WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column2000 Convention
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 WSLC Reports Today logoUPDATED DAILY -- M-F by 9 a.m. Pacific

Links to commercial press stories are functional at the date of posting. In some cases, links "expire" when the source would like to begin charging you for old news. Disclaimer: WSLC Reports Today  links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive and some negative. The intention is to inform.  The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content.


Reports for June 24-27, 2002

Previous weeks' news: June 17-21 -- June 10-14 -- June 3-7  

THURSDAY, June 27 -- Fast Track advances again by one-vote margin in U.S. House
...plus at WashTech.org -- Could you be "Enron-ed"?
(an account of the June 19 town hall)
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Charges traded in dockworker labor talks
...plus -- Regional transportation package unlikely to appear on ballot this year
— In today's Seattle Times -- Unions lobby Nickels to veto developer's deal
— In today's Olympian -- Locke thwarted library deal -- Editorial: Governor Gary Locke has thwarted the directive of the state Legislature by withholding money designated for the state library. As a result, 14 employees are expected to lose their jobs this week.
— In the Seattle Weekly -- John Carlson paid "consultant" wife $30,000 with leftover campaign funds
— In today's Everett Herald -- Mill Creek, city employees call in a mediator
Breaking News at MSNBC.com: Supreme Court upholds school vouchers
...plus -- Tentative agreement on Amtrak

— In today's L.A. Times -- Port labor talks not going well
— In today's Washington Post -- House panel approves 4.1% federal pay raise
— In today's N.Y. Times -- The most unlikely story behind gay rights victory
...plus -- N.Y. bill says firms cannot use state funds to fight unions
...plus -- Italy's extreme labor restrictions (Alternate headline: "Italy's progressive labor protections")
— At SatireWire.com -- Pledge of Allegiance sponsorship opportunity now available

WEDNESDAY, June 26 -- Philip Morris on I-791: We're "concerned" about our taxes
...plus --
It's time to turn in those I-790 signatures... and then celebrate!
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Locke's transportation plan likely to hit a dead end -- Connelly column: Another environmental group is about to oppose Ref. 51 despite governor's recent efforts to lobby for their support. Says one leader: "If you want a date, you don't ask someone after the dance is over."
...plus -- Longview Aluminum talks (USWA 305) resume; restart hangs in the balance
— In yesterday's Wenatchee World -- Extension gives Alcoa workers six more months
— In today's News-Tribune -- Boeing, Machinists start to talk 
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Debt, labor pact key in S.W. Wash. Health District transition
— In today's Everett Herald -- Local DSHS offices do well in study by advocacy group
Today at AFLCIO.org -- Bush, Congress must act now to keep Amtrak rolling
— Today's winner of the Most Understated Headline Contest®... the Salem (Ore.) Statesman-Journal with "WorldCom misstates expenses" re: new revelations of a $3.8 Billion "overstatement" of profit that's likely to eclipse the Enron debacle as the biggest corporate scandal and bankruptcy in U.S. history. The government should begin taking action TODAY to protect the retirement savings of WorldCom workers, including the 17,000 about to get pink slips.
— In today's Wall Street Journal -- Is Qwest next? SEC gets tough on Qwest accounting
— In today's Washington Post -- Corporate scandals taking a toll on the markets
...plus -- In U.S. House bid, Democrats target corporate abuse issue
...plus -- GOP targets liberal interest groups, subpoenas AFSCME, NEA records, among others
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Republicans' passion for term limits has cooled (Right, George?)

TUESDAY, June 25 -- Senators to talk transportation, security at Seattle conference
...plus --
Spokane, businesses can't afford costs of low-wage jobs
— In today's Seattle Times -- Job security tops Machinists' list as Boeing talks begin
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Boeing Machinists will press for rehiring
...plus -- Despite labor objections, city council approves $6 million waiver for developer
...plus -- George "Just 3 Terms" Nethercutt to seek 5th term, cites Sept. 11
— In yesterday's UW Daily -- Get with the program! -- Op-ed: As everyone is aware due to continuing detailed coverage from the U.S. corporate media, there is massive unrest in Spain and Peru... the story is the same — people are in the streets, fighting against globalization and privatization.
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Suit says Wal-Mart forces workers to toil off the clock -- Wal-Mart's push to minimize costs is the industry's fiercest, and holding down labor costs—including fighting off unionization—is at the heart of Wal-Mart's effort to be the nation's low-cost retailer. Washington is among the many states with specific allegations cited in this must-read story.
...plus -- The reality thing -- Krugman column: Will Mr. Bush be willing to set aside, even for a day or two, his drive to consolidate his political base, and actually do something that wasn't part of his preconceived agenda? Oh, never mind.
— In today's L.A. Times -- Union says Sky Chefs worker fired for criticism
— In today's Washington Post -- Supreme Court takes up Family Medical Leave Act
...plus -- Bush tells federal agencies to report on how much time employees "waste" on union work
...plus -- When states' rights get in the way -- Dionne column: States' rights are great until Wall Street firms or HMOs decide they don't like them. Then they're a calamity.

MONDAY, June 24 -- Port Workers Solidarity Rallies this Thursday in Seattle, Tacoma 
...plus -- State ergonomics rule get its day in court this Friday
...plus an AP bulletin
-- Arrest reported in disappearance of state licensing auditor
— In the new P.S. Business Journal -- Union to Boeing: Save jobs
— In today's News-Tribune -- Boeing, Machinists square off Tuesday
— In Saturday's Spokesman-Review -- Kaiser's Tacoma sales worry Steelworkers
— In today's Seattle Times -- Governor presses business groups: Don't support I-791
...plus on Sunday -- Gorton hits road to gain support for transportation tax increase
— In today's Everett Herald -- 8,300 jobs gone in Snohomish Co., and counting (column)
...plus on Saturday -- Ref. 51 will address transportation mess (op-ed by local Chamber chief)
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Downtown developer's big idea runs into labor opposition (HERE Local 8) -- Also see The six-million dollar scam in the new Stranger:
— In today's South County Journal -- Down for Issaquah teacher strike talk -- Editorial: Work stoppages and strikes by public employees are unacceptable.
— In today's Washington Post -- Textiles weave into tangled trade (Fast Track) dispute
— In today's Detroit News -- Stakes are high for Teamsters, UPS as talks intensify
— In today's Baltimore Sun -- Hispanic women energize unions -- Of the 5.8 million Hispanic women employed in the United States last year, more than one in 10 were union members.
— In Saturday's N.Y. Times -- Sacrifice is for losers -- MUST-READ Rich column on the New Watergate: The cancer is not on the presidency but on the economy, where the malignancy is a flood of corporate transgressions whose scope and scale, in the words of The Wall Street Journal this week, "exceed anything the U.S. has witnessed since the years preceding the Great Depression." As the first Watergate undermined Americans' faith in government for generations, so the replay threatens to do the same to American business.

Previous weeks' news: June 17-21 -- June 10-14 -- June 3-7

THURSDAY, JUNE 27
Fast Track advances again by one-vote margin in U.S. House

You wouldn't know it from reading today's newspapers in Washington state, but on Wednesday the U.S. House of Representatives by another one-vote margin, 216-215, passed a measure aimed at jumpstarting conference talks with the Senate to reconcile the two bodies' versions of Fast Track trade promotion authority. Last December, the House passed its version of Fast Track by a one-vote margin, 215-214.

Although three-paragraph briefs on this vote appeared in today's Oregonian and N.Y. Times, and a full story ran in the Washington Post, it is nowhere to be found in newspapers across The Most Trade Dependent State in the Nation™. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal weighs in today with "Trade bill's future remains cloudy," quoting one free-trading Democrat as saying Wednesday's vote “does not bode well for final passage of (Fast Track), which will happen only with wide bipartisan support.”

Wednesday's vote capped three intense weeks of maneuvering in which Republican leaders fought to quell internal unrest that nearly caused Fast Track's defeat last week, while fending off sharp Democratic criticism.

Washington's congressional delegation voted along party lines with all Democrats voting "no" -- including Rep. Norm Dicks, who was the only Democrat from Washington state to side with Republicans in passing Fast Track last December -- and all three Republicans voting "yes."

Those familiar with Republican arm-twisting on the issue note it's no coincidence that the measure passed again by a single vote even though 10 Democratic representatives, including Dicks, switched to a "no" vote on Wednesday. That's because Republicans have a stable of more than a dozen representatives, many from the South where textile industries have been decimated by previous trade agreements, who fear the political consequences of supporting Fast Track, but have agreed to vote "yes" if it is absolutely necessary to pass the measure.

Observers of the Fast Track roll-call vote in December watched time expire without the necessary votes to pass it, but the Republican Speaker kept the polls open for several extra minutes as Republicans went down the list of who would have to take the tough vote.

Many of the 14 out of 23 GOP who voted "no" in December, but "yes" on Wednesday have reaffirmed their opposition to Fast Track's final passage, but supported the rule in the name of party unity. For example, GOP Rep. LaTourette of Ohio opposes final passage of the trade package, but always votes with the party on rules. GOP Rep. Paul of Texas voted "present" Wednesday instead of providing the vote that killed the rule and he opposes final passage.

Fast Track would remove Congress' authority to amend international trade agreements, giving President Bush the authority to negotiate trade pacts that would be submitted to Congress for a simple yes-or-no vote. For more information, see our June 21 posting for a more detailed analysis of Fast Track, its current status and its lack of public support.

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26
Philip Morris on I-791: We're "concerned" about our taxes

Those of you who contacted the Philip Morris Co. to tell them to "Butt Out of Washington" and stop paying for signatures for Initiative 791, may have heard back from the company. See last week's posting regarding the Philip Morris Initiative.

The company's e-mail response cites "concern" about "excessive" taxes in the state. But it fails to respond to criticism that I-791 spending limits -- even broader than their I-601 predecessor -- would fix state expenditures at the current recession levels, effectively making the dramatic budget cuts in school, health care, environmental and other programs permanent. And deeper over time.

Following is the Philip Morris response received by Your Faithful Webmaster™, along with (some helpful explanatory information):

Mr. Groves,

Thank you for taking the time to share your views with Philip Morris (soon to be known as... Altria... which our consultants say sounds kind of like Altruism.)

Philip Morris Companies Inc., which includes Kraft Foods (makers of 61 easy-to-avoid brands), Miller Brewing (although we recently sold that one) and Philip Morris U.S.A. (makers of shockingly straightforward statements like: "We believe in executing with quality") has more than 800 employees (some of whom are NOT lobbyists) in Washington State with facilities and sales offices in Tumwater, Kent, Bellevue, Spokane, and Vancouver (and Olympia).  In 2000, (despite our best efforts) our businesses generated over $283 million in state and local taxes in Washington state (which, coincidentally, is almost exactly as much as we've been forced to pay for killing state residents).  Philip Morris Companies Inc., like many other businesses in the state, is concerned about the impact of excessive tax increases on our businesses, employees, (surviving) consumers and shareholders (especially big tax hikes targeted at us by 66.07% of Washington voters last year).

It is our hope that the (our friends the) voters will have the opportunity to decide whether future tax and fee increases and decisions to increase spending should be approved by two-thirds vote (66.67%, not 66.07%) of the state legislature (because we like our chances with them a little better).  To this end, we have made a financial contribution of $20,000 to the Save Our Spending Limits Committee that is working to gather (buying) voter signatures to help put Initiative 791 on the ballot.

Corporate Communications
Philip Morris
Management Corp.

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26
It's time to turn in those I-790 signatures... and then celebrate!

All union members and activists are reminded to MAIL IN YOUR PETITIONS NOW -- including those only partially (or barely) filled with signatures -- for the Washington State Labor Council-endorsed Initiative 790, the pension reform measure for police and fire fighters. The 198,000 valid signatures necessary to qualify I-790 for the ballot must be submitted by July 5 and the campaign would like to have them in hand as soon as possible.

Also, I-790 supporters are invited to attend a Signature Delivery Party and Barbecue on Wednesday, July 3 at noon at the Olympia offices of the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters, 1069 Adams At. SE. Attendees will deliver the signatures en masse to the Secretary of State's office and then return to WSCFF for a celebration barbecue. The suggested donation is $7.50 per person. If you plan to attend, please RSVP to 360-943-8123.

Washington is one of only four states where local police and fire fighters lack any representation on their own pension board. Instead, the statewide Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters Retirement System 2 (LEOFF 2) is run by a committee made up entirely of legislators, even though local police and fire fighters contribute half the cost of their pensions.

Initiative 790 would change that. It would guarantee our public safety workers representation on a new governing board, giving them a voice in their own retirement without cost to taxpayers. It creates a new Board of Trustees, appointed by the Governor and legislative leaders, to manage the LEOFF 2 police and fire fighter retirement system. The new board would consist of three police representatives, three fire fighter representatives, three local government representatives and two legislators.

I-790 also contains strong safeguards to protect the public and tax dollars: Trustee decisions must be made in public and reported to the Governor, Legislature and State Actuary, subject to judicial review and strict accounting and actuarial standards; day-to-day management will remain with the Department of Retirement Systems; all contributions are capped; and future benefit increases can be rejected by the Legislature.

“With the collapse of Enron, we certainly see the need for such a voice in our pension system," said Kelly L. Fox, president of the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters. "Fire fighters and police officers shouldn’t have to report for duty worrying about the status of our pension fund. We want a voice so we can safeguard what’s ours. I’m glad that voters strongly agree it’s the right thing to do.”

For more information about I-790, visit www.i-790.org.

TUESDAY, JUNE 25
Senators to talk transportation, security at Seattle conference

The Washington Council on International Trade will hold its 7th annual Senators' Conference, "Trade, Transportation and Security: Doing Business in Uncertain Times," on Tuesday, July 2 from 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Bell Harbor International Conference Center in Seattle.

Washington's U.S. Senators will lead 90-minute moderated panel discussions followed by a 30-minute "networking break," then attend a luncheon that "enables maximum interaction with the senators and other experts." 

Experts like our own WSLC President Rick Bender, who'll participate in Sen. Patty Murray's transportation panel, "Freight, Jobs and Gridlock," and King County Labor Council Executive Secretary Steve Williamson who will be on Sen. Maria Cantwell's security panel: "Doing Business on High Alert."

Attendees will be able to directly question the Senators and panelists, and participate in instant electronic polling conducted by Elway Research. The luncheon keynote speaker is Carl Donaway, the new CEO of Airborne Express, will tie the themes together in his remarks.

The cost including luncheon is $60 for WCIT members, $70 for non-members, and a limited number of $10 registrations are available for students and K-12 teachers. The posted registration deadline is TODAY (sorry), so visit www.wcit.org RIGHT NOW to register or get more information.

TUESDAY, JUNE 25
Spokane, businesses can't afford costs of low-wage jobs

The following guest column by Mark Santow, an assistant professor of history at Gonzaga University and vice chair of the Spokane Human Rights Commission, was published in yesterday's Spokesman-Review:

City, businesses can't afford costs of low-wage jobs
Guest column

Mark Santow
Special to The Spokesman-Review

The One Spokane Summit provided an opportunity to envision a new, equitable, and sustainable economy in the region, and Mayor John Powers should be commended for convening it. But we mustn't lose sight of poverty and equity, in favor of glittering visions of downtown development. The question isn't whether we want economic development -- we do. But what kind? There is a low road to prosperity, and a high road.

Ultimately, if the economic development of the Spokane region is to be sustainable, and broadly beneficial to all its citizens and neighborhoods, the issue of poverty must be addressed. And to address poverty, one must address wages, as many of the delegates at the Summit insisted.

A living wage law would be a very good start.

A variety of living wage laws have been enacted in the U.S. since 1994, by over 80 municipalities -- including Missoula and Portland. The basic idea is that elected officials should strive to use our tax dollars to create jobs which pay a wage high enough to lift a family out of poverty. Living wage ordinances hold companies profiting from public money accountable, by insisting that firms which are under contract with a city or which receive tax breaks and subsidies provide family and community-sustaining jobs.

More than 3,000 Spokane citizens signed a petition for such a law back in 1998, and the Spokane Human Rights Commission, in concert with a new group, Spokane Citizens for a Living Wage, has begun working on the issue again. More than 75 living wage campaigns are underway around the country, and most communities that have considered such a law have voted for it.

According to a poll by Jobs for the Future in early 2000, an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that those who work full-time should be able to earn enough to keep their families out of poverty. For a growing number of Spokane families this is difficult. Wages here lag well behind state and national levels, while the cost of living is higher. The average annual wage for retail and service industry workers in Spokane -- half of all employees in the county is well below the amount needed to meet basic needs for a family of four, which the Spokane Regional Health District puts at a little over $25,000 a year (or about $12 an hour). Many workers hold down two jobs just to make ends meet. A living wage law will begin to address this.

Do living wage laws work? Studies indicate that they raise the wages of home health care workers, janitors, food service workers, security guards and others, with little cost in terms of business profits, jobs, or tax dollars.

And while the directly affected families benefit, so do the rest of us. One out of every five homes sold by Spokane realtors in recent months has been re-possessed. Families with living wage jobs are more able to get loans to buy (and keep) a home or start a business. Families that are able to meet their basic needs are more likely to be able to support their children's health and education. This means less demand on public assistance, on charities, on teachers, and on the police, which benefits all of us. It means more taxpayers. Extra dollars that these families receive from a living wage law will be spent locally, getting the roof fixed, buying a used car, purchasing a few more groceries -- generating revenues for small businesses, and quite possibly creating more jobs as a result.

As the old saying goes, money is like manure; it works best if you spread it around. Even the affected firms have benefited, through increases in morale and productivity, and decreases in employee turnover.

Poverty wage jobs are expensive, to all of us. It is a much better use of our public resources to create jobs which allow Spokane citizens to live in independence and dignity. There is nothing wrong with using subsidies and tax breaks to attract and keep employers. The problem is that they are usually offered without any demand for accountability with regard to wages or the number of jobs created. This "low road" to economic development promises nothing but further stagnation and suffering for most Spokane residents.

A "high road" approach to Spokane's future focuses on raising the living standards of average working families. A living wage law is a good first step on this road. It would also be a step toward fairness. And justice. And One Spokane.

Mark Santow is an assistant professor of history at Gonzaga University 
and vice chair of the Spokane Human Rights Commission.

MONDAY, JUNE 24
Port Workers Solidarity Rallies in Seattle, Tacoma Thursday

On July 1, contracts for nearly all West Coast maritime workers' unions expire -- longshore workers, sailors, marine firemen, mates and marine engineers. Union representatives say employers are stonewalling negotiations and demanding major givebacks from union workers, trying to provoke a lockout or a strike.

But if all port workers unite, they can win. So this Thursday, June 27 simultaneous Port Workers Solidarity Rallies (and BBQs) will be held during lunchtime in both Seattle and Tacoma, sponsored by the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Port Division, and the International Longshoremen's Association.

SEATTLE:  From noon to 1 p.m. at Terminal 25 (East Marginal Way at S. Hanford, two blocks north of Spokane Street). 

*** ALSO! Join members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers at 8 a.m. that morning at Pier 69 in Seattle as they rally in their continuing campaign against privatization at port facilities. ***

TACOMA:  From 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Port Satellite Yard (Port of Tacoma Road at E. 11, across from Concrete Technology)

In Seattle, fully 25 percent of jobs are port-related; in Tacoma, it's 40 percent. Port jobs are some of the best-paying union jobs in the Puget Sound, and they're protected by some of the strongest unions and best contracts in the nation.  Waterfront workers and their unions have always shown solidarity with others in need and in struggle, and now they are calling on their supporters from other unions and in the community to attend these solidarity rallies.

Let's show a massive display of workers' unity! Wear your union jacket and bring your union banners as post workers call for:

  • A fair longshore contract... now!

  • Workplace rights for port truckers

  • Environmental protections for port communities

For more information about the contract talks, check out Friday's N.Y. Times story, Fears for jobs could bring shutdown of West Coast ports, which explains "the longshoremen fear that their jobs — and those of future generations of longshoremen — are under siege. Those fears could lead to a shutdown of all seaports from San Diego to Seattle on July 1, a move that could send shock waves through the nation's already fragile economy."

MONDAY, JUNE 24
State ergonomics rule get its day in court this Friday

As many of you know, the business community's attack on the state ergonomics standard has not been limited to legislative and political action. The state Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) will be also be defending the rule in court -- and the date is set for this Friday, June 28 at 1:30 p.m. at Thurston County Superior Court at 2000 Lakeridge Drive S.W. in Olympia with Judge Paula Casey presiding. (The hearing was originally scheduled for earlier this month, but was resceduled.)

The business community, having succeeded in stopping the federal government from implementing a standard on the nation's No. 1 job safety issue, has waged a particularly aggressive fight to prevent Washington state from establishing a standard compelling employers to take steps to prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Like Washington's progressive indexed minimum wage law that is now being championed in other states throughout the country, business groups fear a successful state ergonomics rule here would spread to other states.

A hysterical campaign of misinformation about the rule by the Association of Washington Business and other business lobbying groups succeeded in generating enough outrage and confusion to convince Governor Gary Locke to delay enforcement of the rule by two years, ostensibly so employers could have more time to study the rule and prepare to comply. But business groups have vowed to use those two years trying to kill the bill in the legislature and in court, rather than educating member employers on how to comply.

Friday's hearing will take up the suit filed against L&I by the so-called WE CARE (Washington Employers Concerned About Regulating Ergonomics) Coalition which argues, among other things, that L&I has exceeded its authority in adopting the rule, it did so without following proper procedures, its cost-benefit analysis is flawed, there isn't enough scientific evidence to support the need for ergonomics prevention, and the implementation plan is inadequate. Check out the WE CARE brief.

WE CARE attorneys from Stoel Rives LLP will try to convince Judge Casey that they know better than the Governor's Blue Ribbon Panel of ergonomics experts -- which included representatives from business. After a year of study, that panel unanimously concluded that L&I's rule is understandable and enforceable in a fair and balanced manner.

Like their tobacco industry counterparts, WE CARE attorneys will try to convince Judge Casey that they know better than the National Academy of Sciences and countless universities which have conducted exhaustive studies of the relationship between work and repetitive stress injuries, and concluded that simple, cost-effective steps can be taken to prevent these injuries.

Further, they will claim that Boeing, Weyerhaueser, Seattle City Light and many other enlightened employers who have voluntarily implemented ergonomics prevention programs because they have led to considerable savings in workers' compensation premiums must be using flawed cost-benefit analyses.

And ultimately, they will try to argue that the state's constitutional obligation to protect the health and safety of workers should not apply to the 50,000 workers who suffer these injuries every year, costing the state workers' compensation system some $400 million annually. 

It should be entertaining -- and infuriating -- so make plans to attend the hearing. The AFL-CIO has filed a brief on behalf of workers in our state and will also present arguments for the rule . 

If you have any questions, contact WSLC Safety and Education Director Randy Loomans at (360) 943-0608.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2002  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO