WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
President's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

September 22, 2009


Sept. 21: Fight air safety outsourcing

Sept. 18: Congress: Fix the Baucus bill

Sept. 17: WSLC backs R-71; Trumka elected

RSS 2.0 feed 

Updated DAILY... Almost Every Day!™ by 9 a.m. Pacific
Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire.


Tuesday, September 22, 2009 

 

L&I proposes 7.6% rate increase; WSLC will oppose benefit cuts

With the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries' announcement Monday of a proposed 7.6% workers' compensation premium increase in 2010, the Washington State Labor Council has vowed to aggressively oppose attempts by business lobbying groups to cut injured workers' benefits in a system it called "one of the best in the country." The proposed 7.6% increase was significantly less than the 15-20% increase that L&I warned in June could be necessary next year. Business and labor efforts to ensure system solvency and stabilize rates have helped Washington's State Fund system withstand the recession's negative impact on investments and premium revenue. Read more.

►  In today's Tri-City Herald -- L&I seeks to raise premiums -- The proposed 7.6% increase is an average for all Washington employers. Individual employers could see their rates go up or down, depending on their recent claims history and any changes in the frequency and cost of claims in their industry.

 

Rally against "Big Insurance" TODAY in Seattle

MoveOn and Health Care Action Now! are holding a "Big Insurance: Sick of It!" rally Tuesday at noon at Seattle's City Park at 3rd Ave. & Yesler. This is one of many national events on Tuesday to express the broadly held belief that big health insurance companies must not be allowed to run our health care system. Click here for details.

►  At AFL-CIO Now -- Rallies set across nation to protest Big Insurance -- Big insurance companies are spending $1.4 million a day to oppose reform because they profit by keeping the system as it is, by denying claims, raising premiums, co-pays and deductibles at will, making health care decisions instead of our doctors, denying care because of pre-existing conditions. As the private insurance industry focuses on blocking affordable health care, people who aren’t covered and can’t get decent health care are dying -- one every 12 minutes.


 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

The Senate Finance Committee will begin marking up the Baucus bill TODAY. Call Sen. Maria Cantwell and tell her to "Fix the Baucus Bill!" Call
1-877-264-4226
or the numbers below
. Learn more.

SEN. MARIA CANTWELL
D.C. 202.224.3441; Seattle 206.220.6400; Spokane 509.353.2507; Vancouver 360.696.7838; Richland 509.946.8106; Tacoma 253.572.2281; Everett 425.303-0114.

MESSAGE: Thank you for your continuing support for a public option. Please fix the Baucus bill before moving it out of committee. The Baucus bill fails to deliver a guarantee of good affordable health coverage and does not deliver what the President has proposed. There is no employer responsibility, it does not provide affordable or quality health care coverage, it proposes unfair taxation on certain so-called "high cost" health plans, it has no public option, it increases state Medicaid costs, it has no provisions for early retiree coverage, and weakens state insurance regulation. Please do all that you can to fix it before moving it out of committee.
 

Health reform news:

►  Today from AP -- Senate Finance starts work on Baucus bill -- The panel opens debate on the sweeping health care legislation with its chairman, Sen. Max Baucus, saying Congress has "an opportunity to make history" after generations of failed attempts to overhaul the health care system. But Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Aetna) attacks the bill as a "stunning assault on our liberty."

►  In today's NY Times -- Baucus says he will alter his proposal -- The Finance Committee chairman says he will change it to offer more assistance to moderate-income Americans to help them buy insurance and also make changes to reduce the impact of a new tax on "high cost" health benefits. But he doesn't offer to include a public option or to establish some employer responsibility.

►  In today's LA Times -- Senate Finance Committee keeps eye on bill's price -- As it reworks Baucus' proposal, the goal is to keep it below $900 billion, considered crucial to winning over moderate Democrats. (As David Sirota pointed out, "When it comes to spending on priorities like health-care reform that would help ordinary Americans, (some) scream about deficits and overspending. But when it comes to handing over trillions of dollars to financial firms, defense contractors and other corporate interests, deficits suddenly don't matter.")

 

Health care opinion: 

►  In today's Washington Post -- Labels distort congressional debates (E.J. Dionne column) -- It's time to cast aside the political shorthand and ideological pigeonholing that distort our debates over health care in particular and government's role in American life more broadly. The way words such as "centrist" and "bipartisan" are now deployed turns the discussion away from useful arguments over how various proposals might work and toward arid talk about how ideas fit into prefabricated boxes.

►  In today's Seattle Times -- An epidemic of medical malpractice, not of malpractice lawsuits (guest column) -- As a registered nurse and lawyer, I know that the so-called malpractice "reforms" offered by the insurance industry will not only increase the costs for injured families; they will result in breaking many families financially. When that happens, taxpayers pick up the continuing costs of these often-catastrophic injuries, the insurer gets a free ride, and the costs don't go away. This is no bargain or trade-off. It's robbery.

  

Local news: 

►  In today's Spokesman-Review -- Council OKs firefighters’ plan to ward off layoffs -- The department will avoid layoffs thanks to an early retirement plan approved by the city council. Council members praised the Spokane Firefighters Union for its “creative” solution to erase the 2010 deficit in the fire department’s budget without reducing employee compensation.

►  At SeattlePI.com -- Cash-short King County inks raises for its employees -- While the county executive deals with a $56 million deficit that has him considering closing parks and cutting services, his office also has been negotiating with the county's many unions. The county has finalized contracts with more than a half-dozen bargaining units in the last two months. In each of those contracts the county has agreed to the maximum COLA increase for next year -- 90% of the local CPI, which will likely translate into a 2% wage increases for next year.

►  In today's Bellingham Herald -- Bellingham delays decision on changing big-box rules -- While residents paint two images of big-box stores -- the predatory, small-business-killing, low-wage paying monsters, or the city revenue-generating stores providing options for residents struggling during the recession -- city leaders expressed interest in a revenue-sharing agreement, where local governments share tax revenues from stores.

►  From AP -- Bellingham business fined $100,000 over illegal workers -- Two owners of a Bellingham engine rebuilding company that was raided in January, raising questions about federal policies on illegal immigrants, avoided jail time but were sentenced to a year on probation and their business must pay a $100,000 fine.

►  In today's News Tribune -- Death by delay for Foss Hotel? (editorial) -- The city council may killing the latest effort to build two hotels on Tacoma’s urban waterfront, the Thea Foss Waterway. Part of the reason: Hotel workers’ unions want the developer to fast-track the unionization of the hotels’ staff. Some councilmembers are sympathetic, but it’s a non-starter for the developer.

 

National news:

►  In today's NY Times -- Ms. Smith and the Washington game (editorial) -- M. Patricia Smith was a smart choice to be the Labor Department’s solicitor. As New York State labor commissioner, she has shown sound and innovative leadership and cracked down on minimum-wage and overtime abuses. If anyone could help re-energize the DOL at a time of rising unemployment and rampant violations of workers’ rights, it would be Smith. For those very reasons, some Republicans have been pushing to keep her out of the job. They have unfairly and cynically questioned both her qualifications and her integrity. Congress should approve her nomination.

►  In today's NY Times -- The rights of corporations (editorial) -- At the heart of one of the biggest Supreme Court cases this year is the question: What constitutional rights should corporations have? To us, as well as legal scholars, former justices and, indeed, drafters of the Constitution, the answer is that their rights should be quite limited -- far less than those of people.

 

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
L&I proposes 7.6% workers' comp rate increase
WSLC vows to oppose efforts to cut injured workers' benefits in model system

With the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries' announcement of a proposed 7.6% workers' compensation premium increase in 2010, the Washington State Labor Council vowed to aggressively oppose attempts by business lobbying groups to cut injured workers' benefits in a system it called "one of the best in the country."

►  Part 2 -- Washington's workers' compensation advantage -- One of the most persistent myths about Washington's business climate is that our workers' compensation costs are higher than in other states. The gap between the truth and the negative rhetoric on this question is shocking. Not only do we have comparatively low premiums, the system's costs to employers in Washington state are the fifth lowest of any state in the nation.

The proposed 7.6% increase was significantly less than the 15-20% increase that L&I warned in June could be necessary next year. Business and labor efforts to ensure system solvency and stabilize rates have helped Washington's State Fund system withstand the recession's negative impact on investments and premium revenue.

WSLC President Rick Bender released the following statement Monday afternoon:

"There is never good time to increase premiums, but even with this proposed rate increase, national reports indicate Washington is still among the least expensive states for workers' compensation insurance. Our state’s workers' compensation system is one of the best in the country and we are committed to keeping it that way. Over the past several years business and labor have worked together with the Department of Labor and Industries to ensure the system’s financial solvency and to stabilize rates. Unfortunately, when Wall Street greed and manipulation wiped out gains in the stock market, our system needed help.

"We are the only state in the nation where both employers and employees share the cost of worker comp benefits, so the increase affects both parties. But at the Washington State Labor Council we believe it is imperative to provide good benefits to workers who are hurt or injured on the job -- cutting that lifeline for an injured worker's family should never be an option.

"The business community will try to use this proposed rate increase as a battle cry to lower employers' costs by cutting benefits. That's not reform, that's punishing the victims. The surest way for employers to bring down workers' compensation costs is to reduce workplace accidents by improving safety and training for employees.”

The Department of L&I announced Monday that the premium increase is needed because the recession had taken its toll -- an estimated $1 billion hit -- with "reduced investment returns, fewer premiums because of reduced hours worked, and fewer jobs for injured workers to return to." L&I also notes that 8.5% health-care inflation and 3.4% wage inflation were also factors.

Even with a 7.6% rate increase, if every other state in the nation was able to freeze its premiums,
Washington will STILL have the 5th lowest employer costs in the United States.

The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services conducts a biannual state-by-state study of workers' compensation premiums that is widely cited not only among public policy experts and state labor agencies across the nation, but also by private industrial insurance professionals. The latest edition, released in October 2008, found that Washington state had the 38th highest overall premiums in the nation.

But the news is even better for our state's employers because Washington is the only state in the nation where workers pay a portion of the premiums -- just more than 25% of the costs. Factoring that in, which Oregon's study does not, Washington ranks 5th lowest in the nation in terms of costs for employers.

With the proposed 7.6% rate increase, even if every other state in the nation is able to freeze its premiums in 2010, Washington will STILL have the 5th lowest employer costs in the United States.

Immediately after Monday's announcement of L&I's proposed rate increase, the Association of Washington Business issued a statement calling for the state to "reform" the system by cutting injured workers' benefits. Instead of acknowledging Washington's comparative advantage over other states in terms of employer costs, the state's largest business lobbying group focuses on the system's comparatively high benefits. The AWB says it intends to pursue various benefit cuts in the 2010 legislative session.

The WSLC will aggressively oppose such efforts. 

Any proposed changes to system must be made with the welfare of the injured workers and their families in mind. Simply cutting benefits for injured workers is not "reform." It would pour salt on the wounds of families who, at the worst possible time economically, have lost their source of income due to workplace injury.

Consideration should be made to ensure our system's costs stay competitive with other states. But it is absurd to make our goal to cut benefits so they are more in line with other states. Washington must not engage in a race to the bottom where injured workers and their families are thrown into poverty with no recourse. To engage in this benefit-cutting race, especially when employers in our state already have among the lowest workers' compensation costs in the country, is immoral and unacceptable.

L&I will conduct six public meetings throughout the state to give citizens the opportunity to weigh in on the proposed rate increase before announcing the final 2010 rates in late November. Here is the hearing schedule:

Written comments, accepted through Nov. 7, may be e-mailed to Ronald Moore, Employer Services Program Manager, or mailed to him at the Department of Labor & Industries, P.O. Box 44140, Olympia, WA 98504-4140. Faxed comments should go to 360-902-4729.

 

Copyright © 2009 --  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO