WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

 

UPDATED DAILY -- M-F by 9 a.m.

Links to press stories are functional at the date of posting.  In some cases, free registration is required at newspapers' sites.  Links sometimes "expire" when the source would like to begin charging for old news. WSLC Reports Today  links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative. The intention is to inform. The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content.



FRIDAY, April 8 -- Just the U.I. facts, Senators (WSLC Legislative Update)
— In today's Olympian -- Union faces key votes -- Editorial: The Legislature is poised to give state employees their first cost-of-living increase in four years. How ironic is it that the union that negotiated that pay raise is under fire -- facing decertification votes in multiple state agencies?
...plus -- Union pulls out of Health Care Authority -- WFSE says it would not survive decertification vote.
— In today's News Tribune -- Voters could decide on roads plan in fall 2006 -- Central Puget Sound voters might decide a $10.7 billion plan to raise taxes to fix roads in fall 2006 under the latest proposal.
— In today's Tri-City Herald -- Bechtel lays off 185 more workers, says more job cuts imminent
— In today's Seattle P-I --
Gorton's shabby role -- Editorial: How sadly shabby was the former senator's exploitation of the problems within the King County elections department for crass political gain.
Legislative news: — In today's Olympian -- GOP rolls out budget alternative -- No-new-taxes budget outline calls for mass layoffs of state employees, contracting out of state services and some other timeworn ideas (that have landed that party firmly in the minority).
— In today's Everett Herald -- "Anti-business" legislature chided by EFF's Williams -- "This is the most anti-business session of the Legislature that I've seen," says hyperbolic gubernatorial reject.
— Today from AP -- Senate passes bill for agency audits, grading
— In today's Spokesman-Review --
State budget cuts threaten INTEC job-training program
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Legislators want village to do more (column opposing paid family leave)
National news: — In today's NY Times -- Illinois victory caps effort to organize -- Capping one of the biggest unionizing efforts in the nation's history, the SEIU announced yesterday that 49,000 child care workers in Illinois would be members after workers voted overwhelmingly to join.
...plus -- States told not to steer beneficiaries to drug plans -- The Bush administration has told states they cannot steer Medicare beneficiaries to any specific prescription drug plan, even if state officials find that one or two insurance plans would provide the best deals for elderly people with low-incomes.
— Today from AP --
Poll: Bush, Congress approval slumping -- Bush's job approval rating at 44%, down five points from January. GOP-controlled Congress' job approval is on life support at a measly 37%.

— In today's Washington Post -- Behind Bush's slump -- Ignatious column: The public is uneasy with a president who seems to be playing for political advantage on Social Security with his promises about private accounts, rather than offering a plan for making the system solvent.
...plus --
As government cap on work visas rises, so does confusion 
— In today's SF Chronicle --
Gov. Schwarzenegger gives up on overhaul of public pensions
— And finally this newsflash from AP --
Attractive people get paid more than ugly ones



THURSDAY, April 7 -- Sweeney blasts Bush on Social Security: "Shame on you"
— In today's NY Times -- Shameless photo op -- Editorial:
Bush wants us to believe the Social Security trust fund is a joke. But if the trust fund is a joke, so is the full faith and credit of the United States.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Surrounded by IOUs -- Editorial: Is the president really advocating that the United States renege on all its debt instruments? Or only those debts involving Social Security?
Also today -- Webmaster blasts AWB for exploiting Kent layoffs: "Shame on you"
— In yesterday's Skagit Valley Herald -- Lennox closing Burlington plant -- About 70 will lose jobs when production moves to facility in Mexico.  One employee, for whom his Lennox job is the sole source of support for his wife and 8-month-old son, says, "When they told us, I asked them how much I would make if I moved to Mexico." (Look for another shameless AWB "business climate" press release.)
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Responsible employers protect workers -- Op-ed:
90% of Washington's large employers already provide health insurance for their workers -- it's the 10% who don't that pass on their costs to the rest of us. We can solve health care problems by working together, not by shirking our responsibilities. Almost all employees contribute to their health care costs. Allowing employers to opt out creates a race to the bottom that we cannot afford. This is a problem we can fix.
— In today's Wash. Post -- Wal-Mart denounces Maryland bill mandated health benefits -- Wal-Mart "will have to rethink its future growth in a state that is willing to pass such a bad business bill." (Bonus!)
— In today's News Tribune -- Alaska Airlines union offers deal to thwart outsourcing
Olympia news: — In today's Seattle P-I -- House Democrats' budget aids education
— Today from AP --
State Senate votes to allow Sunday liquor sales
— In today's Olympian --
Legislators say they're on track to adjourn early
...plus --
Senate holds off on gas-tax vote to work on a similar plan
— In
today's Oregonian -- Nickel and diming the wait staff -- Editorial on "tip credit:" Something's chintzy and embarrassing about chronic legislative efforts in Oregon to limit the wages of waiters and waitresses. It's as though a legislative paw periodically rifles through a collective tipping jar, picking out the biggest coins. Again and again, Oregonians are compelled to slap that paw away.
National news:
— In today's Washington Post  -- Bush's Social Security blitz has unprecedented cost
...plus --
Fix health care first -- Broder column:
Social Security trustees say the financing problem can be solved with a 1.9% tax increase, split evenly between employers and workers. The Congressional Budget Office, using slightly more optimistic economic projections, says the increase would have to be only 0.7%. By comparison, the rise in health care expenses has put a much greater dent in the pay packets of workers -- and threatens to continue to do so.

 


WEDNESDAY, April 6
— In today's Seattle Times -- United to close Kent call center; 400 jobs (IAM) will be lost -- Other call centers, including in India, will get the work as the bankrupt airline continues to lay off workers.
— Today from AP --
State must pay live-in care workers after DSHS hours cuts ruled illegal -- SEIU 775 calls the ruling "a big slap at DSHS for trying to use backdoor rules to slash care for clients."
— In today's News Tribune --
Washington gets average grade on health care report card -- State rates poorly in such areas as nursing home and in-home care, according to a massive new federal study.
...plus yesterday --
Longshore applicants narrowed to 1,800 -- More than 18,000 postcards poured in to fill between 400 and 500 Port of Tacoma positions over the next few months.
— In today's Spokesman-Review -- Sacred Heart layoffs fewer than expected -- Hospital says 155 took early retirement or voluntary separation packages, and up to 20 are now likely to be laid off.
Legislative news: — In the Seattle Times -- A state House foolishly powerful -- Editorial describing EHB 2255 as a "foolish about-face" on unemployment insurance and dismissing Boeing's support as being related to impending contract negotiations with the Machinists union. The editorial fails to mention that EHB 2255 sunsets in two years and is revenue-neutral, not costing businesses a cent.
— In today's Everett Herald --
$1.5 billion budgeted to build schools -- "This will be the most money in K-12 construction in state history," said Rep. Hans Dunshee (D-Snohomish).
— In today's Seattle Times --
Two Dems (Hargrove & Sheldon) help Senate GOP derail gay-rights bill -- Making it illegal to fire or evict someone for being gay could "put us on a slippery slope" to gay marriage, says GOP Floor Leader Sen. Luke Esser (R-Bellevue). That's one slippery slope of logic.
...plus yesterday --
House budget to look a lot like Senate's
— In the News Tribune -- Gas-tax backers count votes -- Senate may vote today on 15-cents increase.
— In today's King Co. Journal --
Transportation plan is pricey, but appropriate (editorial) -- Read: We do OK.
— In today's News Tribune -- Senate road plan is highway robbery (editorial) -- Read: We didn't do so well.
...plus --
Estate tax opponents enjoy public benefits but want free ride (Burbank column)
— In today's Salem S-J -- Oregon governor quashes proposed minimum wage freeze for tipped workers
— In today's Washington Post --
Maryland passes rules on Wal-Mart health insurance -- Legislation approved that would effectively require Wal-Mart to boost spending on health care.
More "
Great for America" news: — In today's NY Times -- Wal-Mart chief calls critics unrealistic -- After pointing to headlines on editorial pages that say "Wal-Mart's low prices come at too high a cost," CEO H. Lee Scott says, "I'd suggest a better headline, 'Wal-Mart is great for America'."
— In today's Olympian -- Area residents should be able to patronize Wal-Mart (op-ed)

New guy at L&I news: — In today's Olympian -- L&I gains new leader from Oregon -- Gary Weeks is  touted by Gregoire for his management and conflict-resolution skills. Director of AFSCME in Oregon: "I dealt with him over a number of years. He's honest but tough. I think he's a good manager."
— In today's Seattle Times --
Man known as bridge builder tapped for restive agency -- WSLC President
Rick Bender said he came away encouraged after a 45-minute meeting with Gary Weeks: "He wants to make sure we have strong communication, which is important."
— In today's Salem S-J --
State human-services director Gary Weeks moving north -- "At a time when there may not be a lot of respect for state workers and public service, Gary Weeks has shown an in-depth knowledge of the inner workings of human service delivery systems and a deep respect for the public sector," said the president of SEIU Local 503, Oregon's largest state employee union.
Boeing news: — In today's King Co. Journal -- Mulally: Boeing on upswing -- "I couldn't be more bullish about Boeing's future," says the prospective CEO.
After cutting more than 27,000 Puget Sound-area jobs between Fall 2001 and the middle of last year, Boeing has added 3,771 jobs in this state since June 2004 to bring its total number of workers in Washington to 56,534 as of March 3.
— Today from Bloomberg -- Boeing raises forecast, says it will top Airbus
— In the PS Business Journal --
Boeing Commercial delivers 70 plans in 1st quarter
— In yesterday's Seattle P-I --
Malaysian firm will install 737 winglets
Other national news: — In today's NY Times -- A side order of human rights -- Schlosser op-ed: Taco Bell's recent commitment to farm workers' rights should be an example to the rest of the industry.
...plus -- Bush renews focus on plan to revamp Social Security -- "There is no 'trust fund,' just I.O.U.'s," says our president, calling into question the U.S. government's commitment to the repaying its securities and bonds. These "I.O.U.s" are evidence that our president and Republican-controlled Congress treat Social Security as an extra tax (one that's capped for those with high incomes) to fund general government expenses, like corporate welfare and tax cuts targeted to the wealthy.
— Today from AP --
Workers' comp can be death wish -- Anti-U.S. insurgents mark recipients of benefits for execution. Says BIAW boss Tom McCabe: "That's not a bad idea for a ballot initiative."


TUESDAY, April 5 -- EHB 2255: Myth vs. Reality -- The House-approved Unemployment Insurance bill "stops the bleeding," but retains employer-sought reforms and savings. This fact sheet dispels some of the myths associated with the bill and the UI system.
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Forced allegiance -- Editorial: Making Washington a right-to-work state, along with 22 others, is right on and long overdue.


MONDAY, April 4 -- Are you a Hanford downwinder? Get the latest health information
— In Saturday's Seattle Times -- House bill raises jobless benefits that were cut in '03 overhaul
— Saturday from AP --
House passes unemployment insurance bill
— In Sunday's King County Journal --
Unemployment reforms gutted by House Dems (editorial)
— In today's Seattle P-I --
Legislature ready to reinstate the estate tax
— In today's Spokesman-Review --
Very few people will be affected by estate tax -- 199 out of every 200 people who die in Washington each year wouldn't leave enough cash behind to trigger the tax.
— Sunday from AP --
Dems tie taxes to education -- After a full decade of penny-pinching conservatism and anti-tax warfare by lawmakers and Tim Eyman-led voters, the Democrats are back in charge of Olympia and are cautiously re-entering the scary territory of boosting revenue.
Local news: — In Saturday's Tri-City Herald -- Bechtel announces plant layoffs -- 92 union craft workers, mostly pipefitters, notified they are being laid off at the Hanford vitrification plant under construction.
— In Saturday's Olympian --
Some state workers file to vote on bond with union
...plus today --
DSHS group doesn't have signatures needed to get vote on representation
...plus --
Manager cuts worry state employees -- Column: With 1,000 middle manager positions being cut, changes to the pension plans proposed, and proposals to decrease state contributions to non-represented employees' health benefits, is it any wonder state workers are feeling unsupported?
— In Saturday's Everett Herald --
Murray: Don't trust Airbus -- U.S. Sen. Patty Murray: Claims by Airbus that it will produce military refueling tankers in the United States are a sham. So are claims by the European Union that it will seriously negotiate its subsidies for new Airbus models.
— In today's Seattle Times -- "Doughnut" health insurance reigns in costs -- It's a new type of health plan that is becoming increasingly popular in this state, as companies look to claw back spiraling costs.
National news: — Sunday from Knight Ridder -- Bush campaign on Social Security failing -- At the halfway point in Bush's "60 cities in 60 days" tour to promote private investment accounts, he appears to be, at best, marginally closer to his goal than when he launched the public-relations effort.
— In today's Wash. Post --
Social Security a low priority -- Small business owners say top priority issues are health care reform, budget deficit reduction and tax reform. Only 15% say Social Security.
— In today's LA Times --
Wal-Mart woos reporters to fix its image -- Wal-Mart will play host to nearly 100 journalists this week for meetings with top executives and tours of its Bentonville, Ark., home office.
— In Sunday's NY Times -- Opponents of Wal-Mart to coordinate efforts --
In the next few months, critics including organized labor, environmentalists, community organizations, state lawmakers and academics will speak with one voice in print advertising, videos and books attacking the company.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Blacks failing to benefit from latest jobs rally -- Unlike the recoveries from the recessions of the early 1980s and 1990s, the prospects for black adults searching for work have been getting worse, not better, after three years of economic expansion.


Previous weeks' news: March 28-April 1 -- March 21-25 --  March 14-18

THURSDAY, APRIL 7
Sweeney blasts Bush on Social Security: "Shame on you"

The following statement was released Wednesday, April 6:

Statement by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney

On President Bush's Remarks Casting Doubt on Social Security Trust Fund

 

As part of his crusade to privatize the nation's oldest and most reliable guaranteed retirement income program, President Bush yesterday traveled to the Bureau of the Public Debt in Parkersburg, West Virginia, which houses the U.S. Treasury bonds in the Social Security Trust Fund.  Using a Treasury bond as a prop, the president called into question whether Americans should have any "trust" in this important "fund."

 

The president's trip was a campaign stunt -- and a cynical and irresponsible one at that. 

 

For decades workers have paid in more to Social Security than has been needed to pay benefits -- $67 billion more in 2004 alone -- in order to partially pre-fund future benefits by accumulating surplus assets in the form of U.S. Treasuries.  To suggest now that workers have been had and that there is no trust fund to pay the benefits they paid for is an extraordinary betrayal.  A default on the trust fund-held bonds would represent a $1.1 trillion transfer from low- and middle-income households to the richest 5 percent, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. 

 

Pension fund managers, workers saving for retirement through their 401(k)s and foreign investors and central banks must have been surprised to learn from President Bush that the trillions of dollars in U.S. Treasury securities they own are not "real assets."  This is an extraordinary suggestion by a president who has relied on bond investors to finance a package of big tax cuts for the wealthy and enormous amounts of added federal debt.

 

As Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan recently told Congress, the "U.S. Treasury issues" in the Social Security Trust Fund are "actually real savings" that are "the safest in the world."  Perhaps the Fed Chairman is wrong.  Or perhaps in the president's zeal to privatize Social Security, Mr. Bush is deliberately trying to convince the American people and lenders around the world they cannot trust the United States government to keep its promises. 

 

Moreover, the latest nonpartisan analysis of the president's privatization plan indicates how misleading his proposal is.  Today's report by the Congressional Research Service underscores the fact that privatization threatens Americans' retirement security and shows that Social Security benefits could disappear entirely for higher income earners.

 

Yesterday marked an unprecedented event in our nation's history.  No other American president in history has undertaken to cast doubt on the full faith and credit of the United States. 

 

Shame on you, Mr. President.

THURSDAY, APRIL 7
AWB
exploitation of Kent call-center layoffs is "shameful"

In a timely attempt to resuscitate the myth that Washington has a poor "business climate," the Association of Washington Business issued a news release Tuesday linking the closure of United Airlines' call center in Kent -- and the layoff of 400 workers represented by the International Association of Machinists -- with what the AWB calls "our state's cumulative high costs."

"It is difficult to fathom the shameless combination of cynicism and opportunism it takes to manipulate the misfortune of hundreds of Washington families just to create a talking point in Olympia," said D. Nolan Groves, webmaster for the Washington State Labor Council. "The suggestion that a bankrupt airline struggling with a litany of national factors the entire industry has faced since 9-11 has something to do with Washington's regulatory environment not only fails the straight-face test, it is downright shameful. Shame on you, AWB."

United announced Tuesday that it plans to close its reservations call center in Kent, a move affecting 400 local workers, and transfer that work to other call centers, including in India.  The closure comes as United, under bankruptcy protection since December 2002, is grappling with high fuel costs, low passenger revenue and competition from budget airlines, the airline told the Seattle Times.

But noting United's statement that cited "increased operational efficiencies derived from better utilization of company resources," the AWB claims that to be "code for struggling employers" who can't afford the high cost of business in Washington state.  The AWB goes on to cite yet another "study" from a think tank it created called the Washington Alliance for a Competitive Economy (WashACE), which claims our state has the 8th highest cost of conducting business in the country.

Groves said the AWB's exploitation of United call center closure is a small scale version of what the AWB, other lobbying groups and the state Republican Party succeeded in doing in 2001: Blaming the move of Boeing's headquarters to Chicago on our state business climate. Many people in this state still believe that is true, Groves said. (See the March 29 column by Seattle P-I business writer Bill Virgin for a refresher on why Boeing really moved its HQ.)

"This internal echo chamber that anti-government corporate lobbying groups have created to defame our state is untrue and incredibly counterproductive," said webmaster Groves.  "Plenty of independent studies by national business groups that don't have a vested interest in convincing state legislators otherwise, cite Washington as one of the very best states to do business," added webmaster Groves, amazingly embedding a link into his own speech.

In fact, the Yakima Herald-Republic reported just yesterday that Maytag, Inc. has chosen Washington over other West Coast locations to open a 200-employee customer-service call center in Yakima.  A company spokeswoman said they were looking for a place where they could operate "cost effectively" and that "Yakima presented a viable solution because it has the skilled work force and available contact center facilities."

And then there's Concannon Paper, Inc., a wholesale distributor of paper products, which recently announced it would move from its long-time location in Portland to Vancouver, Washington.  Why?  "Washington's tax structure is too good for a family-owned business like ours to pass up," said company president Mike Concannon.

"If the AWB is really interested in creating jobs, as opposed to shredding safety nets for unemployed and injured workers, it would be touting success stories like Concannon and promoting Washington state alongside our economic development councils," Groves said.  "Instead, they'll probably just write Mr. Concannon a letter and ask him to keep his big mouth shut."

TUESDAY, APRIL 5
EHB 2255: Myth vs. Reality
Unemployment Insurance Bill "Stops the Bleeding,"
But Retains Employer-Sought Reforms and Savings

Last week’s debate in the state House of Representatives revealed some myths and misconceptions about Washington’s Unemployment Insurance system and EHB 2255, the bill supported by organized labor and the Boeing Co. to revisit some of the changes made to the system in 2003.


MYTH:  The 2003 U.I. reforms were carefully considered, striking a delicate balance, and EHB 2255 would destroy that balance.

2ESB 6097 (the sweeping U.I. changes approved in 2003) was approved without a public hearing in the final hours of the second special session. It was dramatically different from a previous proposal -- that HAD been aired in public -- to cut 44,000 workers from eligibility. After public criticism about those eligibility cuts and their "profound implications for the economy and for the social safety net" (Seattle P-I, 4-4-03), business lobbyists and certain legislative leaders negotiated the final version of SB 6097 behind closed doors, replacing those eligibility cuts with four-quarter averaging at the last minute.

The "debate" on 2ESB 6097 was covered on TVW at 3:45 a.m., literally in the middle of the night. The Puget Sound Business Journal lamented: "For everyone’s sake, this kind of political theater should be scheduled during prime time, and during the regular session. The ratings would be better, and the outcome more carefully considered." (PSBJ, 6-13-03).

REALITY: The 2003 reforms were not negotiated in public, they were thrown together at the last minute without a public hearing.
Given the testimony that legislators have heard about the dramatic negative impact of those 2003 benefit cuts, now is the time to stop the bleeding and assess whether those cuts were necessary and fair to unemployed workers.


MYTH:  EHB 2255 "guts" the 2003 U.I. changes.

EHB 2255 makes two changes – on a temporary basis – regarding benefit cuts and leaves intact the majority of the changes incorporated in 2003’s overhaul of the U.I. system.

EHB 2255 restores the "liberal construction" language (which means that in "gray area" cases involving unique circumstances, the worker gets the benefit of the doubt; 43 states retain "liberal construction" in their UI laws), and restores the pre-2003 two-quarter averaging formula for calculating benefits (only 7 states use the most punitive four-quarter formula now in place).

These two changes are revenue neutral and won’t impact the U.I. Trust Fund. They are financed by one-time federal dollars available to the state and an across-the-board 4% U.I. benefit cut. Benefits are merely reallocated to assist the workers disproportionately harmed by 2003 benefit cuts.

EHB 2255 sunsets in two years, during which time a Task Force will study and recommend a permanent solution that’s fair to employers and workers.

Here are just some of the elements of 2003’s changes that EHB 2255 leaves in place:

  • Cutting the maximum potential benefit weeks from 30 to 26.

  • Cutting the maximum benefits from 70% of the state’s average annual wage to 63%.

  • Imposing one of the most severe misconduct statutes in the country, which employers can use to deny benefits to workers that they fire.

  • Eliminating the L&I director’s discretion in determining "good cause" voluntary quits and severely reduced what constitutes "good cause." The Association of Washington Business estimates that the eligibility restrictions enacted in 2003 will save the system $65 million in benefits. (AWB press release, 3-30-05)

  • Creating a new employer-backed tax structure designed to address U.I. tax equity issues.

  • Lowering average trust fund reserves from the national recommendation of 12 months to 8 months.

REALITY:  EHB 2255 is a minor adjustment that merely "stops the bleeding" from unintentionally severe benefit cuts, and won’t cost employers anything.  Employers will still save hundreds of millions of dollars on their U.I. taxes from the benefit cuts that remain in place.


MYTH: Our U.I. system is being used by "seasonal" workers as a lifestyle, as opposed to an emergency safety net. 

Rep. Cary Condotta (R-East Wenatchee) said the "snowboard effect" is a prevalent problem, where people work in the summers and take winters off snowboarding while collecting UI benefits.  This offensive suggestion perpetuates a myth that the UI system is being exploited by workers who deliberately avoid jobs that run 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year.

The Department of Employment Security has studied this very issue to determine its veracity. The department tracked valid claimants over a six-year period, 1996 through 2001, to determine the rate of repeat claimants. The study found that two out of three claimants who received UI during that period did so only once.

REALITY:  Fully 86.6% of claimants had just one or two successful claims during a 6-year period. Only 1.4% managed to make successful claims in six straight years. Whether steps should be taken to discourage or prohibit this tiny minority from repeat claims is exactly the kind of issue the Task Force established by EHB 2255 will consider. But it clearly should not be motivation for cutting construction, agricultural and other cyclical workers’ benefits by hundreds of dollars per week.


For more information, visit www.wslc.org/legis/unempins.htm.

MONDAY, APRIL 4
Are you a Hanford downwinder? Get latest health information

The following information is provided by the Hanford Community Health Project (HCHP):

Did you grow up near the Hanford Nuclear Reservation? If so, there is an important new health resource for you to learn more about potential exposure to radiation (radioactive iodine 131) released from Hanford.

Between 1944 and 1972 radioactive iodine (I-131) was released from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The majority of these releases occurred between 1944 and 1951. The releases were related to the production of plutonium for use in nuclear weapons.

It’s estimated that children who were up to five years old and lived in Adams, Benton or Franklin counties in Washington state at the time of the releases, received the highest doses of I-131. Today, these are adults between the ages of 54 and 65. Much of this exposure came through consumption of contaminated milk produced by cows (and goats) grazing on contaminated pastures downwind of Hanford.

Public health researchers have conducted extensive epidemiological research around the releases of I-131 at Hanford and any potential link to thyroid disease.  The Hanford Thyroid Disease Study, published in June 2002, did not show any association between Hanford’s I-131 releases and the occurrence of thyroid disease.

Other epidemiological studies, including investigations at Chernobyl and the Marshall Islands, have shown that exposure to radioactive iodine is associated with an increased risk of developing thyroid cancer and other thyroid related diseases.

Despite the findings of the Hanford Thyroid Disease Study, downwinders remain concerned about the releases, and there is a demonstrated need in the community for more educational resources. To address this need HCHP has developed new resources for people concerned about exposure.

What should concerned individuals do?  

  • Visit www.hanfordhealth.info.  The site has important educational resources about exposure to I-131 including:

-- A self-assessment tool – A quick, easy-to-use guide to help you learn if you were exposed

-- HCHP mailing list sign-up form – Sign up to get HCHP materials and periodic project updates

-- A variety of educational materials about the releases from Hanford so you can work with your physician to make more informed health care choices

  • Call the HCHP information line toll-free at 1-800-207-3996 to request materials and join the project mailing list  

  • Tell your friends and family who are Hanford downwinders about the HCHP Web site. You can download an electronic message to send them at www.hanfordhealth.info.

About the Hanford Community Health Project

The Hanford Community Health Project (HCHP) is an outreach and education initiative sponsored by ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). The project provides educational resources to individuals, and their health care providers, who were exposed as young children to radioactive iodine (I-131) released from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in south central Washington state. The focus is on releases of I-131 that took place between 1944 and 1951.The project's goal is to assist concerned individuals and their health care providers in making informed health care choices concerning these exposures. For more information visit www.hanfordhealth.info.

  

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2005   Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO