|
Reports for
July 15-19, 2002
Previous weeks' news: July
8-12 -- June
24-27 -- June
17-21 -- June
10-14
FRIDAY, July 19 --
Sweeney:
Now is no time to reward corporate greed with Fast Track
--
Many of the same big corporations that have
victimized shareholders have also victimized employees. Nearly all of the
big corporations that promised to create jobs in the U.S. after NAFTA passed
shipped them overseas instead.
Plus, it's not too late to Call Congress to
Stop Fast Track
And speaking of corporations that promised NAFTA would create
jobs...
— In today's News-Tribune -- Boeing's
overnight shift -- "Will it ever be back to normal?" asks IAM
751 President Mark Blondin.
— In today's Seattle P-I -- 650
more Boeing workers lose their jobs; 870 get warned they're next
At WashTech.org -- High-tech
workers: No quick turnaround in tech employment
— In yesterday's S.F. Chronicle -- As
tech jobs decrease, interest in unions is up
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Talmadge
ready to stir the pot with bid for Governor (Connelly column)
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- Locke
hears pros and cons of SE2 power plant
— In today's Seattle Times -- King
County parks plan: Raise fees — and maybe taxes
...plus -- Appeals
court: Gays constitutionally protected in public workforce
...plus -- Put
workers and towns ahead of forest posturing -- Dickie column: Link the
fate of old-growth forests with restoration jobs. Don't give the greens or
industry a thing, unless they help.
— In today's USA Today -- Retirement
crisis looms as many come up short
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Senate
votes to help states expand drug cost cuts of Medicaid
...plus -- House
takes up, but then drops, Bermuda corporate tax-shelter issue --
Accenture, a Bermuda company that is the former consulting arm of the Arthur
Andersen accounting firm, had lobbyists in the Capitol working to make sure
it could continue to get government contracts.
— In the American Prospect -- Can
liberals save capitalism (again)? -- The entire set of free-market era
claims are due for scholarly reappraisal and broad political challenge, just
like in the 1930s.
THURSDAY, July 18 --
Microsoft, other
corporations ask Congress for state-tax shelters
— In today's Seattle Times
-- Boeing
eases layoff worries as earnings bounce back
— In today's Everett Herald -- Layoffs
keep profit margins up, Boeing says (But at what cost?)
— In today's L.A. Times -- ILWU
offers to cut jobs in port talks
— In today's News-Tribune -- Labor
ads blast GOP candidates over Fast Track
— In today's Olympian -- Politicians
forfeit out-of-state contributions (from unions)
...plus -- Locke
urges action on regional roads package
— In today's Yakima H-R -- Move
to legalize undocumented students gains support
— In today's Eastside Journal -- Tax
debate not just about the numbers (editorial re: I-776)
— In today's South County Journal -- Educators
praise retire-rehire law
— In the new Stranger -- Hedreen
update: Downtown developer misleads Seattle council again
At AFLCIO.org -- Advertising,
marketing eat biggest chunk of prescription drug firms' money
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Bush:
Cheaper Canadian drugs pose health threat -- "Terrorists"
invoked.
...plus -- Poll
finds concerns that Bush is overly influenced by business -- Ya THINK?!
...plus -- SEC
chief Pitt to take role in cases of former clients -- Pitt: "It
would be unthinkable to deprive people of my expertise." We're not
making this up.
...and finally -- Congressional
cowardice -- Editorial: On two issues critical to cleaning up corporate
malfeasance (the Bermuda corporate tax loophole and CEO stock options),
Congress has opted to put the preferences of big business — and big
campaign contributors — ahead of the public good.
— In today's L.A. Times -- For
CEOs, it's a lot lonelier at the top -- Leads with tale of one
$16,600-a-week CEO embarrassed to admit her occupation during a Hawaii
vacation. WAH!
WEDNESDAY, July 17 --
Chandler-Feeney
"Circus" at ILWU Hall in Tacoma on Monday
...plus from SEIU Local 6 -- TAKE
ACTION to support Vashon nursing home workers
— In today's Seattle Times
-- UPS
contract "a grand slam", Hoffa says
...plus -- Gov.
Locke calls meeting to keep regional transportation plan from stalling
— In today's Everett Herald -- Gorton
stumps for Referendum 51
— In yesterday's Columbian -- Ref.
51 would give Clark County its "fair share"
— In today's Seattle P-I -- State
agencies' e-mail abuse firings called unfair
— In today's News-Tribune -- Bad
news, good news: Labor Ready profits up, as Arizona sues firm
— In today's Olympian -- Intel
to cut 4,000 jobs; effect on 1,500 DuPont plant workers unclear
— In today's Salem (Ore.) S-J -- Norpac,
farmworker negotiations ongoing
Today at AFLCIO.org -- AFL-CIO
runs TV ads denouncing "Yes" votes on Fast Track
...and don't forget -- TOMORROW is National Call-In Day
to Stop Fast Track
— In today's N.Y. Times -- UPS,
Teamsters reach deal for a 25% raise
— In today's Washington Post -- House
GOP fights Senate's tough corporate accounting plan
...plus -- Senate
divided over rival plans for prescription drug coverage
...plus -- Homeland
Security debate: Union rights vs. a "culture of urgency"
— In today's L.A. Times -- RadioShack
agrees to pay $30 million in managers' unpaid OT suit
TUESDAY, July 16 --
Get
ready: National Call-In Day on Fast Track is Thursday
...plus at Teamsters.org -- Hoffa
announces details of tentative UPS agreement
— In today's Seattle Times
-- Accord
averts UPS strike, but 210,000 Teamsters still must OK pact
...plus -- L&I
must ease pain for ergonomics ruling -- Editorial: With a court ruling
that upholds Washington's ground-breaking ergonomics rule, the biggest
obstacle the Department of Labor and Industries has now is building trust
with skittish business operators.
— In the P.S. Business Journal -- Arizona
sues Labor Ready over check-cashing fees
— In today's Seattle P-I -- Longview
Aluminum talks could disrupt BPA power payments
...plus -- WTO
protesters appear prophetic -- Gonsalves column: Thomas Jefferson spoke
of the need "to crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed
corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of
strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
— In today's South County Journal -- Boeing
OT doesn't mean crisis looms
— In today's Bellingham Herald -- County
council to vote on nonunion employees' pay, benefits
— In today's News-Tribune -- Cha-ching:
Narrows bridge price tag jumps
Today at AFLCIO.org -- Sweeney:
Thomas' corporate tax reform bill "outrageous"
— Today from MSNBC -- Bush
signed letter promising to hold stock, but sold it before Harken crash
— In today's N.Y. Times -- Steps
to wealth -- Krugman column: Bush's past business dealings are relevant
because they foreshadow many disturbing characteristics of his
administration: an obsession with secrecy and an intermingling of public
policy with private interest.
— In today's Washington Post -- For
Cheney, tarnish from Halliburton -- Page A1: An
executive sells shares in his energy company two months before the company
announces unexpected bad news, and the stock price eventually tumbles to a
quarter of the price at which the insider sold his. George W. Bush at Harken
Energy in 1990? Yes, but also Richard B. Cheney at Halliburton Co. in 2000.
— In today's Financial Times -- Enron
factor hits WorldCom 401(k) plans
— In today's USA Today -- Antiquated
labor laws fail to protect young workers
MONDAY, July 15 --
Rolling Thunder's
"country fair with guts" coming August 24
— In Sunday's News-Tribune
-- Overtaxed?
Don't count on the numbers to prove it -- Truth-challenged Eyman says
we're 2nd highest taxed. The truth is we're 20th among states, down from 6th
in 1995.
...plus -- Can
Washington do more than argue about traffic solutions? (editorial)
— In Saturday's Seattle P-I -- Judge
rejects challenge to ergonomics rule
...and today -- In
compromise, some foreign steel will be used on 2nd Narrows bridge
...plus -- Battle
brewing over tech-worker visas; WashTech wants H1-B program scaled back
— In today's Seattle Times -- Boeing
in retreat on Sonic Cruiser?
... plus on Sunday -- Summer
of strikes? Contracts up in the air in 4 key industries
— In Saturday's Everett Herald -- Barlean
ends congressional bid, says GOP has given up on 2nd
— In Sunday's Spokesman-Review -- State
agencies differ on personal e-mail, web use policy
— In Saturday's Long Beach (Calif.) P-T -- Boeing
engineers in California decertify from OPEIU
— In today's Salem (Ore.) S-J -- Sizemore's
political power starts to wane
— In today's Washington Post -- WorldCom
ignored workers' concerns about accounting
...plus -- Too
soft on stock options -- Mallaby column: Stock options, at least as they
exist currently, do not reward performance. And their accounting cover-up is
not incidental -- it is central to the real goal of many options schemes,
which is to disguise bosses' absurd pay from the rest of us.
— Today at MSNBC.com -- Sticky
business: Cheney's staff: "We don't discuss Halliburton issues"
-- Why? Maybe because the Vice President -- who bragged during the campaign,
"By any measure you want to use, Halliburton has been a great success
story" -- now sees his old company enmeshed in a SEC investigation
about accounting practices during his tenure. Its stock has fallen 75% since
he left to run for vice president, in large part because of fallout from a
huge takeover he orchestrated in 1998. Unlike company investors, Cheney made
out well, taking in $45 million in just under five years.
Previous weeks' news: July
8-12 -- June
24-27 -- June
17-21 -- June
10-14

FRIDAY,
JULY 19
Now is no time to reward corporate greed with
Fast Track
The following statement from AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, who will
appear at the WSLC's 2002 Convention in Spokane this August, was released
Thursday: (If you forgot to do so Thursday, it's not too late to Call
Congress to Stop Fast Track.)
It's no surprise that the White House and many of the nation's biggest
multinational corporations want to rush flawed Fast Track trade
legislation through the Congress—a move that will "Fast Track"
away even more jobs. After all, hundreds of corporate lobbyists advise the
Administration on trade policy behind closed doors.
But what is surprising is that Big Business and the Bush Administration
are willing to end run congressional checks and balances on future trade
agreements at a time when the American people's trust in corporations is
so low.
Fast Track will do nothing to boost market confidence. During the economic
expansion of the 1990's, the President didn't even have Fast Track
authority. In fact, when Fast Track was shelved in 1997 and defeated in
1998, the markets continued to grow.
Instead, Fast Track will continue to drain good jobs from this country.
Our nation has lost more than a million manufacturing jobs over the past
12 months. Since 1994, according to the Economic Policy Institute, about 3
million jobs have been lost due to growing trade deficits—mainly with
the same countries with which we have signed recent trade agreements. This
Fast Track bill—which would allow the President to expand NAFTA to the
rest of the hemisphere and would not give Congress the right to fix flawed
deals—would only accelerate that trend.
Many of the same big corporations that have victimized shareholders have
also victimized employees. Nearly all of the big corporations who promised
to create jobs in the U.S. after NAFTA passed shipped them overseas
instead.
But perhaps far worse is what the corporations want to do with Fast Track.
Global accounting standards could be watered down. Public services here
and abroad could be privatized at the expense of consumers. More jobs
could be shipped abroad where corporations would be under no obligation to
honor internationally-recognized workers' rights, such as a ban on child
labor.
The AFL-CIO urges Congress to reject more of this corporate malfeasance
and reject Fast Track.

THURSDAY,
JULY 18
Microsoft, other corporations seek
state, local tax shelters
Even as Washington and most other states
around the country face dire budget crises caused by the recession and the
events of Sept. 11, Microsoft and other corporations are seeking new federal
restrictions on state and local governments' ability to impose taxes on
"national" corporations. This, despite evidence that the corporate
tax burden has dropped significantly in recent years. (Now, class, can
anyone tell me where more of the tax burden has shifted to?)
The following story on the subject appears in
today's New York Times, and also in the Seattle P-I (although
it's buried in the Business Section):
Now, a Corporate Push to Avoid State and
Local Taxes
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
As lawmakers debated in Washington yesterday how to close the loophole
that allows companies to avoid United States taxes by acquiring a Bermuda
mailbox, a bill advanced with a provision that state officials say would
let companies avoid state and local taxes using some of the same
techniques as the Bermuda loophole.
American
Express, Walt Disney, Viacom,
Cisco
Systems, Eastman
Kodak, Johnson
& Johnson, the Limited, Lowe's and Microsoft
are among the major corporations lobbying for the bill, which was approved
by a House Judiciary subcommittee on Tuesday at a hearing held on such
short notice that state officials said they could not attend. A full
committee vote is expected soon.
The drive to restrict the authority of states and local governments to
tax national companies comes as a study, to be released today by the
Internal Revenue Service, shows that corporations gave themselves a huge
tax cut beginning in 1996 by using tax shelters.
The legislation to restrict state and local taxing authority would cost
the states $9 billion in annual revenue in the first few years, a figure
that could quickly grow as companies adjust operations to make full use of
the proposed loophole, according to the Multistate Tax Commission, which
represents states on tax matters. Cities and counties stand to lose
billions more.
The bill's promoters insist that if the bill becomes law, the
obligation to pay state and local taxes will merely be shifted, benefiting
only those places where the companies use state and local services because
they have invested in offices, factories and computer servers.
"There need be not one penny less of state tax revenue
collected," said Arthur R. Rosen, the head of state and local taxes
at the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery, which represents the
companies supporting the bill.
Mr. Rosen acknowledged that taxes would be reduced or eliminated under
the bill if companies arranged their operations to owe taxes in
jurisdictions that imposed little or no tax, but said he had no dollar
estimates.
Representatives Robert W. Goodlatte and Richard Boucher, Virginia
Republicans who are co-chairmen of the Congressional Internet caucus,
asserted that the bill was needed to stop abusive state tax practices.
"This bill targets states that have abused their authority to
impose taxes," Mr. Goodlatte said yesterday. "It will curb the
tax frenzy on the part of those states imposing unreasonable taxes"
on companies that make sales, do nominal advertising or sell online in a
state.
But Elizabeth Harchenko, chairwoman of the Multistate Tax Commission
and director of the Oregon revenue department, wrote yesterday to the
House Judiciary Committee that the bill "would legalize and expand
abusive corporate tax sheltering that undermines state business activity
taxes."
"In recent years," Ms. Harchenko wrote, "several states
have undertaken efforts to curtail aggressive tax shelter activity. This
legislation would pre-empt those state efforts to ensure that those who do
business within a state pay a fair share of state and local taxes."
She and others said that under the bill a company could use interest
payments, royalties and management fees to transfer taxable income in one
state to its headquarters in a state where corporate profits are not
taxed. That is the same technique that companies use to avoid federal
taxes when they acquire a Bermuda mailbox and hold an annual board meeting
in Barbados.
Mr. Rosen said "the states have all the authority they need to
stop profit shifting" and that if individual state legislatures fail
to do so it is their problem, not that of his clients.
The bill to restrict the power of states and cities to tax companies is
being driven in large part by the growth of electronic commerce and the
sale of products and services that are called intangibles because they
cannot be measured easily like a crate of oranges. Some corporations
oppose state and local efforts to capture revenue from the digital
economy.
The pressure for reduced state taxes on national companies is coming
despite a sharp drop in their tax bill. State corporate business activity
and related taxes equaled 5.2 percent of company profits in 2000, down
from 9.6 percent in 1980, the Multistate Tax Commission said.
This lower effective tax rate meant companies paid $32 billion in such
taxes instead of about $60 billion. But tax breaks enacted by state
legislatures explain only about $5.6 billion, or 20 percent, of this drop
in corporate taxes. This suggests that the use of tax shelters is costing
the states and also that companies have increased efforts to shift revenue
and profits from states that tax to those that do not.
The effect of tax shelters on federal revenue is examined in a study
that the I.R.S. will publish today in the quarterly Statistics of Income
Bulletin.
Untaxed corporate profits rose to 24 percent of the profits reported to
shareholders in 1998, up from 14 percent in 1996, an increase of
two-thirds. This increase meant that the amount of corporate profit not
taxed rose by $66.5 billion from 1996 to 1998.
The I.R.S. analysis follows a March study by a Harvard economist, Mihir
A. Desai, who sifted through reports to shareholders to determine whether
the use of tax shelters was a significant issue and found evidence that
the problem was much larger than the I.R.S. study.
In 1988, less than 62 cents of each dollar of shareholder profit turned
up on tax returns, down from 84 cents in 1996, Professor Desai said.
Untaxed corporate profits totaled $247 billion in 1998, Professor Desai
found, but deductions for stock options and other known legitimate
deductions explained only about $88 billion of this amount.
His study suggests that in 1998 $155 billion or so of corporate profits
were hidden from the I.R.S. in tax shelters, costing the government as
much as $54 billion in taxes. That figure is more than five times the $10
billion cost of abusive tax shelters cited by in 1999 by Lawrence H.
Summers, who as Treasury secretary then started a campaign to crack down
on tax avoidance and evasion by large companies.
Professor Desai said his analysis of shareholder and taxable profits
from 1998 to 2000 found that until 1995 the relative difference was stable
and followed expected shifts caused by tax rules. But starting in 1996, he
said, the gap between taxable profits and those reported to shareholders
began to widen apparently because of tax shelters.

WEDNESDAY,
JULY 17
Chandler-Feeney "Circus" at ILWU
Hall in Tacoma on Monday
Chris Chandler and Anne Feeney’s Flying
Poetry Circus comes to Tacoma on Monday, July 22 beginning at 7 p.m. (with a
reception at 6:30 p.m.) at the ILWU Local 23 Hall at 1710
Market Street, with proceeds benefiting
the Tacoma Organizing Committee of Washington State Jobs with Justice.
This metaphoric high wire act loads
its big top full of folk music, poetry, and humor. Chandler (who has worked
with everyone from Allen Ginsberg to Ani Di Franco) presents a dynamic
concoction of poems and folk songs designed to rouse the slumbering
subconscious of the Starbucks culture. His musical partner is long time
friend and renowned rabble rouser Anne Feeney.
Anne Feeney is no stranger to trouble. Her riveting performance of “Have
You Been to Jail for Justice?” during Seattle’s WTO Protests is featured
in the Independent Media Foundation’s acclaimed video “This
is What Democracy Looks Like.” Narrated by Susan Sarandon, the video
also includes music by Rage Against the Machine. Feeney’s award-winning
songs have made it into the repertoire of many activists and performers,
including Peter, Paul and Mary.
Anne’s seemingly bottomless songbag provides the musical counterpoint to
Chandler’s acrobatic observations of life on the thin highways of fat
America. Their new CD, "Flying Poetry Circus," features seven
"folken word" selections, closing with the dynamic "Things
Have Never Been the Same."
Also
appearing Monday night is Tacoma
longshore troubadour Vance Lelli. Tickets are $10 at the door or $8 in
advance from Jobs with Justice. For more information, call (206)
441-4969.

TUESDAY,
JULY 16
Get ready... National Call-In Day on Fast Track
is Thursday
The final vote to determine if President Bush is granted the Fast Track
authority he needs to spread NAFTA throughout the Western Hemisphere with the Free
Trade Area of the Americas may occur the week of July 22-25 in
the U.S. House of Representatives.
So we need to make sure every one of our congressional representatives,
regardless of their stated position on this critical issue, knows that we
are watching this important vote and we want them to STOP FAST TRACK.
The
National Call-In Day for western states to call the AFL-CIO's Stop Fast
Track Hotline is Thursday. Call toll-free at 1-877-611-0063 (or call the
Capitol switchboard directly at 202-224-3121.)
To avoid overloading the toll-free number, the National
Call-In Day is actually a National Call-In Week with different regions
asked to make the calls on different days, beginning today. Thursday is the
appointed day for the West Coast and Western Plains states: Washington,
Oregon, Idaho, California, Colorado, North and South Dakota, Nevada, Wyoming
and Utah.
Meanwhile, this update on the status of Fast Track:
— As of late last week, the U.S. Senate had still not
appointed its representatives to the Conference that will reconcile the
House and Senate versions of Fast Track. (That reconciled version will
ultimately be the last chance to defeat Fast Track, when it is voted on in
the House.) Insiders say Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle proposed a three-Democrats
two-Republicans mix, but too many Republicans had already been
promised by their leadership that they would participate. GOP Sens. Phil
Gramm, Charles Grassley, Orin Hatch and Trent Lott all want one of the two
slots. Democrats will field Sens. Max Baucus, John Rockefeller and John
Breaux.
UPDATE from Bureau of National Affairs -- Ending a
stalemate on the appointment of conferees, Senate Republicans last weekend
acquiesced to a Democratic demand that Senate conferees be limited to three
Democrats and two Republicans. This has the effect of keeping several GOP
conservatives, such as Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), off the conference
committee.
— Meanwhile, the U.S. House has set its summer vacation --
pardon me -- its "district work period." They will leave
D.C. after work on Thursday, July 25. The return is set for September 4.
Supporters of the unpopular Fast Track measure, including the Bush Administration, are
very aware that the closer we get to election time, the less likely they are
to come up with the votes to pass it. Therefore, at least
one of our state's congressional delegation believes the Fast Track vote in
the House will happen right before the vacation starts.
For background information about how much Americans hate
Fast Track and how much supporters and their commercial media cheerleaders
want to ignore that fact, see our June 21 posting Fast
Track: An update on the effort to expand NAFTA. See also our June
27 posting Fast Track advances again by
one-vote margin in U.S. House.
And speaking of commercial media
cheerleaders, the (Tacoma) News-Tribune recently weighed
in with the editorial: The president, any president, deserves fast
track authority. If you'd prefer to spare yourself from reading this
call for Rep. Adam Smith to switch to a "Yes" vote, it suffices to say
the piece is replete with the usual unchallenged
masticated-swallowed-then-regurgitated "facts" about our
state's dependence on trade and the associated implication that
trade-related jobs will
disappear if Fast Track doesn't pass.
Dave Batker, director of the Asia Pacific Environmental
Exchange, wrote a wonderful op-ed in response called "Democracy,
environment and other factors are more important," and here it is:
Rustling
up the hackneyed scarecrow of "Free Trade vs Protectionism," the
News Tribune's fast-track editorial (7/8) was muddled in obsolete ideology
and devoid of the real issues of modern trade agreements.
Democracy, public interest, the environment, livelihoods and community all
transcend the protectionist boogeyman.
In the 1930s, the primary trade debate was between maintaining trade
restrictions ,like quotas and tariffs, to protect domestic companies and
reducing these trade barriers between nations. Today, the important
debate is about promoting public interest over special interest.
In some cases this means banning trade. Commerce in nuclear weapons,
plutonium, endangered species, slaves, and toxic waste is banned by the
world community. Sometimes trade must be restricted.
Free trade in timber and fisheries has plundered fishing grounds and left
whole nations deforested. Our own state, once a leading timber
exporter, is today a net importer. Reduced tariffs and quotas can also
serve the public interest by reducing prices and increasing competition.
In 1787 the founding fathers gave the power to negotiate trade policy to
Congress. The fast-track bill would transfer this
authority to the President, leaving Congress only an up or down vote on
massive trade deals under short timelines. The TNT argues that a
reduced Congressional role insulates trade deals from special interest
pressure. Ridiculous.
Trade deals today are written by special interests. Congress is a
bastion of purity compared to the US Trade Representatives Office, which
negotiates trade agreements. Corporate lobbyists have credentialed
security access to U.S. trade negotiators throughout the process; the public
is locked out. Lobbyists are thicker than flies at negotiating
meetings and camp at U.S. negotiators' hotels.
We caught the U.S. Trade Representative negotiating to promote trade in DDT,
CFCs and other chemicals banned both under U.S. law and globally. Why?
The office has a chemical advisory committee composed of 34 chemical
companies. They wrote the U.S. position.
With the assistance of Earthjustice, our small environmental group sued the
U.S. Trade Representative's Office to abide by U.S. law, which requires a
"balance" on advisory committees. We won. Now the
environmental community has one seat out of 35.
Reducing Congress' checks and balances reduces public debate and leaves
trade negotiations in the dark realm of special interests. Though
imperfect, Congress is our primary voice--the public's voice--as trade
agreements are negotiated and improved. Under fast-track citizens have
no voice. Since when was shutting out the public the way to make good
law? Yes, democracy slows negotiations. However, it provides
better decisions.
Make no mistake, this vote is between trade democracy and trade
dictatorship. Why should trade policy be a public issue and not left
to vested "experts"? Because trade policy affects all of us
in many areas.
— The Environment: Trade agreements are leveraging global environmental
and health standards down rather than up. A few companies cash in, but
it hurts all of humanity when clean water, clean air, food and a stable
climate are lost. Trade must be more environmentally sound and cannot
undermine existing environmental progress.
— Agriculture security: Washington State's largest wheat importer is the
Philippines. Unrestricted wheat and rice exports would lower food
prices in Philippine cities, but result in massive unemployment, loss of
income and food insecurity in rural rice producing areas where more than 60%
of the population lives. Hunger drives insurgency and national
insecurity in the Philippines and could come back to haunt us. Trade in food
can both reduce hunger and increase it. Good trade policy requires
real study and public debate. It cannot be left to agri-business
lobbyists who control the U.S. Trade Representative's Office.
Washington state's agriculture is among the world's most heavily subsidized.
Even so, more than a third of our apple farmers have gone belly up in the
last five years due to overseas competition.
Free trade may be good or bad, we need to understand the impacts. How
many agricultural products will we still export as these subsidies are
inevitably removed under free trade?
— Jobs: Claiming that trade agreements have added millions of jobs is
misleading. This state lost over 45,000 net jobs since 1994 due to
trade. Boeing employs over 100,000 people in China and recently laid
off tens of thousands here.
Despite the cheerleading by vested interests and the News Tribune for less
democracy, most voters in the Northwest oppose fast-track. As our
Representative, Adam Smith's job is to represent the voters, not big money
lobbyists.
By opposing fast-track in the past, Smith has represented his real
constituency, the voters. He should do so again this year and help
retain Congress' constitutional authority over the details of trade.
Dave Batker of Tacoma is the director of the Asia Pacific Environmental
Exchange.

MONDAY,
JULY 15
Rolling Thunder's "country
fair with guts" coming August 24
The Rolling Thunder Down Home Democracy Tour is a national festival
of music, arts and grassroots organizing. A county fair with
guts. A revival with a reason. A concert with
consciousness. And it's coming to the Seattle area on August
24!
The tour -- featuring, among many others,
Jim Hightower, Tom Hayden and music by Holly Near and Medusa -- will land
that Saturday at Petrovitsky Park in Renton. (Where
the heck is Petrovitsky Park in Renton?) Tickets for the daylong event
will be $5 in advance and $10 at the gate.
"For too long progressives have walked fearful of their
shadows, whimpering and whining about what’s wrong and fighting amongst
themselves over crumbs. That time is over," says progressive
commentator Jim Hightower of Texas (who will be in Spokane for the WSLC
Convention the preceding week). "It’s time to sing and and work
and build a new community dedicated to hope and real change. And good
beer."
Unionizers and wage earners, hipsters and farmers, activists
and artists, stargazers and soccer moms, high-schoolers and life scholars,
welders and body-builders, and everyone else are invited to hear good
speakers and good music. Plus, there will be about 40 workshops/panels
between 11 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. largely focusing on the following five issues:
-
Globalization
-
Civil Liberties/War on Terror
-
Environmental Justice/Food and Agriculture
-
Racial, Social, Gender and Economic Justice
-
Popular Democracy: Creating a World that Works for All
Spearheaded by Hightower, the first festival took place in
Austin in April. It included well-known performers from hip hop, Tejano,
rock, folk, and other musical genres, plus hands-on workshops, games, food
booths, and scores of tables and booths for community organizations. Unlike
other festivals that may allow a few non-profit tables around the fringe,
the whole idea behind this festival is to fuse grassroots politics, music
and fun while reaching out to new people.
The Austin Rolling Thunder stop had more than 7,000
participants; in Seattle, we are planning for more than 10,000. Now is the
time to get involved in a project that can bring new volunteers, new members
and new donors to your organization, and reach thousands of people about
your issues and message. The tour also aims to bring together a broad
spectrum of organizations to collaborate and build stronger progressive
networks at the local level.
The
Washington State Labor Council supports the Rolling
Thunder Tour's stop in Renton and is working to publicize the Aug. 24 event
and encourage all affiliated organizations to become involved.
VOLUNTEERS ARE DESPERATELY
NEEDED: Organizers are seeking the assistance of any and all interested
volunteers to help with Posters/Flier distribution, Media/press, Carnival
games, Parking, Onsite Recycling, Hospitality/ Info, Ticket sales,
Booth/vending coordination, Transportation, Setup, Tear-down/cleanup, Public
speaking/theatre and Child care, among other tasks.
Questions? Want more info? Want
to buy advance tickets? Want to get on an e-mail list for updates on the
local event? Visit the Rolling Thunder web site at www.rollingthundertour.org.
If you can't get the answer to your questions there, try calling Bob Barnes
at (206) 841-4650.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues
in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail
to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.
Copyright © 2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|