WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
President's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

February 26, 2010


Feb. 25: Bold action needed on jobs

Feb. 24: Virtual march for health reform

Feb. 23: More budgets (and hearings)

RSS 2.0 feed 

Updated DAILY... Almost Every Day!™ by 9 a.m. Pacific
Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire.


Friday, February 26, 2010
 

State liquor stores make money and protect the public

(Guest column by the Rev. Jimmie James and state Rep. Zack Hudgins) -- Sometimes, a bad idea just keeps coming back. That's the case with a proposal being discussed in our state capital to deregulate our state liquor stores. The proposal is part of the state House's budget proposal released this week. It is was a bad idea when prior Republican and Democratic governors opposed it. It is still a bad idea in 2010. Why? Three words: safety, control and revenue.  Read more.

 

The economic harm of privatization

(Today's WSLC Legislative Update) -- State legislators should focus not only on the quality and value of the services provided by hard-working state employees, but also the negative ripple effects experienced in local communities when good public-sector jobs are eliminated for no reason other than to achieve "smaller government" -- not cheaper, just smaller. These days, the lives and livelihoods of real people, in both the public and private sectors, deserve more consideration and care than they are getting from bottom-line-blinded international corporations. And they deserve better from the public's employer. Read the newsletter.

 

 

Health care news:

►  In today's NY Times -- President urges focus on common ground -- Obama and his fellow Democrats tried to make the case that the two parties were closer than they thought, with the implication that their bill was centrist and would be acceptable to mainstream voters. Republicans countered that the gap was vast and that Obama should throw it out and start over. By day’s end, Republicans still said there was no way they would vote for Obama’s bill, and Democrats were talking openly about pushing it through Congress on a simple majority vote.

►  In today's Washington Post -- At health-care summit, Obama tells GOP he's eager to move ahead -- Democratic leaders face a heavy lift in reviving their stalled bill, a process that would involve intricate parliamentary maneuvering and carries no guarantee of success. But Obama signaled that if meaningful GOP cooperation does not materialize in the weeks ahead, he is ready to proceed without bipartisan support and risk the political consequences.

►  In today's Washington Post -- Professor Obama schools lawmakers on health-care reform (Dana Milbank column) -- Republicans had been hesitant to accept the president's invitation to participate in Thursday's White House health-care summit. Their hesitance turned out to be justified.

►  In today's Olympian -- Murray recounts death of boy's mother at summit -- Sen. Patty Murray has told the story of Marcelas Owens dozens of times, but never before a bigger audience as she talked of the 10-year-old Seattle boy whose mother died after she lost her health coverage. 

►  In today's NY Times -- Afflicting the afflicted (Paul Krugman column) -- If we’re lucky, Thursday’s summit will turn out to have been the last act in the great health reform debate, the prologue to passage of an imperfect but nonetheless history-making bill. If so, the debate will have ended as it began: with Democrats offering moderate plans that draw heavily on past Republican ideas, and Republicans responding with slander and misdirection.

►  In today's NY Times -- After the summit (editorial) -- The main lesson to draw from Thursday’s health care forum is that partisan differences are too profound to be bridged. That means that it is up to the Democrats to fix the country’s dysfunctional and hugely costly health care system.

 

Unemployment news:

►  From AP -- Unemployment claims rise -- Layoffs are no longer dropping, reinforcing fears that the jobs crisis will weigh down consumer spending and the economic rebound. The Labor Department said first-time claims for benefits rose 22,000 to a seasonally adjusted 496,000.

►  At Huffington Post -- Republican senator to unemployed: "Tough shit" -- Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) is single-handedly blocking Senate action needed to prevent an estimated 1.2 million American workers from prematurely losing their unemployment benefits next month. As Democratic senators asked again and again for unanimous consent for a vote on a 30-day extension Thursday night, Bunning refused to go along. And when Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) begged him to drop his objection, Politico reports, Bunning replied: "Tough shit."

 

Legislative news:

►  At TheOlympian.com -- History lesson: Voter initiatives often get changed -- Tim Eyman keeps saying that temporarily suspending I-960 violates the "will of the people," but that's a bit overblown. The Office of the Secretary of State says, initiatives are frequently, if not commonly revised to fit changing times. That agency has released a list yesterday showing that lawmakers have amended or repealed more than 25 measures since 1952.

►  In today's Seattle Times -- Idea of moving Cascadia Community College to Kirkland debated -- A behind-the-scenes debate over whether to evict Cascadia Community College from the campus it shares with UW-Bothell has surfaced in Olympia.

►  From AP -- Gregoire confident of school reform efforts -- Some say her reform proposal lacks boldness, but she says the bill moving through the Legislature has everything necessary to prepare the state to apply for millions of new dollars from the federal government.

►  In today's Seattle Times -- "Town Hall-ed" to death on Highway 520 (editorial) -- Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn wants to change the rules for replacing the Highway 520 bridge. Never mind that plans have been hashed, thrashed and negotiated for more than a decade. Lawmakers in Olympia are moving forward with the current approach and need not be distracted by the mayor's latest assertion that his arrival as mayor means earlier plans must be torpedoed.

 

"Mr. CEO, What is your commitment to America?"

►  At AFL-CIO Now -- IUE-CWA files changes against Whirlpool -- The union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board against Whirlpool, alleging the company interfered with workers’ rights by threatening employees if they participate in today's rally. Whirlpool announced it is closing the Evansville, Ind., plant, laying off 1,100 workers and sending jobs to Mexico.

►  In today's Evansville (Ind.) Courier-Press -- It's time to fight for U.S. jobs (guest column by Richard Trumka) --  The fight for good American jobs is coming to Evansville today, and our message to Whirlpool will be loud and clear: Keep it made in America and save our jobs. After more than 50 years, Whirlpool is turning its back on Evansville -- shipping hundreds of good local jobs to Mexico despite the company's healthy profits and millions of taxpayer dollars in federal economic stimulus money. We need jobs. And we can't stop in Evansville.

 

Boeing news:

►  In today's (Everett) Herald -- Boeing wins separate orders for 787s, 737s -- United finalizes its December order for 25 Dreamliners. Plus, an unidentified customer orders 20 737s.

►  In today's Seattle Times -- Republic Airways to buy Bombardier jets that compete with 737 -- The agreement to buy up to 40 new Bombardier CS300 jets, with options for 40 MORE, is a big boost for the Bombardier CSeries, which competes with Boeing's 737s and Airbus' A320s.

 

Local news:

►  In today's Yakima H-R -- Granato, other officials tout immigration reform -- Yakima Police Chief Sam Granato and other law enforcement officials urge Congress to take up immigration reform and said local police shouldn't be called on to help enforce immigration laws. The prospect of deportation already causes illegal immigrants to avoid contact with police.

►  In today's Yakima H-R -- Yakima County expects to make cuts to balance budget -- A series of cuts to reduce its $1.1 million shortfall will be announced in April, but employee wage freezes or reductions reportedly won't be part of the plan, at least for this year.

►  In today's Bellingham Herald -- Bellingham schools face $2 million in cuts -- Some of the savings will have to come from staff cuts, according to acting superintendent Sherrie Brown.

►  In today's Seattle Times -- Nearly 200 pack forum on improving public safety -- King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg pointed to the beating of a teenage girl in a downtown transit tunnel as an example "of what happens when you try and do public safety on the cheap." Those were $8-an-hour security guards," he said of the security workers who watched but didn't intervene.

►  From AP -- AIG to pay $8 million for Oregon public pension losses -- The bailed-out insurance giant will pay after a suit regarding its bid-rigging and failure to disclose unethical or improper practices. (Hey, I've got an idea! Let's put AIG in charge of our public workers' comp system!)

 

National news:

►  In today's NY Times -- Plan to use federal contracts as a way to lift wages -- By altering how it awards $500 billion in contracts each year, the federal government would disqualify more companies with labor, environmental or other violations and give an edge to companies that offer better levels of pay, health coverage, pensions and other benefits, officials say.

NY Times photo -- click to enlarge►  In today's NY Times -- Clearing the air at our ports -- The Teamsters union and environmental activists have formed an outspoken alliance aiming to clear the air in U.S. ports, and perhaps bolster the Teamsters’ ranks in the process. The labor-green alliance is getting under the trucking industry’s skin by asserting that short-haul companies working in ports -- and not the truck drivers, who are often considered independent contractors -- should spend the billions needed to buy new, low-emission rigs that can cost $100,000 to $175,000 each.

►  From AP -- Pentagon suspends career aid for military spouses -- Last year, the government started offering them grants of up to $6,000 for college or career training, but the response was so heavy that it nearly exhausted the program’s budget, prompting the Department of Defense to suspend it abruptly last week, setting off angry responses.

►  From AP -- Hourly workers happier, research says -- Stanford University researchers say workers who get paid by the hour are happier than salaried employees because they see a clear link between output and reward. The researchers also tout "the linkage between how much you earn and your happiness."

(Unlike salaried workers, most hourly workers also have the right to form unions. And those that do, make more money. Be smart. Be happy. Form a union!)

  

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2010
State liquor stores make money, protect the public

The following guest column by the Rev. Jimmie James and state Rep. Zack Hudgins (D-Seattle) appears in today's edition of The Seattle Times:

Sometimes, a bad idea just keeps coming back. That's the case with a proposal being discussed in our state capital to deregulate our state liquor stores. The proposal is part of the state House's budget proposal released this week.

It is was a bad idea when prior Republican and Democratic governors opposed it. It is still a bad idea in 2010. Why? Three words: safety, control and revenue.

• State liquor stores are operated by trained staff who have the highest compliance rate in the nation for making sure they don't sell alcohol to minors. This results in better public safety by keeping alcohol out of the hands of underage drinkers. The state system also has done an excellent job at locating stores in generally acceptable locations.

When it comes down to it, it makes sense to have a trained, salaried work force overseeing these liquor sales, rather than a sales clerk in a private company who would have an incentive to sell as much liquor as possible.

• The idea of liquor control has been around since the Prohibition era and has worked out pretty well in Washington. The people pushing the attempt to deregulate our state stores seem to feel we need to fix a system that isn't broken. In fact, the legislators pushing to deregulate don't have any complaints about the current system, they simply want to sell more alcohol to balance the budget.

The controlled sale of liquor results in a lower alcohol-consumption level compared with noncontrolled states. Why? Because states that have deregulated the sale of liquor allow profit to be the key factor in alcohol policy. Under state-control systems like ours, public health and safety is the driving force, not just profit.

There's little short-term gain in allowing it on the shelves of neighborhood convenience stores. Indeed, there's much more to lose if it is allowed.

In areas of Seattle and Kent, we have seen the effects of easily obtained alcohol even under the current system. We've seen the crime and misery that ensues when a community is left unprotected from overconsumption. We've talked with police officers who patrol these streets, and the mothers who have lost children to drunken drivers.

People in our communities tell us they want to limit public drinking, not make it easier for anybody to obtain hard liquor.

• While protecting public health and safety is the primary reason for state liquor control, the current system still generates more than $300 million in net revenue every year. It does not make any fiscal sense to consider changes in a system that is working fine and raising revenue — money that would otherwise come from raising taxes.

Year after year, study after study has shown the costs of selling off our state's liquor stores outweigh the benefits. Proponents of privatization neglect to mention that if we did it, the state could actually lose more money than we'd gain during the worst economic recession we've seen since the Great Depression.

The $300 million generated each year is returned to the state and local governments, and helps fund the law enforcement and first responders necessary to ensure our public safety. In contrast, states without control receive about half the revenue that Washington does, with most of the profit going to the retailers and leaving the state.

Privatizing liquor stores will increase the number of them in our communities, possibly raise taxes, cut jobs with benefits, put more drunken drivers and underage drinkers on our streets, and distract from the real fixes so desperately needed to our economy.

The Rev. Jimmie James lives in Kent. Democratic state Rep. Zack Hudgins represents the 11th Legislative District, including South Seattle, Tukwila and parts of Renton.

 

Copyright © 2010 --  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO