WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

March 14, 2007


THE PAST WEEK:
Tuesday, March 13
Friday, March 9
Thursday, March 8
Wednesday, March 7

WSLC Reports Today
Updated DAILY... Almost Every Day™ by 9 a.m.

Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire. Some links require free registration.  WSLC Reports Today links to stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative.  The intention is to inform.


 

WEDNESDAY, MAR. 14  ▪  TAKE ACTION: Support the Worker Freedom Act! ▪  In today's Seattle Times -- Labor pushes for passage of Worker Freedom Act -- The legislation would give workers the freedom to choose whether to attend so-called "captive audience" meetings where companies attempt to indoctrinate them against organizing unions. "Freedom of speech is not a one-way street," says the WSLC. "You should also have the right to not listen."

Legislative news:  ▪  Today is a legislative cutoff day!  In order to survive, bills must pass from their houses of origin by 5 p.m. Check out our state-of-the-art high-tech WSLC Legislative Tracker™ -- which will be updated throughout the day -- for the latest news on bills of particular concern to you and your union.
▪  In today's Olympian -- Gregoire signs children's health care bill
▪  In today's Seattle Times -- A down payment on public health (column) -- We are a better society than one reduced to cowering in the face of pandemic threats or lurching from crisis to crisis. We need to invest in public health before a repeat of 9/11 or the spread of a nasty virus. This Legislature ought to begin the work with a sizable down payment.
▪  In today's Seattle P-I -- Investing in health (editorial) -- Even as threats of bird flu, bioterrorism and evolving food-borne illnesses have grown, legislators have left public health programs without a source of reliable funding. The Legislature ought to step up to its responsibility (with HB 1825).
▪  In today's News Tribune -- Effort to rid state of tax loopholes faces tough sell ( column) -- The extraordinary steps taken to push a Senate bill extending a tax break for beef producers shows just how difficult it is to repeal any tax break.
▪  In today's Olympian -- Bill to block union negotiation notes stalls, says sponsor Rep. Williams 
▪  In today's Everett Herald -- Public-worker union deals shouldn't be kept secret  (AWB op-ed)
▪  In today's Seattle P-I -- No and no: Seattle voters reject viaduct rebuild, tunnel -- State, county and city leaders plan to hold a news conference this morning to discuss where they'll go from here.

Local news:
▪  Today from AP -- State appeals court repeals part of 2003 unemployment insurance changes -- The state Court of Appeals has overturned legislative attempts to further restrict the availability of unemployment checks to people who voluntarily quit their jobs.
▪  In the Columbian -- Jobless benefits were not intended for quitters (another ever-present AWB op-ed) 
▪  In today's Tri-City Herald -- Hanford proposal riles crowd -- Hearing considers Hanford's possible role in a proposed new national nuclear energy program to reuse spent commercial reactor fuel. Among proposals that could be considered at Hanford is a restart of the Fast Flux Test Facility.
▪  In today's Everett Herald -- Millions for transit could leave Snohomish County -- If county voters say yes to more transit taxes next November, they will send hundreds of millions to King County.
▪  In today's Seattle Times -- Boeing, Airbus warned on rivals -- The most influential man in the business says to expect competition from China, Russia and Japan starting in about 15 years.
▪  In today's Everett Herald -- Premera content as nonprofit -- Turned downed in its attempts to become a for-profit, the health insurance firm's head looks to build on a "very good 2006."
▪  In today's Seattle Times -- Why our state's two-year colleges should offer four-year degrees (op-ed)
▪  In today's Olympian -- Ex-GOP Boss Vance admits he called fired U.S. attorney about Rossi vote -- No word yet on which Boss Vance called Mr. McKay.

National news:
▪  Today at AFL-CIO Now --  Young workers need a union to build a better life -- A new generation of young people is finding the path to the middle class blocked by the decline of high-paying manufacturing jobs, the decline of strong unions and the rising cost of a college education.
▪  In today's Seattle P-I -- U.S. Senate OKs anti-terrorism bill, but hurdles remain -- Will Bush follow through with his threat to veto the bill because it allows airport security screeners to unionize?

 

 

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 2007
TAKE ACTION: Support the Worker Freedom Act!

No worker should have to choose between supporting unionization and losing their job. Yet according to the National Labor Relations Board, a worker is illegally fired or penalized every 17 minutes of the day in America for supporting a union. Existing laws aren’t protecting these workers.

That's why we need the Worker Freedom Act!  This legislation would give workers the freedom to choose whether they want to attend their employers' so-called "captive audience" meetings about unionization.  Employees should not be forced -- under threat of loss of their livelihoods -- to attend meetings where they are subjected to indoctrination by their employer on issues unrelated to their work or job performance. The Worker Freedom Act would simply ensure workers' right to walk away.

TAKE ACTION!  Please take a moment to send an email message to your state legislators urging them to support the Worker Freedom Act.  (There are two different bill numbers associated with the legislation. After today's legislative cutoff deadline, we will update this posting and the online advocacy campaign to include the bill number.) 

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE WORKER FREEDOM ACT

 

Freedom of speech is a two-way street. No one should be forced to listen to someone else's personal views or risk losing their family’s livelihood. No employer should be able to retaliate against employees who choose to avoid indoctrination that has nothing to do with their jobs.  

 

What does the Worker Freedom Act do?

 

  1. Makes it unlawful for an employer to require employees to attend or participate in meetings where the employer lectures on religion, politics or union organizing.

  1. Prohibits the discharge or discipline of employees who report such unlawful, coerced meetings.

  1. Provides a civil court remedy for injunctive and equitable relief. Workers who have been retaliated against must bring action in Superior Court within 90 days.

 

Why is this bill necessary?

 

Currently, workers can be fired or disciplined for either declining to attend or expressing their personal views at such meetings.  These meetings are the most coercive form of employer interference in union-representation drives.  A Cornell University study found that employers force workers to attend such meetings in more than 90% of union-organizing campaigns.

 

Does the bill limit employer free speech?

 

No.  Employers remain free to voice their opinions, conduct meetings and give lectures.  This bill just protects a worker’s right to walk away and not listen.  It eliminates force and coercion.  Employers could still pass out literature and employees could still hear the employer’s views at voluntary meetings.

 

Freedom of speech is a two-way street.  Employers should be free to state their views, but no one should be forced to listen to someone else's personal views at risk of losing their family’s livelihood.  The Worker Freedom Act maintains employer freedom of speech while protecting the worker’s freedom to avoid indoctrination that has nothing to do with their employment.

 

Won’t this bill be preempted by the federal law?

 

No.  The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that “states possess broad authority under their police powers to regulate the employment relationship to protect workers within the state.” 

 

State and local laws can and do regulate minimum employment standards that are not preempted by federal labor law, such as the minimum wage, just-cause terminations, anti-discrimination protections, and more.

 

The National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel under President Clinton testified, “I believe a state is not preempted from providing protection to employees who choose not to listen to an employer’s views on unionization.”

 

Will this bill be bad for business?

 

No.  Washington state has many employment standards that exceed federal standards and are intended to protect workers’ rights and make our state a better place to live, work and run a business.  Our state economy is absolutely thriving because Washington remains an excellent place to do business.

 

Washington ranks 4th best in the nation in the 2006 Small Business Survival Index by the Small Business & Entrepreneur Council, a business lobbying group that advocates for regulatory reform. Even the ultra-conservative Tax Foundation think tank ranks Washington state 11th in “business friendliness.”

 

The Worker Freedom Act is about good corporate citizenship.  It’s about treating employees with dignity and respect, and respecting their rights and freedoms.  That’s good for morale, good for the community, and good for business.

TAKE ACTION!  Please take a moment to send an email message to your state legislators urging them to support the Worker Freedom Act.  

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2007   Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO