WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column2000 Convention
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 WSLC Reports Today logoNEXT UPDATE -- Tuesday, June 4 by 9 a.m. Pacific

Links to commercial press stories are functional at the date of posting. In some cases, links "expire" when the source would like to begin charging you for old news. Disclaimer: WSLC Reports Today  links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive and some negative. The intention is to inform.  The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content.


Reports for May 28-June 1, 2002

Previous weeks' news: May 20-24 -- May 13-17 -- May 6-10

SATURDAY, June 1 -- WSLC affiliates endorse candidates, ballot measures

FRIDAY, May 31 -- Bender column: June is Voice@Work Month
...plus --
Voice@Work events include Harborview, Music Man, Seattle hotels and theaters
— In yesterday's Seattle P-I -- Union troubles follow "Music Man" to Seattle (you can join the trouble)
— In today's Spokesman-Review -- Eyman & Co. back on the offensive (just as offensive as ever)
— In yesterday's Daily World -- GHC teachers' suit over retaliation for union activity set for trial
— In today's Tri-City Herald -- Many could be asked to help pay state for social, health services
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Ridgefield's high-wage strategy has critics (those who must pay them)
— In today's Olympian -- Brewery workers optimistic after sale of Miller Brewing Co.
...plus -- Solve the health care crisis -- Editorial: (
Washington's congressional delegation) must increase the pressure on their House and Senate leaders and truly make this the top legislative priority for the coming year. It's past time for rhetoric. It's time for action.
— In today's Eastside Journal -- PDC right to appeal ruling on teachers, politics (editorial)
— In yesterday's Chronicle -- Memorial In Chehalis honors fallen DOT workers
— Today from UPI -- Declaring "No More Business As Usual," AFL-CIO calls for pension protection

THURSDAY, May 30 -- Campaign against our state's minimum wage has begun
— In today's News-Tribune -- Cantwell seeks probe of where Kaiser spent BPA income
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Alcoa workers glad to be back; two of three potlines are restarting
— In today's Olympian -- PDC to appeal ruling allowing teachers to talk politics at school
...plus -- Miller Brewing Co. sold for $5.6 billion; no plans to close Tumwater plant
— In today's Eastside Journal -- KVI's Carlson says he's against gas tax, but not leading fight
— In today's Everett Herald -- Hansen will resign as mayor to become Snohomish PUD's new GM
— In today's Seattle Times -- County task force considers selling some parks to save others
..plus -- Bitterness coats sweet Hershey; month-long strike is longest in company history
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Shortage of nurses hurts patient care, new study finds
...plus -- As Dynegy probed for Enron-like schemes, CEO gets $33 million more for being fired 
— In today's Washington Post -- Companies gain death benefit; buy life insurance for rank-and-filers
— In today's Chicago Sun-Times -- Clinton library dispute part of Dems' rift with labor (Novak column)
— In the new American Prospect -- Who gets to retire? --
The political battle over pensions will be fought over broad themes, beyond the often mind-numbing complexity of pension finance. To succeed, Democrats therefore must redefine the central issue: In this immensely rich nation, there is no reason why millions of Americans who spend their working lives waiting on tables, loading and unloading trucks, or glued to computer screens should have their retirements depend on whether they were lucky enough to outsmart the inside traders in the stock-market casino. If Ken Lay and George W. Bush can have a defined-benefit plan, why can't we all?

WEDNESDAY, May 29 -- New report: Labor Ready worker misclassification widespread
...plus -- "The Cradle Will Rock" in Olympia starting this Friday

— In the P.S. Business Journal -- AFL-CIO accuses Labor Ready of misclassifying workers
— In today's Seattle P-I -- UW pay freeze ignites union support among faculty
...plus -- Lucrative retirement packages mean truly golden years for CEOs
— In today's News-Tribune -- Murray, Democrats hope Medi-Fair Act will cure state's Medicare woes
— In today's Olympian -- PDC should appeal ruling on teachers, politics (editorial)
— In today's Seattle Times -- Split King County Council backs statewide transportation measure
...plus -- Not so fast on Sonic Cruiser outlook; some airline execs say its not fast enough
...plus -- A disheartening drop in minority contractors in the years since I-200 (editorial)
— In today's N.Y. Times -- The true purpose of welfare reform -- Op-ed: The main lesson of the 1996 welfare reform law is that having a job and earning a livable income are two different things. President Bush and his Congressional allies chose to ignore this fact and instead are going the get-tough route.
— In today's The Onion -- Congress threatens to leave D.C. unless new Capitol is built

TUESDAY, May 28 -- Speak out at hearings on proposed Medicaid co-pays, caps
— In today's News-Tribune -- No peace for new IAM District 751 chief Mark Blondin
...and on Sunday -- Group, led by talk-show host John Carlson, forms to fight hike in gas tax
— Speaking of Carlson, in today's Seattle Times -- Women, minorities lose business after I-200
...plus -- State's fiscal crisis puts UW in jeopardy (McCormick op-ed)
...and on Sunday -- The wage-canary and the price of asparagus (editorial re: minimum wage)
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Rising minimum wage may force Dayton's Green Giant to move
— In Saturday's Olympian -- DOT employees under scrutiny for gas-tax comments
— In today's So. County Journal -- Firefighter files suit against Renton
— In the Chronicle of High Education -- UW student research forms basis of labor journalism website
— In Saturday's Oregonian -- Public employee unions hold aces in PERS deal
— In today's Washington Post -- Unions settle with Las Vegas hotels, casinos
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Shortage of nurses spurs bidding war in hospital industry
...plus -- Paralysis in health care -- Editorial: A sober recognition has settled in Washington that little can be done to expand or improve health coverage while health care costs spiral out of control and the federal budget sinks deeper into deficit. Lawmakers seem to be betting that voters will not punish them for inaction. But they cannot put off the issue forever.
— In Sunday's Detroit News -- Hoffa breaks mold, backs pro-labor GOP candidates

Previous weeks' news: May 20-24 -- May 13-17 -- May 6-10

SATURDAY, JUNE 1
WSLC affiliates endorse candidates, ballot measures

Delegates representing the affiliated union organizations that comprise the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO conducted the 2002 WSLC Political Endorsement Convention on Saturday at the IAM District 751 Hall in South Seattle. A two-thirds majority of the delegates present was necessary for the endorsement of any candidate or ballot measure.

The following action was taken:
(No action was taken on congressional, judicial or state legislative races not listed here.)

CONGRESS

1-CD Jay Inslee
2-CD Rick Larsen
3-CD Brian Baird
6-CD Norm Dicks
7-CD Jim McDermott
9-CD Adam Smith

JUDICIAL

Appeals, Div. 3 Dist. 1 Pos. 2 — Kenneth Kato
Supreme Court, Position 3 — Michael Spearman
Supreme Court, Position 4 — Charles Johnson
Supreme Court, Position 7 — Bobbe Bridge

BALLOT MEASURES

— SUPPORT Referendum 51 re: statewide transportation funding

— OPPOSE SIGNATURE GATHERING on Ref. Measure 53 re: unemployment insurance reform, but if it qualifies for the ballot then to SUPPORT passage Ref. Measure 53

— OPPOSE Initiative 791 re: imposition new state spending limits

— SUPPORT Initiative 797 re: establishing pension management board for public employees

The WSLC Executive Board had taken action prior to Saturday to:
— OPPOSE Initiative 776 re: repeal of local-option transportation taxes
— OPPOSE Initiative 777 re: so-called "Right to Work"
— ENDORSE Initiative 790 re: pension governance for fire fighters and police officers

STATE LEGISLATIVE

District 1 
House-1 Al O'Brien
House-2 Jeanne Edwards

District 2
House-2 Tom Campbell

District 3
House-1 Alex Wood
House-2 Jeff Gombosky

District 6
House-2 Sheila Collins
Senate Laurie Dolan

District 10
House-2 Eron Berg

District 11
House-1 Zack Hudgins
House-2 Velma Veloria

District 17
House-2 Deb Wallace

District 18 
House-1 Bill Crego
House-2 Dave Seabrook

District 21
House-1 Mike Cooper
House-2 Brian Sullivan
Senate Paull Shin

District 22
House-1 Sandra Romero
House-2 Sam Hunt

District 23
House-1 Phil Rockefeller
House-2 Sherry Appleton

District 24
House-1 Bill Thomas

District 25
House-2 Dawn Morrell

District 26
House-1 Pat Lantz
House-2 Brock Jackley

District 27
House-2 Jeannie Darneille

District 28
House-1 Debi Srail
House-2 Tamra Hall

District 29
House-1 Steve Conway
House-2 Steve Kirby
Senate Rosa Franklin

District 30
House-1 Mark Miloscia
Senate Tracey Eide

District 31
Senate Yvonne Ward

District 32
House-1 Maralyn Chase
House-2 Ruth Kagi
Senate Darlene Fairley

District 33
House-1 Shay Schual-Berke
House-2 Dave Upthegrove
Senate Karen Keiser

District 34
House-1 Eileen Cody
House-2 Joe McDermott
Senate Erik Poulsen

District 35
House-1 Kathryn Haigh
House-2 Bill Eickmeyer

District 36 
House-2 Mary Lou Dickerson
Senate Jeanne Kohl-Welles

District 37
House-1 Sharon Tomiko-Santos
House-2 Eric Pettigrew
Senate Adam Kline

District 38
House-1 John McCoy
House-2 Jean Berkey
Senate Aaron Reardon

District 39
House-1 Carolyn Eslick

District 40
House-1 Dave Quall

District 41
House-2 Judy Clibborn

District 42
House-1 James Boyle
House-2 Kelli Linville
Senate Georgia Gardner

District 43
House-1 Ed Murray
House-2 Frank Chopp
Senate Pat Thibaudeau

District 44
House-1 Hans Dunshee
House-2 John Lovick

District 45
House-1 Dave Asher
House-2 Laura Ruderman

District 46
House-1 Jim McIntire
House-2 Phyllis Kenney
Senate Ken Jacobsen

District 47
House-1 Geoff Simpson
House-2 Patrick Sullivan
Senate Rebecca Clark and Deborah Jacobson (dual)

District 48
House-1 Ross Hunter
Senate Steve Van Luven

District 49
House-1 Bill Fromhold
House-2 Jim Moeller

Delegates to the WSLC 2002 Constitutional Convention -- to be held Aug. 19-22 in Spokane -- may choose to make further endorsement action.

FRIDAY, MAY 31
Voice@Work events at Harborview, Music Man, Seattle hotels

The King County Labor Council, AFL-CIO invites all union members and community supporters to participate in a month of action in Seattle to fight for the rights of workers to organize and bargain for fair contracts. The KCLC is working in partnership with Washington State Jobs With Justice, the Washington State Living Wage Campaign, community and religious leaders, and elected officials to conduct Street Heat actions to highlight workers' struggles to gain a voice at work. 

Here's the Street Heat calendar (For more information, contact the KCLC's Verlene Wilder at (206) 441-7102):

Harborview Medical Center (SEIU District 1199NW)
Main entrance, 325 9th Ave. between Jefferson and Alder.
Monday, June 3 from 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. and 4 to 5 p.m.
HMC staff will rally with community supporters to call on the administration to start working with them to negotiate a contract that will help us continue to provide good care at Harborview.

The Music Man (Musicians Local 76-493)
The Paramount Theater, downtown at 9th and Pine.
Tuesday, June 4 from 7 to 8 p.m.; Friday, June 7 from 7 to 8 p.m.; and Sunday, June 9 from 1 to 2 p.m.
Rallies and picketing to protest the non-union performances of The Music Man, which is on the national AFL-CIO Do Not Patronize list. Click here for more information.

Northwest Protective Services (SEIU Local 24/7, Security Guards)
Westin Hotel, 1900 5th Ave. downtown
Friday, June 7 at noon.
Join the Service Employees International Union's National Board in an action supporting union security guards.

Downtown hotel employers (HERE Local 8)
Seattle Labor Temple, 2800 1st Ave. in Hall 1
Wednesday, June 12 at noon.
Join workers from Seattle hotels for a "Walk with the Workers" to support fair contracts.

Cineplex Odeon Theaters (Stagehands & Projectionists Local 15, IATSE)
Meridian Theater, 7th and Pike downtown.
Friday, June 14 at 6:30 p.m.
Join projectionists as they fight for fair contracts in King County theaters.

THURSDAY, MAY 30
Campaign against our state's minimum wage has begun

In case you didn't notice, the public opinion campaign to begin dismantling Washington state's minimum wage as established by Initiative 688 four years ago has begun in earnest. Legislators and reporters were invited last week to tour a Dayton asparagus plant and hear the plant's owners threaten to move if our state can't be more "competitive" regarding its lowest legal wage. (See AP story.)

The state's business community rails against our $6.90 minimum hourly wage -- screaming, "It's the highest in the nation!" -- as if we should be ashamed rather than proud. But where Washington is leading, other states are following.

Rather than wait for the Republican-controlled Congress to raise the federal minimum wage, which at a shameful $5.15 an hour has been frozen for nearly five years and lost 10% of its buying power, the labor movement in states like Alaska are doing what we did: taking matters into the people's own hands.

After the Alaska AFL-CIO and allied groups collected enough signatures to put a similar measure on the ballot, the Alaska legislature this month voted to increase the state's minimum wage from $5.65 to $7.15, effective Jan. 1 and to have Alaska join Washington in indexing future increases to the consumer price index beginning Sept. 30, 2004.

Meanwhile, the Oregon AFL-CIO reports it is having no problem collecting signatures for a ballot measure to increase and index the minimum wage in that state also. Based on these successes out West, the labor movement in other states around the country are considering similar initiatives.

But back here in Washington where "business competitiveness" has become the accepted euphemism for promoting lower wages for the working families (or shifting more of the tax burden to them), when the agriculture industry launched it's public opinion campaign against the minimum wage last week, some in the commercial press bit.

Predictably, it was the Seattle Times that editorialized Monday that the two-thirds majority that voted for I-688 may have had good intentions, but didn't know what they were doing. It called on lawmakers to "consider the effect of a lost industry providing no jobs in the fields or in the processing plants," and begin making exemptions for certain industries to the minimum wage standard.

Whether the legislature will bite is another question. Some of last session's agriculture industry proposals on this issue certainly did.

SB 6304 would have allowed agriculture employers to count the wages of a farm worker against the minimum wage requirement for his or her spouse. In other words, spouses of farm workers would be non-employees that "help" with the work but don’t get paid, don’t get unemployment or workers’ comp coverage, don’t get anything but the satisfaction of knowing their spouses’ minimum wage paid for twice as much work. We're not making this up.

As legislative candidates ring your doorbell asking for your support, make sure you ask them where they stand on our state's lowest wage and whether they would support exempting certain workers from it.

Here what's Rick Bender, President of the Washington State Labor Council, had to say in a Letter the the Editor response to the Times editorial:

To the Editor:

 

Sadly, the Seattle Times continues its anti-worker editorial stance with its latest ill-considered endorsement of an asparagus industry exemption from our state’s minimum wage for workers cutting and canning the vegetable.  Some food for thought:  When has the Seattle Times EVER endorsed ANY minimum wage increase?  Indeed, when has the Seattle Times EVER endorsed ANY legislation or ballot measure that improves the lives of workers?  Search, but you won’t find one example. 

 

A minimum wage of $6.90 an hour is still a minimal income, hardly enough to pay rent and put food on the table for a full time worker, even in Eastern Washington. 

 

Asparagus producers have a problem because they are getting the same price per pound for processed asparagus that they were paid in 1996.  Costs for everything, including energy and equipment have gone up.  The problem will not be fixed until the growers and canners negotiate higher prices.  Perhaps what the asparagus producers really need is a union—often called a cooperative in rural areas—to provide a better bargaining position. 

 

Sincerely,

 

Rick Bender, President

Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO

 

P.S.     You referred to the situation in Dayton, Washington.  For your information, Dayton was my father’s hometown and I still have many relatives in the area.  I know Dayton much better than you do, and I know this:  Dayton’s workers deserve better than a minimum wage.

WEDNESDAY, MAY 29
New report: Labor Ready worker misclassification widespread

The following is a press release from the AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department regarding the Tacoma-based Labor Ready, Inc.:

WASHINGTON, DC -- The Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO, has provided a new report to state regulators containing evidence that Labor Ready Inc. has misclassified its workforce on a large scale in most states in the U.S. since at least 1994. The consequence, according to the report, is that Labor Ready may have:

  • Underpaid its insurance carriers and under-estimated its reserves to pay claims by at least $200 million.
  • Employed more construction workers (32%) than any other type of worker, yet classified less than 10% of their workforce as construction.
  • Classified nearly half of its workforce as "clerical", even though company records show that Labor Ready does not dispatch clerical workers. In several states, nearly 100% of Labor Ready's payroll was classified "clerical."
  • Underpaid more than $125 million in claims to injured workers.
  • Paid NO benefits in Arizona, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts and New York, even though the company had around $20 million in payroll and hundreds of potentially compensable injuries in those states.

In addition to statistical records, the report also cites court testimony submitted to the courts by Labor Ready employees.

Former Labor Ready worker Larry Richards worked as a construction laborer 126 times in West Virginia from March 1996 to December 2000. For workers' comp purposes, Labor Ready coded him as a maid, clerk, or clerical worker 27 times. For the remaining 99 jobs, Richards was coded "piano tuner/taxidermist." Not once was he coded as a construction worker. Workers’ comp insurance for construction workers is more than 10 times higher than the cost of a piano-tuner/taxidermist.

Building Trades President Edward C. Sullivan asked state regulators to use the report to launch new probes of Labor Ready's practices or expand probes that are currently under way, and to consider criminal prosecution against the company.  

For more information, contact Will Collette of the AFL-CIO Building Trades Department at (202) 756-4635.

WEDNESDAY, MAY 29
"The Cradle Will Rock" in Olympia starting this Friday

The Thurston-Lewis Counties Labor Council and the Washington Federation of State Employees Local 443 are sponsoring a South Puget Sound Community College Theater Arts Program production of "The Cradle Will Rock" starting Friday, May 31 at the Washington Center for the Performing Arts' Blackbox Theater at 512 Washington St. S.E. in Olympia.

This funny and provocative 1937 labor musical is the only Broadway musical ever shut down by the federal government. "Cradle" is a comic, passionate, morality tale about the citizens of Steeltown, USA, who are “owned” by the powerful steel magnate Mr. Mister; with the exception of a lone union organizer, Larry Foreman, who refuses to be bought. Blitzstein’s high energy, electric score features gospel, klezmer, vaudeville, patter, barbershop and more.

Tickets for adults are $15 and $12 for students and seniors.  The show will be at 8 p.m. on May 31, June 1, 6, 7 and 8; and at 2 p.m. on June 1, 2, 8 and 9.  A special pay-what-you-can performance is scheduled for Wednesday, June 5 at 8 p.m.

But there's one way you can get in for free, and that is taking part in the performance!

The play's final scene has a procession of actors portraying union members.  The show's producer and director would love to have real-life union members be part of this finale.  By participating you not only get in the show free, you also help put a real face on unions and show audience members that trade unionists are their neighbors and community members.  To participate, you must attend the final dress rehearsal tomorrow night (Thursday, May 30). Call the play's producer, Professor Don Welch, at the South Puget Sound Community College at (360) 754-7711 x5411 to get the exact time and location of the rehearsal.

TUESDAY, MAY 28
Speak out at hearings on proposed Medicaid co-pays, caps

The following is an Associated Press story:
The state Department of Social and Health Services has scheduled public meetings across the state to discuss the proposed changes to Medicaid, including co-payments and enrollment caps on some services. All the meetings will be held from 6 to 9 p.m. The following forums are scheduled:
  • Today (Tuesday), Tacoma, South Park Community Center, 4851 S. Tacoma Way.
  • Thursday, Bellingham, Garden Street Family Center, 1231 N. Garden St.
  • June 5, Port Angeles, Vern Burton Community Center, 308 E. Fourth St.
  • June 6, Seattle/Shoreline, Shoreline Community College, 16101 Greenwood Ave. N., Room 1102.
  • June 11, Tri-Cities, Columbia Basin Community College Workforce Training Center, 2600 N. 20th Ave. in Pasco, Building W.
  • June 12, Yakima, Epic Center, 2902 Castlevale Road, first-floor auditorium.
  • June 18, Vancouver, Educational Service District 112, 2500 N.E. 65th Ave.
  • June 20, Des Moines, Highline Community College, 2440 S. 240th St. and Pacific Highway South, Building Seven.

For more information on the upcoming meetings, or to comment on the Medicaid proposal, visit the Medicaid waiver web page.

OLYMPIA -- How much should poor people pay for health care?

That question lies at the heart of a state proposal to impose premiums, co-payments and enrollment caps on some Medicaid clients and services.

State officials say people need to take responsibility for at least part of their health care costs if Medicaid is going to survive. But some people -- including Washington's entire congressional delegation -- worry the plan would hurt children by making it harder for poor families to get health care.

Now it's your turn. The state Department of Social and Health Services is holding public meetings around the state at which people can learn about the proposed Medicaid changes and speak their mind.

Medicaid provides health care to 900,000 poor people in Washington. The $2 billion yearly cost, split by state and federal government, eats up about 10 percent of the state budget. During the last decade, Washington led the nation in expanding Medicaid to cover more people. Now one in three Washington children get their health care through Medicaid.

But as health care costs grow rapidly, the state is struggling to afford Medicaid.

That's why the state is asking the federal government for permission to charge some Medicaid patients co-pays and premiums, and to cap enrollment in some programs. State officials say the plan would allow them to avoid broader and more destructive cuts.

The eight Democrats and three Republicans in Washington's congressional delegation recently signed a letter opposing the Locke administration's proposal.

"As Washington state works to address its budget shortfall, we believe that the children who need quality care the most should not suffer," they wrote to Medicaid director Tom Scully.

State Medicaid Administrator Doug Porter defended the plan.

"I think children should get excellent health care," Porter said. If the feds approve his proposal, he said, "In my heart of hearts I believe we will be able to better protect the benefits we do have."

Porter hopes the public will give him a better sense of how much people on Medicaid could afford to pay.

"I think there is an affordable number," he said. But, "some people just don't like the idea of a premium."

Kathy Kvalheim, manager of the Sea Mar Community Clinic in Olympia, is one of those people. Sea Mar, a chain of clinics for low-income people and immigrants, serves thousands of Medicaid clients.

"The people that this would affect are the folks that don't have $3 or $5 or $10," Kvalheim said. "To them it might as well be a thousand dollars."

She said Sea Mar sells prescription drugs at cost to people without insurance. Often, Kvalheim said, the staff pitches in with a dollar or two to help people who can't afford $5 for antibiotics.

"It's just amazing, and it happens almost on a daily basis," she said. She said many of Sea Mar's patients are new to Medicaid, having recently lost their jobs and health insurance.

"These are people who have worked their whole life," Kvalheim said. "These are not people who sit around watching soap operas, waiting for people to take care of them."

State officials submitted an intentionally vague "Medicaid reform" plan last December, hoping the federal government would give them broad powers to tinker with Medicaid benefits. But the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare, the federal agency in charge of the program, kicked the proposal back to Washington state and asked for more specifics and more public comment.

In July, after the hearings, the state will resubmit a more specific plan. Here are some details of the proposal:

Co-payments: Clients who want more expensive, name-brand drugs would have to pay about $5 per prescription if there's an equivalent, less costly generic available. Also, clients who go to emergency rooms for non-emergencies would have to pay about $10.

Premiums: Some clients who make more than the federal poverty level ($18,100 for a family of four) would have to pay annual premiums. The state Department of Social and Health Services hasn't yet determined how much the premiums would be, but Porter said on average, they wouldn't cost more than 5 percent of a family's income. If a family of four made twice the poverty level, that would be $1,810.

Enrollment caps: The way it works now is that the Legislature budgets money for Medicaid according to forecasts of how many people will need services. During rough economic times, the need often surges above the forecasted number. So the state goes ahead and serves those people, then presents the Legislature with the bill after the fact. This proposal would trigger an enrollment freeze when enrollment exceeds the budgeted forecast. New applicants, except for the most needy, would have to wait until the Legislature lifts the freeze by supplying more money.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2002  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO