WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column2000 Convention
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 WSLC Reports Today logoUPDATED DAILY -- M-F by 9 a.m. Pacific

Links to commercial press stories are functional at the date of posting. In some cases, links "expire" when the source would like to begin charging you for old news. Disclaimer: WSLC Reports Today  links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive and some negative. The intention is to inform.  The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content.


Reports for July 15-19, 2002

Previous weeks' news: July 8-12 -- June 24-27 -- June 17-21 -- June 10-14

FRIDAY, July 19 -- Sweeney: Now is no time to reward corporate greed with Fast Track -- Many of the same big corporations that have victimized shareholders have also victimized employees. Nearly all of the big corporations that promised to create jobs in the U.S. after NAFTA passed shipped them overseas instead. Plus, it's not too late to Call Congress to Stop Fast Track
And speaking of corporations that promised NAFTA would create jobs... 
— In today's News-Tribune -- Boeing's overnight shift -- "Will it ever be back to normal?" asks IAM 751 President Mark Blondin.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- 650 more Boeing workers lose their jobs; 870 get warned they're next
At WashTech.org -- High-tech workers: No quick turnaround in tech employment
— In yesterday's S.F. Chronicle -- As tech jobs decrease, interest in unions is up
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Talmadge ready to stir the pot with bid for Governor (Connelly column)
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Locke hears pros and cons of SE2 power plant
— In today's Seattle Times -- King County parks plan: Raise fees — and maybe taxes
...plus -- Appeals court: Gays constitutionally protected in public workforce
...plus -- Put workers and towns ahead of forest posturing -- Dickie column: Link the fate of old-growth forests with restoration jobs. Don't give the greens or industry a thing, unless they help.
— In today's USA Today -- Retirement crisis looms as many come up short
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Senate votes to help states expand drug cost cuts of Medicaid
...plus -- House takes up, but then drops, Bermuda corporate tax-shelter issue -- Accenture, a Bermuda company that is the former consulting arm of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm, had lobbyists in the Capitol working to make sure it could continue to get government contracts.
— In the American Prospect -- Can liberals save capitalism (again)? -- The entire set of free-market era claims are due for scholarly reappraisal and broad political challenge, just like in the 1930s.

THURSDAY, July 18 -- Microsoft, other corporations ask Congress for state-tax shelters
— In today's Seattle Times -- Boeing eases layoff worries as earnings bounce back
— In today's Everett Herald -- Layoffs keep profit margins up, Boeing says (But at what cost?)
— In today's L.A. Times -- ILWU offers to cut jobs in port talks
— In today's News-Tribune -- Labor ads blast GOP candidates over Fast Track
— In today's Olympian -- Politicians forfeit out-of-state contributions (from unions)
...plus -- Locke urges action on regional roads package
— In today's Yakima H-R -- Move to legalize undocumented students gains support
— In today's Eastside Journal -- Tax debate not just about the numbers (editorial re: I-776)
— In today's South County Journal -- Educators praise retire-rehire law
— In the new Stranger -- Hedreen update: Downtown developer misleads Seattle council again
At AFLCIO.org -- Advertising, marketing eat biggest chunk of prescription drug firms' money
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Bush: Cheaper Canadian drugs pose health threat -- "Terrorists" invoked.
...plus -- Poll finds concerns that Bush is overly influenced by business -- Ya THINK?!
...plus -- SEC chief Pitt to take role in cases of former clients -- Pitt: "It would be unthinkable to deprive people of my expertise." We're not making this up.
...and finally -- Congressional cowardice -- Editorial: On two issues critical to cleaning up corporate malfeasance (the Bermuda corporate tax loophole and CEO stock options), Congress has opted to put the preferences of big business — and big campaign contributors — ahead of the public good.
— In today's L.A. Times -- For CEOs, it's a lot lonelier at the top -- Leads with tale of one $16,600-a-week CEO embarrassed to admit her occupation during a Hawaii vacation. WAH!

WEDNESDAY, July 17 -- Chandler-Feeney "Circus" at ILWU Hall in Tacoma on Monday
...plus from SEIU Local 6 -- TAKE ACTION to support Vashon nursing home workers
— In today's Seattle Times -- UPS contract "a grand slam", Hoffa says
...plus -- Gov. Locke calls meeting to keep regional transportation plan from stalling
— In today's Everett Herald -- Gorton stumps for Referendum 51
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Ref. 51 would give Clark County its "fair share"
— In today's Seattle P-I -- State agencies' e-mail abuse firings called unfair
— In today's News-Tribune -- Bad news, good news: Labor Ready profits up, as Arizona sues firm
— In today's Olympian -- Intel to cut 4,000 jobs; effect on 1,500 DuPont plant workers unclear
— In today's Salem (Ore.) S-J -- Norpac, farmworker negotiations ongoing
Today at AFLCIO.org -- AFL-CIO runs TV ads denouncing "Yes" votes on Fast Track
...and don't forget -- TOMORROW is National Call-In Day to Stop Fast Track
— In today's N.Y. Times -- UPS, Teamsters reach deal for a 25% raise
— In today's Washington Post -- House GOP fights Senate's tough corporate accounting plan
...plus -- Senate divided over rival plans for prescription drug coverage
...plus -- Homeland Security debate: Union rights vs. a "culture of urgency"
— In today's L.A. Times -- RadioShack agrees to pay $30 million in managers' unpaid OT suit 

TUESDAY, July 16 -- Get ready: National Call-In Day on Fast Track is Thursday
...plus at Teamsters.org -- Hoffa announces details of tentative UPS agreement
— In today's Seattle Times -- Accord averts UPS strike, but 210,000 Teamsters still must OK pact
...plus -- L&I must ease pain for ergonomics ruling -- Editorial: With a court ruling that upholds Washington's ground-breaking ergonomics rule, the biggest obstacle the Department of Labor and Industries has now is building trust with skittish business operators.
— In the P.S. Business Journal -- Arizona sues Labor Ready over check-cashing fees
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Longview Aluminum talks could disrupt BPA power payments
...plus -- WTO protesters appear prophetic -- Gonsalves column: Thomas Jefferson spoke of the need "to crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
— In today's South County Journal -- Boeing OT doesn't mean crisis looms
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- County council to vote on nonunion employees' pay, benefits
— In today's News-Tribune -- Cha-ching: Narrows bridge price tag jumps
Today at AFLCIO.org -- Sweeney: Thomas' corporate tax reform bill "outrageous"
— Today from MSNBC -- Bush signed letter promising to hold stock, but sold it before Harken crash 
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Steps to wealth -- Krugman column: Bush's past business dealings are relevant because they foreshadow many disturbing characteristics of his administration: an obsession with secrecy and an intermingling of public policy with private interest.
— In today's Washington Post -- For Cheney, tarnish from Halliburton -- Page A1:
An executive sells shares in his energy company two months before the company announces unexpected bad news, and the stock price eventually tumbles to a quarter of the price at which the insider sold his. George W. Bush at Harken Energy in 1990? Yes, but also Richard B. Cheney at Halliburton Co. in 2000.
— In today's Financial Times -- Enron factor hits WorldCom 401(k) plans
— In today's USA Today -- Antiquated labor laws fail to protect young workers

MONDAY, July 15 -- Rolling Thunder's "country fair with guts" coming August 24
— In Sunday's News-Tribune -- Overtaxed? Don't count on the numbers to prove it -- Truth-challenged Eyman says we're 2nd highest taxed. The truth is we're 20th among states, down from 6th in 1995.
...plus -- Can Washington do more than argue about traffic solutions? (editorial)
— In Saturday's Seattle P-I -- Judge rejects challenge to ergonomics rule
...and today -- In compromise, some foreign steel will be used on 2nd Narrows bridge
...plus -- Battle brewing over tech-worker visas; WashTech wants H1-B program scaled back
— In today's Seattle Times -- Boeing in retreat on Sonic Cruiser?
... plus on Sunday -- Summer of strikes? Contracts up in the air in 4 key industries
— In Saturday's Everett Herald -- Barlean ends congressional bid, says GOP has given up on 2nd
— In Sunday's Spokesman-Review -- State agencies differ on personal e-mail, web use policy
— In Saturday's Long Beach (Calif.) P-T -- Boeing engineers in California decertify from OPEIU
— In today's Salem (Ore.) S-J -- Sizemore's political power starts to wane
— In today's Washington Post -- WorldCom ignored workers' concerns about accounting
...plus -- Too soft on stock options -- Mallaby column: Stock options, at least as they exist currently, do not reward performance. And their accounting cover-up is not incidental -- it is central to the real goal of many options schemes, which is to disguise bosses' absurd pay from the rest of us.
— Today at MSNBC.com -- Sticky business: Cheney's staff: "We don't discuss Halliburton issues" -- Why? Maybe because the Vice President -- who bragged during the campaign, "By any measure you want to use, Halliburton has been a great success story" -- now sees his old company enmeshed in a SEC investigation about accounting practices during his tenure. Its stock has fallen 75% since he left to run for vice president, in large part because of fallout from a huge takeover he orchestrated in 1998. Unlike company investors, Cheney made out well, taking in $45 million in just under five years.

Previous weeks' news: July 8-12 -- June 24-27 -- June 17-21 -- June 10-14

FRIDAY, JULY 19
Now is no time to reward corporate greed with Fast Track

The following statement from AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, who will appear at the WSLC's 2002 Convention in Spokane this August, was released Thursday: (If you forgot to do so Thursday, it's not too late to Call Congress to Stop Fast Track.)

It's no surprise that the White House and many of the nation's biggest multinational corporations want to rush flawed Fast Track trade legislation through the Congress—a move that will "Fast Track" away even more jobs. After all, hundreds of corporate lobbyists advise the Administration on trade policy behind closed doors.

But what is surprising is that Big Business and the Bush Administration are willing to end run congressional checks and balances on future trade agreements at a time when the American people's trust in corporations is so low.

Fast Track will do nothing to boost market confidence. During the economic expansion of the 1990's, the President didn't even have Fast Track authority. In fact, when Fast Track was shelved in 1997 and defeated in 1998, the markets continued to grow.

Instead, Fast Track will continue to drain good jobs from this country. Our nation has lost more than a million manufacturing jobs over the past 12 months. Since 1994, according to the Economic Policy Institute, about 3 million jobs have been lost due to growing trade deficits—mainly with the same countries with which we have signed recent trade agreements. This Fast Track bill—which would allow the President to expand NAFTA to the rest of the hemisphere and would not give Congress the right to fix flawed deals—would only accelerate that trend.

Many of the same big corporations that have victimized shareholders have also victimized employees. Nearly all of the big corporations who promised to create jobs in the U.S. after NAFTA passed shipped them overseas instead.

But perhaps far worse is what the corporations want to do with Fast Track. Global accounting standards could be watered down. Public services here and abroad could be privatized at the expense of consumers. More jobs could be shipped abroad where corporations would be under no obligation to honor internationally-recognized workers' rights, such as a ban on child labor.
The AFL-CIO urges Congress to reject more of this corporate malfeasance and reject Fast Track.

THURSDAY, JULY 18
Microsoft, other corporations seek state, local tax shelters

Even as Washington and most other states around the country face dire budget crises caused by the recession and the events of Sept. 11, Microsoft and other corporations are seeking new federal restrictions on state and local governments' ability to impose taxes on "national" corporations. This, despite evidence that the corporate tax burden has dropped significantly in recent years. (Now, class, can anyone tell me where more of the tax burden has shifted to?)

The following story on the subject appears in today's New York Times, and also in the Seattle P-I (although it's buried in the Business Section):

Now, a Corporate Push to Avoid State and Local Taxes

By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

As lawmakers debated in Washington yesterday how to close the loophole that allows companies to avoid United States taxes by acquiring a Bermuda mailbox, a bill advanced with a provision that state officials say would let companies avoid state and local taxes using some of the same techniques as the Bermuda loophole.

American Express, Walt Disney, Viacom, Cisco Systems, Eastman Kodak, Johnson & Johnson, the Limited, Lowe's and Microsoft are among the major corporations lobbying for the bill, which was approved by a House Judiciary subcommittee on Tuesday at a hearing held on such short notice that state officials said they could not attend. A full committee vote is expected soon.

The drive to restrict the authority of states and local governments to tax national companies comes as a study, to be released today by the Internal Revenue Service, shows that corporations gave themselves a huge tax cut beginning in 1996 by using tax shelters.

The legislation to restrict state and local taxing authority would cost the states $9 billion in annual revenue in the first few years, a figure that could quickly grow as companies adjust operations to make full use of the proposed loophole, according to the Multistate Tax Commission, which represents states on tax matters. Cities and counties stand to lose billions more.

The bill's promoters insist that if the bill becomes law, the obligation to pay state and local taxes will merely be shifted, benefiting only those places where the companies use state and local services because they have invested in offices, factories and computer servers.

"There need be not one penny less of state tax revenue collected," said Arthur R. Rosen, the head of state and local taxes at the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery, which represents the companies supporting the bill.

Mr. Rosen acknowledged that taxes would be reduced or eliminated under the bill if companies arranged their operations to owe taxes in jurisdictions that imposed little or no tax, but said he had no dollar estimates.

Representatives Robert W. Goodlatte and Richard Boucher, Virginia Republicans who are co-chairmen of the Congressional Internet caucus, asserted that the bill was needed to stop abusive state tax practices.

"This bill targets states that have abused their authority to impose taxes," Mr. Goodlatte said yesterday. "It will curb the tax frenzy on the part of those states imposing unreasonable taxes" on companies that make sales, do nominal advertising or sell online in a state.

But Elizabeth Harchenko, chairwoman of the Multistate Tax Commission and director of the Oregon revenue department, wrote yesterday to the House Judiciary Committee that the bill "would legalize and expand abusive corporate tax sheltering that undermines state business activity taxes."

"In recent years," Ms. Harchenko wrote, "several states have undertaken efforts to curtail aggressive tax shelter activity. This legislation would pre-empt those state efforts to ensure that those who do business within a state pay a fair share of state and local taxes."

She and others said that under the bill a company could use interest payments, royalties and management fees to transfer taxable income in one state to its headquarters in a state where corporate profits are not taxed. That is the same technique that companies use to avoid federal taxes when they acquire a Bermuda mailbox and hold an annual board meeting in Barbados.

Mr. Rosen said "the states have all the authority they need to stop profit shifting" and that if individual state legislatures fail to do so it is their problem, not that of his clients.

The bill to restrict the power of states and cities to tax companies is being driven in large part by the growth of electronic commerce and the sale of products and services that are called intangibles because they cannot be measured easily like a crate of oranges. Some corporations oppose state and local efforts to capture revenue from the digital economy.

The pressure for reduced state taxes on national companies is coming despite a sharp drop in their tax bill. State corporate business activity and related taxes equaled 5.2 percent of company profits in 2000, down from 9.6 percent in 1980, the Multistate Tax Commission said.

This lower effective tax rate meant companies paid $32 billion in such taxes instead of about $60 billion. But tax breaks enacted by state legislatures explain only about $5.6 billion, or 20 percent, of this drop in corporate taxes. This suggests that the use of tax shelters is costing the states and also that companies have increased efforts to shift revenue and profits from states that tax to those that do not.

The effect of tax shelters on federal revenue is examined in a study that the I.R.S. will publish today in the quarterly Statistics of Income Bulletin.

Untaxed corporate profits rose to 24 percent of the profits reported to shareholders in 1998, up from 14 percent in 1996, an increase of two-thirds. This increase meant that the amount of corporate profit not taxed rose by $66.5 billion from 1996 to 1998.

The I.R.S. analysis follows a March study by a Harvard economist, Mihir A. Desai, who sifted through reports to shareholders to determine whether the use of tax shelters was a significant issue and found evidence that the problem was much larger than the I.R.S. study.

In 1988, less than 62 cents of each dollar of shareholder profit turned up on tax returns, down from 84 cents in 1996, Professor Desai said. Untaxed corporate profits totaled $247 billion in 1998, Professor Desai found, but deductions for stock options and other known legitimate deductions explained only about $88 billion of this amount.

His study suggests that in 1998 $155 billion or so of corporate profits were hidden from the I.R.S. in tax shelters, costing the government as much as $54 billion in taxes. That figure is more than five times the $10 billion cost of abusive tax shelters cited by in 1999 by Lawrence H. Summers, who as Treasury secretary then started a campaign to crack down on tax avoidance and evasion by large companies.

Professor Desai said his analysis of shareholder and taxable profits from 1998 to 2000 found that until 1995 the relative difference was stable and followed expected shifts caused by tax rules. But starting in 1996, he said, the gap between taxable profits and those reported to shareholders began to widen apparently because of tax shelters.

WEDNESDAY, JULY 17
Chandler-Feeney "Circus" at ILWU Hall in Tacoma on Monday

Chris Chandler and Anne Feeney’s Flying Poetry Circus comes to Tacoma on Monday, July 22 beginning at 7 p.m. (with a reception at 6:30 p.m.) at the ILWU Local 23 Hall at 1710 Market Street, with proceeds benefiting the Tacoma Organizing Committee of Washington State Jobs with Justice.

This metaphoric high wire act loads its big top full of folk music, poetry, and humor. Chandler (who has worked with everyone from Allen Ginsberg to Ani Di Franco) presents a dynamic concoction of poems and folk songs designed to rouse the slumbering subconscious of the Starbucks culture. His musical partner is long time friend and renowned rabble rouser Anne Feeney.

Anne Feeney is no stranger to trouble. Her riveting performance of “Have You Been to Jail for Justice?” during Seattle’s WTO Protests is featured in the Independent Media Foundation’s acclaimed video “This is What Democracy Looks Like.” Narrated by Susan Sarandon, the video also includes music by Rage Against the Machine. Feeney’s award-winning songs have made it into the repertoire of many activists and performers, including Peter, Paul and Mary.

Anne’s seemingly bottomless songbag provides the musical counterpoint to Chandler’s acrobatic observations of life on the thin highways of fat America. Their new CD, "Flying Poetry Circus," features seven "folken word" selections, closing with the dynamic "Things Have Never Been the Same."

Also appearing Monday night is Tacoma longshore troubadour Vance Lelli. Tickets are $10 at the door or $8 in advance from Jobs with Justice.  For more information, call (206) 441-4969.

TUESDAY, JULY 16
Get ready... National Call-In Day on Fast Track is Thursday

The final vote to determine if President Bush is granted the Fast Track authority he needs to spread NAFTA throughout the Western Hemisphere with the Free Trade Area of the Americas may occur the week of July 22-25 in the U.S. House of Representatives.

So we need to make sure every one of our congressional representatives, regardless of their stated position on this critical issue, knows that we are watching this important vote and we want them to STOP FAST TRACK. The National Call-In Day for western states to call the AFL-CIO's Stop Fast Track Hotline is Thursday.  Call toll-free at 1-877-611-0063 (or call the Capitol switchboard directly at 202-224-3121.)

To avoid overloading the toll-free number, the National Call-In Day is actually a National Call-In Week with different regions asked to make the calls on different days, beginning today. Thursday is the appointed day for the West Coast and Western Plains states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California, Colorado, North and South Dakota, Nevada, Wyoming and Utah.

Meanwhile, this update on the status of Fast Track:

— As of late last week, the U.S. Senate had still not appointed its representatives to the Conference that will reconcile the House and Senate versions of Fast Track. (That reconciled version will ultimately be the last chance to defeat Fast Track, when it is voted on in the House.)  Insiders say Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle proposed a three-Democrats two-Republicans mix, but too many Republicans had already been promised by their leadership that they would participate. GOP Sens. Phil Gramm, Charles Grassley, Orin Hatch and Trent Lott all want one of the two slots. Democrats will field Sens. Max Baucus, John Rockefeller and John Breaux.

UPDATE from Bureau of National Affairs -- Ending a stalemate on the appointment of conferees, Senate Republicans last weekend acquiesced to a Democratic demand that Senate conferees be limited to three Democrats and two Republicans. This has the effect of keeping several GOP conservatives, such as Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), off the conference committee. 

— Meanwhile, the U.S. House has set its summer vacation -- pardon me -- its "district work period."  They will leave D.C. after work on Thursday, July 25. The return is set for September 4.  Supporters of the unpopular Fast Track measure, including the Bush Administration, are very aware that the closer we get to election time, the less likely they are to come up with the votes to pass it.  Therefore, at least one of our state's congressional delegation believes the Fast Track vote in the House will happen right before the vacation starts.

For background information about how much Americans hate Fast Track and how much supporters and their commercial media cheerleaders want to ignore that fact, see our June 21 posting Fast Track: An update on the effort to expand NAFTA.  See also our June 27 posting Fast Track advances again by one-vote margin in U.S. House.  

And speaking of commercial media cheerleaders, the (Tacoma) News-Tribune recently weighed in with the editorial: The president, any president, deserves fast track authority. If you'd prefer to spare yourself from reading this call for Rep. Adam Smith to switch to a "Yes" vote, it suffices to say the piece is replete with the usual unchallenged masticated-swallowed-then-regurgitated "facts" about our state's dependence on trade and the associated implication that trade-related jobs will disappear if Fast Track doesn't pass.

Dave Batker, director of the Asia Pacific Environmental Exchange, wrote a wonderful op-ed in response called "Democracy, environment and other factors are more important," and here it is:

Rustling up the hackneyed scarecrow of "Free Trade vs Protectionism," the News Tribune's fast-track editorial (7/8) was muddled in obsolete ideology and devoid of the real issues of modern trade agreements.

Democracy, public interest, the environment, livelihoods and community all transcend the protectionist boogeyman.

In the 1930s, the primary trade debate was between maintaining trade restrictions ,like quotas and tariffs, to protect domestic companies and reducing these trade barriers between nations.  Today, the important debate is about promoting public interest over special interest.

In some cases this means banning trade.  Commerce in nuclear weapons, plutonium, endangered species, slaves, and toxic waste is banned by the world community. Sometimes trade must be restricted.

Free trade in timber and fisheries has plundered fishing grounds and left whole nations deforested.  Our own state, once a leading timber exporter, is today a net importer.  Reduced tariffs and quotas can also serve the public interest by reducing prices and increasing competition.

In 1787 the founding fathers gave the power to negotiate trade policy to Congress.    The fast-track bill would transfer this authority to the President, leaving Congress only an up or down vote on massive trade deals under short timelines.  The TNT argues that a reduced Congressional role insulates trade deals from special interest pressure.  Ridiculous.

Trade deals today are written by special interests.  Congress is a bastion of purity compared to the US Trade Representatives Office, which negotiates trade agreements.  Corporate lobbyists have credentialed security access to U.S. trade negotiators throughout the process; the public is locked out.  Lobbyists are thicker than flies at negotiating meetings and camp at U.S. negotiators' hotels.

We caught the U.S. Trade Representative negotiating to promote trade in DDT, CFCs and other chemicals banned both under U.S. law and globally.  Why?  The office has a chemical advisory committee composed of 34 chemical companies.  They wrote the U.S. position.

With the assistance of Earthjustice, our small environmental group sued the U.S. Trade Representative's Office to abide by U.S. law, which requires a "balance" on advisory committees.  We won.  Now the environmental community has one seat out of 35.

Reducing Congress' checks and balances reduces public debate and leaves trade negotiations in the dark realm of special interests.  Though imperfect, Congress is our primary voice--the public's voice--as trade agreements are negotiated and improved.  Under fast-track citizens have no voice.  Since when was shutting out the public the way to make good law?  Yes, democracy slows negotiations.  However, it provides better decisions.

Make no mistake, this vote is between trade democracy and trade dictatorship.  Why should trade policy be a public issue and not left to vested "experts"?  Because trade policy affects all of us in many areas.

— The Environment: Trade agreements are leveraging global environmental and health standards down rather than up.  A few companies cash in, but it hurts all of humanity when clean water, clean air, food and a stable climate are lost.  Trade must be more environmentally sound and cannot undermine existing environmental progress.

— Agriculture security: Washington State's largest wheat importer is the Philippines.  Unrestricted wheat and rice exports would lower food prices in Philippine cities, but result in massive unemployment, loss of income and food insecurity in rural rice producing areas where more than 60% of the population lives.  Hunger drives insurgency and national insecurity in the Philippines and could come back to haunt us. Trade in food can both reduce hunger and increase it.  Good trade policy requires real study and public debate.  It cannot be left to agri-business lobbyists who control the U.S. Trade Representative's Office.

Washington state's agriculture is among the world's most heavily subsidized. Even so, more than a third of our apple farmers have gone belly up in the last five years due to overseas competition.

Free trade may be good or bad, we need to understand the impacts.  How many agricultural products will we still export as these subsidies are inevitably removed under free trade?

— Jobs: Claiming that trade agreements have added millions of jobs is misleading.  This state lost over 45,000 net jobs since 1994 due to trade.  Boeing employs over 100,000 people in China and recently laid off tens of thousands here.

Despite the cheerleading by vested interests and the News Tribune for less democracy, most voters in the Northwest oppose fast-track.  As our Representative, Adam Smith's job is to represent the voters, not big money lobbyists.

By opposing fast-track in the past, Smith has represented his real constituency, the voters.  He should do so again this year and help retain Congress' constitutional authority over the details of trade.

Dave Batker of Tacoma is the director of the Asia Pacific Environmental
Exchange

MONDAY, JULY 15
Rolling Thunder's "country fair with guts" coming August 24

The Rolling Thunder Down Home Democracy Tour is a national festival of music, arts and grassroots organizing.  A county fair with guts.  A revival with a reason.  A concert with consciousness.  And it's coming to the Seattle area on August 24!  

The tour -- featuring, among many others, Jim Hightower, Tom Hayden and music by Holly Near and Medusa -- will land that Saturday at Petrovitsky Park in Renton. (Where the heck is Petrovitsky Park in Renton?) Tickets for the daylong event will be $5 in advance and $10 at the gate.

"For too long progressives have walked fearful of their shadows, whimpering and whining about what’s wrong and fighting amongst themselves over crumbs. That time is over," says progressive commentator Jim Hightower of Texas (who will be in Spokane for the WSLC Convention the preceding week). "It’s time to sing and and work and build a new community dedicated to hope and real change. And good beer."

Unionizers and wage earners, hipsters and farmers, activists and artists, stargazers and soccer moms, high-schoolers and life scholars, welders and body-builders, and everyone else are invited to hear good speakers and good music. Plus, there will be about 40 workshops/panels between 11 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. largely focusing on the following five issues:

  • Globalization

  • Civil Liberties/War on Terror

  • Environmental Justice/Food and Agriculture

  • Racial, Social, Gender and Economic Justice

  • Popular Democracy: Creating a World that Works for All

Spearheaded by Hightower, the first festival took place in Austin in April. It included well-known performers from hip hop, Tejano, rock, folk, and other musical genres, plus hands-on workshops, games, food booths, and scores of tables and booths for community organizations. Unlike other festivals that may allow a few non-profit tables around the fringe, the whole idea behind this festival is to fuse grassroots politics, music and fun while reaching out to new people.

The Austin Rolling Thunder stop had more than 7,000 participants; in Seattle, we are planning for more than 10,000. Now is the time to get involved in a project that can bring new volunteers, new members and new donors to your organization, and reach thousands of people about your issues and message. The tour also aims to bring together a broad spectrum of organizations to collaborate and build stronger progressive networks at the local level.

The Washington State Labor Council supports the Rolling Thunder Tour's stop in Renton and is working to publicize the Aug. 24 event and encourage all affiliated organizations to become involved.

VOLUNTEERS ARE DESPERATELY NEEDED: Organizers are seeking the assistance of any and all interested volunteers to help with Posters/Flier distribution, Media/press, Carnival games, Parking, Onsite Recycling, Hospitality/ Info, Ticket sales, Booth/vending coordination, Transportation, Setup, Tear-down/cleanup, Public speaking/theatre and Child care, among other tasks.

Questions? Want more info? Want to buy advance tickets? Want to get on an e-mail list for updates on the local event? Visit the Rolling Thunder web site at www.rollingthundertour.org. If you can't get the answer to your questions there, try calling Bob Barnes at (206) 841-4650.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2002  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO