WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

 

UPDATED DAILY -- M-F by 9 a.m.

Links to press stories are functional at the date of posting.  In some cases, free registration is required at newspapers' sites.  Links sometimes "expire" when the source would like to begin charging for old news. WSLC Reports Today  links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative. The intention is to inform. The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content.



FRIDAY, May 6 -- All WA Democrats in Congress co-sponsor Employee Free Choice Act
— In today's Seattle Times -- CAFTA falls far short of a consensus on trade -- Op-ed by Reps. Baird, Larsen and Smith, all of whom announced their opposition to the CAFTA this week. Learn more.

Local news --
WSLC urges support for construction of Black Rock Reservoir
— In today's Olympian -- Democrats: Early raise is reward -- Top Democratic budget writers say a two-month delay in pay raises for nonunion state employees was as much a reward for the efforts of state employees in unions as it was a cost-saving measure.
— In today's Seattle Times --
The heavy burden for Republicans -- Editorial: Judge John Bridges must be careful before allowing a dry statistical formula to overturn Gov. Christine Gregoire's election. Invalidating an election surrounded by uncertainty should be done only if a new approach provides greater certainty. Proportional analysis raises as many questions as it answers. (Ditto.)
— In The Stranger --
Berendt backs ouster of faux Democratic Sen. Tim Sheldon -- Democratic Party Chairman Paul Berendt says he agrees with the complaint alleging that the state senator is violating a state law that prohibits holding two public offices. "This is a front-burner issue," says Berendt.
— In today's Seattle Times --
King Co. threatens Snohomish Co. over denial of crucial Brightwater permits
— In today's Tri-City Herald --
La Clinica's troubles not easily repaired (editorial)
— In today's News Tribune --
"Dump the Bosses" will recall Wobblies (preview of Saturday concert)
— In today's Bremerton Sun --
Bremerton School District must lay off 22 teachers
— In today's Spokesman-Review --
Mayor West sorry, but staying

Boeing news: — In the Everett Herald -- Murray to IAM: U.S. should appeal to WTO on Airbus subsidies
...plus --
Everett not among finalists for Airbus factory -- Four Southern cities chosen. Hold your press releases, business lobbying groups. The only way we would could have "competed," experts say, is if we were on the East Coast, closer to French factories. We're pretty sure that'd be cost-prohibitive.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- After political pressure from both sides, Polish airline chooses 787 over Airbus 
— In today's Seattle Times --
Northwest Airlines puts in order for 18 Boeing 787s, options for 50 more

Social Security news: — In the Yakima H-R -- Cut benefits? Why not eliminate the wage cap? (editorial)
— Today from AP -- Most not ready to forfeit Social Security benefits to help poor, poll finds

National news: — In today's NY Times -- States and employers duel over health care -- The relentless rise in health care costs is causing states and businesses to fight over whose job it is to insure workers. Nearly two dozen states, struggling with the growing burden of assisting people with jobs but no insurance, are looking to shift more of the financial burden onto the workers' employers.
...plus --
A serious drug problem -- Krugman column: The 2003 Medicare bill is an object lesson in how special interests hold America's health care system hostage.
— In today's Washington Post --
Hospital services performed overseas -- "Nighthawk" companies are taking advantage of time-zone differences and the latest technology by having radiologists read images from such far-flung places as Hawaii, India, Australia, Switzerland, Israel and Brazil.
...plus --
Half-measures -- Editorial: Given the absence of a meaningful, overarching federal immigration policy, it is perhaps not surprising that members of Congress have created a host of narrower, poorly conceived immigration policies to fill the vacuum.



THURSDAY, May 5 -- Reps. Baird, Larsen and Smith will oppose CAFTA
— In today's Seattle Times -- Three lawmakers balk at trade pact -- Their stand marks a significant shift for the Washington delegation, which has largely supported trade deals over the years.
— In today's News Tribune --
Smith opposes free-trade bill -- “This is not the first time we have expressed these concerns (about worker protections),” Smith said. “We have been met with deafening silence.”
— In today's NY Times --
Democrats reject CAFTA as lacking worker protections

Local news: — In today's Olympian -- WFSE membership, income to double -- Leaders of the largest union of state workers say they've weathered most of the backlash from opposition groups.
— In today's Seattle Times --
Performance audits are great; great performance takes money -- Op-ed by Chris Dugovich of AFSCME Council 2:
The only thing Tim Eyman's I-900 will do is create extra layers of bureaucracy -- and with it extra cost for cash-strapped local governments around the state. How ironic: a big government initiative from the man who makes a living railing against government.
— In today's Spokesman-Review --
Jim West tied to sex abuse in 1970s -- Spokane mayor and former GOP Senate Majority Leader accused of using office to lure young men.
— Today from AP --
Democrats now claim 544 felon voters cast ballots in 2004
— In today's Seattle Times -- CEO talks of Safeco's future, puts aside talk of politics -- "Flattered" Mike McGavick won't rule out U.S. Senate bid against Maria Cantwell in 2006.
— In today's Bellingham Herald --
LTI Inc. milk tank truck drivers (IBT 231) approve contract
— In today's Olympian --
11-year DSHS employee to lead Children's Administration

National news: — In today's NY Times -- U.S. warns AFL-CIO on Social Security protests -- The Bush administration is "very concerned" pension plans might be spending workers' money to "advocate a particular result in the current Social Security debate." At issue is the AFL-CIO effort to pressure Charles Schwab, Wachovia Corp. and other investment firms to end their support for privatization.
— In today's Washington Post --
Bush says he won't give up pushing Social Security privatization
— In today's Seattle Times --
Don't let politicians turn Social Security into welfare -- Harrop column: Man has invented no better way of sinking a government program than turning it into welfare. President Bush proposes just that for Social Security.



WEDNESDAY, May 4 -- Panel discussion of AFL-CIO reorganization this Saturday at UW
— In today's Washington Post -- AFL-CIO to cut 167 jobs, spend more on organizing
— Today at the Confined Space blog --
AFL-CIO kills Safety and Health Department

Local news: — In today's Olympian -- Dept. of Retirement Systems employees vote to decertify WPEA
...plus --
Pay raise strategy may backfire -- Delaying pay raises for state employees without union contracts might cost the state just as much as lawmakers expected to save by putting off the raises.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- KIRO radio employees dissatisfied with contract seek to oust AFTRA
...plus --
Groups sue to block tax-hike plan -- The Grange, Farm Bureau, NFIB, BIAW and EFF sue the state alleging Democrats misused the "emergency clause" that immediately enacted I-601 changes -- and rendered them referendum-proof. They want a repeal referendum on the fall 2005 ballot.
— In today's Seattle Times --
Fight legislative arrogance with 900-pound gorilla -- The Times gives free advertising space to initiative salesman Tim Eyman in this op-ed preview of next year's product line.
— In yesterday's P.S. Business Journal --
SPEEA, Boeing cut off talks in Wichita
— In yesterday's Walla Walla U-B --
It's time for NW states to protect gays from discrimination (editorial)
— In yesterday's News Tribune --
Arbitrator's decision sinks Alaska pilots' spirits; pay will be cut 26%
— In today's King County Journal --
Kirkland Police Guild votes down contract proposal
— In today's News Tribune --
Don't look to Wal-Mart for health-coverage answers -- Burbank column: Wal-Mart has figured out how to outsource its benefits (at no cost) to other employers (through those employers’ dependent coverage), the government and the taxpayer. As Brown and Cole CEO Craig Cole says, this situation makes “good employers feel like chumps for paying for the health care of their workers’ families, for the health care of their competitors’ families, for uncompensated care and for the state’s caseload.”

Social Security news: — From Gannett -- Bush gets worst rating yet in Social Security poll -- Most Americans expect eventual benefit cuts, but only 35% approve of Bush's handling of the issue.
— In today's NY Times --
Seeking support, Bush offers assurances on cuts -- He takes his campaign back on the road, seeking to reassure workers about his new call to cut Social Security benefits.
— In today's Seattle Times --
Stacking the deck on Social Security -- Dionne column: Opponents of Bush's cut-and-privatize project -- they include not only Democrats but also skeptical Republicans -- do have a responsibility. Their task is to subject half-baked concepts to the criticism they deserve and insist that they be fully baked before serious discussions can begin.

National news:
— In today's Tri-City Herald -- Latinos left behind in U.S. economic growth
— In today's NY Times --
Unite Here sues CWA in war over who can organize California's tribal casinos
...plus --
Can't Wal-Mart, a retail behemoth, pay more? -- With most of its workers earning less than $19,000 a year, a number of community groups and lawmakers have teamed up with labor unions in mounting a campaign aimed at prodding Wal-Mart into paying its 1.3 million employees more.
— In today's SF Chronicle --
Hotel workers arrested in march to increase pressure for new contract
— In today's LA Times --
Flight attendant loses secondhand smoke case
— Today from -- Poll: Most Americans say Iraq war not worth it -- In new poll, 41% say it was worth it, down from 48% in February. In April 2003, shortly after the war began, 73% thought it worth it.




MONDAY, May 2 -- Felons for Rossi: Why Dino's do-over lawsuit is destined for dismissal
— In Sunday's Seattle Times -- Calculating illegal votes' impact could be key to election lawsuit
— Sunday from AP --
Dems say felon voters missed outside King Co., accuse GOP of "cherry-picking"
— In today's King County Journal --
An interview with Rossi -- On the '05 session: "The state employees' union put millions of dollars into (Gregoire's) campaign. So they raised everybody's taxes so they could give raises to state employees... I wouldn't have gutted unemployment insurance reform.

Local news:
— In today's Tri-City Herald -- La Clinica remedies pains --
One of the two labor unionizing efforts last summer at La Clinica was successful. OPEIU Local 8, representing the nonmedical staff, was certified last week and the interim CEO promised to recognize, respect and work with the union. The other unionizing effort by USNU (UFCW) Local 141, for doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners and physician assistants, is on appeal awaiting certification from the National Labor Relations Board.
— In today's News Tribune --
Legislature loads up governor's to-do box -- Gov. Christine Gregoire has signed or vetoed 226 bills sent to her by the Legislature – and she isn’t even halfway done.
— In the Everett Herald --
Legislative decisions irk local Chamber -- Business group vows to get political.
— In today's P.S. Business Journal -- Bell now tolls for transportation -- Editorial: The portion of the Legislature's $8.5 billion transportation package that relates to mega-projects in the central Puget Sound area is designed to spur local governments to get their acts together on funding their share.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Private ferry operators hope to land Southworth
— In today's Seattle Times -- Arbitrator orders pay cut for Alaska Airlines pilots (IBT)
— In today's Oregonian -- Hospital near Vancouver sorts 15,000 applications for 550 jobs
...plus --
Wage rules could tangle public-private development -- Oregon labor officials have recently threatened to require Oregon cities to pay a legally set "prevailing wage" for construction work done through public-private partnerships.

National news: — In today's Wash. Post -- 4 unions want members off AFL-CIO's lists -- Four dissident union presidents (SEIU, Teamsters, Laborers and Unite Here) have demanded that their members' names be removed from the AFL-CIO's master list, accounting for about one third of all names.
— In today's NY Times --
With little fanfare, a new effort to prosecute unsafe employers
...plus on Sunday --
A new spin on Social Security -- President Bush has chosen to recast the 70-year-old retirement program as one that would keep the lowest-income workers out of poverty but become increasingly irrelevant to the middle class and the affluent.
...plus --
A gut punch to the middle -- Krugman: The attempt to turn Social Security into a program for the poor is not driven by budget cuts but ideology: Bush comes to bury Social Security, not save it.
— At BusinessWeek Online -- Bush's reluctant business allies -- Corporate lobbyists are being told to back the Social Security crusade -- or else.
— In the USA Today --
Bush's Social Security gamble put pressure on Democrats (editorial)
— Today from Cox News Service --
Wage earners feel the squeeze --
Pity the paycheck earner. The April employment report likely will show that hourly wage earners are still losing the battle against inflation.
— Today from Bloomberg --
Wal-Mart store closing chills union drive in 25 Canada outlets
— In today's LA Times --
Shipping out U.S. jobs -- to a ship -- SeaCode Inc. wants to house 600 foreign software engineers on a ship moored three miles off California's coast to circumvent local labor rules.




Previous weeks' news:
April 25-29 -- April 18-22 -- April 11-15

FRIDAY, MAY 6, 2005
All WA Democrats co-sponsor Employee Free Choice Act

Despite a Bush administration and Republican-controlled Congress that opposes American workers' right to form unions free from harassment and intimidation, Democrats are pushing hard to support legislation that would remove unfair obstacles employers routinely use to thwart workers’ freedom to organize unions. And Washington state's entire delegation of congressional Democrats are co-sponsoring this legislation: the Employee Free Choice Act.

Introduced in Congress April 19, the EFCA would reform the nation’s basic labor laws by requiring employers to recognize the union after a majority of workers sign cards authorizing union representation. It also would provide mediation and arbitration for first-contract disputes and establish stronger penalties for violation of the rights of workers seeking to form unions or negotiate first contracts.

"The right to organize is a fundamental right of workers in this country," said U.S. Rep. Adam Smith (D-9th).  "It was the stepping stone to other such basic rights as overtime pay, benefits, livable wages, safe working conditions, and the 40-hour work week. Since the 1930s however, the system has been grossly diluted and manipulated in favor of the employer. The Employee Free Choice Act provides much needed reforms to the flawed labor law that currently regulates organized labor and binds the National Labor Relations Board to an unprecedented and long overdue commitment to the rights of employees and union organizers. I look forward to working with my colleagues to push this valuable legislation through Congress."

In addition to Rep. Smith, among the 155 co-sponsors of H.R. 1696 (EFCA) in the U.S. House of Representatives are U.S. Reps. Brian Baird (D-3rd), Norm Dicks (D-6th), Jay Inslee (D-1st), Rick Larsen (D-2nd) and Jim McDermott (D-7th). In addition, both U.S. Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Patty Murray (D-WA) are among the 35 co-sponsors of the Senate version, S. 842.

57 million U.S. workers would join a union if they could

Some 57 million U.S. workers say they would join a union if they could, based on research by Peter D. Hart Research Associates. But when workers try to gain a voice on the job by forming a union, employers routinely respond with intimidation, harassment and retaliation.

 

During union election campaigns, management routinely coerces employees to convince them not to choose union representation. According to a survey of NLRB election campaigns in 1998 and 1999 by Cornell University scholar Kate Bronfenbrenner, private-sector employers illegally fire employees for union activity in at least 25 percent of all efforts to join a union.

 

Employees not fired fear losing their jobs if they support union representation. According to the Bronfenbrenner survey, management forces employees to attend group anti-union presentations in 92 percent of all union campaigns. Brent Garren, senior associate counsel for UNITE HERE, told a House subcommittee this past September that 79 percent of workers agreed workers are “very” or “somewhat” likely to be fired for trying to form a union.

 

“These employers are literally robbing working people and their communities of better lives,” AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney said at the press conference. “At a time in our nation when the middle class is shrinking, when the gap between the rich and poor is growing, workers deserve the right to form a union to win a real voice on the job through collective bargaining.”

 

The Employee Free Choice Act was introduced last year and gained 210 co-sponsors in the House and more than 30 in the Senate, but the Republican leadership refused to allow it to go to the floor for a vote.

 

Learn more 

FRIDAY, MAY 6, 2005
WSLC urges support for construction of Black Rock Reservoir

The Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO supports the proposed construction of the Black Rock Reservoir east of Yakima. The following letter was sent last week by WSLC President Rick Bender to Washington's congressional delegation:

Dear ___________:

On behalf of the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, and its over 430,000 affiliated members, I am writing to let you know how strongly we support the Black Rock Reservoir. Construction of Black Rock will provide important construction employment opportunities as activities at Hanford scale down and the Tri-cities works to reposition itself.

More importantly, Black Rock has the potential to serve as the foundation for job and economic growth throughout all of Central Washington for many decades to come. Black Rock will be an asset for all of us. It will ensure that irrigators have enough water to grow high quality, high value crops, even in drought years like this one.

Agriculture is the biggest job sector in Central Washington. It is the engine that drives the regional economy. But it is beginning to run dry. This year’s drought is expected to cost $1 billion. It will be the third $1 billion drought to hit Central Washington in twelve years. And by 2040, this year’s drought condition is expected to be the norm.

In addition to providing enough water to ensure a healthy agriculture sector, Black Rock will provide needed water for business growth and municipal use. And, with close proximity to Yakima, the Tri-Cities and some of the best wineries in the world, it is expected to become a world-class destination for flat-water recreation activities.

Black Rock is ambitious, but thinking big is the only way to achieve a lasting solution. I urge you to support creation of the Black Rock Reservoir.

Sincerely,

Rick S. Bender
President

For more information, see "Black Rock to be discussed at free barbecue Saturday" , which appeared in Thursday's edition of the (Ellensburg) Daily Record.

THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2005
Reps. Baird, Larsen and Smith will oppose CAFTA

Where they stand

The positions of Washington's congressional delegation on CAFTA:

REPRESENTATIVES 
Inslee (D-1st) -- undecided
Larsen (D-2nd) --
OPPOSED
Baird (D-3rd) -- OPPOSED
Hastings (R-4th) -- SUPPORTS  
McMorris (R-5th) -- undecided
Dicks (D-6th) -- SUPPORTS
McDermott (D-7th) -- undecided
Reichert (R-8th) -- SUPPORTS
Smith (D-9th) -- OPPOSED

SENATORS
Murray (D-WA) -- undecided
Cantwell (D-WA) -- undecided

U.S. Reps. Brian Baird (D-3rd), Rick Larsen (D-2nd) and Adam Smith (D-9th) all formally announced their opposition to the Central American Free Trade Agreement on Wednesday, dealing a blow to Republican efforts to win approval of the labor-opposed expansion of NAFTA.

Rep. Smith's opposition was particularly noteworthy. He joined three other moderate Democrats who are considered crucial swing votes in the CAFTA vote in signing a letter to President Bush indicating they would oppose the CAFTA because of what they consider weak labor provisions. The letter cited the CAFTA's "inadequate protections for workers' rights, as well as your Administration's refusal to invest adequately in the American workforce and economy, we will oppose this agreement when it comes to the Floor of the House."

In a statement released Wednesday, Rep. Larsen expressed similar concerns: "Instead of supporting funding for programs that invest in U.S. workers and our ability to create internationally competitive products and technologies, this administration has slashed funding for research and development, science, technology, small business and education programs... This administration's active trade policy is dangerously coupled with a dormant economic competitiveness policy that is taking us backwards in our ability to compete."

Rep. Baird also released a statement explaining his opposition to the CAFTA: "American workers cannot compete against foreign workers who lack the right to organize, demand fair wages, and work in safe conditions. We must insist on strong, enforceable labor and environmental standards in trade negotiations. This is both a moral obligation and an economic necessity for American workers to successfully compete in the global economy."

In 2002, when the House passed on a 215-212 vote "fast track" legislation giving the president trade negotiating authority, Republicans picked up 25 Democrats -- including Reps. Larsen and Smith -- while losing 27 GOP colleagues. The CAFTA agreement is going to be a hard sell for Republicans from textile areas and particularly from areas that grow sugar beets or cane. The sugar industry strongly opposes the small increase in sugar imports from CAFTA countries under the agreement.

In 2003, Reps. Larsen and Smith also sided with the Bush Administration in supporting free trade agreements with Singapore and Chile, both of which were opposed by labor.

"I support free trade and have voted for past trade agreements because trade is an important spoke on the wheel of U.S. economic policy," said Rep. Larsen. "Unfortunately, the Bush Administration has ignored the rest of the economic policy wheel."

Learn more.

WEDNESDAY, MAY 4, 2005
"Will Restructuring the AFL-CIO Help Unions Rebuild Power?"
Panel of Washington state labor leaders to discuss the issue at UW
this Saturday

"The Labor Movement in Transition: Will Restructuring the AFL-CIO Help Workers and Unions Rebuild Power?" is a panel discussion and dialogue planned for Saturday, May 7 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. in Seattle at the University of Washington, Smith Hall, Room 102.

Rick Bender, President of the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, will introduce a discussion by a panel that includes:

  • Greg Devereux, Executive Director of the Washington Federation of State Employees, AFSCME Council 28
  • Emily Van Bronkhorst, Vice President of Service Employees International Union Local 1199NW
  • Jim Woodward, Sub-District Director of the United Steelworkers of America
  • Also invited are representatives from the Washington State Building and Construction Trades Council and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

A panel discussion is planned for 9 to 10:15 a.m., followed by break-out groups from 10:30 to 11:30 a.m., and then the panel reconvenes to answer questions from 11:45 a.m. to 1 p.m.

The event is presented by the Washington State Labor Council, the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies and the Labor Center at The Evergreen State College. Co-Sponsors include the King County Labor Council and the Pierce County Central Labor Councils.

MONDAY, MAY 2, 2005
Why Dino Rossi's do-over lawsuit is destined for dismissal

UPDATE: Since this was written and published, the judge in Wenatchee has ruled today that the Republicans will be allowed to argue for using their precinct-by-precinct mathematical formula to assume how felons voted. The ruling does not mean the judge will accept that premise in his final decision, merely that they will be able to present their case for him to do so.

Dino Rossi's quest for a do-over has a May 23 court date in Wenatchee, but today there will be an important hearing regarding the do-or-die assumption upon which his legal challenge of the election rests -- that felons who voted illegally last fall are just like you and me.

Surely, there are other major holes in the Rossi's case to overturn the election he lost. One of the biggies is that he contends the Republican Party's selective King County-focused search for voting problems was comprehensive enough to assume that all mistakes statewide are now accounted for, and therefore we can go ahead and "recount" what the vote should have been.  Clearly, his army of lawyers and business lobbying groups who have been combing election records since last December had no incentive to look for voting irregularities in Rossi-won counties.

In fact, Rossi's folks are trying to prohibit new lists of felons from Rossi-won counties to be entered into evidence by Democrats, who've conducted a much shorter investigation outside King County to hedge their bet on the felon issue. (In addition, King County-like problems ignored by the Rossi camp are turning up on their own, like last week's revelation self-reported by the Pierce County Auditor that some 164 unverified provisional ballots were counted in that Rossi-won county.)

But the biggest flaw in Dino Rossi's case is not just that they "cherry-picked" King County felon voters to try to prove they won, it's that they will ask the judge to assume these illegal voters voted exactly the same way their neighbors did.  If their precinct went 60-40 in favor of Gregoire, Rossi is asking the state to assume that 60% of the felons in that district voted for Gregoire and their votes should be rejected.

Rossi's camp has hired two university experts to testify that this is the only "fair" way to figure out who voted for whom is to assume they are just like us, because the unsavory alternative is to subpoena them all and ask them under oath how they voted. The Seattle Times reports that there's never been an election lawsuit in Washington state that used this sort of circumstantial evidence to apportion illegal votes.

Rossi's professorial hired guns will essentially argue that where people live is the most accurate determination of how they voted, more accurate than making assumptions based on their sex, their income level, their criminal backgrounds or anything else, including that maybe ex-cons live in neighborhoods much different than did before they were busted.  And using this assumption, sure enough, Rossi squeaks out a victory by their precinct-by-precinct count (as long as the judge doesn't allow those pesky Democrats to count any of those new felon voters that have turned up outside King County.)

It's easy to see why Rossi's attorneys wouldn't want his political fate determined by the testimony of a bunch of convicted felons or "dead voters," who apparently filled out the ballots of their recently deceased spouses or relatives.  But it's not just because their testimony would be suspect, but because the incidental evidence is already in on how some of these people voted, and they went for Rossi!

Here's every link we could find in our archives of such stories:

SoundPolitics.com (Jan. 5) -- Deceased voter found -- This story from Republican blogger Stefan Sharkansky -- a guy so bitter about the certified election result that he still can't refer to Christine Gregoire as Governor so he calls her "the former attorney general" -- was one of the first published accounts of a "dead voter." A recently deceased woman is credited with voting, and although no one admits to filling out her ballot, the woman's obituary says she was a "lifelong Republican" so let's count her as a vote for ROSSI.

Seattle P-I (Jan. 7) -- "I want you to vote for me," dying wife said -- The Seattle P-I picks up on the "dead voter" issue, identifying several individuals who King County says voted, although they were deceased before ballots were mailed. Only one widower admits to the P-I that he filled his wife's ballot, and he voted for Rossi.

Bremerton Sun (Jan. 27) -- Felon voting charge diluted -- Two felons that the Building Industry Association of Washington claims voted illegally are interviewed in this story. A former marijuana deliverer voted for ROSSI, and a forger says he voted a straight Democratic ticket with one exception, he voted for Rossi.

Everett Herald (Feb. 2) -- 18 felons in county voted illegally -- Just one felon in this story admits who he voted for: count another vote for ROSSI.

King County Journal (March 9) -- County goes after 99 felons who voted -- A former thief is the only felon interviewed who indicates how he voted, he voted for ROSSI.

Seattle Times (March 9) -- Voter list purge targets 99 -- One felon (meth) admits he voted for ROSSI.

We aren't going to suggest that every felon voted for Rossi. There must be news accounts of alleged illegal votes out there in which people say they voted for Gregoire (although, honestly, we haven't seen any). But Rossi's consistent backing by felons in the stories above beg the question, why would felons love Rossi? 

There are many possible answers, and collectively, they offer a litany of reasons why the judge in Wenatchee should not assume that one can "prove" how felons voted by simply looking at their address.

Democrats say the reason felons would vote for Rossi is because Gregoire was the chief law enforcement officer of the state, and for that reason criminals were predisposed to not like her. Others have suggested that felons prefer to vote for men, or that they liked Rossi because he campaigned as being anti-establishment or anti-government. 

Consider the following Letter to the Editor that appeared in the April 25 edition of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

Dear Editor:

I am a correctional officer at a major state correctional institution. I am a supporter of Gov. Christine Gregoire. Reading of the Republicans' assertion that statistics support the likelihood that felons voted for Gregoire, I have to raise a big red flag.

Based upon my observations of felons in prison, it is highly unlikely that most felons voted for Gregoire. It is more likely that felons would have voted for Dino Rossi.

During the long election contest, many inmates expressed their opinions to me. Inmates seemed attracted to Rossi because they would rather vote for a man and also because Rossi was promising to shake up state government.

The biggest reason felons are unlikely to have voted for Gregoire is her former occupation: state attorney general. Convicted felons do not support prosecuting attorneys. Many felons expressed concern that Gregoire might be too tough on them.

As one of my history teachers used to say, "Facts lie, and liars have facts." The statistical analysis of the Republicans is not valid, because there are too many other factors that affect the way felons vote. Criminals do not support attorneys general.

Greg Senderhauf
Forks

The bottom line: Will a judge decide to toss out the results of an election in which 3 million people in Washington state voted legally, despite the fact that the ballots' counting and results have already been subjected to considerable legal scrutiny and ultimately certified by a Republican Secretary of State?  

If he does so, it will be because he accepts the premise that we can assume how felons voted, and it was just like you and me. Allowing that assumption, would likely be one of the grounds for appeal by Democrats, should Rossi prevail in Wenatchee. Both sides how vowed to appeal the case to State Supreme Court anyway.

 


If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2005   Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO