DON'T EXEMPT ROSSI FROM STATE CAMPAIGN LAWS
Of all the leadership qualities we have a right to
expect from elected officials, openness, integrity and honesty are the
most critical.
Campaign finance laws were enacted to reduce the
influence of special interests by shining a spotlight on financial
support for candidates. This allows voters to judge whether a candidate
might be beholden to one special interest or another.
Our commitment to the laws that promote honesty
and openness is what led us to take legal action against Dino Rossi and
the Building and Industry Association of Washington. We do not take this
action lightly.
But we believe there is evidence that shows the
BIAW and Rossi have both committed serious violations of campaign
finance laws, and these violations are depriving the voters of a clean
and fair election.
In late July, the state attorney general brought
suit against a subsidiary of the BIAW for illegal campaign fundraising
designed to support Rossi's candidacy for governor. The bipartisan
Public Disclosure Commission also found the BIAW's fundraising for
attack ads in the race committed "multiple apparent
violations" of law in building its "war chest" to support
Rossi.
We believe the evidence upon which we base our
legal action shows Rossi was not just a beneficiary of those illegal
activities, but was a knowing and active participant. The evidence
shows, moreover, that the attack ads of the BIAW are not really
"independent" of their beneficiary, Rossi.
The attorney general's suit claims that the
illegal fundraising campaign involved solicitation of 15 local building
groups, targeting the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish
counties for the largest contribution. When the group's leadership met
to discuss the BIAW's request for a donation, the three top officers
acknowledged they had received calls from Rossi. The written minutes
reflect that Rossi discussed whether and when the group would give to
the BIAW's campaign fund. When a candidate makes such calls while a
solicitation is pending, he is encouraging the contribution, regardless
of what he said on the call.
If the meeting minutes are correct and there was
improper coordination, this is a very serious matter. It would mean
Rossi and BIAW broke the law. It would mean that the BIAW's expenditures
on Rossi's behalf were legally limited to $2,800. Instead, it has spent
more than $2 million supporting his candidacy.
This is an important issue for all political
races. Special interests are increasingly supporting candidates through
"independent expenditures" that are not subject to
contribution limits. These "independent" campaigns also tend
to contain the most vicious and dubious negative attacks, since the
benefitting candidates can say they have no control over the messages.
If we want open government, we cannot tolerate
candidates and special interest groups teaming up to break campaign
finance laws.
Washington campaign laws are in place to ensure
our elections are fair and open. And so the voters understand the
interests behind campaigns. The rules must be enforced to ensure those
special interests cannot buy undue influence in our government. The laws
are designed to serve and protect the interests of all citizens. Without
enforcement, our laws are meaningless.