|
|
WSLC
Reports Today Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire. Some links require free registration. WSLC Reports Today links to stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative. The intention is to inform. |
|
THURSDAY,
MAY 11 ■ Reichert
& Co. borrow $69B for wartime upper-class tax cut Meanwhile...:
Immigration
news:
Political news:
Local news:
National news:
Like a Hole in the Head news:
Earlier this week: MONDAY -- TUESDAY -- WEDNESDAY
Last week:
THURSDAY,
MAY 11, 2006 Reps. Dave Reichert (R-8th), Cathy McMorris (R-5th) and Doc Hastings (R-4th) all voted with the majority in a 244-185 vote to approve $69 billion in tax cuts targeted to wealthy Americans, despite a massive budget deficit fueled by war costs, increased domestic spending, and an impending revenue crisis for Medicare and Social Security. The Republican package approved yesterday extends tax breaks on dividends and capital gains, among other things. The nonprofit Tax Policy Center estimates that 80 percent of the package's tax savings will flow to the top 10 percent of taxpayers and that almost a fifth of the benefits go to the top one-tenth of 1 percent. Meanwhile, a tax deduction that saves Washington residents some $500 million a year expired at the end of last year, but Republicans stripped a provision to extend it from their tax-break bill. Washington Democrats were furious at the move, but no comment from Reichert & Co. on why they were unable or unwilling to preserve this tax break. "The Republican Party... is sending all the millionaires on an all-expenses-paid vacation -- for $41,000 a year," said Rep. Jim McDermott (D-7th), who joined the rest of Washington Democratic congressional delegation in voting no (although Rep. Smith was absent). "The rest of America is being forced to choose between filling the gas tank or stocking the refrigerator." Reichert & Co. voted for these upper-class tax breaks after voting for borrow-and-spend budgets that ran up $760 billion in unpaid bills in 2005. In one year, they racked up $156,000 of debt for every man, woman and child in America. In one year. For a family, it's like having a $750,000 mortgage -- and no house. The official estimate of the latest tax-cut bill's cost was $69 billion. But this assumes the tax breaks will be in place for only a year or two. If they were to continue for the next decade -- which President Bush and his Republican supporters want -- the cost would be more than 15 times more, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The New York Times today points out that "the people who benefit the most from today's tax cuts -- mainly wealthy Americans with lots of investment income -- also will get special protection from future tax increases." It adds that Republican claims that the tax cuts will pay for themselves are "seriously delusional. Economic theory suggests that a fraction of the tax cuts' cost could, perhaps, be offset by higher growth, all other things being equal. But when a nation must borrow to pay for tax breaks, as is the case in the United States today, any ability of tax cuts for investors to spur growth is severely diminished." Many Democrats also pointed out that the latest round of tax cuts will reduce revenues precisely when commitments for Social Security and Medicare benefits explode. CALL TO ACTION: Why not give the members of our state's Republican congressional delegation a call? They borrow-and-spend like drunken sailors (not that there's anything wrong with drunken sailors, but we wouldn't loan them our money.) Meanwhile, the rest of us are struggling to pay our health care bills and fill our gas tanks. Where's the "shared sacrifice" when our nation is at war? The upper class gets more tax breaks and the working class gets nothing except more unpaid bills to pass on to our children.
| |
|
If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805. Copyright © 2006 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|