| This page was last updated on |
| 10.05.2007 |
|
Previous 2002 editions: June -- May -- April -- March JULY
2002
The
first Labor-Neighbor event of the 2002 campaign season is set, and the
Washington State Labor Council challenges all unions to have
representatives join in the action Sunday, Aug. 18 from 11:30 a.m. to 4
p.m. in Spokane’s 6th Legislative District.
Delegates for the WSLC convention in town Aug. 19-22 should try to
come early and experience firsthand the power—and fun—of walking
neighborhoods to bring labor’s message home to fellow union members. Volunteers
will distribute literature on candidates like incumbent State Rep. John
Ahern, who voted against collective bargaining for public employees,
co-sponsored a tip credit bill and advocates laying off 18,000 more state
employees to balance the budget. Sheila Collins, his labor-endorsed
challenger, supports labor’s positions on all of those issues. Likewise,
labor-endorsed Senate challenger Laurie Dolan will be compared to Sen. Jim
West, who also voted against collective bargaining rights, opposes
ergonomic safety rules and has a dismal 10% labor voting record. Participants
should meet at the Operating Engineers 370 Hall at 510 S. Elm (off I-90,
exit at Maple Street, Exit 280). Check-in begins at 11:30 a.m.; training
at 12:30 p.m. The
Labor-Neighbor program will be up and running in several legislative
districts throughout the state this summer and fall.
To get involved or for more information, contact Jennifer Grace at
jgrace@wslc.org or 1-800-542-0904. And speaking of
the WSLC Convention...
The
convention will feature panel discussions on the health care crisis, state
transportation needs, union organizing, pension security, and strategic
initiative campaigns. In
addition, delegates can choose between afternoon workshops on everything
from workplace substance abuse prevention to websites and effective union
communication. The
Spokane community will be invited to join convention participants in a
special Monday night (Aug. 19) public forum: “Our State’s Economic
Crisis, Its Impact on Our Families and How We Fight Back!” from 7 to 9
p.m. at the Ridpath Hotel. In
addition to educational events, there will be plenty of opportunities for
plain old fun as well, including the annual COPE Barbecue and the
convention banquet, plus a screening of the critically acclaimed film,
10,000 Black Men Named George, about A. Philip Randolph’s struggle to
organize train porters. GOP owes state
$4.8 million, The
Olympian recently broke a front-page story about the Republican
Party’s failure to properly report millions of dollars of political
campaign money funneled from the national to the state party organization.
If that sounds familiar, it’s because the State Democrats face similar
charges. But
there’s a big difference. A $4.8 million difference. That’s how much
money the State Republican Party should have to forfeit to the state
General Fund if the Public Disclosure Commission enforces the law as
written. The
C-3 form the Democrats filed late (or in some cases not at all) subjects
them to a PDC penalty of a maximum of $2,500, unless the case is referred
to the Attorney General’s office, which could impose a stiffer fine. The
C-5 form the Republicans filed late subjects them to forfeiture of
the campaign money involved—all $4.8 million. The
C-5 form clearly states: “CAUTION: Failure to report transactions within
ten days will cause the funds to forfeit to Washington State.” And that
law has been strictly enforced in the past… at least against unions. Last
fall, 54 state legislators and elected officials, including Gov. Gary
Locke, were forced to turn over some $37,000 to the state after the PDC
found that two unions had made contributions in that amount using funds
from their national union, which failed to fill out the C-5 form. Although
an investigation has not yet been conducted, the PDC has already conceded
that the GOP filed their C-5 forms one or two YEARS late and the reason
they filed them at all is because a PDC auditor made a “courtesy call”
reminding them to do so. But, stunningly, PDC spokesperson Doug Ellis
initially said the agency is unlikely to force the Republicans to forfeit
the $4.8 million! The agency has since changed its tack and promises to
enforce the law. What that means remains to be seen, but we’ll be
watching. Suit against
ergonomics rule rejected On
July 12, a Thurston County Superior Court judge rejected every single
argument in a business group’s lawsuit against the state over its
development and implementation of an ergonomics rule designed to prevent
musculoskeletal injuries at Washington workplaces. “This
ruling is great news for working families in our state,” said WSLC
President Rick Bender. “The state has an interest, and in fact a
constitutional obligation, to ensure workplaces are safe and healthy, and
the ergonomics rule is a critically important step toward meeting that
obligation.” Some
50,000 workers suffer ergonomic-related injuries every year in Washington,
costing the workers’ compensation system around $400 million annually. The
state rule promulgated by the Department of Labor and Industries requires
businesses to develop a plan to identify and address ergonomic hazards. It
has already been implemented, but enforcement is not scheduled to begin
until 2004. Among
the arguments presented by the so-called WE CARE (Washington Employers
Concerned About Regulating Ergonomics) Coalition was that L&I exceeded
its authority in adopting the rule, it failed to follow proper procedures,
its cost-benefit analysis is flawed, there isn’t enough scientific
evidence to support the need for ergonomics prevention, and the
implementation plan is inadequate. Thurston
County Superior Court Judge Paula Casey ruled no, no, no, no and... no. Boeing, port
contract talks continue Contract
talks affecting thousands of area workers at the Boeing Co. and at the
ports continue with no clear sign whether the unions will have to strike
to get a fair contract. In
a massive display of solidarity, thousands of Boeing workers represented
by International Association of Machinists District 751 walked off the job
July 9 and filled the Seattle Center Memorial Stadium to grant strike
sanction— by a 98% vote. The IAM is making its case at the bargaining
table—and to Wall Street analysts alongside the Society of Professional
Engineering Employees in Aerospace/IFPTE 2001 —that Boeing is cutting
jobs not just because orders are off, but to move them overseas hoping to
boost short-term profits. The
IAM, whose contract expires Sept. 1, says it wants to stop the bleeding
and ensure some of the 30,000 workers already laid off will get their jobs
back—or else there may be an attendance problem in September. At
the ports, talks between the International Longshore and Warehouse Union
and the major ocean carriers and stevedoring companies continue with some
signs of progress. The nation’s manufacturers and retailers have a close
eye on this one because 40 percent of all U.S. trade passes through the
West Coast ports between Bellingham and San Diego; a strike would have a
devastating impact on them. These third-party interests may also be
lobbying for some sort of federal intervention. The contract expired July
1 but both sides have agreed to remain at the table for now. Should talks
reach a stalemate, it is believed that the president would invoke an
80-day “cooling off” period before a work stoppage occurs. Learn
more. Fast Track
delayed, but still alive
Having
survived yet another one-vote margin of victory in the U.S. House on June
26, the effort to grant Fast Track trade negotiating authority to
President Bush still survives. It has passed both houses of Congress, but
in different forms, so a conference committee must work out a compromise
that can be put to a final vote in the House and Senate.
Bush
and corporate lobbyists have pushed hard for the conference to complete
its work and vote before Congress’ August recess.
But political infighting has delayed work enough that the committee
chairman now concedes a vote is unlikely before the recess.
That’s good news for unions, environmental groups and consumer
advocates—and the general public, two-thirds of whom oppose Fast
Track—because many believe the final bill will not pass Congress if the
vote is held too close to an election. Congress reconvenes after Labor
Day. The
AFL-CIO has sponsored television and radio ads to generate phone calls to
key lawmakers. Thousands of calls to Congress opposing Fast Track were
made during the national Call to Stop Fast Track Week, July 15-19.
If you haven’t made the call yet, dial toll-free at
1-877-611-0063. Microsoft,
others seek state tax shelters Even
as Washington and most other states face dire budget crises caused by
recession and the events of Sept. 11, Microsoft and other corporations are
seeking new federal restrictions on state and local governments’ ability
to impose taxes on “national” corporations. This despite evidence that
corporations’ share of the overall tax burden has dropped significantly
in recent years. The
bill before Congress would cost the states $9 billion in annual revenue in
the first few years, a figure that could quickly grow as companies adjust
operations to make full use of the proposed loophole.
Corporate lobbyists, including Microsoft’s, successfully pushed
the measure through a congressional subcommittee following a hearing that
was scheduled on such short notice state officials said they couldn’t
attend, the New York Times reported July 17. Meanwhile,
even as the federal budget surplus has been erased and the government
begins borrowing from Social Security again to cover the deficit (caused
by huge tax breaks for the rich and the cost of the war on terrorism),
Congress has not shown any inclination to close the corporate tax loophole
which has U.S. companies moving their headquarters to Bermuda to avoid
taxes. Hey, it’s all about “business competitiveness,” right? |
|
|
If you have news items regarding unions or workplace issues in Washington state that you would like to see included at the WSLC website, please submit them via e-mail to David Groves or via fax to 206-285-5805. Copyright © 2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
|