian -- Teamsters union OKs Miller severance deal; IUOE still negotiating
— In the P.S. Business Journal -- Boeing engineers getting grayer; it's a "real concern" to SPEEA
— In Sunday's Yakima H-R -- Farm Bureau a growing force in Olympia -- But lobbying group claims it doesn't use its $800,000 annual cut in workers' compensation retro refunds for political activities.
— In today's News Tribune -- Protect all state workers with ban on indoor smoking (editorial)
...plus Sunday -- Lawmakers want to close "retire-rehire" loophole
...plus -- Belated attention to health coverage for the uninsured (editorial)
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Lawmakers call for private foot ferries, but operators question profitability
— In Sunday's Columbian -- Reichert, Stanton getting ready for GOP race for governor in 2004
— In today's Everett Herald -- Marysville make-up day: Union and school board dueling op-eds
— In today's Oregonian -- For public employee unions, money talks and leaders listen
At AFLCIO.org -- AFL-CIO calls for "multilateral resolve, not unilateral action" on Iraq
...plus -- AFL-CIO state federations, CLCs face organization and program review

— In today's N.Y. Times -- Corporate gain, Treasury's loss in Bush plan -- With new changes last week, the Bush administration's tax proposal on dividends has become more friendly to investors and to some companies that pay no taxes. The effect of the latest changes, if enacted by Congress, would probably be to reduce the government's tax revenue by even more than under the original plan.
— In today's Washington Post -- Bush's 2004 campaign quietly being planned -- In 2000, the Bush campaign broke all previous records by raising about $100 million. Now, his strategists have begun planning for a 2004 contest in which they envision raising as much as $250 million.

Previous weeks' news: Feb. 24-28 -- Feb. 18-21 -- Feb. 10-14

THURSDAY, MARCH 6
More balanced approach to budget urged by new coalition

The Washington State Labor Council is partnering with a broad coalition of children's and social service advocates, consumer groups, and labor unions in the Committee to Protect Our Community's Future, a group that will spend the coming weeks educating the public about the devastating impact Governor Locke's proposed "all-cuts" budget will have on our communities. The coalition will urge Washington citizens to contact their state legislators and urge a more balanced approach -- a combination of service cuts and new sources of revenue -- to solving our state budget problem.

CALL TO ACTION: The WSLC is calling on all union activists to participate in a grassroots mobilization program to get the word out to union members (other coalition partners will do the same with their own constituencies). Please consider volunteering a few hours of your time for phone banks scheduled to begin in Seattle next week. Contact Diane McDaniel at (206) 281-8901 and provide your name, union affiliation, address, phone number and e-mail address, and the WSLC will respond with details about the phone bank schedule.

In addition the WSLC is asking all affiliated union organizations to download, post and distribute to rank-and-file members a flier (a 539 KB PDF file) entitled "Governor Locke's All-Cuts Budget: The Wrong Medicine for an Ailing Economy." The text of the flier is as follows:

Washington’s state government is facing a $2.4 billion revenue shortfall. But our budget woes are not unique. Other states across the nation face similar deficits because of a national recession and a stock market slump extended by a major crisis of confidence in Corporate America. Our state’s problem has been magnified by the 9/11 attack’s economic impact on the aerospace industry.

But unlike governors of other states, our governor is seeking an all-cuts budget to address this problem. Among the many cuts that target our community’s most vulnerable, Gov. Locke’s budget would:

  • CUT services for children with developmental disabilities

  • CUT health insurance for the working poor

  • CUT assistance to nursing homes

  • CUT foster care funding

  • CUT mental health services

  • CUT voter-approved funding to improve schools

In many other states, elected leaders of both parties are pursuing a more balanced approach, a combination of service cuts and new sources of revenue, such as closing corporate tax loopholes. Gov. Locke’s budget is an extreme and unbalanced approach.

Call 1-800-562-6000 and leave this message for your legislators: "Stop the Cuts!"

A message from the Committee to Protect Our Community's Future

THURSDAY, MARCH 6
Rally Saturday to protest proposed closure of Fircrest School

Union members and community activists who support necessary state services for the developmentally disabled are urged to participate in a "Stop the Closure" rally Saturday from 11 a.m. to noon outside the front gate of the Fircrest School at 155th & 15th N.E. in Shoreline. The Washington Federation of State Employees Local 341 has organized the rally to protest a proposal to shut down the school. A community march will follow.

SB 5971, the bill to close Fircrest School in Shoreline, would ship its 260 residents into the community or another state facility and reap a hoped-for $30 million by selling the property to developers. A dozen WFSE 341 members, along with other Fircrest supporters, testified Monday before the Senate Ways and Means Committee in opposition to the bill. The WFSE testified that this is a "do or die issue for us," with lobbyists Dennis Eagle adding: "This is a somewhat heartless approach to solving our budget problems."

See the WFSE website for more information, including streaming video of the WFSE challenging Gov. Gary Locke to oppose the bill at the Washington State Labor Council's Legislative Conference last Friday.

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5
2003 Women in Trades Fair will be April 11 at Seattle Center

The 24th annual Women in Trades Fair will be Friday, April 11 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the new Seattle Center Fisher Pavilion, with an evening social planned from 4 to 9:30 p.m. The fair promotes employer recruitment of women for trades work and outreach efforts to girls and women who may not be familiar with the high-paying jobs available in trades careers.

Washington Women In Trades, which sponsors the fair, was founded in 1978 for women working in trades to gather and share information. This year's event is co-sponsored by Seattle Center Productions, the U.S. Department of Labor Women's Bureau, the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Seattle/King County Building and Construction Trades Council.

The fair offers workshops, orientation sessions, tool and safety certifications are designed to assist women in becoming more knowledgeable and competitive in the non-traditional trades. It also offers sessions designed for employers, labor unions and non-profits. This year's fair will include workshops on: preparing women for the trades, the OJT Support Services Program, "Fit-for-Work," understanding employment law, benefits of business certification, and "He Said-She Said, Divorce 101."

The evening social will feature live entertainment, an art display hosted by the Women of Iron, a "Rosie" roundtable and the awards ceremony.

For more information, check out www.wawomenintrades.org. Exhibitors and others who wish to participate may now register online at that site (click on the "To Exhibit" button). Space is limited and will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis.

TUESDAY, MARCH 4
Get involved in next week's "Cover the Uninsured" activities

During an especially contentious legislative session in which business and labor interests increasingly find themselves at odds over workplace standards and regulations, why are those sides uniting in a common cause next week? There's more than 41 million reasons.

That's how many Americans lack health insurance. Most of them are working; eight out of 10 have at least one family member with a job. But skyrocketing health care costs are making health insurance harder for working families and their employers to afford. That means almost 11 percent of us in Washington state -- up from 8.4 percent just two years ago -- are gambling we won’t get sick or hurt. (See today's Seattle P-I op-ed on the subject written jointly by Washington State Labor Council President Rick Bender and Association of Washington Business President Don Brunell.)

Union members and other concerned community members are encouraged to join in the discussion of this crisis and possible solutions at a CityClub of Seattle forum, "Employer-Paid Health Care: Triage, Diagnosis and Prognosis," from noon to 1:30 p.m. Thursday, March 13 at the Crowne Plaza Hotel.  President Bender will join a distinguished panel of business, labor and government leaders (see details below) in discussing the the problem, its causes and where we go from here. Registration begins at 11:30 a.m. and the luncheon starts at noon. Admission is $39 per person and $34 for members of WSLC-affiliated unions. Pay in advance by calling CityClub at (206) 682-7395.

The CityClub event is just one of several "Cover the Uninsured Week" activities, funded primarily by The Robert Wood Foundation, with the goal of focusing attention on the plight of the uninsured and initiating a public dialogue on the solutions. Next week's events are:

MONDAY, MARCH 10 -- Town Hall Meeting from 5 to 7 p.m. in Room 109 of the Harborview Medical Center's Research and Training Building, 325 9th Ave.  Enrique Cerna will kick off Cover the Uninsured Week with this discussion about the problems of an America that is increasingly without health insurance. A panel representing the diverse perspectives of the Cover the Uninsured Week coalition will discuss the problems, and possible solutions, of the uninsured. Audience members will also be able to question the panelists. In addition to coalition members and other experts who will be part of the discussion, elected officials from every level of state government will be present. Elected officials and health care leaders will be signing a proclamation committing to work to find a solution to this devastating problem.

TUESDAY, MARCH 11 -- Interfaith Breakfast from 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. at Olympia's Best Western Inn, 900 Capitol Way S. The breakfast is an opportunity for the interfaith community to highlight its role in providing services for those without health insurance. Hosted by the Washington Association of Churches. it will include representatives from many faiths, health care opinion leaders and elected officials.

Campus Event at the University of Washington from 4 to 5:30 p.m. in the Hogness Auditorium at the UW Medical School, 1959 NE Pacific St. KUOW host Steve Scher will moderate the forum that includes a panel discussion that goes beyond the plight of the uninsured to include the struggles of health care providers who are concerned about the current health care system.

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12 -- Enrollment Event at 10:30 a.m. at Swedish Medical Center, 747 Broadway in Seattle. Emergency room personnel and coalition representatives will announce the results of a national study of the effects of the uninsured on emergency rooms. The event will highlight what happens to people without insurance when they end up in the ER, and the consequences on them and the health care system. ER directors, local public health officials and community clinics will all be part of this message. Resources for those who are looking for health insurance will also be available.

THURSDAY, MARCH 13 -- Business-Labor CityClub forum from noon to 1:30 p.m. at downtown Seattle's Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1113 Sixth Ave. (6th and Seneca). Entitled “Employer-Paid Health Care: Triage, Diagnosis, Prognosis,” Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler will join representatives from business and labor to discuss the current and future condition of employer-paid health insurance. In addition to WSLC President Rick Bender, panelists will include State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler, DSHS Secretary Dennis Braddock, Regence BlueShield President Mary O. McWilliams, Dorothy Graham of Puget Sound Energy and Association of Washington Business, and will be moderated by James Whitfield, Director of the Washington Health Foundation.

The CityClub event is co-presented by the Washington State Labor Council, the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce, Health Policy Analysis Program - University of Washington, Washington Health Foundation, Washington Policy Center and WashTech/CWA Local 37083, AFL-CIO.

Please make plans to attend one or more of these important events. For more information, check out CoverTheUninsuredWeek.org.

TUESDAY, MARCH 4
Trumka, Sweeney (not him) argue about labor's Iraq position

AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka appeared as a guest on Chris Matthews' MSNBC program "Hardball" last Friday to discuss the resolution passed by the AFL-CIO regarding impending war in Iraq. Apparently, the program's producers thought it would be funny if the other guest they invited to argue with Trumka was named John Sweeney, so they chose the New York Republican congressman of that name, who attempts to "speak for labor" on the issue.

Here is a transcript of the segment:

       MATTHEWS: Amidst a growing rift between the White House and labor unions, the nation’s largest labor federation has declared its opposition to war on Iraq.
       Yesterday the AFL-CIO’s executive council argued that, quote, “the threat posed by Saddam Hussein deserves multilateral resolve, not unilateral action. The president has not fulfilled his responsibility to make a compelling and coherent explanation to the American people and the world about the need for military action against Iraq at this time.”
       Richard Trumka is secretary treasurer of the AFL-CIO. And U.S. Congressman John Sweeney of New York is a Republican member of Congress.
       Let’s go first, hi, John. Thanks for joining us. You’re not that other John Sweeney, are you? The head of the AFL-CIO?
       REP. JOHN SWEENEY (R-NY): No, I’m not. Good to see you again, Chris.
       MATTHEWS: I just want to make sure we don’t have the wrong guy here.
       SWEENEY: I’m a child of the American labor movement, as you remember.
       My dad was an AFL...
       MATTHEWS: I know you’re a man of the rank and file. Let’s go to this issue of the war.
       And I want to know why you can speak for labor effectively tonight and say that the average working man and woman in this country thinks this war should not be done the way the president’s doing it.
       SWEENEY: Well, I think that the poll numbers that you recited earlier show it still. I agree with your prior guests on why there is slippage in terms of the support.
       But I think substantially, middle America, the working American family, understands the threat that’s presented to this country, especially after September 11, 2001.
       And more particularly, I think, the rank and file men and women who represent organized labor, both the AFL-CIO and other affiliated unions, recognize that we have to protect America first.
       And one of the preeminent threats today is Saddam Hussein and his capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and proliferate those weapons. And the threat that they would present if they were to get into the hands of terrorists groups like al Qaeda, Hamas, et cetera.
       We gave this debate now for months. And I think that underneath it all, there is a substantial majority of feeling among that real grassroots, down the neighborhood people in support of that.
       MATTHEWS: Yes. You say labor is for the war. What do you say, Richard?
       RICHARD TRUMKA, AFL-CIO SECRETARY-TREASURER: Our members really do understand the risk that Saddam Hussein places on the world and on America.
       However, they don’t think that we should go it alone. They think in a back drop of a global war on terrorism, that us going it alone weakens not only our ability to take on Saddam Hussein, but also weakens our ability to take on global terrorism.
       Now, we probably have more members and family members on the front lines there than any other group that you’ll talk to.
       MATTHEWS: You’ve got the first responders, firemen, policemen.
       TRUMKA: Not just that. I’m talking about actually on the ground in Iraq right now. People that have been called up. Seven to 8,000 union firefighters who are in the reserves have been called up.
       They want to do a couple of things. They want to make sure that this coalition is united. They want to make sure that...
       MATTHEWS: How do you know, Richard-bottom line is for both of you, gentlemen, you’re both speaking for labor. You in a more official capacity, obviously. You’re one of the top three guys in labor. Top two guys, right.
       Let me ask you this. How do you know where the rank and file is?
       You’ve got 13 million members out there. Did you poll them?
       TRUMKA: Well, we did.
       MATTHEWS: When did you poll them? How did the numbers come out? How did they come out on the war?
       TRUMKA: I don’t remember the numbers. Here’s how it was.
       MATTHEWS: You’ve got to remember them in the sense of were they for or against the war?
       TRUMKA: The vast majority saying that we understand the risk but don’t do this alone because it is not good.
       We’ve had local unions that have sent in resolutions being against it, in fact, building trades unions, the same people that John was just talking about.
       MATTHEWS: The chapter in Philly did it recently, yes.
       TRUMKA: Yes, exactly. But we’ve also been to-John Sweeney, Rich Trumka, Linda Chavez-Thompson and all the members of our executive board have visited with literally millions, or thousands and thousands of our members through hundreds of local unions and central labor councils. We discuss it.
       The sentiment’s very, very, very strong to say it is not good to go it alone. We must put together a coalition that can win. That’s the best chance of not only fighting Saddam Hussein...
       MATTHEWS: I think maybe Congressman Sweeney is shy. Congressman Sweeney, look at the latest numbers, say basically most people would like to have the U.N. with us. If you don’t have the U.N., you don’t really get a majority.
       How come you say labor doesn’t have the same general view as the country does?
       SWEENEY: Well, let me make these distinctions. I think we all want the United Nations with us. I think I agree with Rich Trumka, I want to see the broadest coalition we can possibly have.
       But at some point in time, the president of the United States has to lead to protect America and the American citizenry. And I think that’s the argument I was first making, that at the core, most people get that. And I would suggest that most people in organized labor get that, as well.
       And then I want to make a distinction. I think that the executive council passing a resolution are well within their rights, well within their rights, and good for them, and it’s part of the American debate on this issue. It doesn’t necessarily represent what the rank and file thinks.
       I think the last election cycle showed that, I think on a lot of issues as related to law and order and war and peace and national defense, we have seen over time, in history, that there has been a great difference between what the rank and file and labor believe. And...
       MATTHEWS: Well, let’s test-Congressman, let’s test that question. When we come back, we’re going to talk about what the labor position on the war, the labor position on the president, will have to do with his reelection when it comes next year.

       (COMMERCIAL BREAK)
       MATTHEWS: We’re back, talking about organized labor and the war coming up with Iraq, with Richard Trumka and Congressman John Sweeney.
       A January fund raising letter sent out by House Republican leader Tom DeLay-he’s called the Hammer; here he is again-charged the labor unions are undermining the national interest. The letter which DeLay has since claimed was sent without his knowledge says, quote, “It is truly sickening that, at a time when we desperately need everyone in America to pull together, the big labor bosses are willing to harm freedom-loving workers, the war effort and the economy to acquire more power.”
       What do you think of that, Richard Trumka?
       TRUMKA: Well, everybody in labor found that very, very insulting, especially...
       MATTHEWS: It’s meant to be, I think.
       TRUMKA: He took on-He took on firefighters, the same people that lost 300 or 400 members...
       MATTHEWS: I get it.
       TRUMKA: ... in the rescue at 9/11 the same people that now have between 7,000 and 8,000 of their members that have been called up and are fighting over there. I mean, it was very, very, very insulting and demeaning.
       It’s a sad time in the country when you can’t have a debate and you can’t accuse somebody or disagree with someone without being accused of being unpatriotic.
       MATTHEWS: Congressman Sweeney, you say you don’t think big labor, the labor leaders themselves, speak for the rank and file.
       But when you run for reelection, don’t you go to the big labor leaders for the PAC money? You let them speak for the-You let them speak for the rank and file when the time comes.
       SWEENEY: Actually, Chris, I come back home and talk to the rank and file. And that’s where my support is.
       And you can talk members like Jack Widd (ph) or Frank Lobiondo (ph), and they’ll tell that you no matter what their voting record is, with big labor, in particular, they have to go back home and get the support of the local people in order to ensure the kind of support that we want to have from those working families, is there.
       Because frankly, there’s a sense that many of the D.C. leadership is an attachment of the DNC, and I think in some instances, and we’re seeing with this resolution and some other things, an attachment of some of the more liberal wings of the Democratic National Committee.
       And that has led many of us to have a loss of confidence in our ability to deal with that leadership.
       TRUMKA: You know, John, I think this is going to be a great debate. In a couple of years ago, you had a 56 percent voting record with us. Now you’re down 26 percent.
       When you get back home, and you talk to those rank and filers, you’re going to have to explain to them why you voted against us ¾ at the time. Why you think that the leaders...
       MATTHEWS: HARDBALL. Thank you Richard Trumka. Thank you Congressman John Sweeney. Thank you both.

MONDAY, MARCH 3
It passed last year, but now Senate GOP balking on drug bill

In an Associated Press story that appears in newspapers across the state today, Sen. Alex Deccio (R-Yakima) is quoted as saying HB 1214, the bill that would consolidate state prescription drug purchasing and save the state an estimated $10 million annually, lacks support in the Senate because the bulk-buying and preferred-drug list "split everybody apart." Adds the chairman of the Senate Health and Long-Term Care Committee, where HB 1214 now awaits action: "It can be addressed in another bill, another time."

The problem is, another bill was addressed at another time -- last year. That's when the same State Senate that Deccio now says is split on HB 1214 approved on a 27-20 vote SB 6348 to create a preferred drug list to buy in bulk and save money. Three Republicans, including Deccio himself, joined Democrats in voting "yes." 

Here's the roll call vote from last Feb. 18 (Republicans are listed in bold, former Senators are in italics):

Voting YES: Senators Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Hargrove, Haugen, Jacobsen, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Poulsen, Prentice, Rasmussen, Regala, Sheldon, B., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Winsley 
Voting NO: Senators Benton, Carlson, Finkbeiner, Hale, Hewitt, Honeyford, Horn, Johnson, Long, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Parlette, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, T., Stevens, West, Zarelli 
Absent: Senator Hochstatter -- Excused: Senator McCaslin

Last year's and this year's versions of the prescription drug bill are fundamentally the same. The significant changes made in HB 1214 were designed to address concerns about the state's oversight of the program, including establishing a public-private governing structure instead of an agency-controlled board. The other significant change is that the program will accept private plans and individual participants sooner, which means private businesses struggling with skyrocketing health care costs could sooner share in the savings.

In truth, the biggest difference between this year and last is purely political. The Republican Party picked up a single seat in the last election and now have 25-24 control of the State Senate, and therefore decide what is allowed to come to a vote. And early indications are that the new leaders of the State Senate are not willing to allow a vote on HB 1214, because they know it will pass.

The pharmaceutical industry, which aggressively opposes HB 1214, spent heavily to support the Republican Party in the 2004 elections.

Earlier in the session, there was reason for optimism because some news reports indicated the biotech industry may have softened its opposition to the plan and that certain individual pharmaceutical companies didn't have a problem with it. Plus early reports from Oregon, where a similar plan was enacted in 2001, showed the program was working exactly as intended -- saving money without restricting patient options or sacrificing quality.

The House moved quickly to pass HB 1214 on a strong bipartisan 64-33 vote on Feb. 7. But now it appears the drug company lobbyists may have known all along that their friends in control of the Senate agenda would prevent a vote from ever happening.

CALL TO ACTION: Call your State Senator on the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000 or e-mail your State Senator (be sure to CC: Sen. Deccio at deccio_al@leg.wa.gov and Senate Majority Leader Jim West at west_ja@leg.wa.gov) and tell them you support HB 1214 and that the people of Washington state want a fair vote on the bill.

For more background information, here are the Top 10 Reasons to Support HB 1214:  

1. WE CAN'T AFFORD TO WAIT ANY LONGER. The skyrocketing cost of prescription drugs has led many patients to lower their dosage or forgo medication all together, resulting in higher medical costs and more urgent health concerns in the long run. Dramatically rising drug prices are fueling overall health care inflation; drug costs are escalating at a rate more than twice as high as the cost of hospital care or physician/clinical services. Those rising health care costs are not only suppressing working families’ wages and costing our economy jobs, they also are a big factor in our state's current budget crisis.

2. DRUG COMPANIES ARE GOUGING THE UNINSURED. One in four Americans, and more than 1.2 million in Washington state, have no insurance covering prescription drugs. Those without prescription drug coverage pay a disproportionately high cost for their drugs—twice what the federal government pays, and 30-70% more than what Canadians and Mexicans pay for the same drugs.

3. THE DRUG INDUSTRY IS THE MOST PROFITABLE INDUSTRY IN THE WORLD. Fortune magazine ranked the pharmaceutical industry as the most profitable in the world on all three of its indexes: revenue, assets and equity. The drug industry’s median return on revenue was four times higher than the Fortune 500 – 18.5% compared to 4.4%.

4. DOCTORS AND PHARMACISTS SUPPORT HB 1214. Representatives of the Washington State Medical Association, the Washington State Pharmacists Association, nurses and other health care providers stand beside advocates for consumers, seniors, unions and the poor in support of HB 1214. Some previous efforts to curb prescription drug costs, such as the governor’s AWARDS program launched in 2000, were opposed by pharmacists and health care providers because they would negatively impact them. But health care providers understand HB 1214 will simplify the prescription process and save money, without sacrificing drug choice. That’s why they support them.

5. WHY SHOULDN'T OUR STATE NEGOTIATE ON THE FREE MARKET? The federal government, HMOs, insurance companies, large corporations and a growing number of other state governments are already able to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices, leaving Washington consumers out in the cold. In fact, some of the very biotech and pharmaceutical companies in Olympia opposing HB 1214 use the very same approach to save money on drug costs for their own employees!

And speaking of drug industry opposition, here’s the "Myths Dispelled" section of our Top 10 list:

6. THIS WILL NOT RESTRICT DRUG CHOICE OR FORCE USE OF "CHEAP" DRUGS. HB 1214 consolidates prescription drug purchasing for state health care programs by having an expert panel of pharmacists and health care providers develop a "preferred drug list" based on clinical data about the effectiveness of similar drugs. The preferred drugs would not be chosen merely because they are cheaper, they may even be more expensive than other drugs in their category. The savings result when they are purchased in bulk through negotiations with the drug companies. But most importantly, doctors would not be forced to prescribe the "preferred" drugs. To prescribe a drug not on the list, they would simply write "prescribe as written," or check a box labeled as such. Only in cases where the doctor did not have a preference between similar drugs would the preferred drug be chosen.

7. THIS WILL NOT HARM ETHNIC OR RACIAL MINORITIES. Advocates for some minority groups have expressed concerns that the "preferred" drugs may not be as effective for women or racial and ethnic minorities. Their concern is understandable given the fact that the drug industry tends to use white men for its clinical trials. But again, the bills allow doctors to prescribe non-preferred drugs by simply checking "dispense as written" on the prescription. There are legitimate issues involving race in health care, but they have nothing to do with HB 1214, and everything to do with drug industry research and development. And speaking of R&D…

8. THIS WILL NOT HARM DRUG RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT. The top 10 drug companies spent nearly three times more on marketing, public relations and administration than they did on research and development in 1999, according to their own annual reports to shareholders. And anybody with a TV knows the trend of mass marketing drugs is a relatively recent development. Does that ad money come out of R&D? And what about the money the industry spends to directly market drugs to doctors? According to a 2001 Scott-Levin audit, the prescription drug industry has 70,000 sales representatives covering 756,000 physicians, a ratio of one salesperson for every 10 doctors!

9. THIS WILL NOT COST JOBS IN OUR STATE.  Pharmaceutical and biotech industry lobbyists are telling state legislators that HB 1214 will cut into their bottom lines and discourage biotech investment, therefore reducing the number of jobs they can create. That is complete hogwash from an industry that can afford dozens of tassel-toed lobbyists in Olympia to fight HB 1214. (Last year, there were more than 40 registered drug industry lobbyists -- one lobbyist for every 3.8 state legislators!) What IS costing jobs in our state – and killing our state budget -- is health care inflation fueled by skyrocketing drug costs. Employers across the state are struggling to cover those health care costs and everyone who works for a living is sacrificing wage increases and paying more out of pocket because of it. For that reason, HB 1214 should be considered a job stimulus package.

10. LEGISLATORS PROMISED TO ACT.  It seemed that just about every state and federal candidate promised during their 2002 campaigns to do something to address the prescription drug crisis. Now is their opportunity to make good on that commitment. The State House of Representatives has already done so, passing HB 1214 by a 64-33 vote with strong bipartisan support. Now it's time for the State Senate to stand up to the drug companies and demonstrate that same commitment to the people and businesses of this state.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2003  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO