|
|
Links to press stories are functional at the date of posting. In some cases, free registration is required at newspapers' sites. Links sometimes "expire" when the source would like to begin charging for old news. WSLC Reports Today links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative. The intention is to inform. The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content. |
|
Previous weeks' news: June
2-4 -- May
24-27 -- May
17-21 FRIDAY,
June 11 -- Check
out the Coming Events
-- Justice for Janitors rally/leaflet; hearing on state agency
outsourcing; labor film screenings; "Let Justice Roll"
rally/worship; and much more. THURSDAY,
June 10 -- Be
a part of labor's historic June door-to-door mobilization WEDNESDAY,
June 9 --
Labor
disappointed with breakdown in workers' comp talks TUESDAY,
June 8 -- More
governors rescind free-trade procurement letter; will Locke? MONDAY,
June 7 --
Bender urges against
AWB hijacking of federal UI money Previous weeks' news: June
2-4 -- May
24-27 -- May
17-21
THURSDAY,
JUNE 10 If
you haven't already, please fill out an
online volunteer form to work a 4-hour shift. These Labor Neighbor walks will
be held for three weekends this month -- June 12-13, 19-20 and 26-27 -- in
King, Pierce, Snohomish and Thurston counties.
The shifts, which begin with 30-minute training sessions, will be held on
Saturdays from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. and from noon to 4 p.m., and Sundays from
noon to 4 p.m. In King County, there will also be weekday
shifts on an RSVP basis. Volunteers will be assigned to
one of the following staging areas (click addresses for maps): KING COUNTY COORDINATOR: Raechelle
Turner, (206) 441-2647 or (206) 718-2022 STAGING AREAS: PIERCE COUNTY COORDINATORS: Randy
Loomans, (206) 669-4023; Dan
Sexton, (888) 943-2420 (pager) STAGING AREA: SNOHOMISH COUNTY COORDINATOR: Christopher
Glenn, (425) 775-0264 STAGING AREAS: THURSTON COUNTY COORDINATOR: Jeff
Johnson, (360) 259-7327 STAGING AREA: The WSLC has challenged
every union organization in Washington state to turn out 3% of their members
for Labor Neighbor activities in 2004. Your efforts in June can help your
Union meet that 3% Challenge. For more
information about June activities, email volunteer@wslc.org
or call State Field Director Raechelle Turner at (206) 441-2647 or (206)
718-2022. George Bush has the money and
the negative ads. But John Kerry has the people and the power of a positive
message for creating jobs, making health care affordable, protecting
overtime pay and more. Help take back America! Volunteer
NOW! Also, check out the AFL-CIO's special
Flash movie about the importance of volunteering in June. Just click on www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/politics/volunteer_flash.cfm.
WEDNESDAY,
JUNE 9 Organized
labor is disappointed with the business community’s decision to withdraw
from the Governor’s mediated negotiations to improve our state’s workers
compensation system. “The group
rules for these talks were that everything would be on the table," said
Rick Bender, President of the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO.
"In our opinion, reducing
workplace injuries through improved safety and health policies is an
integral part of the cost of workers’ compensation.
But some elements of the business community objected to including our
state’s safety and health policies. That
makes me question whether those particular business associations really
wanted any progress to be achieved in these talks. Labor was
willing -- and remains willing -- to discuss ways to improve the efficiency
and fairness of the workers’ compensation system as it affects injured
workers and employers. But the
system is not in crisis. Over the last
10 years, employers in the state have seen an average premium cost increase
of just four percent a year. (Eight
years of no increases and two years of sharp increases.)
In addition, employers received $400 million in premium dividends in
1999-2000 when the stock market produced extraordinary income. The stock market bubble and the recession of the last three
years have created a temporary cost spike that organized labor is confident
will be reduced to manageable levels this year. Washington’s
system is unique because workers contribute 25 percent of the cost with
medical premiums out of their own paychecks.
No other system in the country includes such a premium from workers. Our state
system is rated in national workers' compensation studies as a low-cost
state. For example, the Oregon
Rate Study, which is released every two years, has consistently ranked
Washington as a low-cost state. In
2002, the Washington state system was ranked in the lowest quartile of all
states in terms of workers’ compensation costs. “We
will continue to advocate for improvements to our state’s workers
compensation system,” Bender said. “We will do so at every level, and stand ready to negotiate
in good faith with the employer community.”
TUESDAY,
JUNE 8 Since our May 26 posting -- Tell
Locke: Don't "trade" away our state's purchasing rights! --
two more Governors have rescinded their letters signing away their state's
procurement policies to the federal government and its destructive trade
policies. Unfortunately, Gov. Gary Locke of Washington is not one of them...
yet. Seven
governors, now including Oregon's, have rescinded commitments made in a
letter to the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) last September to make their
states comply with the rules of new “free” trade agreements that limit
government purchasing laws favoring local business, discouraging
outsourcing, buying recycled products, or other local priorities. The states
that have rescinded are Wisconsin, Maine, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Missouri,
Iowa and Oregon. In the days preceding the
USTR's May 28 signing of the Central American Free Trade Agreement, dozens
of you contacted Gov. Locke's office to urge him to rescind the letter.
Locke's office responded without indicating support or opposition to
rescinding the letter, but saying they didn't feel constrained by the timing
of CAFTA's signing. TAKE ACTION: Contact
Locke and ask him to rescind his letter to the USTR on state procurement
policies. Call (360) 902-4111 or use his email form: www.governor.wa.gov/contact/govemail.htm SAMPLE MESSAGE Dear Governor Locke: I am deeply concerned about the your letter
to the US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick, in which you committed
Washington State to comply with whatever rules will be negotiated in
current and future trade agreements, including the ones recently signed
with Australia and Central America. . These rules could bar, for example,
giving preferences to local businesses or restricting outsourcing.
However, nothing has been signed to law yet, I urge you to rescind your
letter, as seven other Governors have in recent weeks. Please keep me
informed of your actions on this issue. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely, ... THANK YOU to the following state
legislators who have already taken action to express opposition to signing
away Washington's purchasing rights: State Reps. Velma
Veloria, Maralyn Chase, Brian Blake, Don Cox, Jim Clements, Eileen Cody,
Mary Lou Dickerson, John McCoy, Tim Ormsby, Simpson, Bob Sump,
Shay Schual-Berke and Lynn Schindler. State Sens. Jeanne Kohl-Welles,
Paull Shin, Dale Brandland, Rosa Franklin, Karen Keiser, Pam Roach
and Pat Thibaudeau. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (from
Public
Citizen): The Bush administration convinced state governors
to sign a letter "voluntarily" committing their states to comply
with draconian constraints on domestic procurement (purchasing) policy
included in all new trade pacts under negotiation. Governors were asked to
commit states to comply with whatever procurement rules result from
negotiations, effectively to deposit an open signature card for future pacts
with unknown requirements. Among the pacts that were listed to be covered
were CAFTA, the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and a slew of
bilateral agreements. If a state agrees to comply with
the procurement provisions of these agreements, the following policies are
prohibited, meaning existing policies that do not conform must be changed,
and states are prohibited from establishing such policies in the future: "No off-shoring"
and other local development policies aimed at keeping state dollars
paying in-state wages and giving preference to locally-produced goods
and services;
"Green"
procurement policies such as those requiring recycled content, fuel
efficiency, energy efficiency or renewable energy;
Prevailing wage, living wage
and project-labor agreements as well as pro-union or pro-public bidding
assistance;
Policies that prohibit
purchases of goods made in sweatshops or goods made with slave labor;
and
Preferences used to demand
corporate responsibility in the face of human rights abuses -- such as
those used to help bring an end to apartheid in South Africa and now in
place regarding Burma. Other nations that are party to
these agreements are empowered to challenge a nonconforming state policy (no
matter when it was established) as a violation of the agreement in a binding
dispute resolution system established in the text. State government
officials have no standing before these tribunals and thus must rely on the
federal government to defend a challenged policy. The tribunals are
staffed by trade officials who are empowered to judge if state policy has
resulted in a violation. Policies judged to violate the rules must be
changed, or trade sanctions can be imposed. As well, the federal
government is obliged to use all constitutionally-available powers -- for
instance preemptive legislation, lawsuits and cutting off funding -- to
force state compliance with tribunal rulings. More and more people are
becoming aware of the implications these pacts, and constituents in many
states are demanding that their governors communicate to the USTR that their
state will not be bound by the rules. State legislators are demanding
notification and consultation regarding trade rules with such significant
implications for their policy-making authority. The USTR has heard
these initial rumblings. Yet, instead of rectifying the shortcomings
of the process used to consult with states, it has pushed back by continuing
its recruitment effort and circulating yet more misinformation about what
these rules actually mean for state sovereignty.
TUESDAY,
JUNE 8 All union and community
activists are invited to meet and support miners on strike against the Co-Op
Mine in Huntington, Utah. The
miners will be in Portland on Wednesday for a 2 p.m. meeting at the IWW
Hall, 616
E. Burnside; and in Seattle on Thursday at 10 a.m. in Room 208 of the
Labor Temple, 2800
1st Ave. These underground coal miners, mostly
immigrant workers, were being paid between $5.15 and $7 an hour with no
benefits (while other miners working in the same canyon earn $18) when on
Sept. 22, 2003, every one of the 75 Co-Op miners were fired for protesting
the suspension of a co-worker and unsafe conditions on the job. At the time,
the miners -- upset about low wages and
dangerous working conditions which had led to countless injuries
and three deaths since 1996 -- were
having meetings with the United Mine Workers of America to get themselves
organized into a real union, unlike a company “union” the bosses had set
up to prevent the workers from being organized. The Co-Op mine is owned by the powerful Kingston
clan, a wealthy group of incestual
polygamists, that owns about 160 businesses throughout Utah -- including pawn shops, payday loan outfits, food markets and a garbage
company -- worth an estimated $150 million. The
Kingston clan (also known as “The Order”) has created The Latter-Day
Church of Christ, which mimics in name the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter
Day Saints, which disavows any connection to the clan. In 1979, the National Labor
Relations Board recognized the “International Association of United
Workers Union” as the sole bargaining agent for the Co-Op mine workers.
Since then, this so-called union has been owned, operated and controlled by
the Kingston family. The union holds no meetings and its officers are not elected; they
are appointed by and are members of the Kingston clan.
Despite a mountain of evidence indicating that the Co-Op miners want
representation with the UMWA and that the company union is a farce, the
Regional NLRB office declined to rule on the case, keeping the workers in
limbo for months until the National Board makes a decision. The Co-Op miners have gotten
support from people across Come get a firsthand account from two of the
Utah miners, Alyson
Kennedy and Juan Salazar, at the Portland and Seattle meetings. For
more information about their area appearances, please contact Wolf Loera of
ILWU Local 19 at (206) 321-2841. Contributions to the striking miners can be
sent to: UMWA District 22, 525 E. 100 South, Price, Utah 84501. Checks
should be earmarked “Co-Op Miners Family Fund.” For more background information, check out Coal
Miners' Blues, published in March by the Salt Lake Weekly.
MONDAY,
JUNE 7 The following letter was sent
last week to Governor Gary Locke by Rick Bender, President of the Washington
State Labor Council, AFL-CIO. For more information, check out our June
3 posting: AWB seeks federal money to avoid self-imposed UI tax hike. The Honorable Gary Locke Dear Governor Locke: It has come to my attention
that the Association of Washington Business is encouraging Congress to
send the unemployment tax money (Reed Act) back to the states to avoid a
2005 rate increase. With regard to this, Labor
has some very strong concerns over statements made by the business
community regarding how expensive the Washington State system is
purported to be. Here are the real facts: The tax increase from
2003 to 2004 was given to Washington businesses by themselves. If
they had accepted a different legislative proposal, there would have
been no tax increase during this recession year. Instead, they have
gambled on a very volatile, untried tax system and may be having
second thoughts about it. The majority of
employers in Washington State pay about $150 in UI taxes per
employee per year, not $524 or $600. The AWB has been overstating
the average taxes by three- to fourfold. Decent UI benefits not
only help the worker, but the community as well insofar as every
dollar in UI benefits creates $2.15 worth of consumer spending,
according to the Department of Labor. It is our opinion that the
State of Washington should be arguing for extended benefits for the
long-term unemployed, if we really are looking after the best
interests of all parties. Instead, the Association of Washington
Business is trying to find a way for the feds to buy down the higher
than necessary taxes and counteract the volatile tax structure. The Washington State Labor
Council does not object to Reed Act distributions to the states, but how
that money is used should be determined by labor, business and the
Employment Security Department, not the Association of Washington
Business. I look forward to hearing from
you on this issue that is so very important to the labor community.
Sincerely, Rick S. Bender |
|
|
If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805. Copyright © 2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|