WSLC Online - Home

Contact
What's New
Upcoming Events
WSLC Reports Today
President's Column
2000 Resolutions
Who We Are
Why Join a Union?
Legislative Issues
Political Education
Site Map

 

 

 

 

June 23, 2010


June 22: Starbucks' CEO a union buster

June 21: Advocates seek stronger OSHA

June 18: SCOTUS sides with employers

RSS 2.0 feed 

 Updated DAILY... Almost Every Day!™ by 9 a.m. Pacific
Links are functional at date of posting, but sometimes expire.
How are we doing? -- E-mail your feedback to our staff!


Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Trumka: Who are you calling names?

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka: "From the mines and the mills, the immigrants of my parents' and grandparents' generation built America. Today, we have a new generation of immigrants. And the names and accusations are just as ugly. I hear it all the time. I even hear it from people close to me. 'Those immigrants are taking our jobs. They can't speak English. They're taking over the country.' I couldn't disagree more, but I know where they're coming from -- an American economy in tatters, rampant unemployment, foreclosures, disappearance of health and retirement benefits. There's justifiable anger at seeing our economy, our way of life, our security trashed. And it's being used by people who have a real stake in maintaining our economic disaster to turn working people against one another. Read more.

 

Wither the fund managers...

►  In today's NY Times -- Cutting off the unemployed (editorial) -- It was bad enough when the Senate left town for a long Memorial Day break without passing a bill to extend expiring unemployment benefits. It’s worse now. Back in session for nearly three weeks, the Senate still has not acted. That means that 900,000 jobless workers have already lost their benefits, a number that will swell to an estimated 1.6 million people if an extension is not passed by the July Fourth holiday. The problem, as always, is getting 60 votes to overcome hurdles imposed by the Republican minority. But Republicans aren’t the only culprits here. Passage was delayed last week as several Democratic senators -- including John Kerry of Massachusetts, Mark Warner of Virginia and Maria Cantwell of Washington -- worked to water down a provision in the bill that would have largely closed an unfair loophole that benefits rich fund managers in investment partnerships. Unfortunately, the senators seem to have won that fight.

 

State government news:

►  At Publicola -- Washington Democrats' FMAP strategy: Wait it out -- The “November strategy” is simple. Local Democrats believe Democrats at the federal level will pass the extension of Medicaid matching funds for the states after the November elections, in a lame-duck session when no one has to worry about the political ramifications of “earmarking.” Rather than calling a special session to deal with the potential shortfall, is Gov. Chris Gregoire waiting until November? Her spokesman said, “the governor is focused on working with our delegation to get a bill passed through the senate that includes FMAP.” Her office declined to give a time line indicating how long they’d be willing to wait to re-address the budget before FMAP funding is passed.

►  Meanwhile in Oregon... -- Gov. Ted Kulongoski orders Oregon agencies to cut budgets by 9% -- Oregon's governor orders 9% across-the-board cuts, which could mean teacher layoffs and loss of critical in-home services for seniors. State leaders remain hopeful that at least some of the cuts can be avoided if Congress agrees to help cash-strapped states.

 

Election news:

►  In today's Olympian -- Signatures gathered for private liquor sales -- Supporters of the Costco-backed Initiative 1100 say they have collected 347,000 signatures, far more than the 241,153 valid signatures needed to make the November ballot, and plan to turn in their petitions today.

►  In today's Spokesman-Review -- Initiatives would close state liquor stores -- The campaigns for two separate initiatives to privatize liquor sales both expect to have enough signatures, raising the prospect of two competing plans for voters to sort out this fall.

►  At Publicola -- It's unclear what happens if both liquor privatization measures pass -- The main difference between the two initiatives is that I-1100 would not include any price controls and would make the cost of liquor licenses the same for both small and large retailers; I-1105 would include some price controls and would require large retailers to pay more for licenses.

►  More Ballot-For-Sale news at TheOlympian.com -- Pop-tax repeal initiative to turn in signatures -- Initiative 1107 seeks to repeal taxes added this year on soda pop, bottled water, candy and certain processed meats. The American Beverage Association of Washington, D.C., has provided all but $25 of the more than $1.7 million raised by the campaign committee. That accounts for the remarkable speed at which signatures were collected over eight days so far.

►  In today's (Everett) Herald -- GOP state senate candidate says his tax appeal may attract voters -- Republican candidate Dave Schmidt hasn’t paid the property taxes on his Mill Creek condo since 2008 but isn’t worried it’ll cost him with voters this fall. “It shows I’m just like a lot of people in the district,” he said. “They will know they have someone in office who has been where they’ve been.” Schmidt said he’s battling to keep his home from foreclosure.

 

Boeing news:

►  At SeattlePI.com -- Boeing negotiations with St. Louis Machinists fail -- Negotiators from Boeing and its union machinists in St. Louis finished mediated talks Tuesday with no resolution to contract issue, IAM District 837 reported. A strike could start as soon as Friday. The main sticking point is Boeing's proposal to replace defined-benefit pensions with a 401(k) plan for future hires represented by the union. Both sides appear to be digging in on the issue.

►  In the Wichita Eagle -- Spirit AeroSystems, Machinists reach tentative accord -- Machinists Local Lodge 839 has not yet released details of the tentative contract covering about 6,000 hourly workers in Wichita, but its negotiating team is expected to recommend that members accept the contract when they vote Friday -- the day the current contract expires.

 

The war on public employees:

►  In today's Seattle Times -- King County's labor policies should reflect today's fiscal reality (editorial) -- The county council must adopt new labor policies that eliminate automatic cost-of-living increases and having employees contributing to health premiums. There is a sense among some unions that if they just hold on, or just wait it out, that robust revenues will return and employees will not have to give anything back. Those who await bigger tax revenues are fooling themselves. The county has to get into the contracts and make key changes.

►  In today's Yakima H-R -- Commission takes hard line before union talks -- Yakima County commissioners signaled a tough stance in future bargaining with employee labor groups after reviewing budget cuts that will result in 10 layoffs. They said labor costs continue to be a contributor to expenses that are outstripping revenues during the current economic downturn.

►  In today's Columbian -- City rec workers form union, prepare to talk -- Employees in Vancouver’s recreation department have joined with AFSCME and contract talks will begin soon. The new union has 37 members. It’s just one of city's several ongoing and upcoming labor negotiations.

 

Local news:

►  In today's News Tribune -- Construction jobs in state still shrinking -- Washington construction jobs continued declining in May, with 700 fewer jobs available than in April, the AGC reports. Last month, 137,800 people held construction jobs in the state compared with 163,200 in May a year ago. That 15.6% year-to-year decline put Washington near the top of the list of states suffering the largest percentage declines in their active construction labor forces.

►  In today's News Tribune -- Pierce Transit's all-or-nothing approach is flawed (editorial) -- The agency is framing the decision in a simple way: The public either accepts higher taxes during the worst economy since the Great Depression or its transit services get gutted. Simple, but not honest. It smacks of an agency that doesn’t want a painful economic crisis to go to waste.

►  In today's Seattle Times -- Seattle teachers union wants board to delay superintendent's contract -- At a union meeting Monday, Seattle teachers recommended that the Seattle School Board not extend Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson's contract until she shows significant improvement in how she works with parents, teachers and other members of the community

►  At TheOlympian.com -- TransAlta deal leaves some environmentalists uneasy -- The power plant in Centralia has reached agreement with state over reducing its emissions, but environmental groups including the Sierra Club are not so pleased, wanting even fewer emissions.

  

And, as if you didn't have enough to worry about...

►  In today's LA Times -- Social Security: Will Obama panel cripple it with "minor" tweaks? (Michael Hiltzik column) -- The instrument causing Social Security advocates anxiety today is the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which President Obama created in February to address the long-term budget deficit. Everything, including so-called entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security, should be on the table, he said, prompting some progressives to worry that he's plotting to offer Republicans cuts in Social Security in exchange for their agreeing to tax increases. it is the most efficient and successful government program in American history, saving millions of individuals and families from destitution since 1940. For some reason, there are people in Washington who don't like that idea. It's up to those who understand the program's virtues to drown them out, and make sure that their voices are heard deep inside the White House.

►  In today's (Everett) Herald -- Reducing Social Security benefits isn't "responsibility" (John Burbank column) -- President Obama's "Fiscal Responsibility Commission" seems to be intent on cutting Social Security benefits. Here is a better idea: propose a financial transaction tax. This would curb the out-of-control speculation and gambling that brought down our economy.

 

National news:

►  From AP -- Senate confirms two NLRB nominees -- The Senate has confirmed two candidates to be NLRB members, breaking a stalemate that has disrupted the board's ability to resolve labor-management disputes. Those winning confirmation were union lawyer Mark Pearce and Brian Hayes, the Republican labor policy director on the Senate committee that oversees labor issues. Not confirmed was was Craig Becker, a third NLRB nominee that Republicans have united in opposing because of his close ties to organized labor groups. 

►  At AFL-CIO Now -- Public supports paid sick leave -- Three-quarters of Americans say that paid sick leave should be a “basic workers’ right” and that Congress should pass legislation that guarantees workers paid sick leave, according to a new survey. Nearly half of all private-sector workers -- and 76% of low-income workers -- have no paid sick days and the survey found that one in six workers has lost a job for taking time off work to care for themselves or a sick family member.

►  In today's NY Times -- New UAW chief is taking on Toyota plants -- The union has been trying, and failing, to organize workers at Toyota for almost as long as the company has had assembly plants in this country. But now Bob King, the union’s new leader, says Toyota is vulnerable because of its safety problems and recalls. He has called on union members to picket Toyota dealerships and has vowed to “pound on Toyota” on the organizing issue at its 10 U.S. plants. 

►  In today's Washington Post -- Major online retailers split on plan to cut Saturday mail -- Amazon.com will tell lawmakers that delivery cuts are "a bad idea," while Netflix, the DVD mail-rental company, will say cuts would have little, if any, impact on its subscribers.

  

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2010
AFL-CIO's Trumka: Who are you calling names?

The following column by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka is posted at Huffington Post:

"Wop." "Hunkie." "Polack." "Kike."

When I was a kid growing up in Nemacolin, Pa., those are some of the slurs people used for us.

Why? Because our parents or grandparents came to this country from somewhere else, fleeing poverty and war, seeking opportunity and hope. As a kid, every person I knew who was older than 50 spoke broken English.

Those names hurt. But they also determined almost everything about us -- where we would live, where we would worship, where we would go to school, where we could work.

It wasn't easy. We were the last hired and first fired, the people who did the hardest and most dangerous work, the people accused of taking jobs away from others who had been here longer, the people whose pay got shorted because we didn't know the language and were afraid to complain.

But from the mines and the mills, the immigrants of my parents' and grandparents' generation built America.

Today, we have a new generation of immigrants. And the names and accusations are just as ugly. I hear it all the time. I even hear it from people close to me. "Those immigrants are taking our jobs. They can't speak English. They're taking over the country."

I couldn't disagree more, but I know where they're coming from -- an American economy in tatters, rampant unemployment, foreclosures, disappearance of health and retirement benefits.

They're anxious and angry. I'm angry, too.

There's justifiable anger at seeing our economy, our way of life, our security trashed. And it's being used by people who have a real stake in maintaining our economic disaster to turn working people against one another.

Many working men and women -- including union members -- were pretty confused that I would be speaking out on behalf of today's immigrant workers, as I did last week at the Cleveland City Club. But I can honestly say to them: An immigrant worker did not move your plant overseas. An immigrant did not take away your pension. A Mexican or Salvadoran or Guatemalan worker did not cut off your health care. His wife didn't foreclose your home. Her children did not crash our financial system.

Blaming immigrant workers for our economic catastrophe is like blaming shrimpers for the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

BP was too greedy to drill that well safely. And many U.S. employers are too greedy to pay workers a living wage, or comply with health, safety and labor laws. They've got exactly the immigration system they want -- plenty of workers living and toiling in the shadows, borders that are closed enough to turn immigrants into second-class citizens and criminals but open enough to ensure an endless supply of socially and legally powerless cheap labor.

Gripped by our own economic insecurity, it's often hard to see immigrants as mothers and fathers who are just trying to make a living and take care of their families -- people pursuing the same goals and dreams the rest of us have. Maybe it's easier to identify with or side with the rich and powerful.

I'm afraid too many working people are forgetting the painful legacy of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It destroyed jobs and industries in this country. It destroyed jobs and industries in Mexico. It increased inequality and eroded workers' rights on both sides of the Rio Grande. Except for the people who are still profiting from cheap plants with low-wage labor and weak environmental and labor protections, it hurt us all. But Mexican workers are being blamed for the results.

We're not going to fix the U.S. jobs and economic crisis as long as we permit a two-tiered workforce and a two-tiered society, with recent immigrants who are easy to abuse, easy to underpay and too intimidated by our broken immigration system to demand better.

Border fences, military patrols and un-American laws like Arizona's aren't going to fix that.

We need a new national economic strategy for a global economy that focuses on creating good jobs and making trade fair, not just "free." But part of that strategy must be comprehensive immigration reform that brings workers out of the shadow economy, provides a path to legalization for hard-working, tax-paying immigrants, determines society's genuine need for more immigrants so corporations who just want cheap labor aren't calling all the shots and extends legal protections -- including the freedom to form unions and to be paid fair wages -- to every person employed in this country.

That will get us much closer to a healthy economy than calling names ever will.

 

Copyright © 2010 --  Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO