|
Reports for
July 8-12, 2002
Previous weeks' news: June
24-27 -- June
17-21 -- June
10-14
FRIDAY, July 12 --
Court REJECTS attempt to
derail ergonomics rule
....plus --
Providence Mother Joseph
nurses rally, picket in Olympia
In today's Olympian -- Mother
Joseph workers: Wages, care are ailing
In today's Seattle Times -- In
a first, Locke joins legal fray over BIAW's Referendum 53
....plus -- Machinists,
engineers join forces, take case against Boeing job cuts to Wall Street
In today's Bremerton Sun -- New
Narrows Bridge to use foreign steel, workers
In today's News-Tribune -- Bill
Gates backs gas-tax increase with $100,000 contribution
In the new Seattle Weekly -- Key
enviro groups will campaign against state gas-tax increase
In today's Yakima H-R -- CanAm
steel workers vote against joining union
In today's Spokesman-Review -- Amtrak:
We want it, but we won't fund it (op-ed)
In today's Salem (Ore.) S-J --
Home
caregivers seek better pay amid Oregon budget crisis
...plus -- Teamsters'
strike is first ever at Woodburn Smucker plant
In today's Everett Herald -- No
child left behind? Utter nonsense --Must-read op-ed: The political
phrase, and new Dept. of Education anthem,
"No child left behind" is the
very acme of American political rhetoric, a perfect encapsulation of who we
are as a culture: trivial, false and meaningless.
At AFLCIO.org -- Longshore
workers are fighting for their livelihood
...plus -- AFL-CIO launches www.laidoffworkers.org
for workers victimized by corrupt corporations
In today's L.A. Times -- As
a board member, Bush OK'd deal like Enron's
...plus -- WorldCom
forcing employees to sign legal waivers to get severance, health benefits
In today's Washington Post -- Congress
challenges Bush on federal workers' pay, union rights
...plus -- Senate
rejects listing stock options as corporate expense
...and finally -- Keep
drug coverage private, says Bush -- Taking page from pharmaceutical
industry talking points, Bush says federal prescription drug coverage would
"stifle innovation."
In today's N.Y. Times -- The
insider game -- Krugman column: The current crisis in American
capitalism isn't just about the specific details about tricky
accounting, stock options, loans to executives, and so on. It's about the
way the game has been rigged on behalf of insiders.
THURSDAY, July 11 --
YOUR union news belongs RIGHT HERE
In today's News-Tribune --
WTO
ruling could be costly to Boeing -- Boeing threat: If the WTO succeeds
in forcing Congress to revoke the $250-million-a-year tax break the company
enjoys, it will be "forced" to move jobs overseas to take
advantage of cheaper labor to remain "competitive."
In today's Yakima H-R -- CanAm
steel workers vote today on organizing union (SMWIA 66)
In today's Seattle Times -- Ref.
53 and the case for vetting the ballot (editorial)
...plus -- Qwest
stock pummeled as criminal probe is confirmed
In today's Olympian -- Philip
Morris to secure Miller workers' pensions
In today's Bellingham Herald -- BTC
talks with clerical staff go to mediation
In today's Salem (Ore.) S-J -- Smuckers
workers (IBT) at Woodburn plant go on strike
In today's L.A. Times -- UPS
labor deadline looms (July 31)
In today's N.Y. Times -- Bush
failed to stress need to rein in stock options
...plus -- Bush
calls for end to corporate loans of a type he once received
In today's Washington Post -- As
pension protection bills gain, differences remain
In today's Louisville (Ky.) C-J -- U.S.
Senate rejects tougher rules on labor unions -- Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)
wanted unions to get more financial policing, apparently because executives
at Enron, WorldCom and other corporations have fraudulently driven their
firms into bankruptcy, costing tens of thousands of workers their jobs and
retirement savings, and sending the entire U.S. stock market into a
tailspin. Although the Labor Secretary's husband failed, 43
Senators -- all Republicans -- thought this was a good idea.
WEDNESDAY, July 10 --
Sweeney: Bush's
get-tough rhetoric an inadequate response
...plus at AFL-CIO.org -- WorldCom
worker joins the club: "I can't take (Bush) seriously"
In today's Washington Post --
WorldCom
workers have lost $1.1 billion in their 401(k)s
In today's Wall Street Journal -- Bush's
past may hinder crackdown (yuh think?)
In today's N.Y. Times -- The
corporate scandals: Coming clean -- Editorial: The president needs to
speak much more frankly about the money he made in selling his faltering oil
company... (which) engaged in questionable bookkeeping practices while Mr.
Bush served on its board. While the S.E.C. has found no illegalities, he
would be a more persuasive advocate of reform if he acknowledged this
deal... is not a shining example of the stern code of responsibility he now
demands.
In today's Spokesman-Review --
Must-read
Molly Ivins column: Perhaps I am too cynical, but I believe there is a
separate class of people in this country called Too Rich to Go to Prison.
With the peerless John Ashcroft at the helm of the Justice Dept., I don't
think any of the now-infamous CEOs need to lose sleep over the prospect.
It's not exactly like Bobby Kennedy going after Jimmy Hoffa.
Today from SatireWire -- Bush
vows crackdown on all corporate crime that didn't happen in 1990
The rest of today's headlines:
In today's Everett Herald -- Boeing
Machinists authorize strike by 98% majority
...plus -- Machinists
take profit vs. job loss issues to Wall Street
In today's Bremerton Sun -- Kitsap
County freezes hiring, cites rising health care costs
In today's Olympian -- National
mood key in longshore labor talks
In today's Seattle Times -- Groups
plea for human services as King County cuts budget
In today's Oregonian -- PERS
board: Oregon retirees are just living too long
In today's Washington Post -- Bush
to ask Homeland Security workers for "flexibility" (bend over)
Today at MSNBC.com -- Machinists
at United reject 10 percent pay cut
TUESDAY, July 9 --
What "outrages" Bush today, enriched him in
the 1980s
In today's Seattle P-I -- Coalition
files suit to stop BIAW's Referendum 53
In today's South County Journal -- Today's
strike vote another step in IAM-Boeing talks
In today's News-Tribune -- The
president, any president, needs Fast Track authority (editorial)
In today's Olympian -- Number
of state jobs dips; more cuts imminent
...plus -- PDC
orders investigation of State Democrats
In today's Everett Herald -- Teens'
focus on paycheck often outweighs job safety
In today's Seattle Times -- Pension
losses will hurt many firms' bottom lines
...plus -- The
collision between commerce, democracy -- Dionne column: Now
is the time for the democratic tradition to reassert itself. Some very
wealthy people, exercising their power at the helms of great corporations,
made themselves even richer by lying, by cheating and by abusing their
stockholders and employees. In the Federalist Papers, James Madison warned
of the danger of laws "made for the few, not for the many." That's
a patriotic sentiment, and we should act upon it.
In today's L.A. Times -- Corporate
scandals bring calls for jail, but convictions are elusive
In today's Washington Post -- The
conservative bubble boys -- Op-ed: It is no accident that the current
wave of costly corporate scandals followed the rise of modern conservatism
to political power two decades ago... What laissez-faire, anti-government
zealots did by trashing government, cutting regulatory budgets and
authority, and blocking needed reforms was to weaken the cop on the beat.
...plus -- Health
care's soaring cost takes a toll on workers, firms and government
MONDAY, July 8 --
Bender: Wall Street Greed
Threatens Our Future -- WSLC
President Rick Bender's monthly column distributed to weekly newspapers
across the state and to labor editors.
In today's Everett Herald -- Boeing
Machinists expected to give strike OK Tuesday
In yesterday's News-Tribune -- Rep.
Adam Smith again in hot seat as Fast Track vote looms
...plus -- Which
initiatives made the cut (I-776, I-790), and which didn't (I-791)
In today's Seattle P-I -- Police,
fire rank and file want more pension clout with I-790
...plus -- State
seeks public help to monitor farm camps after discovery of squalid Clark Co.
shelter
In today's Seattle Times -- State's
seniors deserve beefed up Medicare benefits -- In touting the GOP's drug
industry-supported Medicare bill, Rep. Dunn endorses the idea behind our
state prescription drug bill: "The bill will lower the overall cost of
prescription drugs by up to 30 percent because Medicare will make bulk
purchases and pass the savings along to patients." Get
the truth about the GOP bill that rewards HMOs, drug companies and
insurers with billions in public subsidies.
In today's Washington Post -- With
corporate ties, Bush walks delicate line on business reform
In today's N.Y. Times -- The
free market needs new rules -- Sen. McCain op-ed: I have long opposed
unnecessary regulation of business activity... But in the current climate
only a restoration of the system of checks and balances that once protected
the American investor that has seriously deteriorated over the past 10
years can restore the confidence that makes financial markets work.
...and in a related story -- Former
WorldCom executives will refuse to testify before Congress
In today's Wall Street Journal -- Drug
giant Merck reported billions not collected as income
Today from SatireWire -- Supreme
Court rules corporate earnings statements protected as "art"
Previous weeks' news: June
24-27 -- June
17-21 -- June
10-14

FRIDAY,
JULY 12
Court REJECTS attempt to derail ergonomics
rule
Thurston County Superior Court Judge Paula
Casey today rejected every single argument in a business group's lawsuit
against the state over its development and implementation of an ergonomics
rule designed to prevent musculoskeletal injuries at Washington
workplaces.
"This ruling is great news
for working families in Washington state," said Rick Bender, President
of the Washington State Labor Council. "The state has an interest --
and in fact a constitutional obligation -- to ensure its workplaces are safe
and healthy, and the ergonomics rule is a critically important step toward
addressing the No. 1 cause of work injury in this state."
Some 50,000 workers suffer ergonomic-related injuries every
year in Washington, costing the state workers' compensation system around
$400 million annually. The state rule promulgated by the Department of
Labor and Industries requires businesses to develop a plan to identify and
address ergonomic hazards (get rule details at the L&I
web site). It has already been implemented, but enforcement is not
scheduled to begin until 2004.
Among the arguments presented by the so-called WE CARE (Washington Employers Concerned
About Regulating Ergonomics) Coalition in its suit against the Department of
Labor and Industries was that L&I had exceeded its authority in adopting the rule, it did so
without following proper procedures, its cost-benefit analysis is flawed,
there isn't enough scientific evidence to support the need for ergonomics
prevention, and the implementation plan is inadequate.
Today, Judge Casey ruled no, no, no, no
and... no.
As
reported in the Wall Street Journal, national corporate interests
have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the WE CARE Coalition in
an attempt to defeat the rule and stamp out Washington's pioneering
ergonomics rule before it spreads to other states. They have vowed to appeal
today's decision to the Supreme Court.
"Once again, this important
rule has survived an aggressive attack from certain short-sighted members of
the business community," Bender said. "If they follow through on
their threat to appeal the decision, we will continue to do whatever we can
to help the state defend this critically needed standard."
In February, after studying the
ergonomics rule for an entire year, an independent Blue Ribbon Panel of
ergonomic experts -- which included representatives from the business
community -- unanimously determined that the rule was understandable and
ready for implementation. Today, the court concurred with that
assessment.
Boeing,
Weyerhaueser, Seattle City Light and many other large employers
have voluntarily implemented ergonomics prevention programs. They have
reduced injury rates and realized considerable savings in workers' compensation premiums
for their efforts.
"The fact is, promoting health and
safety at work is not just the right thing to do, it's good business,"
Bender said. "But more importantly, ergonomic awareness and prevention
will stop thousands of easily avoidable injuries -- ones that devastate the
affected families physically and economically -- from ever happening."

FRIDAY,
JULY 12
Providence Mother Joseph nurses rally, picket
in Olympia
The following is a press release for District 1199NW of
the Service Employees International Union:
Providence Mother
Joseph Nurses, Staff Picket and Rally for Better Staffing
OLYMPIA Registered nurses, licensed practical nurses,
certified nursing assistants, and other staff who work at Providence Mother
Joseph Care Center rallied and picketed today to call on their
administrators to make changes that will help attract and retain good staff.
Were fighting for good staffing for our patients. Right now we rely on
temporary staff to keep up, but we need to find ways to retain good staff so
patients can count on stable, quality care, said Sandy Corman, a LPN with
more than six years of experience at the facility.
In contract negotiations that began in May, staff at the long-term care
facility have proposed creating longevity pay incentives to help retain
dedicated caregivers. But the PMJCC administration is demanding that
employees accept a contract that lacks adequate staffing incentives.
Recruitment and retention is a key issue in health care, as health care
facilities across Washington face ongoing shortages of qualified caregivers.
Currently, Providence Mother Joseph Care Center has 180 caregivers on staff.
The employees belong to the 10,000-member Service Employees International
Union District 1199NW. SEIU is the nations largest and fastest-growing
health care union, with more than 760,000 members working in health care.
For more information, contact Carter
Wright, SEIU 1199NW Communications Director, at (425) 917-1199 or visit www.seiu1199nw.org.

THURSDAY,
JULY 11
YOUR union news belongs RIGHT HERE. So
send it!
Since its inception in September 1997, WSLC Online has made
a commitment to reporting labor news as it happens -- updating this site
daily with new information and links to commercial media news of interest to
union members.
The reward has been steadily increasing traffic from an
embarrassingly low level to today's average of about 500
"unique" visitors every weekday. Many report that they check the
site daily; often it's the first thing they do in the morning after checking
their e-mail.
All unions affiliated with the Washington State Labor
Council should take advantage of this and get the word out on your
organizing efforts, contract negotiations, strikes, legislative and
political action, community service and whatever information you'd like to
share with the rest of the labor community in the Northwest.
All you have to do is email (dgroves@wslc.org)
or fax (206-285-5805) the information to the webmaster and we'll post it.
Depending on the issue, we may also be able to distribute it via email to
our ever-growing list of union members, activists and other interested folks
who have signed up to join the WSLC
E-List.
And by the way, labor editors should feel free to "copy
and paste" any information from this website into their own
publications or mailings. All we ask is that you attribute it to the
Washington State Labor Council and list the web address (www.wslc.org)
when you do so.

WEDNESDAY,
JULY 10
Sweeney: Bush's get-tough rhetoric an
"inadequate response"
AFL-CIO President offers 7-point plan
for serious corporate reform
The following statement by AFL-CIO President
John Sweeney -- who will be keynote speaker at next month's Washington
State Labor Council convention in Spokane -- was released Tuesday in
response to President Bush's underwhelming call for corporate evil-doers to
develop a conscience:
From the President to members of Congress
from both parties, elected leaders are using tough words this week to
demand a new spirit of corporate responsibility. But rhetoric and calls
for companies to police themselves are an inadequate response to the
hundreds of thousands of working families who have lost jobs, pensions and
health care because the companies they worked for lied to their employees,
their investors and the public.
The measure now must be the actions the
President and members of Congress are prepared to take to close the gaping
loopholes in our laws that foster the hijacking of American business by
insiders bent on self-enrichment. Better enforcement of existing laws and
new penalties for "bad apples" are not a sufficient answer. The
corporate wrongdoing being exposed daily is not the product of a few bad
people. It is the result of markets that were once well regulated, but now
allow short-term pressures to combine with conflicts of interest and
unchecked greed to destroy companies, industries and lives. Even
responsible CEOs can hardly run a company that respects its employees, its
investors, its customers and its community when its competitors take the
low road. The crisis in corporate governance demands rapid, fundamental
legal reform.
Some of the reforms being proposed are good
and important; others are shams. In the Senate, the Sarbanes bill on
accounting and corporate governance reform, the Leahy-McCain bill on
penalties for securities fraud and the Kennedy pension reform bill are
important steps that deserve the support of every senator. But the Oxley
bill, supported by President Bush and passed by Republicans in the House,
does nothing to prevent future Enrons or Worldcoms and will actually
weaken the nominal investor protections that exist today to hold boards of
directors accountable.
It is positive that President Bush has
acknowledged the serious problems that exist and moved to take some key
steps toward reform. Unfortunately, the proposals made by the president
today only scratch the surface of the widespread problems afflicting
corporate America. They fall short of the new rules today's economy so
desperately
needs, and in suggesting that the problem is simply one of business
"ethics and corporate responsibility," they miss the mark. As
important as corporate responsibility is, corporate accountability - not
only to shareholders but also to employees, customers and the communities
in which they operate - is much more important. And accountability
requires new rules.
The challenge of credibility on the issue
of corporate accountability for President Bush is steep. From his first
days in office, he advanced legal and regulatory changes to loosen
controls on big corporations. He repealed a Clinton rule that would have
made it harder for chronic corporate lawbreakers to get lucrative federal
contracts paid for with taxpayer dollars. He pushed to turn back
ergonomics health and safety standards to protect workers from corporate
negligence. His administration revoked efforts to shut down offshore tax
havens and he appointed the chief lobbyist for the accounting industry
head of the SEC to police big accounting firms like Arthur Andersen. In
the wake of Enron and Worldcom, he's thrown up barriers to reform.
To exert real leadership, the president
will not only have to put the weight of his presidency behind serious
reforms that go further, he must also insist on an investigation of the
irregularities at Halliburton when Vice President Cheney was CEO and fully
disclose details of his own sale of Harken Energy stock.
Serious reform should start in seven areas:
We need new rules to reform the
incentive system for CEOs and require that they take personal
responsibility for the information their companies issue to investors.
The use of stock options that has driven executive compensation up to an
obscene 410 times average workers' pay today provides all the wrong
incentives. Stock options should be expensed when they are granted if
they are declared a deduction when the corporation files their tax
returns. And when CEOs personally profit as a result of abusing their
responsibilities, they should be required to return their gains directly
to shareholders and employees whose jobs, health care and pension funds
have been destroyed by the CEO's conduct.
We need reforms to make boards of
directors real watchdogs, and not lapdogs for CEOs. Shareholders must be
given the ability to elect truly independent board candidates. Short of
that, a call such as President Bush's for more independent directors
will fail.
We need new rules to ensure strict
separation of internal and external auditors. External auditing firms
should be prohibited from providing most consulting or other business
services for the companies whose accounts they are certifying and should
be regularly rotated to ensure the companies they serve do not capture
them. A public oversight body for the accounting industry should be
established with the powers to establish reliable accounting standards
and oversee the accounting industry. And there should be an end to the
immunity from civil liability that auditors, lawyers and investment
bankers now enjoy when they aid and abet securities fraud.
Financial services companies offering
research services to investors should be prohibited from linking analyst
compensation to investment banking performance, to eliminate the
conflicts between honest investment advice and fees to investment firms.
Mutual funds should be required to
disclose to investors how they are voting on proxy votes on issues like
board and auditor independence so that investors know exactly whose
interests the funds are aligned with. And workers should have a voice in
the institutions that invest their money --- starting with the boards of
trustees of their pension plans.
We must have new laws that move
employees from the bottom of the ladder in bankruptcy proceedings to the
top, so individuals whose lives are ruined by their companies' behavior
are not left with crumbs after big banks and preferred creditors get
their share.
We must take away the tax incentives
that encourage companies to dodge their tax responsibilities by
re-incorporating in places like Bermuda.
The challenge of corporate accountability
can only be faced when our elected leaders understand that the problem of
the crisis of confidence in American business stretches beyond "a few
bad apples" to the need to change the rules that are rigged to
entrench and enrich CEOs and other insiders at the expense of employees,
shareholders, the companies themselves, and the national economy.

TUESDAY,
JULY 9
What "outrages" Bush today,
enriched him in the 1980s
Today, President Bush is "outraged"
about the corporate crime scandals ripping through Wall Street, threatening
to plunge our economy into a double-dip recession, and costing thousands of
innocent workers their jobs and retirements.
Among other things, he is proposing doubling
the jail terms of certain corporate offenders, ignoring the notoriously
low conviction rate of well-heeled, well-defended white-collar
criminals. He is proposing increasing the Security and Exchange Commission
budget and hiring more enforcement officers, ignoring the fact that his
first SEC budget proposed eliminating 57 staff positions, including 13 in
the office of full disclosure and 12 in the office charged with preventing
fraud.
But beside the obvious hypocrisy of Bush's
fantastic leap from his conservative laissez-faire, anti-government history
onto the federal-crackdown-on-corporate-crime bandwagon, lies a disturbing
truth that must not be ignored. Our president has a personal history of corporate malfeasance, shady accounting and insider trading
remarkably similar to recent scandals -- as do a disturbing number of his
Cabinet members, including Vice
President Dick Cheney.
Bush faced some tough questions at a Monday news
conference about his personal history, but the case against him -- as
outlined by Paul Krugman of the New York Times in the following
column --
would almost certainly be the subject of an investigation by an independent
prosecutor, if not for his party's control of Congress. (The same bunch of
hypocrites who sought so aggressively -- and at such great cost to taxpayers
-- to hold Bush's predecessor to "a higher standard of accountability.")
SUCCEEDING IN BUSINESS
by Paul Krugman
On Tuesday, George W. Bush is scheduled to
give a speech intended to put him in front of the growing national outrage
over corporate malfeasance. He will sternly lecture Wall Street executives
about ethics and will doubtless portray himself as a believer in
old-fashioned business probity.
Yet this pose is surreal, given the way top
officials like Secretary of the Army Thomas White, Dick Cheney and Mr.
Bush himself acquired their wealth. As Joshua Green says in The
Washington Monthly, in a
must-read article written just before the administration suddenly
became such an exponent of corporate ethics: "The `new tone' that
George W. Bush brought to Washington isn't one of integrity, but of
permissiveness. . . . In this administration, enriching oneself while
one's business goes bust isn't necessarily frowned upon."
Unfortunately, the administration has so
far gotten the press to focus on the least important question about Mr.
Bush's business dealings: his failure to obey the law by promptly
reporting his insider stock sales. It's true that Mr. Bush's story about
that failure has suddenly changed, from "the dog ate my
homework" to "my lawyer ate my homework four times."
But the administration hopes that a narrow focus on the reporting lapses
will divert attention from the larger point: Mr. Bush profited personally
from aggressive accounting identical to the recent scams that have shocked
the nation.
In 1986, one would have had to consider Mr.
Bush a failed businessman. He had run through millions of dollars of other
people's money, with nothing to show for it but a company losing money and
heavily burdened with debt. But he was rescued from failure when
Harken Energy
bought his company at an astonishingly high price. There is no question
that Harken was basically paying for Mr. Bush's connections.
Despite these connections, Harken did
badly. But for a time it concealed its failure sustaining its stock
price, as it turned out, just long enough for Mr. Bush to sell most of his
stake at a large profit with an accounting trick identical to one of
the main ploys used by
Enron
a decade later. (Yes, Arthur Andersen was the accountant.) As I explained
in my previous column, the ploy works as follows: corporate insiders
create a front organization that seems independent but is really under
their control. This front buys some of the firm's assets at
unrealistically high prices, creating a phantom profit that inflates the
stock price, allowing the executives to cash in their stock.
That's exactly what happened at Harken. A
group of insiders, using money borrowed from Harken itself, paid an
exorbitant price for a Harken subsidiary, Aloha Petroleum. That created a
$10 million phantom profit, which hid three-quarters of the company's
losses in 1989. White House aides have played down the significance of
this maneuver, saying $10 million isn't much, compared with recent
scandals. Indeed, it's a small fraction of the apparent profits
Halliburton
created through a sudden change in accounting procedures during Dick
Cheney's tenure as chief executive. But for Harken's stock price and
hence for Mr. Bush's personal wealth this accounting trickery made all
the difference.
Oh, and Harken's fake profits were several
dozen times as large as the Whitewater land deal though only about
one-seventh the cost of the Whitewater investigation.
Mr. Bush was on the company's audit
committee, as well as on a special restructuring committee; back in 1994,
another member of both committees, E. Stuart Watson, assured reporters
that he and Mr. Bush were constantly made aware of the company's finances.
If Mr. Bush didn't know about the Aloha maneuver, he was a very negligent
director.
In any case, Mr. Bush certainly found out
what his company had been up to when the Securities and Exchange
Commission ordered it to restate its earnings. So he can't really be
shocked over recent corporate scams. His own company pulled exactly the
same tricks, to his considerable benefit. Of course, what really made Mr.
Bush a rich man was the investment of his proceeds from Harken in the
Texas Rangers a step that is another, equally strange story.
The point is the contrast between image and
reality. Mr. Bush portrays himself as a regular guy, someone ordinary
Americans can identify with. But his personal fortune was built on
privilege and insider dealings and after his Harken sale, on
large-scale corporate welfare. Some people have it easy.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues
in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail
to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.
Copyright © 2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|