WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

 



LAST WEEK:
TUESDAY
MONDAY

WSLC Reports Today
Updated DAILY... Almost Every Day™ by 9 a.m. 

Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire. Some links require free registration. WSLC Reports Today links to stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative.  The intention is to inform.



WEDNESDAY, MAY 31   New study: Wal-Mart stores add to poverty, not prosperity
■  Saturday from AP -- Unions claim Wal-Mart secretly funding anti-union ads -- The "Center for Union Facts" refuses to identify who donated over $3 million for anti-union ads. Learn more.

Foster Parents' Organizing news:
■  In today's Olympian -- Foster parents: Union adds clout -- Foster parents, who are licensed and paid by the state, can now sign cards and authorize the WFSE to advocate on their behalf.
■  In yesterday's Olympian --
Caretakers flee mired foster system -- In the past year, the number of foster parents statewide -- already considered too low by the state -- dropped by 400 to about 6,300. The system's funding and administrative problems have some frustrated foster parents planning to join forces with a labor union (WFSE), making them the first in the nation to do so.
■  In yesterday's Olympian -- Union talks are a sign of urgency (editorial) -- If foster parents develop a collective voice, backed by a union, to air their grievances, program managers will have no choice but to engage them in meaningful negotiations.

Public Employee news:
■  In today's King Co. Journal --
Library union workers level most complaints against clustering plan
■  In Monday's Olympian --
Government audit may warrant a response --
State employees who pay WFSE "representation fees" need to sign up again; some may get a rebate.
■  In today's Bellingham Herald -- County's low salaries are a service to citizens (editorial) -- That the county is doing a good job of holding the line on its pay is something to be celebrated.
■  At the Olympian's state government blog -- SEIU loses attempt to organize Oregon lottery workers
■  In today's LA Times -- Supreme Court curbs speech of public employees -- Government workers who blow the whistle in the course of their official duties not protected by the First Amendment.
■  In today's NY Times --
Blow the whistle, loudly (editorial) -- The court made the law in this area messy, and even illogical. But the bigger problem is that the ruling rolls back government workers' rights to speak out against possibly illegal actions.

Immigration news:
■  Today from AP -- State GOP stance on immigration causes stir -- Some Republicans are trying to distance themselves from the state party's tough immigration stance to deny automatic citizenship to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. But not Rep. Reichert. He supports it.
■  Last week in the Seattle Times --
Cordial welcome turns serious in Mexican leader's visit to state
■  In today's Yakima H-R -- Legislature needs to set guidelines on services for immigrants (editorial)

Local news:
■  In today's Kitsap Sun -- Meeting could be turning point for Kitsap NASCAR track -- The reaction the firm gets from key legislators to today's presentation could affect whether efforts continue.
■  In Friday's Seattle Times --
Regence faces union fallout -- SPEEA says it was taken by surprise on a Regence BlueShield decision to drop hundreds of doctors from a Boeing health plan.
■  In the News Tribune -- A low blow in fight over health care costs (editorial) --
Regence's letters said physicians were being dropped because they didn’t meet “quality and efficiency” standards. It was a pretty loaded statement... But the really outrageous thing is that it wasn’t exactly true.
■  In today's Everett Herald -- Troubled Snohomish workforce development agency gets new chief
■  In today's Yakima H-R --
State Rep. Janéa Holmquist suffers injuries in I-90 accident
■  In Sunday's Everett Herald --
Unsavory tactic should be dropped by union (editorial) -- SEIU's effort to block Providence Health & Services from issuing bonds is a dubious strategy that doesn't serve the union's members, and it surely threatens to hurt communities its members serve.
■  In Friday's Oregonian -- Secretary of State's role on union-backed panel is questioned -- Oregon Secretary of State Bill Bradbury riles executives of Providence Health System by chairing a union-backed commission that is looking into Providence's handling of a union drive.

Political news:
■  In today's Spokesman-Review -- Referendum 65 is weak (editorial) -- This campaign is designed to show how the "special rights" (that is, the rights everyone else has) conferred upon gays and lesbians are going to infringe on other people's rights. Before signing up, ask yourself how you've been harmed in the seven years since Spokane has had a human rights ordinance.
■  In the P.S. Business Journal --
Democratic legislators looked out for business (Kohl-Welles op-ed) -- To say that Democrats turned their backs on business ignores the facts. We proposed and passed an array of measures to boost businesses large and small, and keep our economy growing. Our bold actions will pay dividends for years to come. Washington is open for business.
■  In the Seattle Weekly --
Ed Murray's port job -- The state House transportation chair wanted to consult for the Port of Seattle, so the Port found work for him.
■  In today's Seattle P-I -- Bush to attend fundraiser for Reichert -- Look for The Decider to make a pitstop at Fort Lewis before heading to the mansion in Medina -- so taxpayers foot the trip's bill.

National news:
■  In yesterday's NY Times -- Teamsters hope to lure FedEx drivers -- The union hopes to deliver on its promise to unionize far more workers after quitting the AFL-CIO, while FedEx hopes to defend its claim that the drivers are independent contractors and have no right to unionize.
■  Today from AP --
Though latest effort fails, FBI says it isn't giving up search for Hoffa
■  In today's Washington Post --
A push in Congress to act on air traffic controllers impasse -- If Congress takes no action by June 5, the FAA can impose its contract proposal on the union.
■  In today's NY Times --
Survey: Workers should come first -- Americans say the way companies treat their employees is a better indicator of their social conscience than their philanthropy.

 


 

Last week: MONDAY, 5/22 -- TUESDAY, 5/23
Previous week: Monday, 5/15 -- Tuesday, 5/16 -- Thursday, 5/18 -- Friday, 5/19

 

 

WEDNESDAY,  MAY 31, 2006
New study: Wal-Mart stores add to poverty, not prosperity

The following posting appears at AFL-CIO Now -- check it out at http://blog.aflcio.org/.

Although Wal-Mart claims its stores benefit communities and grow local economies, a new study shows that Wal-Mart retail stores contribute to higher local poverty rates.

The study, published in the June 2006 issue of Social Science Quarterly (subscription required), the journal of the Southwestern Social Science Association, finds “unequivocally” that counties with the most Wal-Mart stores and counties that added stores between 1987 and 1998 had higher poverty rates during the 1990s economic boom.

Wal-Mart stores increase the poverty rate in several ways, the report says.  First, Wal-Mart’s business practices drive independent retailers out of business.  The workers who once worked for these “mom-and-pop” stores often end up working part-time at Wal-Mart for lower wages.  In addition, other local retailers reduce their wages to remain competitive with Wal-Mart, the study shows.  As a result, even though Wal-Mart may move into a depressed neighborhood, the poverty rate rises after the new stores are built because the chain forces down wages for everyone.  This contradicts Wal-Mart’s claims that its stores benefit low-income communities by lowering prices for consumers.

The businesses that had supplied local stores, such as wholesalers, transporters, accountants and lawyers, also lose income when local stores close because Wal-Mart handles nearly all of those services through its headquarters in Bentonville, Ark., the study says.  With fewer business opportunities, better-educated service providers often move to other areas, reducing the number of “nonpoor” households in an area and leaving more workers jobless, according to the study.

“The public costs that the chain imposes by raising the poverty rate suggest that public infrastructure subsidies may not be warranted or, as a minimum, that these two types of costs need to be added together to assess the overall cost of the chain to a community,” say the study’s authors, Stephan J. Goetz, professor of agricultural economics and rural sociology at Pennsylvania State University, and Hema Swaminathan, an economist with the International Center for Research on Women.

Counties in which the number of Wal-Mart stores increased during the 1990s had higher average usage of food stamps or smaller reductions in use of food stamps, according to the study.

Other studies have noted a large number of Wal-Mart workers are paid poverty-level wages and the retail giant’s lack of affordable health care coverage forces many of its workers to apply for public health care assistance, which adds considerably to the tax burdens of communities in which stores are located.

By reducing the number of local entrepreneurs, the presence of Wal-Mart also decreases local leadership capacity, according to the report, which called this the single, most far-reaching effect of the chain’s impact on communities.

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2006   Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO