|
|
Links to press stories are functional at the date of posting. In some cases, free registration is required at newspapers' sites. Links sometimes "expire" when the source would like to begin charging for old news. WSLC Reports Today links to all stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative. The intention is to inform. The creation of a link does not constitute an endorsement of that story's content. |
|
Previous weeks' news: Aug. 30-Sept. 1 -- Aug. 16-20 -- Aug. 9-13 THURSDAY,
Sept. 9 --
HUGE Labor Neighbor push now through Primary
-- Please check the updated schedule of
union household walks for this weekend and Primary Tuesday. VOLUNTEER
to help get the word out to fellow union members about which candidates
support our issues. Also today at lni.wa.gov -- Small
3.7% increase in workers' comp premiums for 2005
-- But BIAW demands HIGHER
employer fees to generate support for their workers' comp deform measure.
(Plus... the more employers' pay, the more BIAW can skim
from rebates to fund political
attack ads.) WEDNESDAY,
Sept. 8
--
On
Friday, tell Wash. Dental Service: "Don't brush away rights!"
TUESDAY,
Sept. 7
-- Big
Business funds more anonymous political attacks
on Dems Previous weeks' news: Aug.
30-Sept. 1 -- Aug.
16-20
-- Aug.
9-13
WEDNESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 8 "Don't Brush Away Our Rights at Washington Dental Service!" All union members and supporters are urged to help deliver that message to WDS management at a noontime rally this Friday, September 10 outside the WDS offices at 9705 4th Ave. NE, just south of Seattle's Northgate Shopping Center. The rally is being organized by Office and Professional Employees International Union Local 8, which represents WDS workers. "Union standards and benefits are under attack at WDS," reads the OPEIU rally flier -- please download and post this flier. "A new management team at this non-profit insurance company wants to 'modernize' the contract in order to gain a 'competitive' edge. Our health care, retirement benefits and job security are all at risk." WDS was founded by labor unions 50 years ago and at least 75% of WDS business comes from union members. Please help OPEIU show WDS management that the labor community supports a fair contract for WDS employees. Attend Friday's rally at noon and bring your union signs! For more information, read our July 20 web posting -- Union-built Washington Dental Service now a union buster? -- or call OPEIU Local 8 at 1-800-600-2433.
TUESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 7 If you've watched any television in the past week or so, you've probably seen the ads attacking labor-endorsed Attorney General candidate Deborah Senn. An anonymous group called the Voter Education Committee has spent more than $500,000 on this political attack. With this single ad, the group has spent more than Senn has raised for her entire campaign. The group's attorney refuses to file a report with the Public Disclosure Committee, arguing that the ad is issue advocacy, not explicitly advocating for or against a candidate, and therefore it's non-political. The argument is absurd given that Senn currently does not hold public office so the advocacy has no point other than to oppose her candidacy -- not to mention that the group calls itself the VOTER Education Committee. But let's set that aside for now, other than to say that if the Public Disclosure Commission agrees with this idiotic argument, that agency will be revealed as a ineffective and pointless. Though the group refuses to reveal its funders and the press refuses to speculate without a PDC report as a source, WSLC Reports Today is under no such Journalism 101 restrictions against speculation. So here's who is probably paying for the anti-Senn ads: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., PhRMA, Boise Cascade, Microsoft, Philip Morris Co., Physicians Insurance and just about every other insurance company you can think of, because of Senn's record of fighting against their interests on behalf of consumers. If we ever find out who the Voter Education Committee is, WSLC Reports Today bets its URL that it will be corporations like these and their lobbying associations behind it. These deep-pocketed corporations have in the past coalesced into groups like United for Washington and hired the very same Republican campaign consultant, Bruce Boram, who is behind the new anti-Senn ad. In 2002, the WSLC documented the last-minute hit pieces generated by this group -- in coordination with the State Republican Party -- which included accusing targeted House Democrats of forcing sex predators to move into their districts. Until now, the MO of this corporate political group was to create an anonymous, pleasant-sounding political action committee called "People for Good Jobs" or "Washingtonians for Honorable Representation," buy a last-minute attack ad or send negative political mail about a Democratic candidate (often when it's too late for the candidate to publicly respond to the attack), and then file the PDC report just days ahead of the election finally revealing who was behind the attack. These corporations know that if they actually PUT THEIR NAMES on their political attacks it would be less effective, downright bad PR and could hurt them when they send their lobbyists asking for legislative favors from those lawmakers who survive the attacks. Washington has one of the nations best campaign disclosure laws designed to discourage such anonymous political attacks. But frankly, it takes more time and energy than the average person can spare to comb through these reports and answer the simple question: Who sent me this? But now with this latest anti-Senn ad, the big corporations have taken their scurrilous attacks one step further by refusing to file a public disclosure report, arguing that it's not even political. That's just wrong. These corporations and the millions they spend every election to affect its outcome deserve MORE public scrutiny, not less. Rest assured that the anti-Senn ads won't be the last negative political attacks from Mr. Boram and the corporations that finance his services. Look for similar corporate-funded ads against whoever survives the Democratic gubernatorial primary, and the usual last-minute hit pieces against Democrats in the Washington State Legislature. Also look for the corporations that fund groups like the Voter Education Committee to send their tassel-toed lobbyists asking for favors to the very same politicians two months later. They think they absolve themselves from responsibility for their groups dirty political business because they just sign the checks and dont write the ads. After all, many of the corporations also cut campaign checks to the targeted lawmakers. Playing both sides of the fence is a long-standing corporate tradition. But those contributions are limited to a few hundred dollars per election, and an unlimited amount of cash can be spent smearing a candidate through the Voter Education Committee. And just in case someone out there is thinking "everybody does it" (truly, the defense-of-last-resort among scoundrels), that simply isn't true. When the Washington State Labor Council sends mail or buy advertisements about candidates or initiatives, we clearly identify the WSLC as the source of the information. Plus, those groups that do send anonymous hit pieces, usually do so through the mail and have never before done so on the grand scale of the anti-Senn ads now flooding the television networks. Everything the Washington State Labor Council mails to union members is accurate and focuses exclusively on labor issues. And most importantly, IT HAS OUR NAME ON IT. We are prepared to face the music if our advocacy for labor-endorsed challengers angers an incumbent legislator who wins re-election. We accept responsibility for -- and take pride in -- our political advocacy. We are able to agree and disagree in an honest, principled manner. There is no question where labor stands on an issue or which candidates we support. Thats the way it should be. Have corporations grown so cynical that they consider these vicious anonymous attacks to be politics as usual? Do they really think they are above campaign disclosure laws, as opposed to poster children for the necessity of such laws? And have our elected lawmakers become so forgiving of these dirty, underhanded attacks that this behavior has no consequence?
|
|
|
If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805. Copyright © 2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|