|
Reports for
June 24-27, 2002
Previous weeks' news: June
17-21 -- June
10-14 -- June
3-7
THURSDAY, June 27 --
Fast Track advances again
by one-vote margin in U.S. House
...plus at WashTech.org -- Could
you be "Enron-ed"? (an account of the June 19 town hall)
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Charges
traded in dockworker labor talks
...plus -- Regional
transportation package unlikely to appear on ballot this year
— In today's Seattle Times -- Unions
lobby Nickels to veto developer's deal
— In today's Olympian -- Locke
thwarted library deal -- Editorial: Governor
Gary Locke has thwarted the directive of the state Legislature by
withholding money designated for the state library.
As a result, 14 employees are expected to lose their jobs this week.
— In the Seattle Weekly
-- John
Carlson paid "consultant" wife $30,000 with leftover campaign
funds
— In today's Everett Herald -- Mill
Creek, city employees call in a mediator
Breaking News at MSNBC.com: Supreme
Court upholds school vouchers
...plus -- Tentative
agreement on Amtrak
— In today's L.A. Times -- Port
labor talks not going well
— In today's Washington Post -- House
panel approves 4.1% federal pay raise
— In today's N.Y. Times -- The
most unlikely story behind gay rights victory
...plus -- N.Y.
bill says firms cannot use state funds to fight unions
...plus -- Italy's
extreme labor restrictions (Alternate headline: "Italy's
progressive labor protections")
— At SatireWire.com -- Pledge
of Allegiance sponsorship opportunity now available
WEDNESDAY, June 26 --
Philip Morris on I-791:
We're "concerned" about our taxes
...plus -- It's
time to turn in those I-790 signatures... and then celebrate!
— In today's Seattle P-I --
Locke's
transportation plan likely to hit a dead end -- Connelly column: Another
environmental group is about to oppose Ref. 51 despite governor's recent
efforts to lobby for their support. Says one leader: "If you want a
date, you don't ask someone after the dance is over."
...plus -- Longview
Aluminum talks (USWA 305) resume; restart hangs in the balance
— In yesterday's Wenatchee World -- Extension
gives Alcoa workers six more months
— In today's News-Tribune -- Boeing,
Machinists start to talk
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Debt,
labor pact key in S.W. Wash. Health District transition
— In today's Everett Herald -- Local
DSHS offices do well in study by advocacy group
Today at AFLCIO.org -- Bush,
Congress must act now to keep Amtrak rolling
— Today's winner of the Most Understated Headline Contest®... the Salem
(Ore.) Statesman-Journal with "WorldCom
misstates expenses" re: new revelations of a $3.8 Billion
"overstatement" of profit that's likely to eclipse the Enron
debacle as the biggest corporate scandal and bankruptcy in U.S. history. The
government should begin taking action TODAY to protect the retirement
savings of WorldCom workers, including the 17,000 about to get pink slips.
— In today's Wall Street Journal -- Is Qwest next? SEC
gets tough on Qwest accounting
— In today's Washington Post -- Corporate
scandals taking a toll on the markets
...plus -- In
U.S. House bid, Democrats target corporate abuse issue
...plus -- GOP
targets liberal interest groups, subpoenas AFSCME, NEA records, among others
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Republicans'
passion for term limits has cooled (Right, George?)
TUESDAY, June 25 --
Senators to talk
transportation, security at Seattle conference
...plus -- Spokane,
businesses can't afford costs of low-wage jobs
— In today's Seattle Times --
Job
security tops Machinists' list as Boeing talks begin
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Boeing
Machinists will press for rehiring
...plus -- Despite
labor objections, city council approves $6 million waiver for developer
...plus -- George
"Just 3 Terms" Nethercutt to seek 5th term, cites Sept. 11
— In yesterday's UW Daily -- Get
with the program! -- Op-ed: As everyone is aware due to continuing
detailed coverage from the U.S. corporate media, there is massive unrest in
Spain and Peru... the story is the same — people are in the streets,
fighting against globalization and privatization.
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Suit
says Wal-Mart forces workers to toil off the clock -- Wal-Mart's push to
minimize costs is the industry's fiercest, and holding down labor
costs—including fighting off unionization—is at the heart of Wal-Mart's
effort to be the nation's low-cost retailer. Washington is among the many
states with specific allegations cited in this must-read story.
...plus -- The
reality thing -- Krugman column: Will Mr. Bush be willing to set aside,
even for a day or two, his drive to consolidate his political base, and
actually do something that wasn't part of his preconceived agenda? Oh, never
mind.
— In today's L.A. Times -- Union
says Sky Chefs worker fired for criticism
— In today's Washington Post -- Supreme
Court takes up Family Medical Leave Act
...plus -- Bush
tells federal agencies to report on how much time employees "waste"
on union work
...plus -- When
states' rights get in the way -- Dionne column: States' rights are great
until Wall Street firms or HMOs decide they don't like them. Then they're a
calamity.
MONDAY, June 24 --
Port Workers Solidarity
Rallies this Thursday in Seattle, Tacoma
...plus -- State
ergonomics rule get its day in court this Friday
...plus an AP bulletin -- Arrest
reported in disappearance of state licensing auditor
— In the new P.S. Business Journal -- Union
to Boeing: Save jobs
— In today's News-Tribune -- Boeing,
Machinists square off Tuesday
— In Saturday's Spokesman-Review -- Kaiser's
Tacoma sales worry Steelworkers
— In today's Seattle Times -- Governor
presses business groups: Don't support I-791
...plus on Sunday -- Gorton
hits road to gain support for transportation tax increase
— In today's Everett Herald -- 8,300
jobs gone in Snohomish Co., and counting (column)
...plus on Saturday -- Ref.
51 will address transportation mess (op-ed by local Chamber chief)
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Downtown
developer's big idea runs into labor opposition (HERE Local 8) -- Also
see The
six-million dollar scam in the new Stranger:
— In today's South County Journal
-- Down
for Issaquah teacher strike talk -- Editorial: Work stoppages and
strikes by public employees are unacceptable.
— In today's Washington Post -- Textiles
weave into tangled trade (Fast Track) dispute
— In today's Detroit News -- Stakes
are high for Teamsters, UPS as talks intensify
— In today's Baltimore Sun -- Hispanic
women energize unions -- Of the 5.8 million Hispanic women employed in
the United States last year, more than one in 10 were union members.
— In Saturday's N.Y. Times -- Sacrifice
is for losers -- MUST-READ Rich column on the New Watergate: The cancer
is not on the presidency but on the economy, where the malignancy is a flood
of corporate transgressions whose scope and scale, in the words of The
Wall Street Journal this week, "exceed anything the U.S. has
witnessed since the years preceding the Great Depression." As the first
Watergate undermined Americans' faith in government for generations, so the
replay threatens to do the same to American business.
Previous weeks' news: June
17-21 -- June
10-14 -- June
3-7

THURSDAY,
JUNE 27
Fast Track advances again by one-vote
margin in U.S. House
You wouldn't know it from reading today's newspapers in
Washington state, but on Wednesday the U.S. House of Representatives by
another one-vote margin, 216-215, passed a measure aimed at jumpstarting conference talks with the Senate to reconcile the two bodies' versions of
Fast Track trade promotion authority. Last December, the House passed its
version of Fast Track by a one-vote margin, 215-214.
Although three-paragraph briefs on this vote appeared in today's Oregonian
and N.Y.
Times, and a full story ran in the Washington
Post, it is nowhere to be found in newspapers across The Most
Trade Dependent State in the Nation™. Meanwhile, the Wall Street
Journal weighs in today with "Trade
bill's future remains cloudy," quoting one free-trading Democrat
as saying Wednesday's vote “does not bode well for final passage of
(Fast Track), which will happen only with wide bipartisan support.”
Wednesday's vote capped three intense weeks of maneuvering in which
Republican leaders fought to quell internal unrest that nearly caused Fast
Track's defeat last week, while fending off sharp Democratic criticism.
Washington's congressional delegation voted along party lines with all
Democrats voting "no" -- including Rep. Norm Dicks, who was the
only Democrat from Washington state to side with Republicans in passing Fast
Track last December -- and all three Republicans voting "yes."
Those familiar with Republican arm-twisting on the issue note it's no
coincidence that the measure passed again by a single vote even though 10
Democratic representatives, including Dicks, switched to a "no"
vote on Wednesday. That's because Republicans have a stable of more than a
dozen representatives, many from the South where textile industries have
been decimated by previous trade agreements, who fear the political
consequences of supporting Fast Track, but have agreed to vote
"yes" if it is absolutely necessary to pass the measure.
Observers of the Fast Track roll-call vote in December watched time expire
without the necessary votes to pass it, but the Republican Speaker kept the
polls open for several extra minutes as Republicans went down the list of
who would have to take the tough vote.
Many of the 14 out of 23 GOP who voted "no" in December, but
"yes" on Wednesday have reaffirmed their opposition to Fast
Track's final passage, but supported the rule in the name of party unity.
For example, GOP Rep. LaTourette of Ohio opposes final passage of the trade
package, but always votes with the party on rules. GOP Rep. Paul of Texas
voted "present" Wednesday instead of providing the vote that
killed the rule and he opposes final passage.
Fast Track would remove Congress' authority to amend international trade
agreements, giving President Bush the authority to negotiate trade pacts
that would be submitted to Congress for a simple yes-or-no vote. For more information, see our June 21
posting for a more detailed analysis of Fast Track, its current status
and its lack of public support.

WEDNESDAY,
JUNE 26
Philip Morris on I-791: We're
"concerned" about our taxes
Those of you who contacted the
Philip Morris Co. to tell them to "Butt Out of Washington" and
stop paying for signatures for Initiative 791, may have heard back from the
company. See last week's posting regarding
the Philip Morris Initiative.
The
company's e-mail response cites "concern" about
"excessive" taxes in the state. But it fails to respond to
criticism that I-791 spending limits -- even broader than their I-601
predecessor -- would fix state expenditures at the current recession levels,
effectively making the dramatic budget cuts in school, health care,
environmental and other programs permanent. And deeper over time.
Following is the Philip Morris response received by Your Faithful Webmaster™, along with
(some helpful explanatory information):
Mr.
Groves,
Thank you for taking the time to share
your views with Philip Morris (soon
to be known as... Altria...
which our consultants say sounds kind of like Altruism.)
Philip Morris Companies Inc., which
includes Kraft Foods
(makers of 61
easy-to-avoid brands), Miller
Brewing
(although we recently sold that one)
and Philip Morris U.S.A.
(makers of shockingly
straightforward statements like: "We believe in executing
with quality")
has more than 800 employees
(some of whom are NOT lobbyists)
in Washington State with facilities and
sales offices in Tumwater, Kent, Bellevue, Spokane, and Vancouver
(and Olympia).
In 2000,
(despite our
best efforts)
our businesses generated over $283
million in state and local taxes in Washington state
(which, coincidentally, is almost exactly as much as
we've been forced
to pay for killing state residents).
Philip Morris Companies Inc., like many other businesses in the state, is
concerned about the impact of excessive tax increases on our businesses,
employees,
(surviving)
consumers and shareholders
(especially big
tax hikes targeted at us by 66.07% of Washington voters last year).
It is our hope that the
(our friends the)
voters will have the opportunity to
decide whether future tax and fee increases and decisions to increase
spending should be approved by two-thirds vote
(66.67%, not 66.07%)
of the state legislature
(because we like our chances with them
a little better).
To this end, we have made a financial contribution of $20,000 to the Save
Our Spending Limits Committee that is working
to gather
(buying)
voter signatures to help put
Initiative 791 on the ballot.
Corporate Communications
Philip Morris
Management Corp.

WEDNESDAY,
JUNE 26
It's time to turn in those I-790
signatures... and then celebrate!
All union members and activists are
reminded
to MAIL IN YOUR PETITIONS NOW --
including those only partially
(or barely) filled
with signatures -- for the Washington
State Labor Council-endorsed Initiative 790, the pension reform measure
for police and fire fighters. The
198,000 valid signatures necessary to qualify I-790 for the ballot must be
submitted by July 5 and the campaign would like to have them in hand
as soon as possible.
Also, I-790 supporters are invited to
attend a Signature
Delivery Party and Barbecue on Wednesday, July 3 at noon at the Olympia
offices of the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters, 1069 Adams At. SE.
Attendees will deliver the signatures en masse to the Secretary of State's
office and then return to WSCFF for a celebration barbecue. The suggested
donation is $7.50 per person. If you plan to attend, please RSVP to
360-943-8123.
Washington is one of only four states where local police and
fire fighters lack any representation on their own pension board. Instead,
the statewide Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters Retirement System 2
(LEOFF 2) is run by a committee made up entirely of legislators, even though
local police and fire fighters contribute half the cost of their pensions.
Initiative 790 would change that. It would guarantee our
public safety workers representation on a new governing board, giving them a
voice in their own retirement without cost to taxpayers. It creates a new
Board of Trustees, appointed by the Governor and legislative leaders, to
manage the LEOFF 2 police and fire fighter retirement system. The new board
would consist of three police representatives, three fire fighter
representatives, three local government representatives and two legislators.
I-790 also contains strong safeguards to protect the public and tax
dollars: Trustee decisions must be made in public and reported to the
Governor, Legislature and State Actuary, subject to judicial review and
strict accounting and actuarial standards; day-to-day management will remain
with the Department of Retirement Systems; all contributions are capped; and
future benefit increases can be rejected by the Legislature.
“With the collapse of Enron, we certainly see the need for such a voice
in our pension system," said Kelly L. Fox, president of the Washington
State Council of Fire Fighters. "Fire fighters and police officers
shouldn’t have to report for duty worrying about the status of our pension
fund. We want a voice so we can safeguard what’s ours. I’m glad that
voters strongly agree it’s the right thing to do.”
For more information about I-790, visit www.i-790.org.

TUESDAY,
JUNE 25
Senators to talk transportation, security at
Seattle conference
The Washington Council on International Trade
will hold its 7th annual Senators' Conference, "Trade, Transportation
and Security: Doing Business in Uncertain Times," on Tuesday, July 2
from 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Bell Harbor International Conference Center
in Seattle.
Washington's U.S. Senators will lead
90-minute moderated panel discussions followed by a 30-minute
"networking break," then attend a luncheon that "enables
maximum interaction with the senators and other experts."
Experts like our own WSLC President Rick Bender, who'll participate in
Sen. Patty Murray's transportation panel, "Freight, Jobs and Gridlock,"
and King County Labor Council Executive Secretary Steve
Williamson who will be on Sen. Maria Cantwell's security panel: "Doing
Business on High Alert."
Attendees will be able to directly question
the Senators and panelists, and participate in instant electronic polling
conducted by Elway Research. The luncheon keynote speaker is Carl Donaway,
the new CEO of Airborne Express, will tie the themes together in his
remarks.
The cost including luncheon is $60 for WCIT
members, $70 for non-members, and a limited number of $10 registrations are
available for students and K-12 teachers. The posted registration deadline
is TODAY (sorry), so visit www.wcit.org
RIGHT NOW to register or get more information.

TUESDAY,
JUNE 25
Spokane, businesses can't afford costs of
low-wage jobs
The following guest
column by Mark Santow,
an assistant professor of history at Gonzaga University and vice chair of
the Spokane Human Rights Commission, was published in yesterday's Spokesman-Review:
City, businesses
can't afford costs of low-wage jobs
Guest column
Mark Santow
Special to The Spokesman-Review
The One Spokane Summit provided an
opportunity to envision a new, equitable, and sustainable economy in the
region, and Mayor John Powers should be commended for convening it. But we
mustn't lose sight of poverty and equity, in favor of glittering visions
of downtown development. The question isn't whether we want economic
development -- we do. But what kind? There is a low road to prosperity,
and a high road.
Ultimately, if the economic development of
the Spokane region is to be sustainable, and broadly beneficial to all its
citizens and neighborhoods, the issue of poverty must be addressed. And to
address poverty, one must address wages, as many of the delegates at the
Summit insisted.
A living wage law would be a very good
start.
A variety of living wage laws have been
enacted in the U.S. since 1994, by over 80 municipalities -- including
Missoula and Portland. The basic idea is that elected officials should
strive to use our tax dollars to create jobs which pay a wage high enough
to lift a family out of poverty. Living wage ordinances hold companies
profiting from public money accountable, by insisting that firms which are
under contract with a city or which receive tax breaks and subsidies
provide family and community-sustaining jobs.
More than 3,000 Spokane citizens signed a
petition for such a law back in 1998, and the Spokane Human Rights
Commission, in concert with a new group, Spokane Citizens for a Living
Wage, has begun working on the issue again. More than 75 living wage
campaigns are underway around the country, and most communities that have
considered such a law have voted for it.
According to a poll by Jobs for the Future
in early 2000, an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that those
who work full-time should be able to earn enough to keep their families
out of poverty. For a growing number of Spokane families this is
difficult. Wages here lag well behind state and national levels, while the
cost of living is higher. The average annual wage for retail and service
industry workers in Spokane -- half of all employees in the county is well
below the amount needed to meet basic needs for a family of four, which
the Spokane Regional Health District puts at a little over $25,000 a year
(or about $12 an hour). Many workers hold down two jobs just to make ends
meet. A living wage law will begin to address this.
Do living wage laws work? Studies indicate
that they raise the wages of home health care workers, janitors, food
service workers, security guards and others, with little cost in terms of
business profits, jobs, or tax dollars.
And while the directly affected families
benefit, so do the rest of us. One out of every five homes sold by Spokane
realtors in recent months has been re-possessed. Families with living wage
jobs are more able to get loans to buy (and keep) a home or start a
business. Families that are able to meet their basic needs are more likely
to be able to support their children's health and education. This means
less demand on public assistance, on charities, on teachers, and on the
police, which benefits all of us. It means more taxpayers. Extra dollars
that these families receive from a living wage law will be spent locally,
getting the roof fixed, buying a used car, purchasing a few more groceries
-- generating revenues for small businesses, and quite possibly creating
more jobs as a result.
As the old saying goes, money is like
manure; it works best if you spread it around. Even the affected firms
have benefited, through increases in morale and productivity, and
decreases in employee turnover.
Poverty wage jobs are expensive, to all of
us. It is a much better use of our public resources to create jobs which
allow Spokane citizens to live in independence and dignity. There is
nothing wrong with using subsidies and tax breaks to attract and keep
employers. The problem is that they are usually offered without any demand
for accountability with regard to wages or the number of jobs created.
This "low road" to economic development promises nothing but
further stagnation and suffering for most Spokane residents.
A "high road" approach to
Spokane's future focuses on raising the living standards of average
working families. A living wage law is a good first step on this road. It
would also be a step toward fairness. And justice. And One Spokane.
Mark Santow is an
assistant professor of history at Gonzaga University
and vice chair of the Spokane Human Rights Commission.

MONDAY,
JUNE 24
Port Workers Solidarity Rallies in Seattle,
Tacoma Thursday
On July 1, contracts
for nearly all West Coast maritime workers' unions expire -- longshore
workers, sailors, marine firemen, mates and marine engineers. Union
representatives say employers are stonewalling negotiations and demanding
major givebacks from union workers, trying to provoke a lockout or a strike.
But if
all port workers unite, they can win. So this Thursday, June 27 simultaneous
Port Workers Solidarity Rallies (and BBQs) will be held during lunchtime in
both Seattle and Tacoma, sponsored by the International Longshore and
Warehouse Union,
the International
Brotherhood of Teamsters Port Division, and the International Longshoremen's
Association.
SEATTLE:
From noon to 1 p.m. at Terminal 25 (East Marginal Way at S. Hanford,
two blocks north of Spokane Street).
***
ALSO! Join members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical
Workers at 8 a.m. that morning at Pier 69 in Seattle as they rally in
their continuing campaign against privatization at port facilities. ***
TACOMA: From 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Port Satellite Yard
(Port of Tacoma Road at E. 11, across from Concrete Technology)
In Seattle, fully
25 percent of jobs are port-related; in Tacoma, it's 40 percent. Port jobs
are some of the best-paying union jobs in the Puget Sound, and they're
protected by some of the strongest unions and best contracts in the nation.
Waterfront workers and their unions have always shown solidarity with others
in need and in struggle, and now they are calling on their supporters from
other unions and in the community to attend these solidarity rallies.
Let's show a
massive display of workers' unity! Wear your union jacket and bring your
union banners as post workers call for:
-
A
fair longshore contract... now!
-
Workplace
rights for port truckers
-
Environmental
protections for port communities
For
more information about the contract talks, check out Friday's N.Y. Times
story, Fears
for jobs could bring shutdown of West Coast ports, which explains "the
longshoremen fear that their jobs — and those of future generations of
longshoremen — are under siege. Those fears could lead to a shutdown of
all seaports from San Diego to Seattle on July 1, a move that could send
shock waves through the nation's already fragile economy."

MONDAY,
JUNE 24
State
ergonomics rule get its day in court this Friday
As many of
you know, the business community's attack on the state ergonomics standard
has not been limited to legislative and political action. The state
Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) will be also be defending the
rule in court -- and the date is set for this Friday, June 28 at 1:30
p.m. at Thurston County Superior Court at 2000
Lakeridge Drive S.W. in Olympia with Judge Paula Casey presiding. (The
hearing was originally scheduled for earlier this month, but was resceduled.)
The
business community, having succeeded in stopping the federal government from
implementing a standard on the nation's No. 1 job safety issue, has waged a
particularly aggressive fight to prevent Washington state from establishing
a standard compelling employers to take steps to prevent musculoskeletal
injuries. Like Washington's progressive indexed minimum wage law that is now
being championed in other states throughout the country, business groups
fear a successful state ergonomics rule here would spread to other states.
A hysterical campaign of misinformation about
the rule by the Association of Washington Business and other business
lobbying groups succeeded in generating enough outrage and confusion to
convince Governor Gary Locke to delay enforcement of the rule by two years,
ostensibly so employers could have more time to study the rule and prepare
to comply. But business groups have vowed to use those two years trying to
kill the bill in the legislature and in court, rather than educating member
employers on how to comply.
Friday's hearing will take up the suit filed
against L&I by the so-called WE CARE (Washington Employers Concerned
About Regulating Ergonomics) Coalition which argues, among other things,
that L&I has exceeded its authority in adopting the rule, it did so
without following proper procedures, its cost-benefit analysis is flawed,
there isn't enough scientific evidence to support the need for ergonomics
prevention, and the implementation plan is inadequate. Check out the WE
CARE brief.
WE CARE attorneys from Stoel
Rives LLP will try to convince Judge Casey that they know better than
the Governor's Blue Ribbon Panel of ergonomics experts -- which included
representatives from business. After a year of study, that panel unanimously
concluded that L&I's rule is understandable and enforceable in a fair
and balanced manner.
Like their tobacco industry counterparts, WE
CARE attorneys will try to convince Judge Casey that they know better than
the National Academy of Sciences and countless universities which have
conducted exhaustive studies of the relationship between work and repetitive
stress injuries, and concluded that simple, cost-effective steps can be
taken to prevent these injuries.
Further, they will claim that Boeing,
Weyerhaueser, Seattle City Light and many other enlightened employers who
have voluntarily implemented ergonomics prevention programs because they
have led to considerable savings in workers' compensation premiums must be
using flawed cost-benefit analyses.
And ultimately, they will try to argue that
the state's constitutional obligation to protect the health and safety of
workers should not apply to the 50,000 workers who suffer these injuries
every year, costing the state workers' compensation system some $400 million
annually.
It should be entertaining -- and infuriating
-- so make plans to attend the hearing. The
AFL-CIO has filed a brief on behalf of workers in our state and will also
present arguments for the rule
.
If you have any questions, contact WSLC
Safety and Education Director Randy
Loomans at (360)
943-0608.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues
in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail
to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.
Copyright © 2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|