Last Throes update: 
▪  In today's Seattle Times -- Too few bear war's burden (Westneat column) -- This war is unlike any other in how the sacrifice has been divvied up: 5% of Americans -- 1.5 million troops and their relatives -- are living and dying it. The rest of us were asked to go shopping. Says one military spouse: "America isn't at war. The military is. The military and its families are going it alone."
▪  In today's NY Times -- For an Iraq contractor, duty, and then death -- An 125,000 contractors are working in the country, nearly the number of American troops, about 20,000 of whom carry guns. As of June 30, 1,001 contractors had died in Iraq since the start of the war.
▪  Of the 3,680 U.S. troops killed in Iraq; 3,541 of them have died since Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" and an end to major combat operations in May 2003; 3,219 have died since the capture of Saddam; and 2,821 have died since the government was handed over to the Iraqis.
▪  The WSLC's affiliated unions have called for an end to the U.S. occupation of Iraq.

The top seven Democratic candidates for President outlined their plans to create a more fair and equitable economy for all Americans last night at the AFL-CIO Presidential Forum. In a 90-minute forum attended by 17,000 union members at Soldier Field in Chicago and nationally broadcast on MSNBC and XM Radio, the candidates responded to questions posed by moderator Keith Olbermann and working families on core issues like health care, jobs and the freedom to form and join unions.

"Tonight thousands of working people at Soldier Field and millions across the country heard these candidates discuss how they would create fundamental economic change that would restore the hope and promise of the American Dream to working families," said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney. "While political pundits are debating which candidate won or lost here tonight, it's clear the real winners are the working women and men of this country whose issues and priorities are central in this campaign."

One-by-one, the candidates outlined their plans to improve America for working families. The candidates responded to questions posed by audience members, submitted by working people online and Olbermann's own.

Asked by Olbermann about infrastructure, in particular the nation's bridges, Biden said, "We don't need any more studies. We don't need any more operations. What we need is to put America back to work. Put them to work at a prevailing wage. Make us safer as a consequence of that."

Sen. Hillary Clinton invoked local workers' efforts to join a union at a local hospital. "When I am president, we'll have a Department of Labor that actually cares about labor," Clinton said. "And when it comes to organizing at Resurrection Hospital, I will be the president who signs the Employee Free Choice Act."

"Having the kind of first responders at home, like the firefighters and police and EMS services that have the tools and the ability to stand up and defend our country has not been funded -- I think we're vulnerable today, more so that we were right after 9/11," said Sen. Christopher Dodd in response to a question on the Homeland Security department.

In a moving moment, Steve Skvara, a worker from Indiana who lost his pension and health care when his company, LTV Steel, filed bankruptcy, asked the candidates what's wrong with America and how they would fix it.

"My view is that we ought to treat the pensions and the retirement of the chairman and CEOs of companies exactly the way we treat every other worker in the country," Sen. John Edwards said.

Edwards went on to tout unions as a key to improving the lives of millions of Americans. "I intend to be the President of the United States who walks onto the White House lawn and explains how important unions are to the economic security of the country," he said.

"Isn't it time to cover every American with a not-for-profit system," said Rep. Dennis Kucinich on health care. "Furthermore 46 million Americans without any health care, 50 million Americans uninsured, you know and I know this is the issue at the bargaining table."

In response to a question on globalization, Sen. Barrack Obama said, "The question is: On whose behalf is the president negotiating -- on behalf of the people in this stadium or are you only negotiating on behalf of corporate profits?  We've got provisions in our tax code that reward companies that are moving jobs overseas instead of companies that are investing right in the United States of America. And that is a reflection of the degree to which special interests have been shaping our trade policy."

In response to a question from Jim McGovern, an Iraq war veteran who returned to find that his Maytag plant had closed, Governor Bill Richardson said, "I would protect (workers') pensions from this restructuring. I would protect their health care. I would ensure that what you have in the future is job protection."

The AFL-CIO Executive Council is likely to make a decision today as to whether to set the AFL-CIO endorsement process in motion this fall prior to the primaries.

The forum was a key part of an intensive six-month program to engage union members and their families in the AFL-CIO's presidential endorsement decision-making process. Beginning in April, the AFL-CIO held town hall meetings in cities across the United States with presidential candidates to discuss issues of vital importance to working families like health care, jobs, retirement security, trade policy and the freedom to form and join unions.

The support of grassroots union activists is critical to any candidate seeking victory in 2008. In the 2006 elections, the AFL-CIO's massive union voter mobilization proved key to shifting the balance of power in Congress. The AFL-CIO mobilized more than 13.6 million voters in 32 states in support of working family friendly candidates. For more information on the AFL-CIO's Working Families Vote '08 campaign, go to www.workingfamiliesvote08.org.

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2007
AFL-CIO top leadership chooses to hold on endorsement 

Following its presidential forum attended by 17,500 union members in Chicago last night, the AFL-CIO Executive Council today chose to hold off making an endorsement of a single candidate for president, instead calling for continuing "this education and mobilization process -- not only to hear from the candidates, but to ensure that the candidates hear from America's workers."

In a released statement, the 47-member top leadership body left the door open for an endorsement at a later date and made clear that each of the AFL-CIO's 55 unions could make its own primary endorsement.

"It is clear that a number of the Democratic candidates have the experience and the credentials to lead our nation," wrote the Executive Council.  "And it is equally clear that our members support a number of the candidates -- many union members have told us all the candidates are impressive and they are eager to support many of them."

"The issues affecting our nation's working families took front and center last night," said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney.  "We will make absolutely sure that the spotlight remains on working people's concerns, like good jobs, affordable health care, and the freedom to join and form unions to improve their lives."

In 2004, the AFL-CIO made an endorsement for John Kerry in February.

The AFL-CIO's "Working Families Vote 2008" campaign is the broadest effort yet to involve working people in the selection of president.  In addition to hosting last night's Presidential Forum, the 10-million member union federation held town hall forums with each candidate and union members over the last four months, and 20,000 people voted on the questions to be posed at last night's forum on the group's interactive website (www.workingfamiliesvote08.org).

Rather than endorsing at this time, the Executive Council pledged that unions "will focus on preparations for the greatest involvement ever by working voters in the crucial 2008 elections."  In 2006, the AFL-CIO's massive union mobilization proved key to shifting the balance of power in Congress when it mobilized more than 13.6 million voters in 32 states.  In recent national elections, one in four voters have been union household members.