WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
Monthly ReportsPresident's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

March 23, 2007


THE PAST WEEK:
Thursday, March 22
Wednesday, March 21
Tuesday, March 20
Monday, March 19

WSLC Reports Today
Updated DAILY... Almost Every Day™ by 9 a.m.

Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire. Some links require free registration.  WSLC Reports Today links to stories of interest to organized labor; some positive, some negative.  The intention is to inform.


 

FRIDAY, MARCH 23  ▪  It's time for Family & Medical Leave Insurance for all workers -- After six years of debate and compromise, the Senate-approved SB 5659 is ready for a House vote. Read what it does, who supports it, how it protects employers, and how you can support it!
▪ 
Today at Adam Wilson's Olympian blog -- Questions and answers on Family and Medical Leave 

Legislative news:
▪  In today's Olympian -- State worker pay bill turned down -- An attempt to give pay raises to union and nonunion state workers on the same day is rejected. The proposal also would have required a reduction in the amount the state contributes toward state workers’ health insurance.
▪  In today's Kitsap Sun -- NASCAR bill concedes control to locals -- Racetrack officials say the proposed revisions to the legislation would shift more power to the "host communities." 

Local news:
▪  In today's Seattle P-I -- Contract postal carriers get more routes -- One new housing development at a time, more non-postal service mail carriers are taking on routes across the nation. A new 89-home development in Lake Stevens is likely to be the most recent local example. Private carriers typically serve rural areas, don't receive union benefits and work for lower, flat rates. Some residents fear their private mail might not be as safe, and post office employees say the private workers aren't always held to the same ethical standards. There are cases across the country where contract workers have shrugged off responsibility and stolen or thrown away mail.
▪  In today's Everett Herald -- 787 supplier comes through -- The Dreamliner supplier that worries Boeing Co. officials most just shipped its first 787 fuselage sections Thursday.
▪  In The Columbian -- G-P plans change in mix of products -- The shutdown of a paper machine at the Wauna mill is expected to bring a new product-production mix, but not any jobs, to Camas.
▪  In today's Olympian -- Immigrants step in to fill U.S. nursing shortage (op-ed) -- The U.S. nursing shortage has reached a level where hiring foreign nurses is not just an option but a necessity.

National news: 
▪  Today at AFL-CIO Now -- Legislation introduced to reverse anti-worker NLRB decisions -- The bill would reverse a Republican party-line NLRB vote in September 2006 to redefine "supervisor" in such a way that removed the freedom to form unions for millions of American workers.
▪  At AFLCIO.org -- Sweeney praises introduction of immigration reform -- "We welcome that step as a signal that legislators are ready to begin a serious dialogue on one of the most important issues facing working families. We will be analyzing (the bill) through the lens of workers’ rights."
▪  In today's NY Times -- Doubts arise on immigration bill's chances -- House lawmakers hail the introduction of a new measure to secure the border and move millions of illegal immigrants toward citizenship. But behind the scenes, there was much more uncertainty than celebration.
▪  At AFL-CIO Now -- Courts slams down suit to block Montana's minimum wage increase 
▪  Today from AP -- Bush welcomes EU "Open Skies" deal, but labor unions don't -- It would allow airlines to fly from anywhere in the E.U. to any point in the U.S., shedding limitations that also discourage them from charging what they like or combining with other carriers.

 

 

FRIDAY, MARCH 23, 2007
It's time for Family & Medical Leave Insurance for all workers
After 6 years of legislative debate, Senate-approved SB 5659 ready for a VOTE!

What would you do if your child, spouse, partner or parent was suddenly diagnosed with a serious illness and hospitalized, and you couldn't afford to take any time off work?  

That's a real-world dilemma for nearly half of the workers in Washington state who get no paid sick leave from their employers. If it becomes necessary for them to care for a sick family member or a new baby arrives, they simply lose their incomes -- and sometimes their very jobs. Even workers who have good benefit packages often exhaust their paid leave during a critical family illness or following the birth of a child.

The federal Family and Medical Leave Act provides up to 12 weeks of leave for such events, but about half of the private workforce is not covered by the FMLA -- which only covers businesses with 50 or more employees -- and even if they are covered, the FMLA only provides unpaid leave.  A U.S. Department of Labor study found that 78% of those who needed leave did not take it. The most common reason people don't take leave when a family member really needs their care is because they simply can't afford it.

"We all benefit..."

An excerpt from The (Tacoma) News Tribune's March 16 editorial supporting SB 5659 passage, Family leave still out of reach for too many:

The 1993 passage of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act represented major progress in helping Americans balance their responsibilities to work and family.

Dire predictions about the damage the law would do to the economy and job growth have largely not come to pass. In 1995 and 2000 U.S. Department of Labor surveys, employers reported that the law hadn’t harmed profits or productivity; in some cases, both improved. That should come as no surprise. Employees who come to work distracted by family medical problems or other issues are usually less productive.

We all benefit when mothers and fathers can take time off to bond and care for their children. Nurtured kids fare better in school, are more resilient and eventually make greater contributions to the working world. Same goes for allowing workers to tend to elderly parents or an ailing spouse, care that might otherwise fall to a government program to deliver at higher cost.

But for some workers, especially those at the bottom of the wage scale, the 12-week unpaid leave guaranteed by the federal law is an empty promise. Fewer than half of employers in Washington offer paid sick leave that would allow workers to afford to take time off...

What came off the Senate floor (the amended SB 5659) was a reasonable step toward allowing more workers to use family leave.

That's why the Washington State Labor Council has joined a broad coalition of organizations, businesses and advocates for working mothers and families to support SB 5659, the Family and Medical Leave Insurance Act sponsored by Sen. Karen Keiser (D-Des Moines) and Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson (D-Seattle). The labor unions that comprise the WSLC believe that all workers, when faced with a serious health condition in their family, should be assured both job security and economic security.  And after six years of discussion, debate and policy revision, we believe the time is finally here for a paid family leave insurance program in Washington state.

SB 5659 already passed the Senate on a 32-17 vote, and is scheduled to advance from the House Commerce and Labor Committee this afternoon, making it available for a House floor vote any time in the next three weeks. (Friday, April 13 is the cutoff date for it to pass the House.)

What SB 5659 does

SB 5659 would provide all Washington workers with partial pay for up to five weeks at a stipend of $250 a week (pro-rated for part-timers) when they must deal with a serious illness for a family member, including domestic partners, or the birth or adoption of a child. The insurance program would be financed by a 2-cents-an-hour payroll deduction on workers. That means for a premium of about $40 a year, all workers in Washington state would have Family and Medical Leave Insurance coverage, and the security of knowing they can afford to take some time off work when they have a family health emergency or when they welcome a new child into their family.

California, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island offer paid disability leave for all workers, including coverage for women following childbirth. In 2004, California became the first state to add a family leave component to its existing disability insurance program. Since that time, 90% of the claims for paid family leave in California were for bonding with a new child and 10% of the claims were for care giving. As this new program is marketed, the number of claims for illness and care giving are expected to increase.

The program has proven so successful that, in addition to Washington, other states are also considering the creation of family leave insurance programs. Oregon currently has a bill before its legislature to offer about $229 a week for up to six weeks through a worker payroll deduction. New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Illinois are also considering similar programs.

Who supports SB 5659

Three of four Washington voters (73%) support creating a worker-funded Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FMLI) program covering all workers in Washington state, according to a new poll conducted by Lake Research Partners, a respected national polling firm. In Eastern Washington, the support rose to a remarkable 82%. A recent Elway Poll also measured strong support for worker-funded FMLI.

Dozens of business owners and advocates for working families and mothers have testified before the Legislature in support of SB 5659. A survey of 48 small business owners and managers in both urban and rural parts of Western Washington, conducted by the Economic Opportunity Institute, found that 85% of those interviewed support FMLI. (See a list of some of the businesses that support the FMLI.)

The most common reason given was that FMLI would help small businesses retain dependable employees, especially part-time workers who receive no sick pay or vacation benefits. Often these employees are forced to quit their jobs when they must care for a sick family member or a new baby arrives.

What else SB 5659 does to protect employers

SB 5659 was amended before its Senate passage to address some of the concerns raised by business lobbying groups in Olympia. It now stipulates that:

  • Although all workers are entitled to receive the benefit regardless of the size of their employer, only businesses with more than 25 employees are required to provide job protection (meaning the workers who take paid leave must be returned to their equivalent jobs). 
  • Employers of 50 or fewer can receive a B&O tax credit of up to $1,200 for each replacement worker hired for someone out on family leave
  • Coverage for the worker's own health conditions was removed after some opponents argued that this should be covered by employer-provided sick leave instead.

Even before the amendment, SB 5659 included strict standards to protect employers:

  • A one-week waiting period before benefits start
  • A requirement for medical certification of a serious health condition, with verification by the Department of Labor and Industries (which will administer the program)
  • Benefits run concurrently with FMLA, may not be “tacked on” to other job-protected leave
  • Employers must be notified when leave will begin and end
  • Employers may require workers to periodically report on their status during leave
  • Right of employers to appeal

In its March 16 editorial, Family leave still out of reach for too many, The (Tacoma) News Tribune praised the amended SB 5659, "What came off the Senate floor was a reasonable step toward allowing more workers to use family leave."

What you can do to support SB 5659

Please call the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000 and leave a message for both of your State Representatives -- plus ask them to forward a copy of the message to House Speaker Frank Chopp and Governor Christine Gregoire. Urge them to:

SUPPORT SB 5659, which provides Family and Medical Leave Insurance to all Washington workers. This policy has been debated for six years now, it's time to vote on it -- and to vote YES!

Thank you for taking the time to place this important call. 

If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see posted here, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805.

Copyright © 2007   Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO